Cracks in newly openedGkp link e-way expose corruption: Akhilesh
2
Lucknow: The first spell of monsoon rains has exposed cracks in Rs 7000 crore Gorakhpur Link Expressway which speaks volumes of rampant corruption behind the Rs 7000 crore project, said
Samajwadi Party
national president
Akhilesh Yadav
on Tuesday.
The expressway was inaugurated by UP CM Yogi Adityanath on June 21.
The former UP CM said the fact that a local resident Suresh Lodhi died after he fell into an open drain during waterlogging in Thakurganj area of Lucknow exposes the government's poor preparedness to handle monsoon woes in the state capital in particular and the state in general. "If this is the situation in the state capital, one can imagine the situation that must be prevailing in the rest of the state," Akhilesh said.
Citing reports of how the approach road to a bridge in Chitrakoot caved in leaving the commuters in a lurch, Akhilesh said such instances were a routine and only highlight the corruption that has taken place in development projects across the state. "In development projects, norms have been overlooked and authorities have been paid hefty commissions to look the other way. This has resulted in the quality of development projects being compromised but the life of the common citizen to risk like the case in Thakurganj where one Suresh Lodhi died when he was swept into an open drain," he said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
Akhilesh said bridges, link expressway and roads were not the only casualties of corruption, overhead community water tanks collapsing in different parts of the state in the past few months also narrate the extent to which corruption has seeped into the government projects. Making tall claims like zero tolerance towards corruption does not leave any impact on ground and such moves are nothing more than mere posturing, the former UP CM said.
He said it was not only development projects where rampant corruption has been exposed. "Corruption in transfer postings has public knowledge and money changing hands in Invest UP related projects too has come to the fore." Akhilesh also highlighted the recent case in Kanpur where 11 constables have been accused of forcibly taking Rs 10,000 from a livestock trader after beating him mercilessly for ferrying livestock despite all valid documentation.
Akhilesh said even more serious was the fact that people were being forced to live with the rampant corruption as those involved in such irregularities were being sheltered by the powers that be. "People are feeling hapless as they are compelled to live with this corruption," he said.
Party to observe July 26 as Samvidhan Man Sthumb Diwas
Lucknow: Senior Samajwadi Party functionaries held a meeting at the office of the party's Lucknow unit to discuss the manner in which the cadres will observe the Samvidhan Man Sthumb Diwas on July 26 to mark the Reservation Day as per the directions of the party president. Prominent among those who attended the meeting were MLA Arman Khan, Faqir Siddiqui, SP corporators Yawar Hussain Reshu and Shafiqur Rehman and Gaurav were present.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
a minute ago
- Time of India
Defamation case against Rahul Gandhi: Hearing deferred to Aug 8
The defamation case against Rahul Gandhi was adjourned in the MP-MLA court due to lawyers' abstention, rescheduling the hearing for August 8. BJP leader Vijay Mishra filed the suit in 2018, alleging objectionable remarks against Amit Shah during the Karnataka elections. Gandhi, who surrendered and received bail earlier this year, recently claimed innocence, alleging a political conspiracy. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The hearing in a defamation case against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi was adjourned on Thursday in the MP-MLA court due to lawyers abstaining from court has now fixed August 8 as the next date of case dates back to 2018, when BJP leader Vijay Mishra filed a defamation suit against Gandhi, alleging that the Congress leader had made objectionable remarks against Union Home Minister Amit Shah during the Karnataka Assembly election Santosh Kumar Pandey, appearing on behalf of Vijay Mishra, said the court was the hearing had to be deferred due to lawyers asbstaining from work due to Bar association MP-MLA court had issued a warrant against Rahul Gandhi in December February 2024, Gandhi surrendered before the court and was granted bail on two sureties of Rs 25,000 July 26, 2024, Gandhi recorded his statement in court, claiming innocence and stating that the case was part of a political conspiracy against him.
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-UK FTA: Three year exemption from social security contribution in UK major breakthrough, says Piyush Goyal
The three-year exemption from social security contributions in UK as part of the Double Contribution Convention is a "significant breakthrough" for Indian workers and their employers, Union Minister Piyush Goyal said on Thursday. Goyal further said India's talent in IT, services and education will gain from easier access to the UK's high-value markets with the two sides signing the "landmark" trade deal. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Finance Artificial Intelligence Leadership Management Product Management Data Analytics Healthcare Data Science Digital Marketing Others Public Policy others Project Management Technology PGDM Degree Data Science CXO Design Thinking Operations Management Cybersecurity healthcare MCA MBA Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Fintech & Blockchain India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 Months IIM Calcutta SEPO - IIMC CFO India Starts on undefined Get Details India and the UK have inked a free trade agreement (FTA) that will slash tariffs on British whisky, cars and an array of items, besides help double bilateral trade by 2030, from USD 56 billion currently. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Paul Gascoigne's Actual House Left Us With No Words - Take A Look Ohi Blog Undo The deal was signed by Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal and his British counterpart Jonathan Reynold in the presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his British counterpart Keir Starmer. Taking to X, Goyal said: "India's talent in IT, services, and education will gain from easier access to the UK's high-value markets." Live Events He described the three-year exemption from social security contributions in the UK (as part of the Double Contribution Convention) as a significant breakthrough for Indian workers and their employers. "The #IndiaUKFTA will open doors to UK customers, investors, and innovation hubs for our startups, helping them expand their global footprint," according to Goyal. The India-UK FTA is also poised to supercharge India's electronics exports. Zero-duty access is expected to accelerate exports of electronic products with optical fiber cables and inverters set to strengthen India's foothold in the UK market. It would also spur software services growth , as ambitious UK commitments for software and IT-enabled services are seen unlocking new markets, driving job creation, and enhancing opportunities for Indian software firms. Competitive access for software development and network infrastructure is also expected to fuel growth in digital trade.
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk tweeted (and deleted) Donald Trump was in Epstein files
He helped him get elected, got a cabinet post, donated $300 million, and even let his son attend White House dinners. Then came the breakup—and the tweet Musk later deleted: Donald Trump was in the Epstein files. And now we know—he was right. Pam Bondi privately told Trump in May that his name appeared in the DOJ's Epstein document review. Trump denied it. The Justice Department buried it. And Musk—who'd already torched the bromance—turned out to be the one telling the truth. TL;DR In June 2025, Elon Musk posted (then deleted) a tweet suggesting Donald Trump's name was in the unreleased Epstein files. On July 23, it was confirmed that Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy privately briefed Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the DOJ's Epstein-related documents. The DOJ declined to release the full files, citing the presence of child pornography and sensitive victim information. Trump had publicly denied being informed; Bondi's private briefing contradicts that. The incident has deepened the rift between Musk and Trump, further fracturing the Republican base. The Deleted Tweet Was Right When Elon Musk posted a cryptic tweet in June implying Donald Trump might be named in the unreleased Epstein files, it was quickly dismissed by Trump allies as conspiratorial innuendo. Musk later deleted the tweet. Now it's official: the deleted tweet wasn't a tantrum—it was a tip-off. Musk was right. According to senior administration officials, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy informed President Trump in May 2025 that his name appeared multiple times in the Justice Department's trove of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents. The White House briefing reportedly included mentions of many prominent individuals, not just Trump. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Do you have a mouse? Play this for 1 minute and see why everyone is crazy about it. Play Game Undo Bondi characterised the references as unverified hearsay and said no evidence of criminal wrongdoing was found. Despite this, the Justice Department chose not to release the remaining files. In a statement published on July 7, the department said much of the unreleased material contained child pornography or sensitive victim information that would be sealed in court. The memo also stated no 'client list' was discovered and that the files included no basis for further investigations into uncharged third parties. But once it became clear that Trump's name was in fact among the documents, the decision to withhold them has come under fresh scrutiny. Trump Denies, DOJ Contradicts On July 15, when asked by an ABC News journalist whether Pam Bondi had informed him about his name appearing in the Epstein files, Trump replied: 'No, no, she's—she's given us just a very quick briefing.' That denial doesn't hold up. Senior officials now confirm Trump was explicitly told about the mentions during the May meeting at the White House—contradicting his public claim. The revelation has triggered political fallout—not just for Trump but also for Bondi and the Justice Department. Critics from across the spectrum have accused the administration of suppressing information for political reasons, especially given Trump's 2024 campaign pledge to declassify all Epstein-related documents in full. The Bromance That Blew Up The confirmation also marks the sharpest rupture yet in Musk's once-close relationship with Trump. After endorsing him in 2024, Musk donated $300 million to GOP operations and was appointed head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). He was frequently spotted at fundraisers and high-level events, with his son even attending White House dinners. But by early 2025, the alliance soured. Musk criticised Trump's tariffs, immigration policy, and his flagship 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which gutted EV subsidies. In May, Musk resigned from DOGE. Weeks later came the Epstein tweet—short-lived but, as it turns out, accurate. Trump retaliated by threatening federal contracts with Musk's companies. MAGA influencers turned on him. But the facts now suggest the real betrayal wasn't the tweet—it was the administration's silence. No Charges, Just Chaos To be clear, DOJ officials continue to assert that Trump is not under investigation. Mentions in the Epstein files, they say, do not amount to criminal evidence. The materials reportedly include guest lists, correspondence, and unverifiable claims—nothing actionable. Still, the political cost is high. A 2023 Journal of Interpersonal Violence study found that 78% of Americans believe the Epstein case involved a cover-up to shield powerful figures. The decision to suppress more files, coupled with Trump's denial, has only intensified that perception. Cover-Up or Cleanup? DOJ Faces Heat The fallout has reached inside the administration itself. Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino reportedly clashed with Bondi behind closed doors, accusing her of eroding public trust. Bondi, for her part, denies any wrongdoing and maintains the DOJ acted to protect victims and follow federal law. The DOJ has since petitioned a federal court to consider releasing limited grand jury testimony, but officials admit the odds of approval are low. Meanwhile, Musk has not commented publicly since the WSJ's July report—but he hasn't needed to. The facts have done the talking. FAQ Was Trump named in the Epstein files? Yes. Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy briefed Trump in May 2025 that his name appeared multiple times in DOJ-reviewed Epstein-related materials. Is Donald Trump under investigation? No. The DOJ has made clear that mentions in the files were not treated as criminal evidence and do not indicate wrongdoing. Why didn't the DOJ release the full Epstein files? The department cited the presence of child pornography and the need to protect victims' identities. A memo released on July 7 stated there was no Epstein 'client list' and no further files merited public disclosure. Did Trump publicly deny being told his name appeared in the documents? Yes. On July 15, Trump told ABC News he had only received a 'quick briefing' and was not told about any references to himself. Did Elon Musk make this claim before it was confirmed? Yes. In early June, Musk posted a tweet suggesting Trump was named in the Epstein files. He later deleted it. The claim was confirmed weeks later. Is Musk facing legal action for the post? No. Trump has not taken any legal action against Musk over the tweet.
