&w=3840&q=100)
How much is Manchester City's new 10-year kit deal with Puma worth?
This translates to roughly £100 million (€115 million) per year, far surpassing City's previous annual deal worth about £65 million, signed in 2019, and overtaking Manchester United's current £90 million per year agreement with Adidas.
#ManCity 's kit deal extension with Puma could eventually be worth £1 BILLION, with the agreement now running until at least 2034/35 and valued at £100M a season - making it the highest in Premier League history. [via @TyMarshall_MEN ] pic.twitter.com/9XCSlFIz11
— City Xtra (@City_Xtra) July 15, 2025
This groundbreaking deal highlights the strength and appeal of the partnership between Manchester City and Puma. Since joining forces in 2019, the two have achieved remarkable success on multiple fronts. On the pitch, City has secured numerous Premier League titles and lifted their first-ever UEFA Champions League trophy. Additionally, the club's women's and youth teams have also thrived, reflecting a holistic approach to excellence.
Top 5 football kit deals in the world
Club Kit Partner Annual Deal Value (£ million)
Real Madrid Adidas £110m
Barcelona Nike £105m
Manchester City Puma £100m
Manchester United Adidas £90m
Arsenal Adidas £75m
Off the pitch, Puma has effectively capitalized on Manchester City's growing global stature, using the club's platform to promote high-performance sportswear and lifestyle gear. This symbiotic relationship has elevated the club's commercial profile and reinforced its position as a dominant international brand. The partnership has helped City to extend its reach beyond football, appealing to fans and consumers worldwide.
Both parties have expressed enthusiasm about the renewed collaboration. Puma CEO Arthur Hoeld described the partnership as 'a success both on and off the pitch,' highlighting the blend of sporting achievement and brand strength. Meanwhile, Ferran Soriano, CEO of City Football Group, emphasized their shared ambition: 'We joined forces with Puma with the ambition of exceeding expectations, and we've done just that and more over the past six seasons.'
This landmark deal not only secures Manchester City's place as a footballing powerhouse but also sets a new benchmark in commercial partnerships within the sports industry, underlining their status as true trailblazers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Max Verstappen's Red Bull future in the air, following Christian Horner's sacking and Mercedes interest
If there is one truism that has stood the test of time, it is that empires always fall. Some crumble quickly, while others wither away slowly, even as the rulers fail to realise the erosion of power and influence. This applies to history, big businesses and sporting outfits. Sport, in particular, has seen many rises and falls, given the relatively short playing careers of professional athletes and how that impacts team fortunes. Past glory The West Indies did not lose a Test cricket series from April 1980 to April 1995. It has since continued to plummet to new lows. Manchester United hasn't won the Premier League since legendary manager Alex Ferguson retired after guiding the club to its 20th top-flight title in 2013. Last season, the Red Devils finished 15th in the standings, their lowest in five decades. In the world of Formula One, Ferrari hasn't won a title since 2008, a period following the departure of its famous axis of Ross Brawn, Michael Schumacher and Jean Todt, which had powered the Scuderia to stupendous success from 1999 to 2004. ALSO READ | Will Piastri vs. Norris go the way of Formula One's other stormy intra-team battles? However, unlike most other sports, where bringing in a few exceptional players can quickly transform a team's fortunes, turning the ship around is more complex in motorsport. It takes years to establish the team structure required to compete for wins and titles. So, when a successful outfit starts to fall apart, it can go off the rails spectacularly. Earlier this month, Red Bull, which has won four drivers' and two constructors' titles over the last four seasons, hit the news for the wrong reasons when team boss Christian Horner was sacked. Horner has been at the helm of the energy drink giant's main F1 team since it entered the sport in 2005. In the cut-throat world of competition, his 20-year stint is one of the longest tenures at the helm for someone who is not an owner. Horner was instrumental in the team's success, luring design genius Adrian Newey away from McLaren in the first year. Newey went on to lay the foundations for the squad's tremendous run of triumphs from 2010 to 2013 and from 2021 to 2024. In all, Red Bull has won eight drivers' and six constructors' titles, and its 124 race wins make it the fourth-most successful team in the sport's 76-year history. Horner's exit comes on the back of other high-profile Red Bull departures over the last year, including that of Newey, who joined Aston Martin, and sporting director Jonathan Wheatley, currently team principal at Sauber. Horner has been in the eye of the storm since February last year, when he was accused of sexual harassment by a female employee. He was cleared of the claims by an internal investigation, but his position has been tenuous. Red Bull's drastic drop in form since the middle of last year also weakened his hand. There are reasons to believe that his underplaying of Newey's influence forced the legendary designer to leave. ALSO READ | Madrid's new street circuit to debut in 2026, replacing Imola on F1 schedule Newey also indicated that the engineering team did not heed his warnings about the capricious nature of the car as early as 2023, when Red Bull won 21 of 22 races. Only Verstappen has been able to live with the car's handling. The reigning champion is almost heroically keeping Red Bull afloat, having scored 165 of the team's 172 points. He is third in the drivers' standings, 69 behind leader Oscar Piastri. Not sustainable The fact that Verstappen has managed two wins and consistently fights for the podium, even occasionally securing pole, demonstrates his exceptional ability behind a problematic car. However, the 27-year-old has made clear his frustrations of having to wring its neck to extract miraculous results every weekend. As it often happens, whenever there is trouble in the kingdom, it attracts enemies who sense an opportunity to strike gold. Since last year, Mercedes and its part-owner team boss Toto Wolff have made no secret of courting the four-time champion. Wolff missed the chance to sign a teenaged Verstappen in 2015, as Red Bull offered the Dutchman a seat immediately in its sister team Toro Rosso, something Mercedes couldn't guarantee. Smarting from that snub, Wolff has always hoped to one day get his man. Another factor that was in play until recently was the simmering tension between the Verstappen camp and Horner. Max's father Jos attacked the now-sacked team boss publicly last year after the harassment allegations, saying the team was in danger of being torn apart as long as Horner remained in the hot seat. Seen in this light, could Red Bull's sacking of Horner have been a means of placating the Verstappen camp into staying, given the significance of next season? In 2026, F1 will transition to new sustainable power units. Red Bull is taking a step into the unknown by building its own powertrains. Traditionally, engines are built by OEMs and not independent racing teams, which prefer to focus on the chassis and partner with a major auto manufacturer for engine supply. But when Red Bull's current partner Honda pulled out in 2021, Horner pushed for Red Bull to become an engine manufacturer. Despite hiring heavily from rival teams, there are now murmurs that Red Bull's engine is behind Mercedes in terms of competitiveness. ALSO READ | India's first F1 driver Narain Karthikeyan's life to be immortalised on screen The annual summer break (after the Hungarian GP on August 3 this season) is around the time when most driver contracts are renewed, and even though Verstappen has a deal until 2028, there are always get-out clauses. Mercedes has a potential opening next year, with George Russell's contract ending at the end of 2025. The Briton has revealed his situation is dependent on Verstappen. In any other scenario, Russell, who proved faster than Lewis Hamilton in their years as teammates and is performing at a high level this season, would have been a shoo-in for an automatic renewal. The fact that it has not happened shows how seriously Wolff believes he has a chance to land the big fish. Before Verstappen's reign, Mercedes ruled F1 from 2014 to 2021, winning eight constructors' titles on the bounce in one of the longest periods of dominance in any sport worldwide. The foundation for that success was laid in 2014, when the current hybrid power units emerged, and Mercedes gained a significant lead over its rivals. Interestingly, in preparation for the new era, Wolff and Niki Lauda, then a director at Mercedes, convinced Hamilton to leave McLaren at the end of 2012. Doing a Hamilton? It proved a masterstroke, with Hamilton securing six more world titles. If there is truth in the rumour of Mercedes nailing the new engines, Verstappen could be tempted to do what Hamilton did and jump from a ship that has a lot of holes. While any move is fraught with risk, Mercedes has a track record of producing fast, reliable engines, and could offer Verstappen a shot at shattering even more records. If he does jump ship, it could deal a fatal blow to Red Bull and send the F1 silly season into overdrive during the summer break.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Puma caught between tariff fears and weak US demand as it discounts stock, plans price hikes
London: Puma faces a dilemma in the United States: after rushing shipments from Asia to beat incoming tariffs, the German sportswear brand is now discounting to clear stock, while planning to raise prices this year to offset rising costs. These conflicting pressures reflect a broader challenge for retailers trying to make sure U.S. shelves are stocked for the crucial back-to-school and holiday seasons, while looking to pass on higher costs through price increases at a time when demand is softening. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Technology Design Thinking MBA PGDM Project Management Data Science Degree Operations Management Management healthcare Product Management Others Public Policy Cybersecurity Data Science Leadership Finance Healthcare CXO MCA Data Analytics others Artificial Intelligence Digital Marketing Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Weeks MIT xPRO CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India Starts on undefined Get Details Puma, which warned on Thursday that it expects an annual loss, said it was cutting orders and plans to raise prices in the fourth quarter to soften the impact of tariffs, which it estimates will take ₹80 million ($93.7 million) off its annual gross profit. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Doctors Call These The 'Rolls-Royce' of Hearing Aids Hear True Learn More Undo "Elevated inventory levels on our balance sheet are leading to lower full price realisation," CFO Markus Neubrand told journalists on Friday. "In response, we've adjusted our future orders to better match expected demand." At the end of the second quarter, Puma's inventories were up 18.3% in currency-adjusted terms compared with the previous year, hitting 2.151 billion euros. The increase was mostly driven by North America, he said. Live Events But North America was also Puma's weakest region last quarter, with sales down 9.1% in currency-adjusted terms. Puma now expects global sales to fall this year by at least 10%, further heightening the inventory problem. "The idea to front load imports into the U.S. was a sensible tactical position given uncertainty, but it does come with the risk of increased discounting in a weak market," said Adam Cochrane at Deutsche Bank Research. Puma's plan to reduce orders should help bring inventories down, but also reflects weaker demand from retailers, Cochrane added.
NDTV
38 minutes ago
- NDTV
Trump's Trip To Scotland As His New Golf Course Opens Blurs Politics, Family's Business
Edinburgh: Lashed by cold winds and overlooking choppy, steel-gray North Sea waters, the breathtaking sand dunes of Scotland's northeastern coast rank among Donald Trump's favorite spots on earth. "At some point, maybe in my very old age, I'll go there and do the most beautiful thing you've ever seen," Trump said in 2023, during his New York civil fraud trial, talking about his plans for future developments on his property in Balmedie, Aberdeenshire. At 79 and back in the White House, Trump is making at least part of that pledge a reality, traveling to Scotland on Friday as his family's business prepares for the Aug. 13 opening of a new course it's billing as "the greatest 36 holes in golf." Trump will be in Scotland until Tuesday and plans to talk trade with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The Aberdeen area is already home to another of his courses, Trump International Scotland, and the Republican president also plans to visit a Trump course near Turnberry, around 200 miles (320 kilometers) away on Scotland's southwest coast. Using a presidential overseas trip - with its sprawling entourage of advisers, White House and support staffers, Secret Service agents and reporters - to help show off Trump-brand golf destinations demonstrates how the president has become increasingly comfortable intermingling his governing pursuits with promoting his family's business interests. The White House has brushed off questions about potential conflicts of interest, arguing Trump's business success before he entered politics was a key to his appeal with voters. White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers called the Scotland swing a "working trip." But she added Trump "has built the best and most beautiful world-class golf courses anywhere in the world, which is why they continue to be used for prestigious tournaments and by the most elite players in the sport." Trump went to Scotland to play his Turnberry course during his first term in 2018 while en route to a meeting in Finland with Russian President Vladimir Putin. This time, his trip comes as the new golf course is about to debut and is already actively selling tee times. It's not cheap for the president to travel. The helicopters that operate as Marine One when the president is on board cost between $16,700 and nearly $20,000 per hour to operate, according to Pentagon data for fiscal year 2022. The modified Boeing 747s that serve as the iconic Air Force One cost about $200,000 per hour to fly. That's not to mention the military cargo aircraft that fly ahead of the president with his armored limousines and other official vehicles. "We're at a point where the Trump administration is so intertwined with the Trump business that he doesn't seem to see much of a difference," said Jordan Libowitz, vice president for the ethics watchdog organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. "It's as if the White House were almost an arm of the Trump Organization." During his first term, the Trump Organization signed an ethics pact barring deals with foreign companies. An ethics frameworks for Trump's second term allows them. Trump's assets are in a trust run by his children, who are also handling day-to-day operations of the Trump Organization while he's in the White House. The company has inked many recent, lucrative foreign agreements involving golf courses, including plans to build luxury developments in Qatar and Vietnam, even as the administration negotiates tariff rates for those countries and around the globe. Trump's existing Aberdeenshire course, meanwhile, has a history nearly as rocky as the area's cliffs. It has struggled to turn a profit and was found by Scottish conservation authorities to have partially destroyed nearby sand dunes. Trump's company also was ordered to cover the Scottish government's legal costs after the course unsuccessfully sued over the construction of a nearby wind farm, arguing in part that it hurt golfers' views. And the development was part of the massive civil case, which accused Trump of inflating his wealth to secure loans and make business deals. Trump's company's initial plans for his first Aberdeen-area course called for a luxury hotel and nearby housing. His company received permission to build 500 houses, but Trump suggested he'd be allowed to build five times as many and borrowed against their values without actually building any homes, the lawsuit alleged. Judge Arthur Engoron found Trump liable last year and ordered his company to pay $355 million in fines - a judgment that has grown with interest to more than $510 million as Trump appeals. Family financial interests aside, Trump isn't the first sitting U.S. president to golf in Scotland. That was Dwight D. Eisenhower, who played in Turnberry in 1959. George W. Bush visited the famed course at Gleneagles in 2005 but didn't play. Many historians trace golf back to Scotland in the Middle Ages. Among the earliest known references to game was a Scottish Parliament resolution in 1457 that tried to ban it, along with soccer, because of fears both were distracting men from practicing archery - then considered vital to national defense. The first U.S. president to golf regularly was William Howard Taft, who served from 1909 to 1913 and ignored warnings from his predecessor, Teddy Roosevelt, that playing too much would make it seem like he wasn't working hard enough. Woodrow Wilson played nearly every day but Sundays, and even had the Secret Service paint his golf balls red so he could practice in the snow, said Mike Trostel, director of the World Golf Hall of Fame. Warren G. Harding trained his dog Laddie Boy to fetch golf balls while he practiced. Lyndon B. Johnson's swing was sometimes described as looking like a man trying to kill a rattlesnake. Bill Clinton, who liked to joke that he was the only president whose game improved while in office, restored a putting green on the White House's South Lawn. It was originally installed by Eisenhower, who was such an avid user that he left cleat marks in the wooden floors of the Oval Office by the door leading out to it. Bush stopped golfing after the start of the Iraq war in 2003 because of the optics. Barack Obama had a golf simulator installed in the White House that Trump upgraded during his first term, Trostel said. John F. Kennedy largely hid his love of the game as president, but he played on Harvard's golf team and nearly made a hole-in-one at California's renowned Cypress Point Golf Club just before the 1960 Democratic National Convention. "I'd say, between President Trump and President John F. Kennedy, those are two of the most skilled golfers we've had in the White House," Trostel said. Trump, Trostel said, has a handicap index - how many strokes above par a golfer is likely to score - of a very strong 2.5, though he's not posted an official round with the U.S. Golf Association since 2021. That's better than Joe Biden's handicap of 6.7, which also might be outdated, and Obama, who once described his own handicap as an "honest 13." The White House described Trump as a championship-level golfer but said he plays with no handicap.
