logo
Sanseito hopeful supports Japan entering nuclear arms race

Sanseito hopeful supports Japan entering nuclear arms race

Asahi Shimbun18-07-2025
An Upper House election candidate from the rising opposition party Sanseito is championing a nuclear-armed Japan, a provocative idea generally endorsed by the party leader.
Saya, who is running in the Tokyo constituency on the July 20 ballot, was asked about nuclear armament and the Japan-U.S. alliance on an online program Nippon Television Network Corp. distributed on July 3.
'By acquiring nuclear weapons, even North Korea has become able to talk with U.S. President Donald Trump in the international community,' said Saya, who goes by only one name.
'Nuclear armament is one of the most inexpensive and effective measures to ensure safety,' she said after noting that it is her personal view.
Speaking to reporters in Kobe on July 17, Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya said Japan should consider arming itself with nuclear weapons.
'I do not think we should immediately possess them,' he said. '(But) we must not shy away from a discussion.'
Japan must first withdraw from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty should it decide to go nuclear.
Saya has come under fire on social media not only for her remarks on nuclear armament but also for her pro-conscription comments made in 2023.
'In military service, the educational role played by conscription and what cannot be learned in school education can be taught and experienced,' she said on a YouTube program.
Still, she expressed a negative view of immediately restoring the draft.
Kamiya asked reporters on July 17 why they questioned the comments on conscription that Saya made before joining Sanseito.
The Russian state-owned news agency Sputnik posted a video interview with Saya on social media on July 14. Kamiya demanded a party staff member resign for arbitrarily giving permission for the interview.
Sanseito also apologized for Saya's 'inappropriate' action on the social media account X on July 12 after she replied to and thanked a poster who apparently called on others to vote for her and her party in exchange for food and drink.
The Public Offices Election Law prohibits provision of food and drink to voters in election campaigns, in principle.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

North Korea Rejects Denuclearization Talks With US
North Korea Rejects Denuclearization Talks With US

The Diplomat

time3 hours ago

  • The Diplomat

North Korea Rejects Denuclearization Talks With US

A day after delivering a statement laying out Pyongyang's mistrust of the South Korean government – despite the change in administrations – Kim Yo Jong, the powerful sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and the main voice on inter-Korean relations, said that the United States should change its stance on North Korea should it want to make a contact. 'If the U.S. fails to accept the changed reality and persists in the failed past, the DPRK-U.S. meeting will remain as a 'hope' of the U.S. side,' Kim said in the statement published on July 29 by the North's state-controlled Korean Central News Agency. (DPRK is an acronym of North Korea's official name: Democratic People's Republic of Korea.) While downplaying a White House official's praise of U.S. President Donald Trump's efforts in 2018 and 2019 to defuse tensions on the Korean Peninsula by holding summit meetings with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Singapore, Vietnam, and the Demilitarized Zone of the two Koreas, Kim also indicated that Pyongyang would not accept any offers of dialogue as long as Trump takes a same approach that he used last time. 'It is worth taking into account the fact that the year 2025 is neither 2018 nor 2019,' Kim said. Two years ago, North Korea encoded the policy of building up its nuclear arsenal in its constitution through a key ruling party meeting. In doing so, North Korea made clear that its nuclear status is unchangeable and its nuclear weapons program can not be a bargaining chip at the negotiating table. This development came after Trump walked out of the Hanoi summit in 2019 without reaching a deal with Kim Jong Un. Just as the U.S. and South Korea have solidified their views that North Korea will never denuclearize due to its growing aggression in pursuing advanced nuclear weapons in the past few years, Pyongyang's mistrust over Washington and Seoul's approaches to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula was cemented due to Trump's offer to make a big deal – which is also called an 'all for all' approach – during the summit meeting with Kim in Hanoi in 2019. Also, as the U.S. and South Korea have consistently carried out extensive joint military drills, which are deemed as 'invasion rehearsal' by North Korea, Pyongyang's bid to build more advanced nuclear weapons for the safety of the Kim regime has only accelerated. 'The recognition of the irreversible position of the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state and the hard fact that its capabilities and geopolitical environment have radically changed should be a prerequisite for predicting and thinking everything in the future.' Kim Yo Jong said. 'No one can deny the reality and should not misunderstand.' In light of what Kim said in her statements published on July 28 and 29, Pyongyang clearly showed what can be considered as its minimum condition for renewing dialogue with Washington and Seoul. According to Kim, the U.S. and South Korea should recognize North Korea as a nuclear state and recalibrate their policies in order to restore inter-Korean relations and resume the deadlocked nuclear talks. In other words, the conventional approaches of the U.S. and South Korea to entice North Korea to dismantle its nuclear weapons should be scrapped preemptively. 'Any attempt to deny the position of the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state, which was established along with the existence of a powerful nuclear deterrent and fixed by the supreme law reflecting the unanimous will of all the DPRK people, will be thoroughly rejected,' Kim said. Unlike her belligerent statement toward Seoul, in which she said Pyongyang had 'no interest' in diplomacy, Kim slightly opened the possibility of the North Korean leader meeting with Trump in the future. She said that 'the personal relationship between the head of our state and the present U.S. president is not bad.' However, she also clearly described denuclearization as a pointless concept that can be interpreted as 'nothing.' It is uncertain whether Trump can recalibrate U.S. policy on North Korea by scrapping the decades-old goal of the denuclearization of North Korea and instead pursuing a nuclear freeze or arms control in talks with Pyongyang. According to policymakers and government officials in Washington, the U.S. strategic goal – meaning the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula – will not change as long as it pursues nonproliferation. Also, even though Trump once called North Korea 'a nuclear power,' that does not imply the possibility of the U.S. government firmly recognizing North Korea as a legitimate nuclear state. Kang Yoo-jeong, a spokesperson of the South Korean Presidential Office, reiterated Seoul's stance to build a Korean Peninsula where the two Koreas have no reason to fight each other during her press briefing on Tuesday. Highlighting the KCNA's publication of Kim's statements two days in a row, Kang also mentioned that the Presidential Office views the restoration of bilateral trust between the two Koreas as the priority to handle, considering Kim's hostile remarks toward the Lee government.

LDP executives to hold decision-making Joint Plenary Meeting soon
LDP executives to hold decision-making Joint Plenary Meeting soon

NHK

time5 hours ago

  • NHK

LDP executives to hold decision-making Joint Plenary Meeting soon

Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party has decided to convene a key decision-making meeting soon. The move comes as Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru, who heads the party, faces pressure to take responsibility for the LDP's losses in the recent Upper House election. Ishiba and other LDP executives decided on Tuesday to hold the Joint Plenary Meeting of both houses of the Diet. Ishiba referred to harsh criticism of him at a meeting of party lawmakers the previous day. He said he will accept the opinions in good faith, and make appropriate decisions on the management of the party and his administration. LDP Secretary-General Moriyama Hiroshi later told reporters that party members have called for the Joint Plenary to be held, and such calls should be respected. The party's mid-ranked and young lawmakers have been collecting signatures to seek the Joint Plenary. Moriyama said it is possible to convene the meeting without going through such procedures. Moriyama said the Chair of the Joint Plenary will listen to the opinions of the lawmakers who have been calling for the meeting. Asked if the Joint Plenary could decide to bring forward the date of the party's presidential election, Moriyama said the issue is extremely complicated. He suggested that the party's presidential election management committee would be involved in the issue.

US survey: 35% of Americans say US atomic bombings justified
US survey: 35% of Americans say US atomic bombings justified

NHK

time6 hours ago

  • NHK

US survey: 35% of Americans say US atomic bombings justified

A recent US survey has found that Americans have mixed views about whether their country's use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Pew Research Center surveyed about 5,000 people aged 18 or older between June 2 and 8, ahead of next month's 80th anniversary of the bombings of the two Japanese cities. The results were released on Monday. Thirty-five percent of the respondents said the bombings were justified, while 31 percent said they were not. Thirty-three percent said they were not sure. The approval rate was higher for older Americans. Among respondents aged 65 or older, 48 percent said the bombings were justified. The figure was 40 percent for those aged 50 to 64, followed by 29 percent for those aged 30 to 49, and 27 percent for those 18 to 29. By contrast, the number of respondents who said the bombings were not justified was higher among younger age groups, including 44 percent for those aged 18 to 29. The survey also asked Americans whether the development of nuclear weapons has made the world safer. Sixty-nine percent of respondents said it has made the world less safe, far exceeding the 10 percent who said the world has become safer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store