I just found the perfect $12 desk accessory at Kmart: 'I never knew how much I needed it'
Adelaide content creator Michael Jaimie took to social media this week to share his latest find: a desktop mug warmer from Kmart and Target, which he says has been a game-changer for keeping his coffee at the perfect temperature.
'I've been looking everywhere for these desktop mug warmers and I finally found them at my nearest Target,' Michael said in the video.
'It's really cold, cloudy, and rainy in Adelaide at the moment - thought it was the perfect time to do a review on this.'
The compact warmer is compatible with stainless steel, glass, ceramic, and porcelain mugs, and allows users to choose between three heat settings - 40C, 50C, and 60C - to keep drinks consistently warm. It also comes with a safety auto shut-off after eight hours.
Michael gave the warmer a thorough test during his morning routine.
'An hour and a half in and the gadget has kept my coffee nice and warm,' he reported.
'The purple setting (50C) is the perfect temperature - not too cold, not too hot, perfect for sipping.'
He also had a few ideas for other uses, adding: 'Tick of approval from me. I think this will be really good for cups of soup.'
Australians in the comments were quick to add their own thoughts - and shopping plans.
'I'm going to get this for my colleague at work. She makes a coffee, gets distracted, and it always goes cold before she takes the second sip,' one person wrote.
'I bought one of these and it's amazing - perfect for Saturday morning in bed,' said another.
Others shared their own use cases, with one writing: 'Love this for my herbal teas.'
There were a couple of minor gripes, with one user noting: 'Placement of that USB port is annoying.'
Another joked: 'I drink my coffee too fast to need one.'
Still, with its affordable price, sleek design, and winter-ready functionality, the $12 mug warmer is shaping up to be this season's most underrated home essential.
The buy is similar to a $29 warming mug from Kmart, with thousands praising it as the 'ultimate desk-side companion' for work, study, or busy mornings with young children.
The budget-friendly gadget has quickly become a cult favourite for its ability to keep hot drinks warm throughout the day - an issue many say they've struggled with for years.
The Kmart warming mug includes a sleek mug with a 270ml capacity and a discreet USB-powered warming plate that keeps beverages at a consistent 55C.
Kmart's version is a dupe of Ember's temperature control smart mug ($219) - which has a built-in battery as well.
But everyday Aussies don't have over $200 to spend on a mug warmer, which is where Kmart comes in.
Since appearing in stores, the $29 gadget has generated a storm of reactions online, with fans flooding social media with rave reviews and desperate pleas for restocks.
'Oh my god, I need one of these - as an office worker you never get to finish a drink while it's hot!' one user posted.
Another added, 'Where was this when I had toddlers? I used to microwave my coffee three times before I even took a sip.'
The device's practicality appears to be its biggest selling point.
From remote workers to parents juggling chaotic mornings, many say the mug has changed their daily routines.
'This would be great for when I hyper-focus. I keep forgetting about my drink, and it always ends up stone cold,' one user commented.
The mug is designed with convenience in mind, offering a simple on/off switch and plug-and-play functionality - making it suitable for home offices, shared work spaces, or even beside your bed during winter.
According to Kmart, the mug is ideal for 'savouring coffee, tea or hot chocolate at your own pace', and its compact size makes it an unobtrusive yet efficient addition to any setup.
Unlike traditional thermal flasks, which can be bulky or affect the flavour of drinks, this device allows users to enjoy their beverage from a classic cup while maintaining optimal temperature.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
3 days ago
- Scotsman
Intercity greening: How Scottish firm Ember is creating zero emissions travel
Ember | Chris Watt Photography A Scottish business has created the only all-electric intercity coach service in the UK Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The journey begins quietly, with no engine hum. The driver chats amiably to a passenger adjusting his reclining seat as the vehicle pulls away from a stop on Edinburgh's George Street. Welcome to the 9.21am coach service from the Scottish capital to Dundee, powered entirely by electric batteries. It's operated by Ember, a young business based in Scotland that has created the only all-electric intercity coach service in the UK. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Edinburgh-Dundee route was the first offered when Ember launched in 2020 offering zero emissions travel, round trip, on a single battery charge. Keith Bradbury | Chris Watt Photography Routes added since include Dundee to Glasgow, Aberdeen to Edinburgh, and Glasgow to Fort William, pitting Ember against established operators Scottish CityLink, Stagecoach, National Express and a recent entrant from Germany, FlixBus. For co-founders Keith Bradbury and Pierce Glennie – who swapped careers in fintech in London to start Ember – the idea was simple: decarbonise one of the most polluting sectors of transport while improving the often-miserable intercity coach travel experience. 'We'd been following electrification for some years and had seen what Tesla had done for cars,' explains Manchester-born Bradbury in the Georgian townhouse in Charlotte Square that serves as Ember's operational headquarters. The 43-year-old is dressed in Silicon Valley casual: T-shirt, slacks and baseball cap. Behind him, a table tennis table takes up half the room. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The idea for Ember came after Glennie endured a 24-hour journey from Namibia to South Africa in a diesel-powered bus in 2018. 'He did a quick calculation to figure out how much you'd have saved if the bus had been electric,' explains Bradbury. 'The vision then was: can you build a business model around emission-free bus travel?' The pair secured a £490,000 loan from Triodos Bank under a UK government Covid loan support scheme, which helped acquire the first two coaches. A year later, Ember borrowed again from Triodos to part-fund expansion of the fleet to 24 coaches, and to set up a technology platform called EmberOS that provides real time data on the fleet while responding to passenger demand. In 2022, Ember bagged external investors including Pale Blue Dot, a Swedish venture capital firm, Gareth Williams, co-founder of travel search firm Skyscanner, Monzo founder Tom Blomfield, and Steven Meersman, co-founder of Zenobē, an electric vehicle battery storage business. Last year others followed, including Inven, a Czech venture capital fund. Ember's mission fits with the Scottish government's aim to decarbonise transport as set out in its National Transport Strategy, launched the same year as Ember. Since then, Holyrood has funded the acquisition of 800 zero emission buses, mostly through over £100m in subsidies to operators under the so-called Scottish Zero Emission Bus Challenge Fund (ScotZEB), one of the most ambitious such schemes in Europe. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ember's trajectory so far owes much to ScotZEB, whose subsidies have partially funded 136 of the 138 coaches the company will have in its fleet by next year, up from 78 currently. The source of those vehicles, Chinese manufacturer Yutong, has raised questions about how the design of Scotland's green transport subsidies can be reconciled with a perceived need to sustain domestic bus manufacturing. That was thrown into sharp relief in June when Canadian-owned Scottish bus manufacturer Alexander Dennis (ADL) said it might close its factory in Falkirk with the loss of 400 jobs. Pierce Gennie (L) and Keith Bradbury (R) | Chris Watt Photography In a second funding round last year, known as ScotZEB2, a consortium led by Zenobē was awarded funds for the purchase of about 250 vehicles and the installation of supporting infrastructure. By far the majority of buses ordered under the scheme (171) went to Yutong, with ADL a distant second (44). Critics of the scheme, including Laurie Macfarlane of think-tank Future Economy Scotland, argue that its evaluation criteria were weighted in favour of financial criteria, benefiting overseas manufacturers and resulting in jobs 'offshored abroad'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad ADL has itself criticised Scottish government policy, warning a year ago of 'an uneven playing field' for domestic manufacturers. It said this was partly due to subsidy criteria that require adherence to advanced 'Fair Work First' standards of employee remuneration, welfare and safety, while overseas bus manufacturers face no such requirement. Transport Scotland counters that ADL has secured more orders for zero emission buses than any other manufacturer through ScotZEB and predecessor schemes. 'It is for bus operators to select their preferred manufacturer,' a spokesman says. This month, a further £40m was made available under ScotZEB2, possibly offering some hope for the survival of ADL's Falkirk factory. What is undisputed is how well Yutong is working for Ember – and not just on price. Bradbury explains that the Chinese company, which traces its origins to a bus repair factory founded in Zhengzhou in 1963, is happy to tweak design features on request. 'We are spending time with their engineers in China giving real time feedback and they're able to make changes quickly,' he says. One result is that Yutong recently swapped side mirrors for aerodynamically efficient camera mirrors. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad MeanwhiIe, improvements in battery technology by CATL, the Chinese company that supplies Yutong's batteries, mean that a battery can be charged in an hour compared with two and a half hours previously.
The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
Researchers asked AI to show a typical Australian dad: he was white and had an iguana
Big tech company hype sells generative artificial intelligence (AI) as intelligent, creative, desirable, inevitable and about to radically reshape the future in many ways. Published by Oxford University Press, our new research on how generative AI depicts Australian themes directly challenges this perception. We found when generative AIs produce images of Australia and Australians, these outputs are riddled with bias. They reproduce sexist and racist caricatures more at home in the country's imagined monocultural past. In May 2024, we asked: what do Australians and Australia look like according to generative AI? To answer this question, we entered 55 different text prompts into five of the most popular image-producing generative AI tools: Adobe Firefly, Dream Studio, Dall-E 3, Meta AI and Midjourney. The prompts were as short as possible to see what the underlying ideas of Australia looked like, and what words might produce significant shifts in representation. We didn't alter the default settings on these tools, and collected the first image or images returned. Some prompts were refused, producing no results. (Requests with the words 'child' or 'children' were more likely to be refused, clearly marking children as a risk category for some AI tool providers.) Overall, we ended up with a set of about 700 images. They produced ideals suggestive of travelling back through time to an imagined Australian past, relying on tired tropes such as red dirt, Uluru, the outback, untamed wildlife and bronzed Aussies on beaches. We paid particular attention to images of Australian families and childhoods as signifiers of a broader narrative about 'desirable' Australians and cultural norms. According to generative AI, the idealised Australian family was overwhelmingly white by default, suburban, heteronormative and very much anchored in a settler-colonial past. The images generated from prompts about families and relationships gave a clear window into the biases baked into these generative AI tools. 'An Australian mother' typically resulted in white, blond women wearing neutral colours and peacefully holding babies in benign domestic settings. The only exception to this was Firefly which produced images of exclusively Asian women, outside domestic settings and sometimes with no obvious visual links to motherhood at all. Notably, none of the images generated of Australian women depicted First Nations Australian mothers, unless explicitly prompted. For AI, whiteness is the default for mothering in an Australian context. Similarly, 'Australian fathers' were all white. Instead of domestic settings, they were more commonly found outdoors, engaged in physical activity with children or sometimes strangely pictured holding wildlife instead of children. One such father was even toting an iguana – an animal not native to Australia – so we can only guess at the data responsible for this and other glaring glitches found in our image sets (the image also showed the man holding an odd tool and standing in front of a malformed horse). Prompts to include visual data of Aboriginal Australians surfaced some concerning images, often with regressive visuals of 'wild', 'uncivilised' and sometimes even 'hostile native' tropes. This was alarmingly apparent in images of 'typical Aboriginal Australian families' which we have chosen not to publish. Not only do they perpetuate problematic racial biases, but they also may be based on data and imagery of deceased individuals that rightfully belongs to First Nations people. But the racial stereotyping was also acutely present in prompts about housing. Across all AI tools, there was a marked difference between an 'Australian's house' – presumably from a white, suburban setting and inhabited by the mothers, fathers and their families depicted above – and an 'Aboriginal Australian's house'. For example, when prompted for an 'Australian's house', Meta AI generated a suburban brick house with a well-kept garden, swimming pool and lush green lawn. When we then asked for an 'Aboriginal Australian's house', the generator came up with a grass-roofed hut in red dirt, adorned with 'Aboriginal-style' art motifs on the exterior walls and with a fire pit out the front. The differences between the two images are striking. They came up repeatedly across all the image generators we tested. These representations clearly do not respect the idea of Indigenous Data Sovereignty for Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander peoples, where they would get to own their own data and control access to it. Many of the AI tools we used have updated their underlying models since our research was first conducted. On 7 August, OpenAI released their most recent flagship model, GPT-5. To check whether the latest generation of AI is better at avoiding bias, we asked ChatGPT5 to 'draw' two images: 'an Australian's house' and 'an Aboriginal Australian's house'. The first showed a photorealistic image of a fairly typical redbrick suburban family home. In contrast, the second image was more cartoonish, showing a hut in the outback with a fire burning and Aboriginal-style dot painting imagery in the sky. These results, generated just a couple of days ago, speak volumes. Generative AI tools are everywhere. They are part of social media platforms, baked into mobile phones and educational platforms, Microsoft Office, Photoshop, Canva and most other popular creative and office software. In short, they are unavoidable. Our research shows generative AI tools will readily produce content rife with inaccurate stereotypes when asked for basic depictions of Australians. Given how widely they are used, it's concerning that AI is producing caricatures of Australia and visualising Australians in reductive, sexist and racist ways. Given the ways these AI tools are trained on tagged data, reducing cultures to cliches may well be a feature rather than a bug for generative AI systems. Tama Leaver is a professor of internet studies at Curtin University. Suzanne Srdarov is a research fellow in media and cultural studies at Curtin University This article was originally published in the Conversation
Daily Mail
5 days ago
- Daily Mail
I was told my electric car had a driving range of 800km... I had barely made it out of Brisbane when the real trouble began
An Aussie four-wheel driver has slammed hybrid EVs as a 'false economy' after putting a hybrid vehicle to the test in a cross-country road trip. Gold Coast man Shaun Whale was only 100km into a 2,000km drive from Brisbane to the Simpson Desert last month when the BYD Shark hybrid vehicle he tasked with the journey already needed a charge. 'I've apparently got a range of 800km, I'm 100km-ish out of Brisbane, I've got a quarter of a tank of fuel and I'm out of battery,' he said in a video posted to the popular YouTube account, 4WD 24/7. 'So, something's not quite right at the moment.' He interrupted the journey to stop in at a designated charging station, where the first outlet he tried turned out to be out of order. Lacking the cable required to use a separate outlet within the same station, he drove on to a second charging station where the only vacant outlet was again out of order. Only at the third station - after two failed attempts and already hours into the drive - was he able to begin the charging process. While he agreed the vehicles were desirable for those driving short distances in urban areas, Mr Whale concluded the technology was 'not quite there'. 'Overall, what I'm seeing with these vehicles is it's a little bit of a false economy... in the sense that all the great things you want out of a ute are not quite there,' he said. 'My whole point is these PHEVs (plug-in hybrid electric vehicles) might suit people in the inner city with short commutes, but don't cut it if you drive long distances,' he told the Daily Mail. 'They are terrible when it comes to fuel consumption compared to a standard diesel ute if you plan on driving any real distance.' The unreliability of public EV chargers is a major concern among road users, with 13 per cent of registered chargers in Australia being unavailable when reviewed in May. Of Australia's nearly 6,000 registered public charger sites with 15,290 connectors, nine per cent were under repair and four per cent were listed as 'coming soon'. Arcadis national asset management lead Clara Owen, who extracted the data from PlugShare, said the issue stressed the need for better monitoring and maintenance. 'We need predictive maintenance, we need real-time monitoring and networks that perform like critical infrastructure,' Ms Owen told The Drive. 'If I turned up at a petrol station and they said "sorry we're out of petrol," you can imagine the furore. Chargers should be the same.' Australian Electric Vehicle Association (AEVA) president Chris Jones has called for financial penalties for operators who fail to maintain their chargers. 'There absolutely needs to be some kind of financial penalty for neglecting service licence agreements,' Mr Jones said. 'The thing that's grinding our gears is the fact that charge point operators are often in receipt of public funds to expand their footprint, but they never seem to prioritise the maintenance of their hardware.' The complaints are widespread on EV user social media pages, with many sharing similar stories of abandoned road trips and emergency tow operations. When Tanya Turner-Jones took her BYD SUV on its first road trip in March, she made sure to plan ahead, mapping out a charging destination along the way. Only upon arriving at the charging station did she find out the charger was out of order, and the second charger required a cable she didn't possess. 'There were no other chargers in this town,' she wrote on the popular Facebook group, EV Owners Australia. 'The distance to our destination was less than the available kms/charge so we pushed on but we didn't get there. 'I pulled over on a side road at about 2 per cent charge and got towed to our destination. I felt so stupid and learned a lot of lessons.' The Australian Automobile Association (AAA) tested five EVs in its Real-World Testing Program and found some models drove up to 111km less on the road than they did in laboratory testing. The 2023 BYD Atto 3 was the worst performer, with a driving range of 369km on a single charge — 23 per cent less than the 480km recorded in its lab testing. The 2024 Tesla Model 3 had a real-world range of 441km, which was 14 per cent less than the 513km it achieved in the lab. The 2022 Kia EV6 and the 2024 Tesla Model Y both had driving ranges eight per cent shorter than their lab tests. The best performer was the 2024 Smart #3, which logged a real-world driving range of 432km, five per cent below its compulsory lab test.
