Seven symptoms you need to look out for as doctors issue Covid warning
Health officials have warned that people could experience a host of nasty and unusual symptoms if they contract the latest Coronavirus strain.
The new variant, named NB.1.8.1, was designated a "SARS-CoV-2 variant under monitoring (VUM)" on May 23, one of six emerging variants currently under WHO monitoring. As of this month, it has crossed multiple continents, with cases flagged in the UK and Ireland in Europe, and further afield in the US and Australia. People have been urged to stay at home for days on end if they find they have symptoms of the new Covid variant, which are a far cry from the classic flu-like signs of their predecessors.
While early signs of Covid once included symptoms like a severe cough, sore throat and high fever, NB.1.8.1 is felt most acutely in the gastrointestinal tract.
Symptoms of the variant include:
Nausea
Vomiting
Diarrhoea
Heartburn
Bloating
Constipation
Abdominal pain
Dr Lara Herrero, associate professor and virology research leader at Griffith University in Australia, explained in an article posted on The Conversation that the variant appears to be spreading faster than its predecessors. Of those, Dr Herrero said, it is most similar to subvariants of the Omicron lineage.
She said: 'The evidence so far suggests NB.1.8.1 may spread more easily and may partially sidestep immunity from prior infections or vaccination.
'Reports suggest symptoms of NB.1.8.1 should align closely with other Omicron subvariants." The WHO has said the same, stating in its report that the variant has obtained a series of mutations that allow it both to spread easier and potentially evade antibody protections afforded to people by previous infections.
The organisation explained: "Spike mutations at position 445 have been shown to enhance binding affinity to hACE2, which could increase the variant's transmissibility."
It adds: "Mutations at position 435 shown to reduce the neutralisation potency of class 1 andclass 1/4 antibodies, and mutations at position 478 shown to enhance the evasion of Class 1/2 antibodies." People who exhibit any symptoms have been told to stay indoors by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) which advises people to "avoid contact with vulnerable people and stay at home if possible" for 48 hours.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
The worrying thing Covid can do to your blood revealed by new study
Covid may prematurely age blood vessels by around five years, according to a new study, increasing the risk of heart attack and stroke. Research published in the European Heart Journal revealed that a Covid infection could accelerate the ageing of blood vessels, particularly in women. Vaccinated individuals show less stiffening in their arteries and stabilised symptoms over time in comparison to those who had not been protected against Covid. Lead researcher Professor Rosa Maria Bruno, from Université Paris Cité, said: "We know that Covid can directly affect blood vessels. We believe that this may result in what we call early vascular ageing, meaning that your blood vessels are older than your chronological age and you are more susceptible to heart disease. 'If that is happening, we need to identify who is at risk at an early stage to prevent heart attacks and strokes." The new study tested nearly 2,500 people from across the world, categorising them based on whether they had Covid and whether they had been hospitalised for it, both in a general ward and in an intensive care unit. Tests were taken six months after an infection and again after 12 months. It measured each person's vascular age with a device that examines how quickly a wave of blood pressure travels between the artery in the neck and the legs. The higher the measurement meant the stiffer the blood vessels, indicating a higher vascular age. It found that all three groups of patients who had a Covid infection had stiffer arteries compared to those who hadn't been affected. The average increase in women was 0.55 meters per second for those who had mild Covid, 0.60 for those who had been hospitalised, and 1.09 for those in intensive care. According to researchers, an increase of around 0.5 meters per second is "clinically relevant" and equivalent to ageing around five years. It also increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, like heart attack, stroke or sudden cardiac arrest, in 60-year-old women by 3 per cent. The difference between men and women could come down to immune systems, Prof Bruno added. She said: 'Women mount a more rapid and robust immune response, which can protect them from infection. However, this same response can also increase damage to blood vessels after the initial infection.' She said the virus acts on specific receptors in the body that are in the lining of the blood vessels. The virus will use these receptors to enter and infect cells. Last month, it was reported that a new strain of Covid had spread across the UK, accounting for the highest proportion of cases - around 30 per cent. Experts warned the Stratus strain was resisting immunity and had a unique symptom of giving people a hoarse voice.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Too hungry to think, too weak to sit upright. Concentration slips away': the struggle to stay focused as an academic in Gaza
I must admit: I write this piece while starving – too hungry to think clearly, too weak to sit upright for long. I do not feel ashamed because my starvation is deliberate. I refuse my hunger even as it decays me. I can survive no other way. Since 2 March 2025, Israel has imposed a full blockade on Gaza. Little aid – food, medicine, fuel – is getting in or being distributed. The markets are empty and bakeries, community kitchens and fuel stations are shuttered. On 27 July, the World Health Organization confirmed 74 deaths from 'malnutrition' in Gaza this year – 63 of them in July. Among the dead are 24 children under the age of five and one older child. Starvation is avalanching, nearly unstoppable. A trickle of aid was dropped. The humanitarian agency Médecins Sans Frontières has called these airdrops 'notoriously ineffective and dangerous'. The distribution points of US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation have been denounced as 'death traps', the UN warning that the system violates humanitarian principles and has cost more lives than it has saved. Famine is no longer a threat – it is here. Some days, my stomach cramps as I try to revise a single paragraph. My fingers feel dry and achy, parched from lack of fluids. Hunger is loud. I read, but hunger is shouting in my ear. I write, but the maw snaps with every keystroke. And when I try to still myself, to think in the meagre pleasures of drone-infused quiet, my mind floats: what rabbit hole could I be down if I were in a library? Oh, for a coffee in between articles. A sandwich in between sentences. A snack alongside a lazy perusal of the latest issue of TESOL Quarterly. I wonder: how can I keep my mind sharp when my body has gone so thin and dehydrated? The hunger starts with a rumble, and it spreads so quickly. My legs barely carry me to the nearest internet cafe. There, I try to keep up with work and commitments, charge my devices, and catch a brief connection to the outside world. But with a heavy laptop bag on my shoulder, the journey feels less like a short walk and more like crossing a desert. Some days, survival comes down to a single sachet of Plumpy'Nut, a peanut-based nutrient paste usually distributed for free in famine zones, but here sold for about $3.50, a price many can no longer afford. If you are more fortunate, you might buy a few overpriced fortified biscuits. But the problem is not just paying for food. It is about accessing money in the first place. With every bank in Gaza damaged and not a single functioning ATM left, cash has become both scarce and essential. Online transactions, or Eftpos, are not common here – almost all purchases depend on cash. After nearly two years of war, banknotes are torn and worn, and often rejected in shops. Getting money from your own account can be exploitative: withdrawing through an informal money exchange outside standard bank processes can cost up to 50% in commission. This deeply contradicts the spirit of Gaza – known for its generosity, where neighbours always looked after one another, and where, for as long as many of us can remember, no one went to bed hungry if someone else had food to share. That spirit has not vanished. People still share what little they have. But the scale of deprivation has grown so severe that even the most generous hands are now often empty. Families go to bed hungry and wake up hungry. One day in particular, I had been working nonstop, pushing through dizziness and exhaustion. By the time I reached the stairs to my apartment, my legs were barely holding me up. My blood sugar had crashed. I collapsed just as I reached my bedroom. I was rushed to the nearest GP, where I was given an IV [intravenous fluids] to stabilise me. The next morning, I was back at work. Not because I had recovered, but because I felt I could not afford to stop. There were interviews to conduct and transcribe, students to support, messages that needed to be sent. The urgency to bear witness outweighed the need to rest. This is not about ego. It is about refusing to disappear. About resisting the slow erasure that comes with war and famine. About insisting that our thoughts and our work continue, even when it must be done in the ruins. In Gaza, to be an academic today is to refuse to be reduced to a statistic. There are days when continuing feels impossible. The body simply gives out. Reading leaves me light-headed. Concentration slips away. Teaching becomes a battle to remain coherent. And beyond the physical toll, there is another erosion – of identity. As scholars, we are meant to cultivate emancipatory and liberatory thinking among our students. But when our daily realities are hunger, grief and displacement, we begin to question whether we are still fulfilling that role. What does it mean to be a scholar when the conditions needed to think, teach and create are stripped away? What does academic freedom mean when intellectual, political and pedagogical freedom is restricted by siege? What does it mean to mentor youth towards critical inquiry when we ourselves are battling to stay upright? These questions linger, not as abstract concerns but as lived tensions. Still, we carry on. Because to stop would be to relinquish one of the last remnants of our agency. I often find myself caught between two difficult choices in the classroom: either avoid discussing the crisis, fearing retraumatising my students; or confront it directly, opening space for collective reflection. Both paths are fraught, yet driven by the same hope – to use education not only to inform, but to liberate in helping students believe their voices still matter. Sign up to Global Dispatch Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team after newsletter promotion The work goes on. Research calls. Project check-ins. Webinars. Recorded lectures. Training sessions, though they must often pause. This is our reality. Still, we show up: attending classes, writing proposals, giving talks, joining conferences, publishing. Not because we are strong or brave, but because we believe in the transformative power of education. And because to stop would be to give in to silence. Yet, the most basic truth remains difficult to say aloud: we are hungry. Not by accident, but by design. When did naming that become taboo? For days, split lentils have been my only meal. Finding flour is a scavenger hunt. And when we do manage to gather ingredients, baking over an open fire is exhausting, physically and emotionally. We burn wood from broken furniture to make bread. Used notebooks and scrap paper become fuel; otherwise, we must buy wood just to finish the job. This is not just about hunger. It is about being forced to fight for survival in silence. Lighting a fire is a daunting challenge. Matches have run out. Lighters are nearly impossible to replace – and when one is available, it can be prohibitively expensive. Those who still have a working lighter refill it cautiously with small amounts of gas. In many cases, families or neighbours share a single flame, passing it from household to household – another quiet act of solidarity and enduring spirit. So we keep documenting. Not out of heroism, but to remain present. Because behind every report, every footnote, every lecture lies a deeper truth: knowledge is still being produced in Gaza. Even now. Especially now. What does solidarity mean when some of us must think, teach and work while starving? What does inclusion mean when access to food, water and safety determines who gets to take part? This is not a call for charity. It is a call to face an uncomfortable truth: solidarity is meaningless if it does not name – and challenge – the systems that keep people excluded while they struggle to survive under siege, occupation and deliberate deprivation. True solidarity means asking hard questions: Who gets to speak? Who is heard? Who can keep learning and imagining a future when bombs fall and hunger bites? Solidarity means changing the way the world works with those in crisis: adapting deadlines, waiving fees, opening access to books and journals, and making space for voices from Gaza and beyond – not as victims but as equal partners. It means understanding that grief, hunger and destroyed infrastructure are not 'disruptions' to work – they are our current conditions of life. To generate knowledge in the context of hunger is to think through pain. To teach students who have not eaten and still tell them their voices matter. To insist, against all odds, that Gaza still thinks, still questions, still creates. That, in itself, is an act of resistance. Ahmed Kamal Junina is an assistant professor of applied linguistics and head of the English department at Al-Aqsa University in Gaza and a fellow at Bristol University's Centre for Comparative and International Research in Education
Press and Journal
8 hours ago
- Press and Journal
Aberdeen man thriving three years after care home's failings left him facing needless 'end of life' care
Recent failings at a troubled Aberdeen care home have stirred up painful memories for a former resident's family, whose loved one was hospitalised for severe malnourishment. Wendy Sutton spoke candidly about her family's ordeal after her brother, Michael Yeoman, was placed in Hamewith Lodge in Northfield back in 2022. She told The Press and Journal his care left him so poorly that a visiting nurse believed he was in his final days. The worried medical professional is even said to have prescribed end of life medication to ease his pain. Only when he was hospitalised did the care home's failings become clear. He made a significant recovery after being moved from Hamewith Lodge and, in new accommodation, is 'thriving' three years on from his ordeal. Wendy is clear that the home badly failed her brother, with key issues including poor nutrition and medication mismanagement — complaints that were upheld by the Care Inspectorate. She has come forward to speak out after a 2025 report outlined continued failings at Hamewith. For Wendy the issues raised by inspectors are eerily similar to those made by she and her family during her brother's time there. It was back in February 2022 that Michael, aged 67, was moved from his specialist home into Hamewith Lodge. He suffers from severe mental disabilities, with the family referring to him as 'Peter Pan' as he has the mental age of a five-year-old. He'd been in the care home just two months when it became clear his health was declining rapidly, prompting the family to demand help. A Covid outbreak at the home had forced the cancellation of family visits. But they continued to interact with him over video and Wendy could see a difference in his appearance. 'We noticed on a number of occasions, with each and every FaceTime, that Michael was deteriorating,' she said. 'He was rocking back and forth in his chair. He wasn't communicating very well. And he had black eyes and bruising on his body.' According to Wendy, the staff said her brother's appearance was simply down to Covid. But within six weeks he had lost 10kg in weight. Michael's brother Brian tried to visit him, but was told by staff that he was 'fine'. Undeterred, Brian turned up unannounced, creating what the family said was 'visible panic' among the staff. And in fact, by the end of the day, staff had attempted to administer end of life care – a move that confounded his siblings. Wendy said: 'They told us he was 'end of life' but we couldn't understand why because he had recovered from Covid, and his vitals and blood pressure were good. 'We were told we couldn't sit in with Michael because he was end of life. He was prescribed end of life drugs. 'We demanded that Michael be taken to hospital but they didn't want that. 'They said he was comfortable where he was and we were advised to leave him. 'We fought to get him into the hospital. 'At the hospital we were told that he was suffering from malnutrition and severe dehydration and they didn't know if he would pull through. 'Michael would have died if we hadn't intervened.' A spokesperson for HC-One, which operates Hamewith Lodge, told The Press and Journal: 'Mr Yeoman sadly experienced a rapid decline in his health in May 2022, which prompted colleagues to contact his GP services for additional medical advice. 'Following a consultation with an NHS advanced nurse practitioner, Mr Yeoman was placed on 'End of Life Care' and was moved to hospital soon after. 'This decision was not made by colleagues at the home and a subsequent hearing by the Nursing and Midwifery Council found no wrongdoing.' Despite that, Wendy lodged five specific complaints with the Care Inspectorate regarding Michael's situation. All were upheld. In documents made available to The P&J, the Care Inspectorate found: For Wendy, reading the 2025 report into Hamewith Lodge left her 'horrified'. She said: 'It was the same situation as before. 'The care inspector's recommendations are exactly what they said to us in 2022. 'It's now 2025 and I just think someone is going to die in that home before something is actually done.' One complaint Wendy made was that Michael was given improper doses of medication. This was echoed by inspectors in the 2025 report. She said: 'I couldn't believe how many times we had put in concerns about certain things over the few weeks that Michael was there. 'It was practically on a daily basis that there were always issues.' An HC-One spokesperson added: 'We take the feedback and findings from the Care Inspectorate very seriously. 'We acknowledge that the standard of care for Mr Yeoman fell below the level we as an organisation set ourselves and our residents expect. 'We apologise for the upset and distress caused to Mr Yeoman and want to reassure his family that everyone at the home is continually committed to raising the standards of care to an appropriate level.' Hamewith Lodge made improvements following the problems in 2022, achieving a 'very good' rating in a 2024 report. The report noted that during that time a new management team had been installed. Hamewith Lodge was also praised for being 'clean, tidy and clutter free'. However, in the nine months since that report, there has once again been a decline in standards. Following his hospital admission, Michael remained in a hospital bed for weeks as he recovered. He was then offered a chance to live at Cowdray Club Care Home, where he remains to this day. Wendy said: 'He has improved greatly since being at Cowdray Club. 'It's a wonderful end to the story, because it could have had a very different ending.'
