logo
Carney's 'nation-building' projects bill faces uncertain future in unpredictable Senate

Carney's 'nation-building' projects bill faces uncertain future in unpredictable Senate

Yahoo8 hours ago

Prime Minister Mark Carney's point-person in the Senate is pressing for the swift passage of the government's landmark "nation-building" projects bill, but he isn't certain he can get it over the finish line before the upper house is scheduled to break for the summer.
In an interview with CBC News on Wednesday, Sen. Marc Gold, the government representative charged with shepherding C-5 through the Red Chamber, said he wants the bill to pass this week with no amendments.
But, with senators essentially free agents after a series of changes under former prime minister Justin Trudeau, it's hard to say what the outcome will be — given the criticism from some Indigenous leaders and environmentalists, Gold said.
"I don't know what will occur," Gold said. "But I believe the bill as written is firmly anchored in the Constitution. I believe that bill reflects a clear electoral mandate that was given to this government.
"This is an important step towards meeting an historic moment for Canada."
The legislation essentially gives cabinet the ability to pick projects to speed through the regulatory process, with an eye to projects that can deliver an economic boost to Canada and help strengthen the country's autonomy and resilience as it grapples with a U.S. trade war.
WATCH | What is Bill C-5?:
The Senate has agreed to study, debate and pass the bill by Friday — but an amendment could throw a wrench in the works.
Paul Prosper, a Mi'kmaw senator from Nova Scotia, is promising to "slow down the process" with an amendment to give Indigenous people more time to weigh in and make their pitches to change the bill.
The legislation itself states the government will recognize, affirm and "respect" Indigenous Peoples' constitutional rights when considering a project to fast-track.
But there's a fear among some leaders that the consultation process with First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities will be inadequate given Carney campaigned on making final decisions within a two-year timeline. These leaders want protections for what's called "free, prior and informed consent" in the Indigenous legal sphere.
"If you don't do it right, we're looking at some potential litigation in the future. It's best to be proactive now," Prosper told reporters last week.
Amendment expected
A spokesperson for Prosper confirmed to CBC News that he's still planning to propose an amendment to address some of the concerns raised by rights holders.
An amendment from Prosper or anybody else could be a problem for the government, if backed by the wider Senate.
Any legislative changes would also need to be agreed to by MPs — and the House of Commons has already risen and it's not due to return until mid-September.
If an amendment goes through, either MPs would have to be called back to Ottawa or the bill could be left on the order paper for further discussion and approval in the fall.
That's something Carney and his government want to avoid, given the whole point is to fast-track approvals and get shovels in the ground quickly."There's a process that the Senate has committed to, to get to a final vote on it by [Friday]," Government House leader Steven MacKinnon said. "It's a very important legislation that has massive support among Canadians."
After Trudeau kicked Liberal senators out of the national caucus and instituted a series of reforms, most members of the upper house sit in loosely constituted groups where votes aren't whipped and senators can make amendments as they please.
The Senate has acted quickly on some government bills while taking its time with others, including the last Liberal government's streaming bill and firearms law changes, which were debated for months.
Still, Gold said he hopes a majority of senators realize just how important it is to get the bill passed this week. He said that would allow the government to start liaising with project proponents, premiers and Indigenous communities on what to approve.
While acknowledging the timeline is quite fast, Gold said senators sat for hours of pre-study last week before getting the legislation from the Commons and, by Friday, it will be time to make a final decision.
"We have done our job," he said. "The government will speak against amendments if it comes to that and try to persuade the majority of senators to agree with us."
The legislation itself doesn't approve any particular project and there will be time for more in-depth consultations with Indigenous people and other interested parties when the approvals process for whatever is pitched gets underway, Gold said.
"This is legislation that sets out a framework. These projects won't happen overnight," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Big, Beautiful weekend on the Hill: 'Everybody having fun yet?'
A Big, Beautiful weekend on the Hill: 'Everybody having fun yet?'

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A Big, Beautiful weekend on the Hill: 'Everybody having fun yet?'

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., was ebullient Tuesday afternoon. The South Dakota Republican just concluded a lengthy lunch meeting with fellow GOPers and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent about the Big, Beautiful Bill. "Good afternoon. Everybody having fun yet?" Thune asked the Congressional press corps as he approached the microphone in the Ohio Clock Corridor of the Capitol for his weekly exchange with reporters. "Ask us around 3:45 Sunday morning," suggested yours truly. Reporter's Notebook: Marathon Weekend Awaits Senate As Johnson Prepares House For 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Battle If you are an insomniac… Read On The Fox News App Or don't want to see the National Symphony Orchestra Pops perform Dolly Parton's musical canon at the Kennedy Center… Or you don't have tickets to see the Savannah Bananas play at Nats Park this weekend… The U.S. Senate may be the place for you. Action on the Big, Beautiful Bill could happen at any time of the day or night this weekend. The Senate is attempting to pass the Big, Beautiful Bill sometime on Saturday or Sunday. Maybe even early Monday. Presuming Senate Republicans can pass the bill. "If the bill is going to pass, do you expect that you at least have two or three members on your side who would vote no?" I asked Thune. "Could be," replied Thune. "Why?" I countered. "Well, we've got a lot of very independent thinking senators who have reasons and things that they'd like to have in this bill that would, in their view, make it stronger," answered Thune. "Hopefully when push comes to shove and everybody has to say yes or no, we'll get the number of votes that we need." House Conservatives Go To War With Senate Over Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' There's more political pushing and shoving in the U.S. Senate than there is in a line of fourth graders waiting for the water fountain after recess. And senators may advance beyond pushing and shoving to actual fighting as Republicans grouse about the bill's contents. It's about the math. Senate Republicans can still lose three votes and pass the bill with a tie-breaking vote by Vice President Vance. Fox was told that the bill was in trouble if there are ten potential noes now. But if the universe of prospective nays is only five, they can probably whittle that down enough to pass the bill. Here are the GOP senators worth keeping an eye on because of possible problems they could have with particular provisions in the legislation: Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., Rick Scott, R-Fla., Josh Hawley, R-Mo., Thom Tillis, R-N.C., Mike Lee, R-Utah, John Kennedy, R-La., Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, Susan Collins, R-Maine, John Curtis, R-Utah and Jim Justice, R-W.V. That's 11. And many of those on the list could vote yes. They may hold out until the end to either score a provision in the bill they want. Or, they want to understand the final product. "We don't know what's in the bill. The parliamentarian has thrown out some provisions," said Kennedy. "Look, I'm labor. I'm not management. But I got one vote, the same as management does. And I'm willing to work nights. I'm willing to work weekends. But what I'm not willing to do is have someone pat me on the head and say 'shut up and just vote for it.'" Kennedy said he unearthed "a few things in this bill that we weren't told about. And I'm not happy." With hat tips to boxing analysts Al Bernstein and Larry Merchant, Thune reverted to discussing the physicality of senators. "When push comes to shove, you're looking at whether or not you're going to allow the perfect to become the enemy," said Thune. "You have to recognize that this is a process whereby everybody doesn't get everything they want." Senate Gop Aims To Approve Major Legislation Next Week As Trump Touts Party Unity One of the most outstanding issues remains SALT, the deduction for state and local taxes in high-tax states. "We'll have a solution on that in 24 to 48 hours," said Bessent after his huddle with GOP senators. "I know that there are a lot of conservatives who don't like it," said White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on Fox Business. "A lot of very important people in the House, who want it as big as it can be. And, Secretary Bessent is in there working with people to find exactly the right number that'll land the bill." So when does the Senate finish? "The question of when will the Senate get it done, that's a great question," said House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo. "They've had it for over six weeks. I'm waiting." The Senate will likely take a procedural vote to formally get on the bill on Friday. If the Senate votes to get on the bill, 20 hours of clock time starts to run under special Senate budget rules. The procedural vote only needs a simple majority. The 20 hours of time is split. Democrats will probably burn all 10 of their hours. Republicans will use a few of their hours. So, the Senate probably begins its "vote-a-rama" on the bill late in the wee hours of Saturday morning. A "vote-a-rama" is where the Senate takes hours and hours of consecutive roll call votes on amendments to the package. It would culminate with passage of the Big, Beautiful Bill in the Senate late Saturday or early Sunday. Senate Republicans Look To Sweeten Medicaid Pot To Silence Dissent On Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Note that it is impossible to game out when this could happen. But frankly, a final vote could come at any time of the day or night all weekend long – if not early Monday. Also, this scenario presumes everything goes swimmingly. The most recent vote-a-rama ran just under ten hours earlier this year. A 2021 vote-a-rama consumed 14 hours and 48 minutes, with the Senate considering a total of 40 amendments. We believe this vote-a-rama might be on the longer end. Here's the other wild card: How fast can the House pivot to pass the bill and align with the Senate? House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., signaled the House may aim to vote on Tuesday. Also, the "72-hour rule" to allow the House to read the bill before voting does not apply. The Senate is sending back to the House an "amendment" to the original House plan. Thus, the "72-hour rule" is not in play under these circumstances. However, the question is if Johnson faces pressure to let the bill marinate for a few days. Trump Pressures Congress To Pass 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Insisting 'No One Goes On Vacation Until It's Done' But some House conservatives aren't happy with the Senate measure. "We're not going to get jammed on this. We're just not," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, believes the Senate should just accept the House measure – since the House could barely pass its version in May. "We did the hard work of threading a very tight needle with this legislation. So it does not need to come back looking too much different from what we ended up passing out of the House," said Pfluger. So the question is whether the Senate can pass its bill. And if the House can accept whatever the Senate passes. So, as I said, if you don't have a lot to do this weekend, Capitol Hill may be the spot to be. Especially at 3:45 Sunday article source: A Big, Beautiful weekend on the Hill: 'Everybody having fun yet?'

Trump's budget director defends NPR, PBS, foreign aid cuts to senators
Trump's budget director defends NPR, PBS, foreign aid cuts to senators

UPI

time2 hours ago

  • UPI

Trump's budget director defends NPR, PBS, foreign aid cuts to senators

1 of 3 | White House budget director Russell Vought testifies at a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Wednesda. Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo June 25 (UPI) -- White House budget director Russell Vought on Wednesday urged U.S. senators to approve the Trump administration's proposed cuts of $8.3 billion in foreign assistance and $1.1 billion for public broadcasting. Vought testified before the Senate Appropriations Committee. The cuts, which are from the Department of Government Efficiency, are a tiny fraction of the nearly $7 trillion the federal government spends each year The House last week voted 214-212 to advance the request that reduces funds for the U.S. Agency for International Development, which has largely been dismantled, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps to fund NPR and PBS. Republicans have a 53-47 majority in the Senate. A simple majority is needed for passage. A group of protesters disrupted the meeting, saying "Vought's Cuts Kill," and "Vought Lies, People Die!" Capitol Police officers forcibly removed some protesters from the room, with at least one hitting his head on the floor. During his opening remarks, Vought touted the cuts as part of Trump's "steadfast commitment to cutting wasteful federal spending antithetical to American interests." "Most Americans would be shocked and appalled to learn that their tax dollars, money they thought was going to medical care, was actually going to far-left activism, population control and sex workers," Vought said. "To be clear, no lifesaving treatment will be impacted by this rescissions package." If Congress approves the cuts, the AIDS program would lose $400 million, and another $500 million would be stripped from global health programs that support child and maternal health, AIDS care and prevention of infectious diseases. Lawmakers from both parties have criticized the proposed cuts. "There's no way that President Trump's administration would allow such wasteful and questionable spending," Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins, R-Maine, told Vought. "So, I am puzzled why you would be cutting funds that the president signed in March as part of the continuing resolution." Trump signed legislation in March to keep the government open through September. Vought responded the costs are "largely multiyear funding," and that "there is some expiring funds with regard to fiscal year '25, but the way that this was structured was to find the waste. "We are $37 trillion in national debt," Vought said. "Our view is to see, when we look at these programs, can we do it cheaper, as evidenced by what we find, and then to reflect that, with some savings to the taxpayer." Collins also questioned the administration's proposed cuts targeting the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR. "These are not only the right thing to do for humanitarian reasons, but they're incredible instruments of soft power," she said. That includes "lifesaving multivitamins for pregnant mothers and the food supplement that's used for malnourished children." Collins held up a packet of Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food used to treat malnutrition in babies and young children. Sen. Lindsey Graham, the Republican serving South Carolina, said he was surprised that millions of dollars were being spent to support abortions and gender care under PEPFAR. The AIDS-fighting program has been credited for saving millions of lives since President George W. Bush launched it more than 20 years ago. Graham said he would approve the measure though he backs the program. "And to my Democratic colleagues: There is a consequence to this crap," Graham said. "The first thing I thought about: How is PEPFAR fraud, waste and abuse? Well, I had no idea there was one dollar spent like this." GOP members in the House and Senate have voiced concerns about the potential impact cuts would have on local stations and rural radio. "We have Native American radio stations in South Dakota. They get their funding through NPR," Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said during the hearing. "Ninety-some percent of what they use." The director called PBS and NPR "radical far-left networks," and "there is no longer any excuse for tax dollars to subsidize" them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store