logo
Productivity Commission backs biggest Australian company tax rate cut in 40 years

Productivity Commission backs biggest Australian company tax rate cut in 40 years

The Guardian2 days ago
The company tax rate would be slashed to 20% for all but the very biggest businesses as part of an 'ambitious' Productivity Commission proposal aimed at boosting investment and revitalising the country's flagging productivity.
The plan would deliver the biggest reduction in the company income tax rate in nearly 40 years and dramatically shift Australia from having one of the highest to one of the lowest rates in the world.
The PC on Thursday night released its interim report on how to create a more dynamic and resilient economy, the first of five separate inquiries commissioned by Jim Chalmers late last year.
Alex Robson, the PC's deputy chair, said the tax proposal was 'ambitious but sensible'.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
'We need to spark growth through investment and competition – the best way to do that is to reform our company tax system,' he said.
Robson argued that Australia's high headline company tax rate versus its peers was a barrier to foreign investment and there was evidence that it was driving local entrepreneurs to set up business in lower-taxing countries.
He argued that lowering the tax rate for the more dynamic smaller and medium-sized business sector would provide the biggest 'bang for buck' when it came to driving local investment.
The PC also recommended the government do more to reduce the 'ever-growing thicket of rules and regulations', which was acting as a handbrake on growth by making it more difficult to, for example, supply homes, build green energy infrastructure and start a business.
'Better regulation and approvals' will be a major area of discussion on day two of Chalmers' three-day economic reform roundtable to be held in three weeks' time.
Chalmers, in a statement accompanying the release of the PC's interim report, said 'reducing regulatory burden is an important part of our productivity effort' but made no mention of the company tax plan.
Labor has sent no signals that company tax relief is among its reform priorities and has instead looked at ways to crack down on tax avoidance by multinationals and make changes to the resource rent tax for gas exporters.
Ed Husic, the former industry minister, in May last year was reportedly scolded for publicly backing a lower company tax rate or expanded investment allowance.
A survey by Newgate released this week found that only 25% of Australians supported cutting the company tax rate, and nearly half opposed it. But Robson said the PC was 'focused on good reform ideas'.
'We think it's a good proposal that's worthy of serious consideration, and we leave the politics to others.'
Economists have long blamed Australia's declining productivity on a similar decline in capital expenditure as a share of the economy and Robson said the company tax cut was the 'main lever' to drive investment growth.
Under the plan, the company tax rate on the 1.2m companies that earn below $50m would drop from 25% to 20%, while the rate for roughly 7,000 businesses earning between $50m and $1bn would fall from 30% to 20%. That would leave about 500 of the biggest firms with no additional tax relief.
The deep cut to the company income tax rate would be accompanied by a world-first net cashflow tax of 5%, which would apply to all businesses and help make the tax package 'broadly' revenue neutral over the longer term.
'The introduction of the net cashflow tax means that while most companies will pay less tax, the total tax burden will rise for some large companies, especially those not undertaking new investment,' the report said.
'Overall, the new tax will incentivise new capital expenditure across all firm sizes.'
The PC will now conduct another round of consultation ahead of a final report due by the end of the year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sydney Harbour Bridge protest shutdown: What you need to know as pro-Palestine demonstrators disrupt public transport and close down roads
Sydney Harbour Bridge protest shutdown: What you need to know as pro-Palestine demonstrators disrupt public transport and close down roads

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Sydney Harbour Bridge protest shutdown: What you need to know as pro-Palestine demonstrators disrupt public transport and close down roads

A massive pro-Palestine protest is set to block the Sydney Harbour Bridge after the Supreme Court threw out cops' failed bid to stop the march. Tens of thousands of protesters are set to gather in Lang Park, in the city's CBD, at 1pm on Sunday and begin the march to block the iconic bridge. Despite rainy conditions forecast for the demonstration, Palestine Action Group expect as many as 50,000 people to participate. Protesters are scheduled to begin marching through York and Grosvenor streets at 1.30pm before heading across the bridge and finishing Bradfield Park, on the bridge's northern end. The Harbour Bridge will be closed to traffic from 11.30am. Authorities expect the march will last three hours and are set to re-open the bridge at 4pm. Transport for NSW said that 'extensive' queues are expected at the entrance to the Sydney Harbour Tunnel. Motorists were urged to avoid the area and consider alternative routes. Bus services will not cross the bridge during the demonstration. Buses on the south side of the bridge will terminate in the CBD while those on the northern side will end at North Sydney and St Leonards. Trains will continue operating across the bridge throughout the protest but are expected to suffer significant delays due to increased commuter volume. More to come...

STRATEGIC EQUITY CAPITAL: Giving small UK firms the muscle to take on the big boys
STRATEGIC EQUITY CAPITAL: Giving small UK firms the muscle to take on the big boys

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

STRATEGIC EQUITY CAPITAL: Giving small UK firms the muscle to take on the big boys

Investment trust Strategic Equity Capital has a bold approach. It takes big stakes in companies it likes in the expectation that its judgment will be proved right, then rewards its shareholders with attractive returns. Although the strategy is not foolproof, the current manager is making a mighty good fist of it. Since taking the reins in September 2020, Gresham House's Ken Wotton has delivered shareholder returns in excess of 100 per cent, outperforming both the average for the trust's peer group and its benchmark index, the FTSE Small Cap (excluding investment companies). Wotton's modus operandi at Strategic is to seek out opportunities in the smaller companies section of the UK stock market – a sector Gresham knows intimately as a result of running numerous other funds focused on it. 'I look for companies with market capitalisations between £100 million and £300 million,' he says, 'and provided the quality and valuation are right, become one of the biggest shareholders.' This approach, he says, gives the trust 'muscle' to 'actively engage' with the companies it buys. He adds: 'At one end of the scale, engagement may be rather benign and just a question of supporting a company's management plans. 'But at the other, it may be helping a company find a non-executive board member or pointing them in the direction of a merger and acquisitions boutique if they become the target of interest from a potential private equity buyer.' The fruits of this strategy can be rewarding. For example, one of the fund's top-ten holdings is Inspired, which advises companies on optimising their procurement and usage of energy. Wotton had been a backer of the company before he took over the helm at Strategic, and made it one of his first new holdings for the trust. He then kept tickling up the stake, participating in the company's raising of new capital late last year to reduce borrowings. Inspired was then subject to a hostile takeover by Regent, an owner of gas and infrastructure companies. Strategic said it would not back the deal and put adviser Evercore in touch with Inspired. The result was the discovery of 'white knight' HGGC, a US private equity firm, which trumped Regent's 68.5p a share deal by offering 81p a share. The new offer is likely to be accepted in the coming weeks, providing the trust with a tidy profit. The £168 million trust has 18 holdings – a concentrated portfolio, especially given the top-ten stakes account for nearly 80 per cent of assets. Wotton describes the other eight positions as 'toe-hold positions,' the trust's 'pipeline'. Some of these, he says, could benefit from the cash received from the sale of Inspired. Wooton says mistakes are part of being a fund manager. 'If you don't make them, you're not taking enough risk,' But he adds: 'Risk can be mitigated by engaging with company management – which Strategic does as a matter of course – selling out, or ensuring you have an appropriate-sized holding.' The manager believes the trust's prospects are 'really attractive' over the next three to five years, although he admits the FTSE AIM market – where a majority of the trust's holdings are listed – has been undermined by Labour's decision to reduce the inheritance tax attractions of holding AIM shares. 'There has been a lot of forced selling of shares,' he says, 'and some have been derated.' Annual trust charges are 1.2 per cent, the fund's stock market ticker is SEC, and identification code B0BDCB2.

TONY HETHERINGTON: What's the truth about this energy firm promising me 12% returns?
TONY HETHERINGTON: What's the truth about this energy firm promising me 12% returns?

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

TONY HETHERINGTON: What's the truth about this energy firm promising me 12% returns?

Tony Hetherington is Financial Mail on Sunday's ace investigator, fighting readers corners, revealing the truth that lies behind closed doors and winning victories for those who have been left out-of-pocket. Find out how to contact him below. R.B. writes: Some time ago I was contacted by TBE Consultants Ltd about investments in Terra Firma Energy Ltd. They said: 'Our clients enjoy a 12 per cent return on their capital inside 12 months.' I did not invest, but I have now seen a website called Stonehold Investment also promoting Terra Firma Energy. Are you able to find out anything about this company and the people who run it? Tony Hetherington replies: This investigation began in January, with more than a few twists and turns since then. Let's start with the sales firm TBE Consultants. Coincidentally, a few weeks after I began enquiring, its owner William Davies put it into liquidation with debts estimated at £1.7 million. According to the Financial Conduct Authority, Davies was once an investment adviser at Beaufort Securities, already a disreputable stockbroking company when he joined in 2005. The City watchdog fined it £90,000 in 2006. He also ran finance firm Salesian Consultants Ltd until he put this into liquidation in 2019. He borrowed more than £79,000 from it but convinced the liquidator to accept just £30,000 in settlement, saying he was close to bankruptcy. A few months later, Davies became a director of one of the Terra Firma Energy (TFE) group of companies and now sits on the board of four TFE businesses. So when TBE Consultants was recommending investment in TFE, Davies was a boss at both. The salesman who contacted you from TBE Consultants was Stephen Leary, whose background in dodgy investments is pretty scary. He is currently banned for 14 years from acting as a director of any limited company following his central role at Worldwide Commodity Partners Ltd, an investment scam which cost investors almost £3 million. That said, this does not stop him from working in his present role. According to the FCA, Leary was also at two separate disreputable stockbrokers, both exposed by The Mail on Sunday. And while a salesman at TBE Consultants he marketed loan bonds issued by Platinum Assets And Developments (PAD). I warned in 2020 that this was a high-risk scheme. It relied largely on the prospects of an offshoot, Platinum Energy Solutions, but last year the High Court ordered this into liquidation because of its debts. And here is a link to Terra Firma Energy. Peter Eagle was the managing director of the failed Platinum Energy Solutions, and he became a director of TFE in 2020 until quitting in 2021. The day-to-day management team at TFE are just as interesting. When I began investigating, its business development manager was Dan Keenan. In 2012 he was jailed for 11 years for money laundering and other financial crimes, linking him to a major drug dealer. And before this he was jailed for five years for blackmail and conspiracy to defraud. Mr Keenan vanished from TFE's website within hours of my first questions to the company. Simon Fagan was named as TFE's legal adviser. He is a Manchester solicitor, and in 2015 he was a director of radiator company Xefro Ltd, the parent company of Xefro Trade, which was wound up by the High Court following an investigation which described its products as defective and dangerous. Of course, none of this means TFE's 12 per cent loan notes will flop. The firm exists and runs 'battery farms' that store power with the idea of selling it on. It is concerning, though, that its website claims TFE is in partnership with National Grid, which told me: 'Terra Firma sell power to the electricity grid, or into the national energy market. They do not sell it to National Grid.' TFE did, however, say that their assets had participated in the electricity market. TFE's loan notes are only supposed to be offered to experienced or wealthy investors who can take risks. The website of Stonehold Investment – where you spotted the TFE investment – emphasises this. And it should know, as Stonehold Investment is just TFE itself using a different name! Stonehold has claimed to be 'award winners' and 'trusted by 123,000 investors'. What awards? And how many investors! Well, I asked TFE about Stonehold and about its personnel. TFE failed to reply, but back like a guided missile came a rocket fired at me by its lawyers. Stonehold's claims erroneously appeared in Google results, they conceded. TFE had no explanation but would correct this. Yes, William Davies was a stockbroker but was just one of many employees at firms penalised by the regulator. Nothing to do with TFE, they added. Yes, Stephen Leary is banned as a director for ripping off investors, but this does not ban him from recruiting investors now for TFE, they explained. Yes, Simon Fagan provides legal advice to TFE, but so what, as TFE has no connection to disgraced company Xefro. The lawyers insisted that TFE's management team had no idea of Dan Keenan's prison record and told me that he has now left the company by mutual agreement. If so, it might be a good idea to ask Mr Keenan to change his LinkedIn page, which still says he is TFE's full-time business development manager. It might also be a good idea for Helen Aletras, one of TFE's management team, to stop putting holiday photos online showing her with Mr Keenan, who she has known for many years. Mysteriously, investment in TFE's loan notes was promoted via a now-defunct website called This claimed that TFE has a '15-year purchase agreement with National Grid'. However, I am told now that TFE has no idea who ran the sales site, or why they promoted TFE as an investment. TFE's lawyers also told me there was no reason that any of this should be published. I disagree.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store