logo
Six months and no LoP in Haryana from Congress, Saini govt considers ‘legal options'

Six months and no LoP in Haryana from Congress, Saini govt considers ‘legal options'

Indian Express21-04-2025

The Haryana government is considering seeking legal opinion on how to 'bypass' the requirement of a Leader of the Opposition in panels for selection to several posts, given the Congress's failure to appoint one more than six months after the BJP returned to power in the state.
The faction-ridden Haryana Congress is no closer to deciding its legislature party head, who would serve as the LoP. Sources said the decision was at least a few more weeks away.
Incidentally, in a similar situation in Jharkhand, when the BJP had failed to choose an LoP four months into a JMM-led alliance government, the latter had gone to the Supreme Court. In January, the Supreme Court intervened, and in March, the BJP named Babulal Marandi as the LoP.
In Haryana, along with the Chief Minister and a minister, an LoP is part of selection committees for appointments to posts such as the Chief Information Commissioner and 10 Information Commissioners. Currently the State Information Commission is functioning with barely three members – Jagbir Singh, Pradeep Kumar Shekhawat and Kulbir Chhikara – with pending appeals and complaints under the Right to Information Act now numbering over 7,200.
Sources said former chief secretary T V S N Prasad is among the frontrunners for the post of Chief Information Commissioner, if and when the meeting of the selection committee takes place.
Last week, speaking to mediapersons, Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini said: 'We are going to take legal opinion from the Advocate General to see how we can go ahead with the appointments that are stuck due to the absence of an LoP.'
Haryana BJP chief Mohan Lal Badoli told The Indian Express: 'It is for the Congress to decide whom they want to appoint as their CLP leader. But, the government has to go ahead with its appointments. Whatever can be done legally, the government shall do.'
In the case of Jharkhand, the Supreme Court had directed the BJP on January 5 to nominate an LoP within two weeks, while hearing a petition regarding the long-pending appointments of Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners in the state. The state government had told the Court that the main reason for the delay was the absence of an LoP. The BJP had finally named Marandi as its legislature party leader in March.
While Bhupinder Singh Hooda, the senior-most leader of the Congress in Haryana, declined to comment on the issue, Congress Rohtak MLA B B Batra said the government was wrongly claiming that its hands were tied on the matter of appointments. Claiming that the Congress decision on LoP would come 'soon' and that only a limited number of appointments were decided by selection panels of which the LoP was a part, Batra said: 'But, there is no bar on the government to hold a selection committee meeting. They can do so without the LoP, too… pick any senior leader from the opposition party instead.'
At the Centre, for example, after the Congress could not lay claim to Leader of the Opposition post due to the low number of seats it won in the 2014 general elections, the Modi government had included Mallikarjun Kharge – by virtue of being the leader in the Lok Sabha of the Congress, the single-largest party – in several selection panels.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘No letter, no meeting request': ECI questions Rahul Gandhi's 'intent'
‘No letter, no meeting request': ECI questions Rahul Gandhi's 'intent'

Hans India

time25 minutes ago

  • Hans India

‘No letter, no meeting request': ECI questions Rahul Gandhi's 'intent'

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has issued a detailed and pointed response to the Congress' allegations regarding a sharp surge in voter turnout during the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections. The statement, coming after Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge echoed Rahul Gandhi's concerns in a public post, dismisses the claims as unfounded and politically motivated, while also questioning the procedural conduct of the Congress leadership. Sources within the ECI said that despite making serious public allegations, Rahul Gandhi has not approached the Commission formally. 'Even after two days of making his baseless assertions, Rahul Gandhi has not sent any complaint or letter, nor has he requested an appointment to meet the ECI. Why?' the source asked. Sources described the silence as a lack of intent to engage constructively. The Commission clarified that the Congress party had already received a formal reply to its earlier queries on December 24, 2024. This response, according to the ECI, is publicly available on its official website, contradicting claims of a lack of transparency. Refuting the charges of deliberate opacity in the electoral roll process, the ECI advised District Congress Presidents to appoint Booth Level Agents (BLAs) at every polling booth and actively participate in the annual process of electoral roll updates, sources said. The Commission sources added that it has been conducting training programmes for BLAs of all political parties at its dedicated training institute and encouraged the Congress to make full use of these opportunities to avoid any 'misconceptions". The sources further asserted that if the Congress chooses not to engage in the roll revision process, it should at least trust the Booth Level Officers (BLOs) appointed by the Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) under Section 13B(2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950. These officials, the ECI sources noted, function as part of a statutory framework to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the electoral rolls. The EC sources also reminded the public that the preparation of electoral rolls, conduct of polls, and counting of votes are overseen by statutory authorities such as the ERO, Presiding Officer (PRO), and Returning Officer (RO), all of whom work under the ECI's constitutional mandate under Article 324. Ultimately, it stressed, it is the voters who decide the outcome of elections, not the administrative process. In a strongly worded final remark, ECI sources took aim at what they described as a pattern of political deflection by the Congress. They said any party preparing for electoral outcomes should do so in the political domain, not by 'fighting the referee". The Commission sources concluded, 'The electors of India are intelligent enough to understand why the INC (Indian National Congress) keeps fighting the referee whenever it loses an election.'

Lop Partap Singh slams AAP of sidelining Punjabis, calls Sugarfed recruitment policy deceitful
Lop Partap Singh slams AAP of sidelining Punjabis, calls Sugarfed recruitment policy deceitful

New Indian Express

time28 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Lop Partap Singh slams AAP of sidelining Punjabis, calls Sugarfed recruitment policy deceitful

CHANDIGARH: Senior Congress leader and opposition leader Partap Singh Bajwa on Monday slammed the AAP government in Punjab, accusing it of a 'deliberate and deceitful attempt' to sideline the Punjabi language and deprive local youth of job opportunities in the recruitment for 166 posts in Sugarfed Punjab. Bajwa claimed that the AAP government initially attempted to dilute the requirement of Punjabi language proficiency by allowing candidates who hadn't passed Punjabi in Matric to appear for the examination, on the condition that they clear a basic Punjabi test during their three-year probation. "It was a clear attempt to recruit non-Punjabis by stealth. Only after a massive public outcry and media backlash did the government take a panicked U-turn and declare Punjabi compulsory again. This is not governance, it's deceit,' Bajwa said. He accused the AAP government of trying to sneak in policies that betray Punjab's linguistic and cultural ethos, only to reverse course when caught red-handed. 'This pattern has become a hallmark of the AAP regime, quietly undermining Punjab's interests, then staging a course correction to save face,' Bajwa stated.

'Derogatory' Remarks Against Amaravati: Journalist Who Hosted Show Arrested
'Derogatory' Remarks Against Amaravati: Journalist Who Hosted Show Arrested

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

'Derogatory' Remarks Against Amaravati: Journalist Who Hosted Show Arrested

Amaravati: Senior Telugu journalist Kommineni Srinivas Rao was arrested in Hyderabad on Monday for hosting a programme on a vernacular channel where a scribe allegedly made derogatory remarks against the greenfield capital city Amaravati, said a police official. Guntur district Superintendent of Police S Satish confirmed that Thullur police from Amaravati have arrested the journalist. "Thullur police have arrested Kommineni Srinivas Rao from Hyderabad over the derogatory remarks against Amaravati," Satish told PTI, adding that the journalist is being brought to Andhra Pradesh from Telangana. VVR Krishna Raju, the journalist, who was also part of the programme, was accused of spewing venom against Amaravati and its women. According to information shared by a source close to the TDP-led NDA government, the duo were booked under BNS Sections 79, 196 (1), 353 (2), 299, 356 (2) and 61 (1) and Section 67 of the IT Act, including Section (1) of the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. Meanwhile, YSRCP said that an FIR was registered against Rao four days ago in Thullur police station, accusing him of "failing to intervene during the broadcast", which featured those alleged vitriolic remarks. "Immediately after his arrest, Rao was transferred to Vijayawada. Rao, a senior citizen, questioned the legality of the arrest without explanation," said a note from the YSRCP. Condemning the arrest, YSRCP chief Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy, called it a "political vendetta". "In any discussion, diverse opinions are natural. Punishing an anchor for guests' statements is not only unjust, it's dangerous," Reddy said in a post on 'X'. The former chief minister questioned the rationale behind punishing a moderator for remarks made by panelists during a televised debate, warning such actions endanger democratic discourse and press freedom. He accused the TDP-led NDA government of suppressing dissent, using fear and intimidation tactics to silence intellectuals, journalists, and opposition voices across the southern state. He alleged that Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu was "weaponising the state apparatus" to divert public attention from failures, corruption, and broken electoral promises. "You (Naidu) were given five years-one has already passed. The day will come when the people will demand answers for your abuses and injustices," Reddy warned.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store