7/11 train blasts case: After acquitting all 12 accused, HC says it did its duty
The bench quashed the conviction of the 12 persons by a special court in 2015, noting the prosecution had 'utterly failed" to prove the case and that it was hard to believe the accused committed the crime.
The prosecution has failed to even bring on record the type of bombs used in the crime and that the evidence relied on by it was not conclusive to convict the accused persons, it said.
The witness statements and alleged recoveries made from the accused have no evidentiary value, the HC said.
After the court pronounced its verdict, advocate Yug Chaudhary, appearing for the accused, said the judgment restores faith in humanity and judiciary as the 12 accused have been languishing in jail for 19 years for a crime they have not committed.
The bench then remarked that it was only doing its duty.
'We did our duty as judges. That is the responsibility cast upon us," the bench said.
Chaudhary told the HC that it was indeed a credit to the institution that 12 persons charged with the most serious offences could be held innocent after all these years and acquitted.
'It is a credit to the independence of the institution. More than restoring faith in the judiciary, this judiciary restores faith in humanity. This judgment will always be a sign of hope in times to come," Chaudhary said.
Senior advocate S Murlidhar, who appeared for some of the accused, also thanked the high court for its patient hearing and the acquittal.
During arguments in the case, Murlidhar, a former high court judge, submitted that the accused spent the better parts of their life in jail despite being innocent.
He had alleged a pattern wherein investigating agencies show 'communal bias" while probing terror related cases.
The high court on Monday refused to confirm the September 2015 judgment of the special court convicting the 12 persons.
Of the 12, five were sentenced to death while the remaining seven were given life imprisonment.
Seven blasts ripped through Mumbai local trains at various locations on the western line, killing more than 180 persons and injuring several others on July 11, 2006.
Since 2015, the pleas pertaining to the 7/11 blasts case were not taken up even after the matter came up for hearing before 11 different benches.
In 2024, Ehtesham Siddiqui, who was handed the death penalty, filed an application in the HC seeking its intervention, expeditious hearing and disposal of the appeals.
After this, a special bench of Justices Kilor and Chandak was set up to hear the appeals last year.
On January 31 this year, the bench, after hearing the appeals on a daily basis for five months, reserved its order. PTI SP GK
view comments
First Published:
July 21, 2025, 12:45 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mumbai train blasts: Shock, anger among those hurt, families of deceased
Shock, anger among those hurt, families of deceased MUMBAI: Shock, anger and a sense of futility overcame the families of those who were killed or injured in the 11/7 serial train blasts. Monday's acquittal of all 12 accused prompted them to ask who actually perpetrated the crime, with some remarking sarcastically, 'No one did it!' Decades of fruitlessness have sealed the lips of Priti Sawant, whose husband, Parag (36), became the face of the tragedy. Parag died in 2015 after a long spell in coma. Priti is currently employed with Western Railway at Bhayander station but declined comment to TOI, saying she did not wish to relive the trauma. She was an expectant mother in 2006, and her daughter was born after Parag's injury. Harshal Bhalerao (23) of Vasai was killed in the blast. His mother Saguna said Monday, 'No verdict will bring my son back. But the guilty must be punished.' Harshal's father, Yashwant, said, 'Not a single victim's family will like this judgment. We have named our bungalow 'Harshal 11/7' after him. He was our only boy, now our daughter takes care of us.' Harshal was on his first day of work in Andheri when he fell victim at Borivli. Artist Mahendra Pitale lost an arm. He said, 'The order is a massive shock. Is it going to take law enforcement agencies another 19 years to find the real perpetrators?' Pitale too was given a job by railways. 'My prosthetic limb is very expensive and I have to find sponsors or depend on trusts to be able to afford it,' said Pitale, who has changed prosthetic limbs seven times in the past two decades. 'No one killed 200 people & injured 700...,' tweeted chartered accountant Chirag Chauhan, who had suffered a spinal injury that left his legs and lower body paralysed. Vishakha Seksaria, sister of Vrindesh, who was killed, said, 'I am unable to digest this news.' Subhash Saboo said, 'I can never forget that day as my father (Nathmal) was on the train towards Malad and he never made it home.' Rishi Bobra (38), who spent a month in the ICU, said he had nothing to say on the verdict and had moved ahead. Garden landscaper Harish Pawar was injured when a train rod pierced his chest. He bubbled over in anger on Monday. 'Why was the evidence that was deemed acceptable by the lower courts for conviction, entirely negated by HC?' Vasai resident Raniya D'Souza lost her father, Manuel (36), when she was just six and a half. Manuel, a chemical engineer and the sole breadwinner, was killed in the Matunga blast. Raniya is grateful to Western Railway for having granted her a job after graduation. Her younger brother, who was only two and a half at the time, does not have any memories of their father. Hansraj Kanojia, who lost a leg, demanded reinvestigation. 'If they are being set free today and go on to commit the same crime again, who will take responsibility? The case should be taken to the SC.'
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
2006 Mumbai train blasts: HC rubbishes reliability of prosecution witnesses
HC rubbishes reliability of prosecution witnesses MUMBAI: Bombay HC Monday ripped apart the trustworthiness of the prosecution's witnesses in the 11/7 train blasts case and held that the special executive officer (SEO) who conducted the test identification parade — a primary step following the arrest of an accused — lacked the authority to do so. The parade of various accused was conducted by two SEOs, one of whom ceased to hold the post in 2005. High court said the prosecution failed to bring any evidence on record to show that he continued to be the SEO when the test identification parade was conducted by him on Nov 7, 2006. Hence, the identification of three accused—all alleged planters—stands vitiated and is discarded, it stated. However, prosecution witnesses can identify accused in court during the trial, but HC found such identification lacked the credibility it needed. HC said the first of six categories of eyewitnesses produced by the prosecution against the accused were two taxi drivers who took two accused, both alleged planters, to Churchgate station; they identified the accused. A total of eight witnesses identified the accused in test identification parades and also in court. Apart from the two taxi drivers, four claimed to have seen the accused planting the bombs in the trains. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy the Dip: Top 5 Dividend Stocks with Growth Potential Seeking Alpha Read More Undo The seventh one claimed that he saw the accused preparing bombs, and the eighth said he saw the hatching of the conspiracy and identified the accused in court. One witness claimed to have seen the suspects after they alighted from the train. His statement helped in creating two sketches, but he was not asked to identify the accused in court, HC noted. HC went through 44,000 pages of record After more than six months of hearing in the 2006 serial train blasts case, and going through more than 44,000 pages of record, Bombay HC concluded that Maharashtra Anti-Terror Squad (ATS) had no case. It said the prosecution failed to prove what kind of explosive was used: no importance could be attached to the claims of recovery of RDX, circuit boards and detonators, as prosecution failed to prove custody chain before analysis. In a detailed analysis of the case and evidence on record, Bombay HC said while the 'prosecution has referred to al-Qaida Manual for many things, nothing is brought on record about it'. Over two decades ago, bombs planted on first-class compartments exploded during peak evening commute at seven locations on Western Railway suburban network. They ripped apart metal bogies and lives between Khar Road and Santacruz, Bandra and Khar, Jogeshwari and Mahim Junction, Mira Road and Bhayander, Matunga and Mahim Junction, and Borivli. The prosecution case was of sophisticated explosive RDX being used, of accused being members of terror outfits like SIMI who received training in Pakistan, and of 15 wanted accused, mainly Pakistanis. While the trial court's special MCOCA judge, Y D Shinde, in 2015 said special public prosecutor Raja Thakare had rightly described the accused as 'merchants of death' and Thakare argued that the trial verdict could not be dislodged and the noose be confirmed, the HC noted the prosecution case had unravelled completely. The dozen men were in prison all along since their arrests in 2006. While one of them died after the Covid pandemic in 2021, the 11 whose appeals were allowed joined on Monday via video-conferencing from prisons across the state, including Pune's Yerawada and the prisons in Nashik, Amravati and Nagpur. An alleged planter, Naved Khan, from Nagpur prison, told court he suffered 'needlessly for 19 years' and while lives were lost, innocents could not be hanged either.
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Despair and disbelief overcome victims of Mumbai train blasts as high court verdict brings case back to square one
Mumbai: Shock, anger and a sense of futility overcame the families of those who were killed or injured in the 11/7 serial train blasts. Monday's acquittal of all 12 accused prompted them to ask who actually perpetrated the crime, with some remarking sarcastically, "No one did it!" Decades of fruitlessness have sealed the lips of Priti Sawant, whose husband, Parag (36), became the face of the tragedy. Parag died in 2015 after a long spell in coma. Priti is currently employed with Western Railway at Bhayander station but declined comment to TOI, saying she did not wish to relive the trauma. She was an expectant mother in 2006, and her daughter was born after Parag's injury. Harshal Bhalerao (23) of Vasai was killed in the blast. His mother Saguna said Monday, "No verdict will bring my son back. But the guilty must be punished." Harshal's father, Yashwant, said, "Not a single victim's family will like this judgement. We have named our bungalow 'Harshal 7/11' after him. He was our only boy, now our daughter takes care of us." Harshal was on his first day of work in Andheri when he fell victim to the blast at Borivli. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai Artist Mahendra Pitale lost an arm to the bombing. He said, "The order is a massive shock. We believed the guilty would hang. If these men were not the perpetrators, then who carried out the bomb blasts? Why were they not apprehended? Nineteen years have passed and there is no justice. Is it going to take the law enforcement agencies another 19 years to find the real perpetrators?" Pitale too was given a job by the railways. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In IC Markets Learn More Undo "My prosthetic limb is very expensive and I have to find sponsors or depend on trusts to be able to afford it," said Pitale, who has changed prosthetic limbs seven times in the past two decades. "No one killed 200 people & injured 700...," tweeted chartered accountant Chirag Chauhan, who had suffered a spinal injury that left his legs and lower body paralysed. "Personally, I may have forgiven the terrorists and moved on with my life. But the law of the land has failed to deliver justice today to the people who were left dead or disabled... Today is a very sad day for everyone. Justice got killed..." Vishakha Seksaria, sister of Vrindesh, who was killed, said, "I am unable to digest this news. The accused had been convicted in 2015... how can they be acquitted now? My brother, Vrindesh, was like a pillar of support to us. After losing my parents during the pandemic, I'm now all alone. The court order feels like a blow. I would like to discuss with the other (victims') families and petition the court to reconsider." Subhash Saboo said, "I can never forget that day as my father (Nathmal) was on the train towards Malad and he never made it home. I have been trying to erase the memory for the last two decades but today the sorrow is searing through me and seeing the acquittal order has left me speechless." Rishi Bobra (38), a gritty survivor who spent a month in the ICU, said he had nothing to say on the verdict and had moved ahead. "I work for a securities firm. I drive or take the train to my workplace. l don't want to dwell on the past," he said. In 2016, Bobra had said that he felt the delay not just in this case, but in all cases is a reflection of the Indian legal system. Garden landscaper Harish Pawar was injured when a train rod pierced his chest. He bubbled over in anger Monday. "It appears as if we the commuters are to blame for stepping out for work to support our families. Why was the evidence that was deemed acceptable by the lower courts for conviction, entirely negated by the high court?" Vasai resident Raniya D'Souza lost her father, Manuel (36), when she was just six and a half. Manuel, a chemical engineer and the sole breadwinner, was killed in the Matunga blast. "Our family struggled emotionally and financially, and the void left by my father has not been filled even after all these years," she said. Raniya is grateful to Western Railway for having granted her a job after graduation. Her younger brother, who was only two and a half at the time, does not have any memories of their father. Calling the judgment unjust, Hansraj Kanojia, who lost a leg, demanded reinvestigation. "If they are being set free today and go on to commit the same crime again, who will take responsibility? The case should be taken to the Supreme Court." On Monday BJP leader Kirit Somaiya along with Kanojia and Pitale met additional chief security (home) I S Chahal at Mantralaya. They expressed unhappiness over the judgement and requested the state to challenge the decision in the SC. (Inputs by Nitasha Natu, V Narayan, Somit Sen, Vishal Rajemahadik, Swati Deshpande, Vijay V Singh, Pushkraj Vernekar and Bella Jaisinghani)
