Scottish Water workers accept pay offer but ‘concerns continue', says union
The union represents more than 1,000 workers at the Government-owned corporation, making it the union with the largest presence at Scottish Water.
The pay deal is worth a minimum of £2,850 for staffers on salary bands one to six.
Staff on band seven salaries will receive an additional £3,030, and band eight workers will gain another £3,771.
Some 77% of Unison members at Scottish Water voted, 63% of whom accepted the offer.
Scottish Water initially offered workers a basic pay rise of 3.4% or £1,050 for those on the lowest grades.
Unison members had earlier rejected an improved pay offer from the employer.
There were 10 days of strike action this year at Scottish Water.
Staff who took action included treatment plant operators, maintenance crews, water quality teams and other frontline workers.
During the strikes, the union said there were no emergency repairs, water quality checks, or responses to public reports of problems with water supply, sewage or drainage.
The employer had originally offered a pay rise of £1,050 for those on the lowest-grade salaries.
This was later upped to 7% over two years, which was also rejected.
While the latest offer was accepted, Unison said it will continue to press Scottish Water bosses to cut the excessive use of contractors and agency staff.
The union also said more must be done to improve industrial relations across the sector following the dispute.
Unison Scotland regional organiser Greig Kelbie said: 'The immediate dispute may be over, but staff concerns continue. They want better pay and conditions, and to keep Scottish Water as a publicly-owned and run service.
'The company's behaviour has become ever more like that of profit-driven water firms in England. That's not the way a vital public service for Scotland should operate.
'The union and staff will be fighting the creeping privatisation of the industry.'
Unison Scottish Water branch secretary Patricia McArthur said: 'Staff have decided to accept this offer after a long and difficult dispute, but it's far from ideal.
'In theory, Scottish Water is still the jewel in the crown of Scotland's public services. But the reality is that its operations are being handed increasingly to private operators. That must stop.'
Fellow unions GMB and Union have also been in dispute with the employer.
Lynne Highway, Scottish Water's director of people, said: 'We are pleased that members of all three trade unions have voted to accept our pay offer.
'We now look forward to implementing the salary increases that our people have been waiting for and to working constructively with the trade unions in the future.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Urgent warning made over UK pensions
An industry expert has warned that the UK state pension age may need to rise to 80 without significant reforms, as the current system is becoming unaffordable. The state pension age is already scheduled to increase from 66 to 67 by 2028, with a further rise to 68 expected to be brought forward from 2046. The Office for Budget Responsibility projects the annual cost of the state pension could reach £200 billion by 2073, representing 7.7-8.4 per cent of GDP by the 2070s. Pensions expert Jack Carmichael suggests the cost could be even higher than official projections, potentially necessitating a state pension age of 80 to maintain affordability. To manage spiralling costs, the government may be compelled to either raise the state pension age more rapidly or reform the triple lock mechanism.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Australia regulator says YouTube, others 'turning a blind eye' to child abuse material
SYDNEY, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Australia's internet watchdog has said the world's biggest social media firms are still 'turning a blind eye' to online child sex abuse material on their platforms, and said YouTube in particular had been unresponsive to its enquiries. In a report released on Wednesday, the eSafety Commissioner said YouTube, along with Apple, failed to track the number of user reports it received of child sex abuse appearing on their platforms and also could not say how long it took them to respond to such reports. The Australian government decided last week to include YouTube in its world-first social media ban for teenagers, following eSafety's advice to overturn its planned exemption for the Alphabet-owned Google's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab video-sharing site. 'When left to their own devices, these companies aren't prioritising the protection of children and are seemingly turning a blind eye to crimes occurring on their services,' eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said in a statement. 'No other consumer-facing industry would be given the licence to operate by enabling such heinous crimes against children on their premises, or services.' Google has said previously that abuse material has no place on its platforms and that it uses a range of industry-standard techniques to identify and remove such material. Meta - owner of Facebook, Instagram and Threads, three of the biggest platforms with more than 3 billion users worldwide - says it prohibits graphic videos. The eSafety Commissioner, an office set up to protect internet users, has mandated Apple, Discord, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Skype, Snap and WhatsApp to report on the measures they take to address child exploitation and abuse material in Australia. The report on their responses so far found a 'range of safety deficiencies on their services which increases the risk that child sexual exploitation and abuse material and activity appear on the services'. Safety gaps included failures to detect and prevent livestreaming of the material or block links to known child abuse material, as well as inadequate reporting mechanisms. It said platforms were also not using 'hash-matching' technology on all parts of their services to identify images of child sexual abuse by checking them against a database. Google has said before that its anti-abuse measures include hash-matching technology and artificial intelligence. The Australian regulator said some providers had not made improvements to address these safety gaps on their services despite it putting them on notice in previous years. 'In the case of Apple services and Google's YouTube, they didn't even answer our questions about how many user reports they received about child sexual abuse on their services or details of how many trust and safety personnel Apple and Google have on-staff,' Inman Grant said.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
It's time to come clean on what the Government actually owes
Today's fiscal climate is dominated by one overriding and impossible to escape fact: the Government owes so much money it may be impossible to borrow much more at affordable interest rates. The last time we got close to this position was in 1976, when in October of that year, at the worst point of the funding crisis, the Government was forced to issue what was then a 'jumbo' gilt issue (£600m) with a maturity date of 1998 at an interest rate of 15.5pc. Imagine that interest rate today! As you may recall, this was the same year the UK applied to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for the largest loan requested at that time (although only half was actually drawn). In return, the Government agreed to IMF-imposed austerity. Clearly, this is consequential stuff. Gilts are UK government bonds, which pay a fixed annual interest at the rate stated until they mature, at which point they are repaid in full. They are unconditionally guaranteed by the UK government – which has never defaulted on its debt promises – so have lent their name in a colloquial sense to their 'gold-plated' nature as high grade assets. The name itself, however, comes from the original debt certificates issued by the Bank of England being literally 'gilt-edged'. The Government mostly covers its annual fiscal deficit by issuing gilts.
