How Nvidia became the world's first $4 trillion company
Robbie Whelan , Asa Fitch , Muhammad Shumail , The Wall Street Journal The chip maker at the beating heart of the AI boom is embedded in gaming, data centers and crypto mining. Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia. Gift this article
Nvidia became the first company in history to reach a market value of $4 trillion, beating rivals Apple and Microsoft to the milestone in Wednesday morning trading on the Tech-heavy Nasdaq exchange.
Nvidia became the first company in history to reach a market value of $4 trillion, beating rivals Apple and Microsoft to the milestone in Wednesday morning trading on the Tech-heavy Nasdaq exchange.
The AI chip giant has seen its fortunes surge over the past three years thanks to the rise of generative artificial intelligence, an emerging technology that promises to revolutionize business and remake how humans interact with technology across the globe.
Nvidia, based in Santa Clara, Calif., designs the chips, known as graphics processing units, or GPUs, that power the AI industry. The rally in Nvidia's shares caps a remarkable run and comes barely two years after the company notched a $1 trillion closing valuation for the first time. The AI chip maker which closed at $162.88 a share and just shy of the $4 trillion mark, is now worth as much as the 214 smallest companies in the S&P 500 combined, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
Apple and Microsoft have come close to the $4 trillion mark. Apple closed with a market cap of $3.915 trillion in late 2024, and Microsoft had a valuation of $3.708 trillion last week.
Founded by Taiwanese-American engineer Jensen Huang in 1993, Nvidia initially had a much more niche purpose: making personal-computer game graphics better. Its ascendance from a graphics-chip designer catering mainly to videogamers into the digital arms dealer at the red-hot center of the AI boom has been meteoric.
Earlier this year Nvidia faced one of its biggest challenges ever when DeepSeek, a lower-priced Chinese chatbot, launched after being developed much more quickly and cheaply than most large language models.
DeepSeek, which was developed using about 2,000 Nvidia H800 processors—significantly fewer than most competitors use—proved that developers could create powerful AI software more cheaply and without using as much computing power as previously believed necessary. Nvidia's stock tumbled nearly 20% on that news but has more than recovered on the promise of higher spending by the company's biggest customers.
In its early years, Nvidia grew with the gaming industry, becoming, alongside Advanced Micro Devices, a market leader. But Huang had bigger ambitions. There was a wider range of computational tasks that he thought his chips could accelerate.
About a decade and a half ago, Nvidia planted the seeds for that to happen by developing software that allowed people to use its chips for purposes other than graphics processing.
The development of cloud computing and an increased focus on scientific computing led Huang's company to a new frontier: data centers powered by Nvidia's processors. Their uses expanded from there, including for cryptocurrency mining, where they flourished for a time. It also led to their wide use in machine learning, computer vision and other nascent AI applications.
Starting in the early 2010s, the company began producing increasingly powerful chips, naming each new 'architecture," or design, for famous physicists and other scientists such as James Clerk Maxwell, Johannes Kepler, Alan Turing and Ada Lovelace. For roughly two decades, Nvidia fell into a regular pace of releasing a new generation of chips every two to four years.
More recently, as AI technology has ramped up, that cycle has shortened dramatically—now, the company says that it aims to maintain a cadence of releasing a new generation of chips every year.
In March 2022, the company released its Hopper generation of chips, which proved a massive hit with AI software developers for its improvements in memory and computing power. Nvidia sold millions of its Hopper H100 chips in 2023 alone, helping power the company past a market value of $2 trillion.
Last year, Nvidia released its newest microarchitecture, Blackwell, which represented its most powerful GPUs yet, including the B200, which crams 208 billion transistors onto a chip roughly the size of four Scrabble tiles arranged in a square.
Demand has been nearly insatiable for these chips, as large customers such as Meta Platforms, OpenAI and Google-owner Alphabet race to accumulate the firepower to develop the most sophisticated chatbots and other large language models ever made.
Any AI chip Nvidia could make was quickly snapped up, even though they cost tens of thousands of dollars each. Tech companies boasted about how many thousands of Nvidia chips they were buying; sprawling data centers were built to house them. Huang took on an almost Steve Jobsian aura—part-celebrity, part-oracle—cutting a distinctive figure with his signature black leather jackets.
There have been some ups and downs. Both the Biden and Trump administrations have placed strict limits on Nvidia's ability to sell many of its most powerful AI chips in China, treating them almost as strategic national-security assets.
In October 2023, the Biden White House curbed China sales of the company's H800 chip, a processor that Nvidia had begun offering just seven months before. Then, in April of this year, the Trump administration limited sales of another chip, the H20, to China, leading Nvidia to take a $5.5 billion write-down.
'With the current export controls, we are effectively out of the China data-center market, which is now served only by competitors such as Huawei," an Nvidia spokesman said Wednesday.
Nvidia's revenue rose in tandem with its stock price. Two years ago, it had $7.2 billion of revenue in its May quarter. This year it had $44.1 billion—an enormous number for a business with a gross profit margin above 70%.
Write to Robbie Whelan at robbie.whelan@wsj.com, Asa Fitch at asa.fitch@wsj.com and Muhammad Shumail at muhammad.shumail@wsj.com Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News , Corporate news , Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Wall Street week ahead: Focus on further fallout from weak jobs data, fresh Q2 earnings
After US stock indices fell sharply on Friday following weak jobs data and stiffer tariffs on several American trading partners, focus of Wall Street investors in the week ahead would be on any further fallout from the non-farm payroll numbers and fresh earnings reports. Following the jobs data, US President Donald Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Erika McEntarfer. Trump accused the BLS Commissioner of faking the jobs numbers without providing any evidence of data manipulation. Meanwhile, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBS that Trump had "real concerns" about the data, while Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said the president "is right to call for new leadership." The economic calendar in the week ahead will be fairly light with data on services PMI and consumer credit slated to be released. On the earnings front, market participants will see finacial results from theme park and entertainment giant Walt Disney, pharma majors Pfizer and Eli Lilly. On August 4 (Monday), a report on Factory orders for June will be released. On August 5 (Tuesday), separate reports on US trade deficit for June, S&P final US services PMI for July, and ISM services for July will be released. On August 7 (Thursday), separate reports on initial jobless claims for the week ended August 2, US productivity for the second quarter (Q2), wholesale inventories for June, and consumer credit for June will be released. Following companies are due to report second quarter results in the week ahead — Palantir, ON Semiconductor, AMD, Caterpillar, Pfizer, Apollo Global Management, Yum! Brands, McDonald's, Walt Disney, Shopify, DoorDash, Eli Lilly, ConocoPhillips, Block, and Take-Two. US stocks slumped on Friday as new American tariffs on dozens of trading partners and a weak jobs data spurred selling pressure. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 542.40 points, or 1.23%, to 43,588.58, the S&P 500 lost 101.38 points, or 1.60%, to 6,238.01 and the Nasdaq Composite lost 472.32 points, or 2.24%, to 20,650.13. For the week, the S&P 500 fell 2.36%, the Nasdaq declined 2.17%, and the Dow fell 2.92%.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Anthropic CEO fires back at NVIDIA's Jensen Huang sparking explosive AI ethics clash. Calls his words 'the most outrageous lie'
— BigTechPod (@BigTechPod) A Battle of Beliefs Race to the Top vs. Race to the Bottom A Clash Rooted in Business and Belief In a sharply worded rebuttal that adds heat to an already simmering Silicon Valley rivalry Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has accused NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang of twisting his words and intentions on AI governance and safety. Speaking on the Big Technology Podcast, Amodei slammed Huang's claim that Anthropic believes only it should be allowed to develop advanced AI systems.'That's the most outrageous lie I've ever heard,' Amodei said, visibly frustrated. 'I've said nothing that anywhere near resembles the idea that this company should be the only one to build the technology.'The comments come amid a widening philosophical divide in the tech world—between those calling for controlled, measured AI deployment and others advocating for open innovation at full feud escalated after Jensen Huang publicly accused Amodei of advocating for exclusive control over AI development. During VivaTech 2025 in Paris, Huang told reporters, 'He thinks AI is so scary, but only they should do it,' referring to Amodei's lobbying for export controls on semiconductor technology and repeated warnings about AI's disruptive has indeed sounded the alarm on AI's capacity to wipe out as much as 20% of entry-level white-collar jobs in the next five years—a prediction he shared with Axios earlier this year. Huang, on the other hand, has remained consistently upbeat, insisting AI will transform rather than destroy jobs.'I pretty much disagree with almost everything he says,' Huang said at the the podcast, Amodei elaborated on what he calls a 'race to the top'—an approach he believes all AI developers should follow. 'When you have a race to the bottom, it doesn't matter who wins—everyone loses,' he said. 'With a race to the top, it doesn't matter who wins because everyone wins.'He pointed to Anthropic's transparent policies, such as their 'Responsible Scaling Policy' and open-access interpretability research, as proof that the company is not hoarding progress behind closed doors. Instead, he argued, these initiatives were designed to encourage safer practices across the entire industry.'We've released our work so others can build on it,' Amodei said. 'Sometimes that means giving up commercial advantages—but it's worth it for the field to grow responsibly.'There may also be financial motivations at play in this war of words. Amodei's support for semiconductor export controls to China could hinder NVIDIA's massive chip sales, particularly in the AI boom where demand for powerful GPUs is soaring. Huang, whose company stands to lose billions if such restrictions tighten, has not held back his criticism of however, is adamant that the friction isn't about limiting competition but about fostering responsibility in an industry where mistakes can have global consequences.'It's just an incredible and bad faith distortion,' he said of Huang's the race toward superintelligence intensifies, the dispute between Amodei and Huang highlights an essential question: who gets to define 'safe' in the age of AI?While Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic continue pushing the frontiers of artificial intelligence , the real divide may not lie in model sizes or compute power—but in values. Should AI be guided by market dynamics and open-source contributions, as Huang believes? Or does it need more control and caution, as Amodei argues?
Economic Times
4 hours ago
- Economic Times
Anthropic CEO fires back at NVIDIA's Jensen Huang sparking explosive AI ethics clash. Calls his words 'the most outrageous lie'
AP In a heated exchange, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei refuted NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's claims about his stance on AI governance, calling them an "outrageous lie." Amodei advocates for responsible AI development, emphasizing safety and transparency, while Huang champions open innovation and market-driven progress. In a sharply worded rebuttal that adds heat to an already simmering Silicon Valley rivalry, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has accused NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang of twisting his words and intentions on AI governance and safety. Speaking on the Big Technology Podcast , Amodei slammed Huang's claim that Anthropic believes only it should be allowed to develop advanced AI systems. 'That's the most outrageous lie I've ever heard,' Amodei said, visibly frustrated. 'I've said nothing that anywhere near resembles the idea that this company should be the only one to build the technology.' The comments come amid a widening philosophical divide in the tech world—between those calling for controlled, measured AI deployment and others advocating for open innovation at full throttle. — BigTechPod (@BigTechPod) The feud escalated after Jensen Huang publicly accused Amodei of advocating for exclusive control over AI development. During VivaTech 2025 in Paris, Huang told reporters, 'He thinks AI is so scary, but only they should do it,' referring to Amodei's lobbying for export controls on semiconductor technology and repeated warnings about AI's disruptive potential. Amodei has indeed sounded the alarm on AI's capacity to wipe out as much as 20% of entry-level white-collar jobs in the next five years—a prediction he shared with Axios earlier this year. Huang, on the other hand, has remained consistently upbeat, insisting AI will transform rather than destroy jobs. 'I pretty much disagree with almost everything he says,' Huang said at the summit. On the podcast, Amodei elaborated on what he calls a 'race to the top'—an approach he believes all AI developers should follow. 'When you have a race to the bottom, it doesn't matter who wins—everyone loses,' he said. 'With a race to the top, it doesn't matter who wins because everyone wins.' He pointed to Anthropic's transparent policies, such as their 'Responsible Scaling Policy' and open-access interpretability research, as proof that the company is not hoarding progress behind closed doors. Instead, he argued, these initiatives were designed to encourage safer practices across the entire industry. 'We've released our work so others can build on it,' Amodei said. 'Sometimes that means giving up commercial advantages—but it's worth it for the field to grow responsibly.' There may also be financial motivations at play in this war of words. Amodei's support for semiconductor export controls to China could hinder NVIDIA's massive chip sales, particularly in the AI boom where demand for powerful GPUs is soaring. Huang, whose company stands to lose billions if such restrictions tighten, has not held back his criticism of Amodei. Amodei, however, is adamant that the friction isn't about limiting competition but about fostering responsibility in an industry where mistakes can have global consequences. 'It's just an incredible and bad faith distortion,' he said of Huang's the race toward superintelligence intensifies, the dispute between Amodei and Huang highlights an essential question: who gets to define 'safe' in the age of AI? While Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic continue pushing the frontiers of artificial intelligence, the real divide may not lie in model sizes or compute power—but in values. Should AI be guided by market dynamics and open-source contributions, as Huang believes? Or does it need more control and caution, as Amodei argues?
