logo
Margins compressed, growth intact: What's next for Shriram Finance?

Margins compressed, growth intact: What's next for Shriram Finance?

Indian Express28-05-2025

When the IL&FS crisis hit in late 2018, India's NBFC sector was thrown into disarray.
Liquidity dried up, credit growth stalled, and confidence in shadow banks took a big hit. Shriram Transport Finance, then focused mostly on used commercial vehicle (CV) loans, was no exception. The stock dropped sharply, not just because of refinancing worries and economic slowdown, but also due to confusion around the group's plans.
In 2017, Shriram had announced a complex merger with IDFC Bank to create a full-service financial company. But the deal was called off within months because both sides couldn't agree on the structure and valuation. Around the same time, Piramal Enterprises, which owned a large stake in Shriram, was exploring ways to consolidate the group under one roof. That too didn't materialise. Eventually, Piramal exited its investment in 2019. This period of uncertainty and failed deals only made investors more cautious.
But over the next five years, through a combination of operational resilience, conservative lending, and a well-timed merger with Shriram City Union Finance, the business transformed. What was once seen as a CV loan-heavy NBFC became a diversified retail lending powerhouse with a Rs 2.6 trillion loan book, strong rural reach, and improving profitability across segments.
The market took note. From its 2019 lows to early 2025, the stock delivered 6x returns, far outpacing most peers in the sector.
As of Q4 FY25, with 17% AUM growth, 3.5% RoA, and a rebalanced portfolio that's less dependent on CVs, Shriram Finance looks stronger. Yet, concerns around net interest margin (NIM) compression, asset quality, and macro cyclicality persist.
So the big question is: After a six-fold rally, does Shriram Finance still offer upside, or has it already played its best hand?
Let's break it down.
To understand Shriram Finance's transformation, you have to start with what it used to be.
Before the 2022 merger, Shriram Transport Finance (STFC) was India's largest lender in one specific segment that used commercial vehicles.
Think second-hand trucks used by small fleet owners, drivers who own 2-3 vehicles, or even first-time entrepreneurs looking to haul goods across India. It's a gritty, operationally intense business where borrowers often don't have formal income proof, repayments are cash-based, and collection happens through deep field relationships.
But Shriram made it work, building a Rs 1 trillion+ loan book in this niche alone, with enviable margins and reach into rural and semi-urban India.
Then came Shriram City Union Finance (SCUF), a sister concern focused on smaller-ticket retail loans: two-wheelers, gold loans, MSME lending, and personal loans. When the two companies merged in late 2022, the new entity, Shriram Finance Ltd, suddenly had a much broader product mix.
And that's where the story changed.
The CV lending business, while profitable, is deeply cyclical. It depends on infrastructure activity, freight rates, fuel prices, and overall economic momentum. So when STFC merged with SCUF, it wasn't just about scale. It was about reducing volatility and tapping new growth engines.
Here's how the portfolio looks now:
That shift changes the risk profile of the company. Gold loans, for instance, are fully collateralised and offer short tenors. MSME loans are mostly secured against property. Even two-wheeler borrowers, while riskier than salaried home loan customers, are often repeat clients with long-standing relationships.
In short, Shriram is no longer a one-trick CV lender; it's now a diversified retail NBFC with a much more balanced revenue stream.
Let's unpack the key financial metrics driving this 6x stock performance.
Shriram's loan book crossed Rs 2.6 trillion in Q4 FY25 — a 17% YoY growth. Some segments, like MSME loans and two-wheelers, are growing at 25-40% annually.
Shriram consistently delivers an RoA of 3.0-3.3%, one of the best in the NBFC sector. Most banks struggle to cross 1.5%. Even top-tier NBFCs like Cholamandalam and Bajaj Housing Finance operate in the 2.5-3.0% zone. So why is Shriram higher?
Because of two things:
This is a high-spread business that is messy, labour-intensive, but profitable.
In Q4 FY25, NIM slipped to 8.55% from 8.84% a year ago.
Why? Not because yields dropped, but because Shriram was sitting on excess liquidity — Rs 3,100 crore parked in cash and liquid instruments. That dragged margins down temporarily.
The good news? Management says this cash will be deployed in the coming quarters, pushing NIMs back up to ~8.7-8.8%.
Despite lending to relatively informal segments, credit costs remain below 2%. The reason? Most of Shriram's portfolio is secured or relationship-based. Field officers know the customers. Collateral exists. And recovery is boots-on-ground, not call-center-driven.
If you strip away the complexity, here's what's happening:
That's what has driven the stock from ~Rs 100 to ~Rs 600 (adjusted) in just five years.
But as always, past returns don't guarantee future performance. The question now is whether Shriram can sustain this momentum, navigate upcoming risks, and justify a further re-rating.
One of Shriram's biggest strategic advantages is its geography.
While most NBFCs chase salaried borrowers in metros, Shriram built its model around tier-2 and tier-3 cities and rural India. As of FY25, around 68% of its business comes from semi-urban and rural markets. And this isn't new; it has built trust in these regions over decades.
That's why it's able to:
In a country where 60% of the population still lives in rural areas, this isn't a bug, it's a moat.
And the demand? Despite inflationary pressure and some early-stage rural stress, Shriram has seen steady loan demand, especially for two-wheelers, MSME expansion, and personal consumption.
Now with monsoon forecasts looking stable and rural incomes expected to rise, the next few quarters could see even stronger disbursements.
Let's revisit the product mix.
Analysts believe that the shift toward MSME and 2W will help Shriram maintain 9%+ NIMs over the next few years, even as the CV segment normalises.
This diversification is critical. It means that if truck demand slows, Shriram isn't exposed the way it used to be five years ago.
While fintechs were raising capital and lending aggressively, Shriram stuck to its old-school playbook:
Shriram has also been reducing its reliance on bank loans and high-cost sub-debt. Plus, the company is clear: it doesn't want to chase 25-30% growth. It wants sustainable 15-18% growth with stable RoA. That's how you avoid boom-bust cycles.
Now the flipside.
In Q4 FY25, NIM dropped to 8.55%, down from over 8.84% a year ago. Why?
Management says NIMs should bounce back in FY26 once the funds are deployed. But if loan growth slows or the cost of funds remains high, margins could stay compressed longer than expected.
Shriram's gross Stage 3 loans fell to 4.55% in Q4 FY25, helped by a large technical write-off. That's good. But it came at a cost: provision coverage dropped from 51% to 43%.
The company says this is manageable and in line with pre-Covid norms. But the cushion is thinner now. Also:
In other words: nothing alarming, but no room for complacency either.
Shriram's business is still closely tied to macroeconomic health.
To add to this intensifying competition, Mahindra Finance, Chola, and even fintech-led lenders are targeting similar customer segments.
Shriram's edge lies in its legacy systems, physical presence, and local credit assessment. But in a rising rate environment with aggressive peers, it will have to stay sharp.
So far, Shriram has managed to balance growth, profitability, and risk extremely well. But the next phase won't be automatic.
In the final section, let's look at valuations, earnings potential, and whether the stock still offers room for upside.
Despite the 6x rally over five years, Shriram Finance's current valuation still feels conservative when compared to peers.
However, some of Shriram's peers like Cholamandalam or Sundaram Finance already trade above those levels despite similar return ratios.
So why the discount?
Because the market is factoring in:
But that also opens a window.
If Shriram delivers on what it's guiding:
According to consensus estimates compiled by Trendlyne, PAT could reach Rs 11,000-12,000 crore by FY27.
At even a modest 2x P/B multiple, that would imply a stock price range of Rs 750-825 over the next 18-24 months.
That's about 25-35% upside from current levels, without needing a re-rating to extreme valuations.
Note: This is not a prediction of where the stock price could head. It's just an if-then calculation for academic purposes.
On the flip side, here's what investors should keep an eye on:
If any of this plays out, the upside gets capped, and valuation could settle around 1.5-1.6x P/B, implying limited near-term returns.
Shriram Finance is no longer an undervalued turnaround. It's a well-run, scaled-up, diversified NBFC that has matured post-merger. Its core strength lies in sticking to basics, that is, collecting dues, managing risk, and growing profitably in the heartlands of India.
The stock isn't dirt cheap anymore, but it's far from expensive, especially relative to peers with lower RoAs and higher valuations.
If you're looking for a rapid multibagger, this may not be your next bet. But if you want steady compounding, exposure to India's rural credit story, and a high-yield lender with strong return ratios, Shriram Finance is worth tracking closely.
The next leg of value creation won't come from P/E expansion. It'll come from execution.
Note: This article relies on data from annual and industry reports. We have used our assumptions for forecasting.
Parth Parikh has over a decade of experience in finance and research and currently heads the growth and content vertical at Finsire. He holds an FRM Charter and an MBA in Finance from Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meet fails to find consensus on Metro alignment in Thiruvananthapuram; state govt opts for further consultation
Meet fails to find consensus on Metro alignment in Thiruvananthapuram; state govt opts for further consultation

Time of India

time37 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Meet fails to find consensus on Metro alignment in Thiruvananthapuram; state govt opts for further consultation

Thiruvananthapuram: The long-pending Metro rail project in the state capital has hit another roadblock, as the high-level meeting chaired by chief minister on Wednesday failed to finalise the alignment. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Instead, the state govt decided to constitute an advisory committee to consult stakeholders on the various alignment proposals, effectively pushing the project back to square one. According to sources, the decision to form the committee was taken after multiple stakeholders presented differing alignment suggestions, complicating the planning process. The committee will be formed under the leadership of the chief secretary. It will examine related matters and submit its recommendations. The committee will include the secretaries of revenue, finance, local self-govt and transport departments. Kochi Metro Rail Limited (KMRL), the implementing agency of the project, presented six alignment options during the meeting. However, Shashi Tharoor, MP, who participated online, also submitted his alignment proposals, prompting the chief minister to recommend further stakeholder consultation before moving forward. In a post on social media platform X, Tharoor wrote, "Had a very constructive online meeting this morning (Wednesday), chaired by the Chief Minister @pinarayivijayan, to discuss plans for a Metro in Thiruvananthapuram, something I have been clamouring for ever since becoming an MP." He added that an advisory committee would be formed to evaluate the proposals. "Our vision for the Metro must be to anticipate the needs of generations yet unborn," Tharoor posted. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "I am confident that, with the right approach, we can make Thiruvananthapuram an ideal capital city for the 21st century," he added. Meanwhile, KMRL chief Loknath Behera described the meeting as positive and expressed hope that a final decision would be made soon. "A presentation about the alignments of the proposed Metro rail in Thiruvananthapuram was completed. Now, the govt has to take a final decision," he told TOI. Once the alignment is finalised, it will be handed back to KMRL to revise the detailed project report (DPR) originally prepared by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC). The DPR's executive summary was submitted to the state govt in Feb 2024. The finance department gave its approval to the project earlier this year. After the chief minister's nod, the project will be sent to the state cabinet for final clearance. In the 2025-26 state budget, the govt announced that preliminary work on the Metro would begin within the year. However, alignment disputes continue to stall progress. The transport department earlier rejected DMRC's original alignment, citing impracticalities and suggested an alternative route beginning at Kazhakkoottam instead of Pallipuram on NH 66. As per the previous cost estimate prepared by DMRC, the project will cost Rs 11,560.8 crore. The KMRL proposed a conventional Metro in Thiruvananthapuram instead of a light Metro, which was initially proposed. It was earlier said that DMRC would submit the report to the KMRL in Jan last year, which would in turn submit it to the state govt by the end of Jan after reviewing it. However, it was delayed.

Ranchi vendor markets sinking under choked drains, unhygienic surroundings, & poor infra
Ranchi vendor markets sinking under choked drains, unhygienic surroundings, & poor infra

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Ranchi vendor markets sinking under choked drains, unhygienic surroundings, & poor infra

1 2 Ranchi: The city's main vendor markets, especially Naga Baba Khatal and Kokar, are characterised by choked drains, unhygienic surroundings, and poor infrastructure. These public spaces remain on the margins of municipal attention in spite of being important areas in a civilised society. A vendor at Rs 10.86-crore valued Naga Baba Khatal Vendor Market, Rekha Devi, said, "Overflowing drains, stagnant water, and heaps of rotting vegetables have turned the area unbearable. Even a small shower turns this place into a filthy swamp. The stink is terrible. Customers avoid coming here." Echoing the statement, customer Neha Kumari said, "The area lacks drainage system. We have to walk in muck mixed with vegetable waste. Toilets are barely usable, especially for women." At Kokar Vendor Market, vendors operate beside garbage piles and blocked drains. "The waste isn't picked up regularly, turning into heaps and lying scattered with rainwater," said Imran, a fruit seller. The Atal Vendor Market, built at a cost of Rs 54 crore with 478 shops, is structurally better but overcrowded. Vendors and customers struggle to navigate narrow congested passages. "There's no space to walk during rush hours, especially when shopkeepers display goods outside their stalls," said Arun Kumar, a vendor. Though these markets were constructed to decongest roads and fight encroachments, their neglected condition is forcing vendors back onto roads and footpaths. "The markets helped control encroachment to some extent. However, the vendors prefer doing their business from the roadside, where footfall is higher and conditions are manageable," said Shabnam Ansari, a vendor at Naga Baba Market. Assistant municipal commissioner Nikesh Kumar said, "Each market has four to five cleaning staff. Restoration files have been submitted to the authorities. Upgradation of infrastructure would begin based on approval." "For hundreds of vendors and thousands of customers, restoring hygiene and functionality in these markets isn't about comfortbut survival," said Ritu Sinha, another customer at the Atal Vendor Market.

After SC order, MMRDA seeks price bids from L&T on projects
After SC order, MMRDA seeks price bids from L&T on projects

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

After SC order, MMRDA seeks price bids from L&T on projects

Mumbai: Nearly two weeks after MMRDA informed Supreme Court that it had "in public interest" scrapped its tenders for the Thane-Ghodbunder-Bhayander twin tunnel and elevated road projects—collectively estimated at Rs 14,000 crore—the planning authority has sought detailed financial estimates from infrastructure giant Larsen & Toubro (L&T). Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The projects include an underground road tunnel from Gaimukh to Fountain Hotel Junction on Ghodbunder Road and an elevated road from Fountain Hotel Junction to Bhayander. Sources said MMRDA sent a letter on June 10 asking L&T to submit detailed financial estimates/price bids, rate analysis and justification and related documents in seven working days "to ensure completeness of the bid records" and "further transparency and public interest". The tender process for the projects had landed in court after MMRDA disqualified L&T from the technical bids round by declaring it non-responsive, saying it had failed to submit a mandatory affidavit. The affidavit required bidders to declare that none of their bridges had collapsed within two years of completion. Megha Engineering and Infrastructure, a prominent purchaser of electoral bonds prior to being scrapped by the apex court, was declared the successful bidder. L&T then moved Bombay HC, alleging lack of clarity over the rejection and the decision not to open its financial bids. HC granted a temporary stay on the opening of price bids on May 13 but dismissed L&T's petitions on May 20, observing "material suppression" by the company. The court upheld MMRDA's tendering process. L&T approached SC, which expressed surprise that technical bids of a firm that had built Central Vista and Atal Setu had been rejected. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The company disclosed during the proceedings that its quoted prices were significantly lower—Rs 6,498 crore for the tunnel and Rs 5,554 crore for the elevated road. SC was informed that the difference was over Rs 3,100 crore between the lowest bidder and L&T. The bench asked MMRDA how L&T could be technically disqualified from the projects in that case and directed it to check with the state govt if it was willing to re-tender the projects. SC disposed of L&T's petition after MMRDA agreed to re-tender the projects. MMRDA has since maintained that both SC and HC had upheld its submission, but that in deference to the courts and in line with its institutional commitment to transparency, it was decided that both tenders would be scrapped and a fresh tender process would be initiated. In its June 10 letter, it said it had decided to voluntarily scrap the tenders and revise cost estimates in the "spirit of transparency and larger public interest. "

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store