
ICS 2025: Strike the right narrative, then stick to it
HighlightsNidhi Verma, Senior Vice President at Tata Consumer Products, emphasized the importance of self-awareness for brands, stating that authenticity is key to building trust with customers. Akanksha Jain, Assistant Vice President of PR and Communications at Swiggy, highlighted the shift in consumer behavior post-pandemic, urging brands to adopt more genuine narratives that align with their core values. Nikhil Bharadwaj, Vice President and Head of Corporate Communications at Bajaj Allianz General Insurance, pointed out that trust in the insurance industry is built through honoring claims and sharing genuine customer stories.
In today's VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous) world, maintaining the authenticity of a narrative is crucial. Just as nations strive to control their narratives, corporations aim to project and preserve their brand stories.
At the recently concluded
India Communication Summit
2025, industry leaders gathered to explore how brands can safeguard their narratives in a dynamic environment. They emphasised that a consistent and genuine narrative helps build trust and credibility.
The session featured Nidhi Verma, senior vice president, head – investor relations,
corporate communications
and vending business, Tata Consumer Products; Sipika Khandka, director and head of corporate communications, Myntra; Nikhil Bharadwaj, vice president and head – corporate communications, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance; Akanksha Jain, AVP – PR and communications, Swiggy; Shilpashree Muniswamappa, director – ESG and communications, Colgate-Palmolive India; and Nitin Mantri, president, APAC, We. and group CEO, AVIAN We. The session was chaired by Manisha Singh, corporate vice president and head of corporate communications and CSR, Axis Max Life Insurance.
Verma spoke about the importance of understanding what authenticity means for a company, noting that self-awareness is key. If a brand follows trends or portrays something it is not, customers will quickly see through it. Knowing your values and staying true to them is the first step towards building authentic narratives.
'One thumb rule we follow before launching any campaign is to ask, 'Is this who we are even when no one's watching?' This principle helps ensure that the brand remains authentic to its core values,' Verma said.
Khandka shared that when the company launched, with e-commerce still in its early days, the focus was on democratising fashion through technology—a theme central to its early storytelling. However, a few years later, the company paused to re-evaluate whether this narrative still reflected its essence. The conclusion was clear: it was time for a shift.
Today, the brand's purpose is to inspire vibrant, joyful self-expression and expand fashion possibilities across India. This vision shapes campaigns, guides storytelling, and influences hiring and internal communications, ensuring brand values are reflected across all levels.
Bharadwaj pointed out that there are no shortcuts in insurance and that trust is built by honouring claims. 'Insurance is about selling a story. You're not selling a tangible product, but a narrative. If you're genuine in your commitment, customers will trust you. And that trust comes from paying claims—there's no other way. You must consistently share stories of claims you've settled.'
He added, 'Authenticity grows when customers speak positively about their experiences, especially after receiving a claim. It's not about promising the cheapest policy or vague assurances like 'We'll be there when you need us.' People need to understand that insurance is not the business of collecting money—it's the business of paying claims.'
Jain spoke about the shift in consumer behaviour post-pandemic, which pushed brands to adopt more authentic narratives. 'During COVID, consumers began valuing what is real and authentic over fairytale stories. Brands had to wake up, take a stance, and return to the drawing board to craft a playbook for more genuine storytelling across all platforms.'
According to Jain, this shift coincided with the rise of Gen Z, who, according to research, prefer brands with a clear purpose.
'Your narrative must align with your core values to avoid feeling like a hard sell, which fails to connect. Authenticity should be seamless across all touchpoints—from campaigns to customer interactions—to ensure the brand remains genuine.
'You can't have authentic storytelling on one platform while pushing aggressive sales on another. Similarly, if senior management champions a narrative but the on-ground team doesn't reflect it, the effect is diminished. Authenticity must flow from top to bottom for a cohesive brand story.'
Muniswamappa shared an example from her time at Alstom, a company known for manufacturing trains and metros. 'I hadn't realised how passionate many young people in India are about trains,' she said. 'People would eagerly point out Alstom's contributions—like their role in the Make in India initiative, the jobs they've created, and their supply chain efforts. By keeping your narrative focused and consistent, and delivering on your promises, you build trust. That's the only way to foster long-term confidence among stakeholders.'
Mantri said, 'Legacy is a platform to nurture and build upon, not a museum piece to be preserved.'
'Inconsistent narratives over time erode trust, as they signal dishonesty in the brand. Our research revealed that customers may quickly embrace a brand, but they're equally quick to criticise if something goes wrong. This raises a critical question: if your brand faces swift backlash, how deep is its relevance and loyalty among customers?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Rapido's food delivery entry unlikely to dent duopoly, say brokerages
Rapido's foray into food delivery through a pilot in Bengaluru is unlikely to materially disrupt the entrenched duopoly of Zomato and Swiggy, multiple brokerages said in separate notes, citing the operational complexity, capital intensity and customer experience challenges inherent to the business. TOI reported on Monday, Bengaluru-based Rapido is currently preparing to launch its food delivery service with a fundamentally different pricing structure, choosing flat fees over traditional percentage commissions charged to restaurants. The move positioned the ride-hailing firm as a challenger to Zomato and Swiggy at a time when small restaurant owners are increasingly vocal about rising aggregator costs. Rapido plans to charge a fixed Rs 25 on food orders below Rs 400 and Rs 50 for those above. These charges are flat fees deducted from the order value, paid by the restaurant to Rapido. Bernstein's Rahul Malhotra noted that while Rapido plans to leverage its over 3 million rider base and charge lower take rates, 'new entrants have been unsuccessful in the past.' Malhotra cited prior attempts by Amazon, Ola and ONDC that failed to scale due to limited restaurant selection, fragmented supply, and weak customer experience. He added that India's food delivery market, dominated by Zomato and Swiggy with 54% and 46% market shares respectively, has become operationally complex with over 200,000 to 300,000 restaurants, posing high barriers to scale for new players. Elara Capital's Karan Taurani acknowledged Rapido's cross-utilisation model, where its rider network may reduce incremental capital expenditure. However, Taurani warned that 'the absence of a dedicated fleet may compromise the delivery experience, especially with rising sub-30 minute delivery expectations.' Elara's sensitivity analysis suggested that even a moderate impact from Rapido could lead to a 6% cut in the target price of Eternal (Zomato), should revenue growth or valuation multiples weaken due to pricing pressures. HSBC analysts Yogesh Aggarwal, Prateek Maheshwari and Sagar Desai pointed out that while the underlying cost structures of two-wheeler ride-sharing and food delivery are similar, scaling food delivery demands sustained execution. They argued that "customer experience, ability to execute, and achieving scale remain key challenges" for Rapido. The analysts also flagged that long-term industry growth is already moderating, with most of the incremental demand expected to come from higher order frequencies rather than significant customer base expansion. Kotak Institutional Equities, in its sector alert, described Rapido's entry as having 'no immediate impact' on the incumbents. It reiterated that Zomato and Swiggy have built significant operational moats in logistics, customer loyalty, and dense restaurant partnerships, making material share shifts unlikely in the near term. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
6 hours ago
- Business Standard
Rapido pilots food delivery in Bengaluru; analysts see limited impact
As mobility platform Rapido begins piloting a food delivery service in Bengaluru, analysts expect limited disruption to India's entrenched food delivery giants. According to a recent report by Bernstein, the market remains a tight duopoly, with Zomato holding approximately 54 per cent share and rival Swiggy at 46 per cent. While Swiggy has shown stronger year-on-year growth in gross order value (GOV), the US-based asset manager does not foresee Rapido's entry shifting the balance in the near term. 'We don't anticipate material market share impact from Rapido's entry,' said Rahul Malhotra, an analyst at Bernstein, noting that the service remains in its early pilot phase. Rapido, which provides bike and taxi services, has announced plans to enter the food delivery business with a pilot launch in Bengaluru. The firm, which has raised about $600 million, plans to leverage its rider base (over 3 million) and charge lower take rates of 8–15 per cent. In comparison, Zomato and Swiggy take rates are higher at 18–20 per cent, according to the Bernstein report. India's food delivery space has previously seen several entrants attempt to grow the restaurant base by offering lower take rates. These include Amazon, Ola, and ONDC. However, most failed to scale due to limited selection, poor customer experience, and operational complexity. Food delivery remains a challenging business. Online food aggregators must negotiate take rates with approximately 300,000 restaurants. India's market is highly fragmented—only 10 per cent of GOV comes from QSRs (quick service restaurants), with the remainder from smaller restaurants—making scale difficult and favouring incumbents. The Bernstein report noted that at low contribution margins, the flywheel effect fails. The average delivery cost per order is ₹50–60, so an 8–15 per cent take rate on a ₹400–500 order generates very low profitability, leaving little room for reinvestment or expansion into Tier 2 cities, where penetration is lower but growth potential higher. Rapido could expand the restaurant pool (currently 300,000–400,000, with potential for over 1 million) by attracting lower AOV (average order value) restaurant outlets in Tier 2 and smaller markets. These outlets have not been viable for Zomato and Swiggy. 'We believe the ability to operate at low take rates will be difficult for Rapido,' said Malhotra in the report. 'Eventually, it will have to increase take rates to sustain.' The report also noted that Rapido remains an unprofitable business. Notably, Swiggy is an investor and holds a 12–13 per cent stake in the company. Bernstein continues to favour Zomato as its top pick, citing strong execution and growth in quick commerce. It also rated Swiggy as 'outperform', expecting the company to remain a key player in India's expanding convenience economy. Swiggy's food delivery GMV grew 18 per cent year-on-year in Q4FY25, compared to 16 per cent for Zomato. Swiggy's GOV growth has trended higher on a year-on-year basis over the past two quarters. Management also saw good traction in the 10-minute delivery service Bolt, which is available in 500 cities and accounts for 12 per cent of total food delivery orders. Zomato remains stronger on the supply side. Its average monthly restaurant partners stood at around 314,000 in Q4FY25, compared to 252,000 for Swiggy. Bernstein said Rapido would face difficulties negotiating with the over 500,000 restaurants currently associated with the two incumbents. HSBC, in a recent note, said the unit economics of two-wheeler ride-hailing are on par with food delivery, but warned that customer experience, operational execution, and scaling remain formidable challenges. The bank added that while newer players may tap into lower-margin segments, they are unlikely to meaningfully disrupt the dominance of market leaders. Separately, Kotak Institutional Equities reportedly said Rapido would need to invest aggressively in discounts and technology to gain a foothold in the food delivery business. With Zomato and Swiggy already deeply embedded in the restaurant and consumer networks, Kotak said the competitive threat posed by Rapido remains minimal. Disclosure: Entities controlled by the Kotak family have a significant holding in Business Standard Pvt Ltd
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
8 hours ago
- First Post
Rapido enters food delivery business to challenge Swiggy and Zomato
Some Industry observers believe the new venture has the potential to reshape India's online food delivery ecosystem, especially because of no commission charged. However, others point to previous unsuccessful attempts by ONDC, Amazon, and Ola read more Rapido has decided to make inroads into the online food delivery market- a space currently dominated by Swiggy and Zomato. Image: Moneycontrol Ride-hailing company Rapido has entered the food delivery market with the launch of a new zero-commission platform called Ownly in a move that seeks to disrupt the duopoly of Swiggy and Zomato in the country's fast-growing online ordering space. The Bengaluru-based start-up, which reportedly facilitates four million rides daily across 500 cities and serves 30 million monthly active users, is positioning Ownly as a transparent, cost-efficient alternative to dominant players that typically charge restaurants between 15 per cent and 25 per cent commission on every order. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Citing a communication shared with restaurant partners, Hindu Businessline reported that the company said, 'We are a zero commission platform that believes in honest pricing - offline price equals online price.' More from Business How Indian fintech startups are driving Malaysia's UPI-like digital payments revolution Unlike its rivals, Rapido's new venture will not impose commission fees, nor will it charge packaging or platform fees to customers, apart from statutory taxes. Cross-subsidised delivery model targets affordability Ownly's pricing model shifts the financial burden of delivery away from restaurants. For orders under Rs 400, restaurants will pay a Rs 25 delivery fee, and for higher-value orders, Rs 50. However, sources familiar with the company's pricing plan say Rapido is cross-subsidising delivery costs to keep the service affordable for customers. In practice, restaurants pay as little as Rs 10 on orders under Rs 100, while customers are charged Rs 20. For orders above Rs 100, restaurants pay a flat Rs 25 fee plus applicable GST, with Rapido absorbing the remaining costs. The company plans to introduce a fixed subscription model for restaurants once it achieves scale, while maintaining its commitment to zero commissions. 'Structurally, we hope to bring delivery costs down across the industry,' Rapido said in a note to partners. The platform has asked restaurants to list at least four meals priced under Rs 150 in an effort to keep the platform accessible to price-sensitive users. Restaurant visibility and competitive edge In a further departure from industry norms, Rapido is promising 'earned visibility' based on customer ratings, not paid promotions or discounts. This model, the company argues, will better reward quality and customer satisfaction, rather than advertising budgets. Some Industry observers believe the new venture has the potential to reshape India's online food delivery ecosystem. 'This could bring about a disruption in the market which is currently dominated by Swiggy and Zomato,' said an industry stakeholder familiar with Rapido's plans, quoted by The Hindu. Still, scepticism remains. In a recent research note, analysts at Bernstein pointed out that previous attempts by Amazon, Ola, and government-backed ONDC to break into the segment failed to gain meaningful traction. These efforts struggled with inconsistent customer experience, limited restaurant availability, and challenges related to India's fragmented supply chains. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD HSBC analysts echoed similar concerns in a separate report, noting that while there are cost parallels between two-wheeler ride-sharing and food delivery, maintaining user experience and scaling up operations will remain major obstacles, according to a report by Moneycontrol. Funding and strategic goals The launch of Ownly coincides with Rapido's latest funding round, which is expected to raise Rs 125 crore (approximately $15 million) from Nexus Ventures as part of its Series E. The additional capital could help subsidise early delivery costs and fund customer acquisition in a highly competitive market. The zero-commission model may resonate with smaller restaurant operators and cloud kitchens who have long protested the high fees levied by Swiggy and Zomato. However, Rapido's success in the space will hinge on its ability to attract a large user base, offer consistent delivery service, and maintain financial sustainability without the commission revenue stream that underpins its rivals.