Six-week pension delays after Rachel Reeves's Budget triggers panic
The chancellor 's October inheritance tax raid has sparked a surge in people seeking to take their cash out of retirement pots in a bid to avoid paying the levy, after Ms Reeves scrapped an exemption on them.
One person was left waiting two months for their payment, it has emerged.
Currently, the levy is charged at 40 per cent on assets over £325,000, with those passing on their main homes eligible for an extra £175,000 allowance meaning couples can pass on up to £1 million tax free.
But the changes, set to come into effect in April 2027, mean savers will see their pension pots counting towards the tally, dragging thousands more into paying inheritance tax.
It has led to a surge in retirees looking to withdraw cash from their pensions and spend it now in a bid to minimise their tax liabilities, leading to delays in the system, The Telegraph reported.
Daniel Hough, of wealth manager RBC Brewin Dolphin, said: 'There are widespread delays for people looking to withdraw money from their pensions, because providers have been inundated with requests since October's Budget.
'While prior to Christmas it would typically take around two weeks from receipt of the instruction or payment request, now it is nearer to six – we even had a case where it took two months for the client to receive their cash.
'It is no coincidence that this ties in with pensions being brought within individuals' estates for inheritance tax purposes, from April 6, 2027. In response, many people have come to the conclusion that they would rather spend the money, so are looking to cash in on their pension savings.'
When savers reach aged 55, they are eligible to withdraw a quarter of their pension tax free as a lump sum, with those made after subject to income tax.
'Tax-free lump sums appear to be taking longer, as they are, by definition, free of any taxation consequences,' Mr Hough added.
He said: 'Whether your pension provider is large or small, the delays are the same across the board. If you submit instructions, be prepared for the fact that it might take four or five weeks to complete, and speak to your financial advisor about the knock-on effect this may have for your financial situation in the coming months.'
The Treasury has been contacted for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
4 hours ago
- Leader Live
FUW give evidence to Westminster's Welsh Affairs Committee
Last week the Farmers' Union of Wales welcomed the opportunity to present evidence to Westminster's Welsh Affairs Committee inquiry into the challenges and opportunities facing farming in Wales in 2025. The FUW was represented by our Head of Policy, Gareth Parry, who was questioned by MPs on a number of the ongoing challenges facing Welsh agriculture; including the UK's withdrawal from the European Union, the changes to agricultural and business property relief and how changes to the UK Government's funding for Welsh agriculture will impact the sustainability of the sector. As part of the session, the FUW highlighted the impact the UK's departure from the EU has had due to the loss of the intermediate-term stability provided by the EU's seven year Multiannual Financial Framework. The lack of such replacement financial frameworks has allowed the UK Government to apply the Barnett Formula to any future adjustments to Welsh agricultural funding, meaning that Wales will receive subsequent uplifts based on a historical share of the UK population as opposed to rural needs. Beyond the uncertainty regarding future farm funding, the FUW also highlighted how successive UK governments' appetite to sign trade agreements with other countries has undermined domestic food production. These agreements threaten to pull the rug from beneath Welsh farmers by reforming agricultural policies and replacing domestic food production with imports, with little consideration of the economic viability of Welsh farming businesses. Several questions during the session focused on the proposed inheritance tax reforms, with Mr Parry relaying the latest figures from Family Business UK and CBI Economics on the potential impacts for the UK economy. In summary, the report suggests that the reduction in business activity will lead to a loss in Gross Value Added (GVA) of £14.8 billion over the next five years. These latest figures again demonstrate HM Treasury's failure to consider the wider economic and social impacts of the proposed changes, and far-reaching implications on Welsh family farms and the economy. Frustratingly, it's been clear since the Budget announcement that HM Treasury Officials have had no intention of even acknowledging our concerns. They have slammed the door on the industry and appear to have thrown away the key. It remains the case that the FUW are not calling for the policy to be scrapped, however we continue to seek an opportunity to design a policy with HM Treasury that works for genuine family farms whilst closing the loopholes that currently exist.
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Spending Review 2025: What's next for Northern Ireland?
Wednesday's UK Spending Review means Stormont ministers now know the rough size of their budget in the two years before the next assembly 2026, they will have about £16.3bn for day-to-day spending, up by about 2% in cash terms compared to this will initially rise by another 3% in cash terms in 2027 to £ Minister John O'Dowd did not waste any time in managing expectations about what this means. "The reality is the executive will still remain in a financially constrained position, particularly in 2026-27," he said."It is clear that significant challenges remain for our public services."Those challenges were obvious on the streets of Northern Ireland this week. The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI), which the chief constable says is "critically underfunded", had to ask for outside help after just two nights of violence. Justice Minister Naomi Long is bidding for funding for a policing recovery plan, which is one of many competing in the week, the independent budget watchdog, the NI Fiscal Council, warned there were no easy answers to the chronic underfunding of NI Water.A lack of investment in wastewater infrastructure is already undermining other executive aims to increase housing supply and tackle pollution. A 'needs-based' top-up for Stormont The Spending Review confirmed that for the foreseeable future Stormont will continue to get a "needs-based" financial was introduced when devolution returned last year and adds 24p to every £1 which comes to Northern Ireland via the standard devolution funding formula.A bid to increase the size of the top-up was not successful, though negotiations between Stormont and the Treasury with no immediate prospect of significant additional funds from London executive ministers will need to look again at how they spend what they have.A more stable Stormont means makes a strategic approach relatively intention is to use the Spending Review as an opportunity to agree a multi-year budget next year, the first time that will have happened in more than a decade. The Audit Office, a spending watchdog, has previously concluded that single-year budgets were hampering planning and innovation across NI public services."The executive now needs to move away from single-year, crisis budgets and take more ownership of its own financial position," said Ann Watt, director of the Pivotal think tank."A multi-year settlement provides a chance for ministers to plan for the next three years, and choose how best to prioritise spending, investment, reform and workforce planning."However she warned that a multi-year budget on its own will come nowhere near to solving the problems in NI public services."Transformation is essential," she said."This is the only way that services can be made sustainable and affordable for now and the future."A focus on prevention and early intervention is key."Some relative minor transformation projects are underway, funded by the financial package which accompanied the return of is probably only a limited window to start bolder, perhaps controversial, projects before the Stormont parties start to move into election mode in the second half of next year.
BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Failure 'not an option' says Derbyshire's new anti-waste chief
Reform UK's new efficiency chief in Derbyshire says the party's flagship anti-waste agenda will pull the council's finances "back from the brink", despite admitting there is "limited scope" for savings in the County Council has a net budget spend of roughly £770m and debt levels in the region of £400m. Its current budget plans - formed under the previous Conservative leaders - include a deficit of well over £30m, largely due to pressures on adult and children's social care and special educational is one of only a few of Reform's new councils that has made its efficiency drive into a formal cabinet position. John Lawson, the newly elected Breaston councillor who has a background in finance, will be leading the county's "Doge" drive, modelled after the Department of Government Efficiency previously overseen by Elon Musk in the says formalising the position in Derbyshire is part of a "concerted effort" to stop the council from going into special measures, which would be the "direction of travel" without their efforts."[The council] is in significant debt's not really the problem. The problem we see is the increase in runaway expenditure. The operating expenses of running the council," he said."The position we inherited was a council spending beyond its means." Rather than making cuts and slashing expenditure, the party's focus will be on making spending more efficient and effective with existing efficiency by 10% is seen as an achievable target over the course of the next few years, and while it is unclear how exactly this will be measured, attempting to maintain existing levels of spending against a backdrop of rising costs and demand will be the broad aim. Lawson says that in the past two years, the council has spent £238m more than it anticipated it would have to, roughly a 15 - 20% overspend, which he says cannot be wholly explained by rising costs and other external and assessing council contracts, as well as combing through the council's operating costs, are seen as a prime target for where efficiencies can be found. However, the former administration's budget plans passed by the council in February will be adhered to for the rest of the financial year."We're not looking to make any savings over and above that, other than the small savings that we've already made, because we're just still understanding where we are," Lawson said."Hopefully we can make more savings but I can't promise anything at the moment."If you come back in six months time hopefully we've managed to find £10m we can save, but I doubt that will be the case simply because we know that there have been cost pressures."Having said that, we know that over the last two years the Conservative administration massively overspent, so if we can rein some of that in then possibly we can make some savings."He rejected any suggestion the party had underestimated the scale of the difficulty in finding efficiencies. "70% of the council's spend is spent on very vulnerable there's very limited scope for reducing spend, but that doesn't mean it can't be done," he said. However, the finance director admitted the party had overestimated figures put out recently claiming to have made around £88,000 of savings in its first two weeks in power, or £6,000 a day."We'll hold our hands up - we made a mistake there, was just a miscalculation", says Lawson, claiming the figure is more like £4,000 a day and about £60,000 worth of savings on councillor allowances and other small scale parties have used the "minute" figures to claim that the party's Doge agenda has been "discredited", according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service."I'm grateful that our colleagues in the Tories and the Greens have actually pointed out we are saving money," Lawson said. Morale concern While job cuts are not being ruled out, Lawson says employee headcount will not be reduced in the short term with the potential exception of "small teams".However, it is possible staff pension schemes will be looked at, which the deputy leader of the party Richard Tice has criticised for being "unaffordable"."There's no doubt that defined benefit pension schemes have unfortunately become very expensive to operate," Lawson said."Ultimately, we haven't got a magic money tree, and we have to bear that in mind with future contracts." Leaders also think productivity can be tackled by "improving staff morale", which Lawson says is "on the floor". But the emphasis will be an ongoing mindset shift to the council's approach to its spending, rather than a "slash and cut" mentality in order to achieve the party's aims."We're very focused. We were elected on a ticket of change," Lawson says, rejecting the idea that recent turmoil at the top of the party will hinder their efforts for delivering Doge on the ground."We were elected by the people of Derbyshire to try to essentially instil some common sense into the management of council services. Failure is not an option." The leader of Derbyshire Conservatives Alex Dale predicts Reform UK will fail to "live up to their own hype" and says the Conservatives had left the council's budget "in a far stronger position than it was two years ago"."It's becoming increasingly clear that running a council of this scale and with these challenges is far more complex than Reform UK claimed during the election campaign and so it's little wonder they're getting their excuses in early now," he said."We'll be holding them to account for every promise they made and every decision they now take, on behalf of Derbyshire residents."
