logo
Steve Irwin's father delivers brutal message to Bob Katter as feud over crocodile cull boils over: 'He's not listening'

Steve Irwin's father delivers brutal message to Bob Katter as feud over crocodile cull boils over: 'He's not listening'

Daily Mail​11-06-2025
The father of Steve Irwin has joined his estranged family to slam Bob Katter and his calls to cull crocodiles.
Bob Irwin Senior came out swinging on Wednesday to label the outspoken MP a 'd***head'.
Katter's Australian Party (KAP) introduced the Crocodile Control and Conservation Bill 2025 in February to the Queensland Government.
The aim of the proposed law is to 'eliminate crocodiles which pose a threat to human life' while protecting them from going extinct.
The move has prompted outrage from the Irwin family with Bob the latest member to publicly share his opposition to it.
'He's not listening to the people that know. He has no idea of how the environment works and that's his problem,' the Australia Zoo founder told The Courier Mail.
Bob had spoken at state parliament earlier in the day against the legislation.
'Steve and I have learnt from the word go that if you want to be successful with anything you want to do with crocodiles, you've got to get inside their head figuratively,' he said.
'So we spent a lot of time doing nothing else but observing what crocodiles do.'
Bob added there have been previous situations where someone calls for the culling of crocodiles, but said people did not listen to researchers and scientists.
Katter's son and KAP leader Robbie defended the bill while taking aim at the Irwin family.
He claimed they were 'entertainers' with little understanding of regional communities' fears.
He also told state parliament his father's knowledge came from speaking to his constituents in north Queensland.
Although estranged from his son's wife and children, Bob's statements echoed that of Terri, who submitted a letter to the government criticising the proposed law.
His daughter-in-law described the bill as 'more dangerous than previous efforts' to argue in favour of culling crocodile populations.
'It is such a lazy and sloppy attempt to recycle old draft legislation,' Terri said.
In issuing her comments, Terri came under fire from Katter on Friday.
'How would you know all about crocodiles if you live in Brisbane?' he said in a video published to Facebook.
'Oh that's right, she's got them all locked up in a cage in Brisbane.'
KAP MP for Hill Shane Knuth, who submitted the bill, joined the pile-on.
'The Irwin's built a multimillion dollar business off the back of crocodiles,' he wrote on social media.
'And now they're lecturing North Queenslanders on how to enjoy our recreational waterways while they're infested with crocs - and getting worse.
'Spare us the patronising 'Crocwise' slogans. We don't need a zoo telling us how to survive in our own backyard.'
The Irwin family feud began 13 years ago when Bob quit Australia Zoo because he was concerned the wildlife park he'd founded in 1970 was becoming a 'circus'.
Various reports from the time of Bob's exit claim he was worried the Sunshine Coast tourist attraction was becoming 'too commercial - and even feared a then nine-year-old Bindi was being pushed into child stardom.
When Bob left the zoo for good in 2008 - two years after the death of his famous son - Terri was said to be planning a five-year expansion 'to make it Australia's peak tourist destination with a Disneyland feel'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tense moment ABC's Sarah Ferguson shuts down Israeli ambassador to Australia with cutting remark
Tense moment ABC's Sarah Ferguson shuts down Israeli ambassador to Australia with cutting remark

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Tense moment ABC's Sarah Ferguson shuts down Israeli ambassador to Australia with cutting remark

has clashed with the Israeli Ambassador to Australia in a tense interview after Anthony Albanese declared Australia would recognise Palestine at the United Nations. Amir Maimon appeared on the public broadcaster's flagship 7.30 program during which he was grilled over the suffering of civilians in Gaza, refuting figures quoted by Ferguson, but being unable to provide his own. 'Do you accept that 100 children in Gaza have died of starvation in recent months? Do you accept those statistics?' Ferguson asked. Mr Maimon sidestepped answering the question. 'I'm following the statistics of the Israeli authorities. The statistics of COGAT,' he said. The Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) is an Israeli authority tasked with overseeing policy in the West Bank and logistical activities in the Gaza Strip. 'I'm aware there are other views, like in any other issue, but I'm following the statistics of COGAT and I just share with you some of the statistics.' Ferguson then interrupted him. 'Ambassador, you mentioned COGAT,' Ferguson pressed. 'Excuse me, how many children do they say have died from starvation in recent months?' The ambassador then replied: 'I don't have the figures'. 'Well you can't push back on these figures if you don't have any of you own.' The figures Ferguson quoted were from the Gaza Health Ministry. 'Well, I have no figures, but I can push back on the fact Israeli hostages that did not receive humanitarian aid since October 7th, nor a visit from any of the organizations that are responsible to assist those who are in need.' Israeli authorities have repeatedly denied Palestinians in Gaza are starving or that they have stemmed the flow of aid into the region. There have also been claims that Hamas had been looting the aid that did get through. Ferguson also pointed out that: 'Israeli defense officials speaking to the New York Times said clearly that the Israeli military had not found evidence that Hamas had looted aid from the convoys.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced Australia will join allies such as France, the UK and Canada and recognise Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly meeting in September. 'Australia will recognise the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own,' the prime minister told reporters in Canberra on Monday. 'A two-state solution is humanity's best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza.' The prime minister said Palestinian recognition was part of international efforts to resolve the conflict in the Middle East. Any recognition would need to guarantee that the designated terror group Hamas, which de facto governs Gaza, played no role in its future government, the prime minister said. The prime minister said the international community had to act. 'This is about much more than drawing a line on a map. This is about delivering a lifeline to the people of Gaza,' he said. 'The toll of the status quo is growing by the day, and it can be measured in innocent lives. 'The world cannot wait for success to be guaranteed.' But Palestinian recognition could be used as a 'veneer' that allows Israel to 'continue brutalising Palestinians with no consequences', Australia Palestine Advocacy Network's president Nasser Mashni warned. 'What I want today is for Palestinians not to be slaughtered, what I want as an Australian is our government not to be complicit in that slaughter ... for Palestinians like myself to have the opportunity to enact our inalienable right to return,' he told reporters in Melbourne. 'What happens after that will be upon the Palestinian people. 'It's not my job, or Anthony Albanese's to determine how Palestinians might seek their self-determination.' The Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council has condemned the government's decision. 'Recognition by Western countries telegraphs to Hamas that its rejection of multiple ceasefire proposals over the past 12 months were the correct decision,' the council said in a statement. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and coalition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash have also taken issue with recognition. They warned it 'risks delivering Hamas one of its strategic objectives' and puts Australia at odds with the US, which is 'our most important ally and the most consequential player in the conflict in Gaza'. Foreign Minister Penny Wong confirmed she spoke with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio about Australia's intention to recognise Palestine before the decision was formally announced.

Australia's time has come to be a green energy intensive export superpower
Australia's time has come to be a green energy intensive export superpower

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Australia's time has come to be a green energy intensive export superpower

One really big idea is to take the steps necessary to see Australia become a renewable energy superpower by exporting green energy intensive products such as green iron, green aluminium, green transport fuels and green fertilisers. Australia is blessed with some of the best solar and wind resources with world-best availability factors, and comparatively little of this is needed domestically. These significant resources can be used to make energy intensive exports. The key point to understand is that in the fossil fuel world it is low cost to transport, for example, our iron ore, coking coal, gas and thermal coal to north-east Asia where they are used to make iron and steel. In the net zero world, however, it is extremely expensive to export the renewable energy, and the hydrogen to replace coking coal, which are needed to make green iron. So green iron should be made where the renewable resources are and where the hydrogen is made – in Australia. The change in transport costs flips the economics so that it is logical that more value adding occurs in Australia. The benefits for Australia and the world are enormous. Significant investment is required, many skilled workers are needed, and our productivity will be boosted as the technology and learning-by-doing sees continuing improvement in making these products. The world benefits as well because if we realise our green energy intensive export potential Australia can produce products that will reduce world emissions by up to 10%. Countries that do not have the renewable resources to decarbonise themselves will rely on Australia playing its role, just as we have by being the world's largest exporter of coal and gas combined. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The only downside is that we do not know how quickly countries will meet their international commitments and decarbonise. The faster they do, the larger the opportunity for Australia. Australia as an energy intensive green export superpower is extremely practical. Indeed, its time has come. Continually talking about the superpower opportunity without projects emerging encourages scepticism and sees other countries gain an advantage over us that they should not have. Other countries are starting projects and gaining the learning-by-doing lessons we should be benefiting from. What is needed is for the government to support early projects with 15-30% innovation capital grants, and to provide initial support to make up for the lack of a world carbon price. If you believe in the climate science that fossil fuel use damages our environment, it is ridiculous that products that do not damage the environment are competing with those that do without the latter paying for the damage they cause. While not a necessary component of this big idea, this could all be paid for, with considerable money left over, if Australia introduced a carbon price. This would see Australia decarbonise in an easier and much less costly way than we are now. There are minimal political risks apart from where the government obtains the small amount of money to fund this. The funding is small as only the first few projects will qualify for the innovation grants, and Australia's green energy intensive exports, once we have made a start, can respond to overseas carbon pricing, as will soon apply in Europe with the introduction of its Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, and as is emerging in other countries directly or via increasing green product mandates which have the same effect. Whereas decarbonising Australia involves some politically difficult decisions, what is not to like about Australia value adding more in Australia, with new jobs outside our cities, and a continuing boost to productivity and prosperity? The only downside is talking about it but not taking the steps to bring it about. Rod Sims is the chair of the Superpower Institute. He is an expert advisor to the Treasury's competition taskforce and to the UK's Competition and Markets Authority on digital issues. From 2011 to 2022 he was chair of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

The crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow: Russell
The crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow: Russell

Reuters

time4 hours ago

  • Reuters

The crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow: Russell

LAUNCESTON, Australia, Aug 11 (Reuters) - The crude oil market's rather sanguine reaction to the U.S. threats to India over its continued purchases of Russian oil is effectively a bet that very little will actually happen. President Donald Trump cited India's imports of Russian crude when imposing an additional 25% tariff on imports from India on August 6, which is due to take effect on August 28. If the new tariff rate does come into place, it will take the rate for some Indian goods to as much as 50%, a level high enough to effectively end U.S. imports from India, which totalled nearly $87 billion in 2024. As with everything related to Trump, it pays to be cautious given his track record of backflips and pivots. It's also not exactly clear what Trump is ultimately seeking, although it does seem that in the short term he wants to increase his leverage with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of their planned meeting in Alaska this week, and he's using India to achieve this. Whether Trump follows through on his additional tariffs on India remains uncertain, although the chances of a peace deal in Ukraine seem remote, which means the best path for India to avoid the tariffs would be to acquiesce and stop buying Russian oil. But this is an outcome that simply isn't being reflected in current crude oil prices. Global benchmark Brent futures have weakened since Trump's announcement of higher tariffs on India, dropping as low as $65.81 a barrel in early Asian trade on Monday, the lowest level in two months. This is a price that entirely discounts any threat to global supplies, and assumes that India will either continue buying Russian crude at current volumes, or be able to easily source suitable replacements without tightening the global market. Are these reasonable assumptions? The track record of the crude oil market is somewhat remarkable in that it quickly adapts to new geopolitical realities and any price spikes tend to be shortlived. The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 sent crude prices hurtling toward $150 a barrel as European and other Western countries pulled back from buying Russian crude. But within four months the price was back below where it was before Moscow's attack on its neighbour as the market simply re-routed the now discounted Russian oil to China and India. In other words, the flow of oil around the globe was shifted, but the volumes available for importers remained much the same. But what Trump is proposing now is somewhat different. It appears he wants to cut Russian barrels out of the market in order to put financial pressure on Moscow to cut a deal over Ukraine. There are effectively only two major buyers for Russian crude, India and China. China, the world's biggest crude importer, has more leverage with Trump given U.S. and Western reliance on its refined critical and other minerals, and therefore is less able to be coerced into ending its imports of Russian oil. India is in a less strong position, especially private refiners like Reliance Industries ( opens new tab, which will want to keep business relationships and access to Western economies. India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, or about 37% of its total, according to data compiled by commodity analysts Kpler. About 90% of its Russian imports came from Russia's European ports and was mainly Urals grade. This is a medium sour crude and it would raise challenges for Indian refiners if they sought to replace all their Urals imports with similar grades from other suppliers. There are some Middle Eastern grades of similar quality, such as Saudi Arabia's Arab Light and Iraq's Basrah Light, but it would likely boost prices if India were to seek more of these crudes. If Chinese refiners were able to take the bulk of Russian crude given up by India, it may allow for a re-shuffling of flows, but that would not appear to be what Trump wants. Trump and his advisers may believe there is enough spare crude production capacity in the United States and elsewhere to handle the loss of up to 2 million bpd of Russian supplies. But testing that theory may well lead to higher prices, especially for certain types of medium crudes which would be in short supply. It's simplistic to say that higher U.S. output can supply India's refiners, as this would mean those refiners would have to be willing to accept a different mix of refined products, including producing less diesel, as U.S. light crudes tend to make more products such as gasoline. For now the crude oil market is assuming that the Trump/India/Russia situation will end as another TACO, the acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. But the reality is likely to be slightly more messy, as some Indian refiners pull back from importing from Russia, some Chinese refiners may buy more and once again the oil market goes on a geopolitical merry-go-round. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab. The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store