China hits EU with reciprocal ban on major medical equipment contracts
China's finance ministry said in a statement that European Union companies, with the exception of 'those with European capital established in China, will have to be excluded' from orders of more than 45 million yuan (€5.3 million).
China's ban, which comes into effect from today, covers a wide range of products, from prosthetic devices and parts to medical machinery and surgical instruments.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited the EU's headquarters, as well as France and Germany, over the past week in a bid to improve relations with the 27-member bloc.
However, deep frictions remain over economic ties, including a yawning trade deficit reaching into hundred of billions of euro between China and the EU.
Advertisement
Beijing's finance ministry also specified that the proportion of products from the EU could not exceed 50 percent in bids from non-European companies.
The EU drew an angry response from Beijing, and an accusation of double standards, when it banned Chinese firms from government medical device purchases worth more than five million euros ($5.8 million) in retaliation for limits Beijing places on access to its own market.
The European Commission said at the time the ban was a reaction to 'China's longstanding exclusion of EU-made medical devices from Chinese government contracts'.
According to Brussels, just under 90 percent of public procurement contracts for medical devices in China 'were subject to exclusionary and discriminatory measures' against EU firms.
'China has repeatedly expressed, through bilateral dialogue, its willingness to resolve these disputes appropriately through consultations, dialogue and bilateral arrangements in the field of public procurement,' China's commerce ministry said in a separate statement.
Over the last three years, Brussels and Beijing have come into conflict in a number of economic sectors, including electric cars, the rail industry, solar panels and wind turbines.
With reporting by
© AFP 2023
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
When it comes to climate action, politicians can't see the wolves from the trees
What have experts ever done for us? 'I think the people of this country have had enough of experts,' British Conservative MP Michael Gove famously said during the Brexit debate, as he dismissed concerns about the potential downside impacts of leaving the EU. But Gove and a lot of people thought they knew better. Well, it seems many may have buyer's remorse or 'Bregret' over the decision. Since late July 2022, the share of people who regret Brexit in surveys has consistently been above 50%. As of May 2025, 56% of people in Great Britain believed it was wrong to leave the European Union, compared with 32% who thought it was the right decision. Just when we thought things could not get any worse, the American electorate and Donald Trump said 'Hold my beer'. Even the most pessimistic person could not have been ready for the vengeful gutting of scientific and educational standards, contempt for the law and disdain for facts and the truth during the second Trump term. But like most right-wingers, Trump seems to hold a special contempt for the environment and any person or body protecting the environment. He has launched more attacks on the environment in 100 days than his entire first term — hitting protections for land, oceans, forests, wildlife and climate. But lest we get complacent and superior over on this side of the water, it looks like those in charge in Europe and Ireland are just as willing to ignore experts and academics when it suits them, and particularly when it comes to the environment. Recently, the European Parliament voted to lower the protection status of wolves under the Habitats Directive — with no sound scientific basis. This proposal was a politically motivated U-turn away from science-based conservation. Ireland's own experts in the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) advised against supporting it, as the wolf remains in an unfavourable conservation status in six out of seven biogeographical regions in Europe. A data-driven reassessment of the species conservation status is due later this year, and the NPWS concluded any change to the species protected status before then was premature. Fine Gael MEP Regina Doherty was quoted as saying: 'A high wolf population can be a threat to biodiversity conservation, farmers, rural communities and tourism.' In fact, wolves play a crucial role in maintaining healthy ecosystems and biodiversity by regulating prey populations, which can lead to a more balanced and diverse ecosystem, the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park in 1995 being just one example. As for the threat to farmers and rural communities, it seems MEPs could have appraised themselves of some studies before they made their decision. Wolf predation represents a very small fraction of total livestock losses, according to nature strategist Kriton Arsenis. In a LinkedIn post, he referenced a peer-reviewed study from Poland which found grey wolves avoid eating farm animals — even when thousands roam unprotected. In an area where more than 4,000 cattle and 700 horses graze freely each year, scientists found over a two-year period: Only three cattle calves were consumed by wolves; No horse attacks were recorded; Livestock made up just 3% of the wolf diet — and even that was likely scavenged — meaning wolves fed on animals that were already dead; Instead, wolves fed mainly on wild prey — roe deer and wild boar made up over 80% of their diet. And then there's the effect on tourism — but not in the way that Ms Doherty thinks. Nature and wildlife tourism is a growing market. Wildlife tourism centred around wolves is growing across Europe, with organisers highlighting its value for both conservation and rural revitalisation. And it's more profitable than killing wolves. There are already areas with wolves that make 10 times more money organising sightseeing tours than for shooting them, according to the Wilderness Society. Forestry minister Michael Healy-Rae's suggestion to allow forestry on peatlands 'about the dumbest thing we can do'. Many people may not care about wolves. But if we allow these laws to unravel without any evidence or expertise taken into account, what's next. And we in Ireland are not immune from ignoring or threatening to ignore expert and scientific advice, particularly in relation to the environment. 'About the dumbest thing we can do' from the point of view of climate action were the words of Peter Thorne, a professor of climate change at Maynooth University in response to forestry minister Michael Healy-Rae's suggestion to allow forestry on peatlands, which would be a reversal of Government policy, which prohibits afforestation on deep peat. The Irish Peatland Conservation Council warned such actions would have severe environmental consequences and undermine Ireland's commitments to biodiversity and climate action. Peatlands are one of Ireland's most valuable ecosystems, serving as critical carbon sinks, supporting unique biodiversity, and regulating water quality. Scientific research has repeatedly shown afforestation on peatlands disrupts their natural hydrology, accelerates carbon release, and damages habitats essential for rare and endangered species. Of course, the minister's suggestion is cloaked in a faux argument that if you don't plant forestry in bogs, the only other option is to import them: a Sophie's Choice of tree planting. You should always be wary when you're offered a binary choice to a complex problem. More recently, concerns have been raised over Government plans which will lower protections for rivers and lakes by labelling them 'heavily modified water bodies'. Sustainable Water Network chief executive Sinéad O'Brien said the Government's plan to lower protections for one in 10 of our rivers, lakes, and coastal waters, without evidence or proper explanation, shows disregard for the public. This is all starting to sound familiar. We need experts, academics and scientists to help us make decisions based on the best knowledge, information, evidence and science available. The laws of science and nature do not really care about your political affiliations, party policy or whether you think the world is flat — they just carry on regardless. They can't just be discarded on a whim or because the political wind has changed direction. And you ignore them at your peril, as we're finding out with our changing climate.
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Trump unveils 50% Brazil tariff, criticises Bolsonaro trial
US President Donald Trump announced a 50% tariff targeting Brazil as he blasted the trial of the country's ex-leader, while widening a push to secure more bilateral trade deals with other partners. In a letter addressed to Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Mr Trump criticised the treatment of former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro as an "international disgrace". The letter added that the trial "should not be taking place". He also said Washington would launch an investigation into Brazil's trade practices. The latest tariff threat came after Brazil said it had summoned the US charge d'affaires in a diplomatic row over Mr Trump's earlier criticism of the coup trial of Mr Bolsonaro. Mr Bolsonaro denies he was involved in an attempt to wrest power back from Lula in an alleged coup plot prosecutors say failed only for a lack of military backing. The 50% US tariff on Brazilian goods will take effect 1 August, Mr Trump said in his letter, mirroring a deadline that dozens of other economies face. While Mr Trump has started to issue letters to trading partners this week as he ramps up pressure towards more deals, he has focused on partners with which his country runs significant deficits. Brazil had not been among those threatened with these higher duties previously. The United States runs a goods trade surplus instead with Brazil. Escalation threats Mr Trump's message to Mr Lula was the latest in more than 20 such letters the US president has released since Monday, setting out tariff rates as Washington tries to bring about more trade pacts. On Wednesday, Mr Trump had addressed letters to leaders of the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Brunei, Algeria, Libya, Iraq and Moldova, spelling out duties ranging from 20% to 30% that would also take effect on 1 August. Similar to a first batch of documents published Monday, the levels were not too far from those originally threatened in April, although some partners received notably lower rates this time. While Mr Trump in April imposed a 10% levy on almost all trading partners, he unveiled - and then withheld - higher rates for dozens of economies. The deadline for those steeper levels to take effect was meant to be Wednesday, before Mr Trump postponed it further to 1 August. Countries that faced the threats of elevated duties began receiving letters spelling out US tariff rates on their products. In the messages, Mr Trump justified his tariffs as a response to trade ties that he says are "far from reciprocal". The letters urged countries to manufacture products in the United States to avoid duties, while threatening further escalation if leaders retaliated. Other countries that have received Mr Trump's letters include key US allies Japan and South Korea, as well as Indonesia, Bangladesh and Thailand. EU deal in 'coming days'? Analysts have noted that Asian countries have been a key target so far. But all eyes are on the state of negotiations with major partners who have yet to receive such letters, including the European Union. The Trump administration is under pressure to unveil more trade pacts. So far, Washington has only reached agreements with Britain and Vietnam, alongside a deal to temporarily lower tit-for-tat levies with China. Mr Trump on Tuesday said that his government was "probably two days off" from sending the EU a letter with an updated tariff rate for the bloc. An EU spokesman said the bloc wants to strike a deal with the United States "in the coming days," and has shown readiness to reach an agreement in principle. Apart from tariffs targeting goods from different countries, Mr Trump has rolled out sector-specific duties on steel, aluminum and autos since returning to the White House in January. Yesterday, Mr Trump said levies were incoming on copper and pharmaceuticals. The planned rate for copper is 50%, he added, while pharmaceutical products face a levy as high as 200% but manufacturers would be given time to relocate operations to the United States.
Irish Examiner
6 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Blighe asks Electoral Commission to examine process to replace him as Ireland First leader
The anti-migrant campaigner Derek Blighe has asked the Electoral Commission to examine the process to replace him as leader of the far-right Ireland First group. Mr Blighe resigned from the Ireland First party in April, saying he wants to 'resume other ambitions' and 'cannot be involved in party politics at the moment'. Mr Blighe, a construction worker from Mitchelstown, Co Cork, said the past few years have taken a large toll on both his family and work life, adding: 'I must take this step now to focus on those closest to me and work on some new exciting ventures.' He ran for Ireland First in both the local and European elections last June, and also ran in the Cork North Central constituency in the November general election. He was eliminated in the latter on the seventh count. Mr Blighe was replaced as president of the group by Anthony Casey, one of the key figures in the Sinne na Daoine, an anti-immigrant 'patrol group'. Mr Casey had been a candidate in last year's local elections for the Irish Freedom Party, whose leader Hermann Kelly has described Sinne Na Daoine as a 'vigilante group'. In a social media post on Tuesday, Mr Blighe claimed that the election to replace him was invalid. He said the election of Mr Casey had only been attended by two committee members, including himself, meaning it was invalid. 'At that point, Ireland First had five committee members, and electing new leadership required a 61% majority — four out of five votes,' Mr Blighe wrote. 'When I asked where the other committee members were, I was told two had failed to renew their memberships, and the third had said he was too busy to attend. The vote proceeded, and both myself and the other committee member present voted in favour of Anthony Casey. In the weeks following the vote, it became clear something wasn't right. After speaking with two of the absent committee members, I learned that the memberships of two committee members had been cancelled by the party on February 13 — just three days before the vote — and that all three absent committee members were not informed of, or invited to the meeting. Mr Blighe said there had been attempts to resolve the matter in early May, but that the Electoral Commission had since undertaken an investigation and invited submissions from both sides. Mr Blighe said he has 'received a huge amount of abuse and attacks over the last few months' which had 'got more frequent and intense every time the question of the Ireland First leadership vote was brought up'. He said that he had made a criminal complaint in relation to this. In a subsequent post, Mr Casey said that he 'will be more than willing to attend the first sit down with Mr Blighe and relevant others'. A spokesperson for the Electoral Commission said that an application to amend the party's register was being considered. 'The Registrar of Political Parties has received an application to amend the Register of Political Parties in respect of Ireland First. 'The application is under consideration and a decision will be published in due course.'
