China hits EU with reciprocal ban on major medical equipment contracts
China's finance ministry said in a statement that European Union companies, with the exception of 'those with European capital established in China, will have to be excluded' from orders of more than 45 million yuan (€5.3 million).
China's ban, which comes into effect from today, covers a wide range of products, from prosthetic devices and parts to medical machinery and surgical instruments.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited the EU's headquarters, as well as France and Germany, over the past week in a bid to improve relations with the 27-member bloc.
However, deep frictions remain over economic ties, including a yawning trade deficit reaching into hundred of billions of euro between China and the EU.
Advertisement
Beijing's finance ministry also specified that the proportion of products from the EU could not exceed 50 percent in bids from non-European companies.
The EU drew an angry response from Beijing, and an accusation of double standards, when it banned Chinese firms from government medical device purchases worth more than five million euros ($5.8 million) in retaliation for limits Beijing places on access to its own market.
The European Commission said at the time the ban was a reaction to 'China's longstanding exclusion of EU-made medical devices from Chinese government contracts'.
According to Brussels, just under 90 percent of public procurement contracts for medical devices in China 'were subject to exclusionary and discriminatory measures' against EU firms.
'China has repeatedly expressed, through bilateral dialogue, its willingness to resolve these disputes appropriately through consultations, dialogue and bilateral arrangements in the field of public procurement,' China's commerce ministry said in a separate statement.
Over the last three years, Brussels and Beijing have come into conflict in a number of economic sectors, including electric cars, the rail industry, solar panels and wind turbines.
With reporting by
© AFP 2023
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
17 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Fianna Fáil MEPs still to pick a side ahead of no-confidence motion in European Commission president
Fianna Fáil MEPs have come under pressure for suggesting they might support a motion of no-confidence in European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen . The no-confidence vote was tabled by a far-right Romanian MEP and 74 others, predominantly from right-wing populist and nationalist parties. On Thursday, Members of the European Parliament will vote on the proposed motion of no-confidence in Ms von der Leyen, the head of the EU 's executive arm that proposes laws. The effort is widely expected to fall far short of the required two-thirds majority needed to censure the commission. If the motion was successful, it would likely force Ms von der Leyen and her team of EU commissioners, including former Fianna Fáil minister Michael McGrath , to resign. READ MORE Fianna Fáil's four MEPs, Barry Andrews, Billy Kelleher, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú and Barry Cowen, have yet to declare what way they will vote. Fianna Fáil have been weighing up the possibility of supporting the motion or abstaining in the vote. The no-confidence vote centres on the 'Pfizergate' controversy, where the commission faced criticism for refusing to release text messages exchanged between Ms von der Leyen and the chief executive of Pfizer, during negotiations to secure supplies of Covid-19 vaccines at the height of the pandemic. Copies of the texts had been sought in access-to-information requests made by the New York Times, which later took the commission to court for blocking the release of the texts. Speaking in the European Parliament on Monday, Ms von der Leyen said the motion was supported by extreme political movements, 'from anti-vaxxers to Putin apologists'. Defending her role at the top of the EU executive during the pandemic, Ms von der Leyen said it was 'no secret' that she was in contact with senior figures in companies producing Covid-19 vaccines. 'Every single contract negotiated was examined in detail in the capitals before being signed by each of the 27 member states. There were no secrets, no hidden clauses,' she told a sitting of MEPs in Strasbourg. 'The implication that these contacts were somehow inappropriate or against the European interest is, by any measure, simply wrong.' The motion was an attempt to spin 'debunked conspiracies' and try to rewrite the history of how Europe 'successfully overcame a global pandemic together', she said. The EU executive needed to be in a strong position during ongoing tariff negotiations with the United States, the German politician said. Sinn Féin's two MEPs, Lynn Boylan and Kathleen Funchion, said they would vote against Ms von der Leyen, due to the failure of the EU to hold Israel to account for its conduct during its invasion of Gaza, among other things. Fine Gael's four MEPs will oppose the motion, which they said had been 'tabled by far-right members of the European Parliament in a bid to destabilise the EU for political gain'. Iratxe García, a senior Spanish MEP who leads the centre-left Socialist and Democrats (S&D), the second largest grouping in the parliament, said its members would not support the motion, as it refused to work with the far right. The motion has divided some right-wing populists, with hard right Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni's party opposing the effort to bring down the commission leadership. Nicola Procaccini, an MEP from Ms Meloni's Brothers of Italy party, said the move was a mistake. 'This motion is doomed to fail and we know it, without even getting close to the level of votes needed,' he said. The proposal was one 'big political show' from the far-right to undermine democracy, according to Bas Eickhout, the co-leader of the European Greens.
The Journal
26 minutes ago
- The Journal
Trump to push Wednesday tariff deadline out to 1 August
US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump will push back the deadline for the imposition of higher tariffs to 1 August, the White House has said. The deadline for countries to make deals before steeper tariffs kick in had been set for this Wednesday, but White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters this evening that Trump would be signing an executive order to delay it. The delay is the latest last-minute shift in Trump's trade policy, which has seen the US impose sweeping tariffs with on imports from around the world. Trump originally announced sweeping tariffs on world economies on what he called 'Liberation Day' on 2 April, claiming the United States was being 'ripped off.' When his policies created market turmoil, Trump then suspended the initial tariffs for 90 days, a deadline that was due to expire on Wednesday. Negotiations with states around the world are ongoing. Earlier today, Trump had hinted at the deadline extension when he sent nearly identical letters to Japan and South Korea informing them that 25% tariffs would come into effect on 1 August, rather than this Wednesday. Trump said the tariffs would be imposed on the two countries because their trading relationships with Washington were 'unfortunately, far from Reciprocal.' The Trump administration had promised to make 90 trade deals in the space of 90 days. Advertisement So far though, Washington has unveiled deals with only the UK and Vietnam, while also agreeing with China to temporarily lower tariff levels on each other's products that had gone well over 100%. Today, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said he was 'hopeful' that the EU and US could reach a deal on trade following an update from European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris said that he had also been briefed on the EU-US negotiations. In a statement this evening that showed the uncertainty caused by the inconsistent position of the US, Harris said while he had been briefed ahead of the expected Wednesday deadline, 'My understanding is that we can now expect an extension of the current status quo until 1 August'. Harris stressed that tariffs at even low levels would be 'bad for consumers, jobs, economic growth and investment'. 'The uncertainty is also bad for economic confidence and Irish businesses seeking clarity on the trading environment in which they operate. 'We have consistently called for zero-for-zero tariffs in as many areas as possible and I know the EU has advocated this course of action. He said that 'uncertainty continues' around many areas of US-EU trade, including the pharmaceutical sector. 'This is obviously an area of significant concern to Ireland,' he said. With reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
US pauses plans for higher tariffs on EU as trade talks continue
The US is to pause plans to impose higher tariff rates on the EU until August as trade talks continue. However, the Government here has ruled out any once-off supports for businesses in this autumn's budget despite warning that the economy faces 'serious risks' as a result of US trade uncertainly. Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said he 'remains hopeful' that the US and the EU can agree an outline agreement or framework principle agreement this week after speaking with EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, but he added that there are still 'a number of issues' to be negotiated. Although the Trump administration has provided a tariff extension beyond the initial deadline of this Wednesday, Tánaiste Simon Harris said it remains the position of the EU and the Irish Government that discussions on a trade agreement should be concluded before the new August 1 deadline. Mr Harris said: I want to be clear that while it is likely there will be some form of tariffs going forward, their imposition even at a lower rate is bad for consumers, jobs, economic growth, and investment. The Trump administration has already imposed 50% tariffs on all steel and aluminium imported into the US as well as 25% duties on cars and car parts. While the US appears adamant that a 10% 'universal' levy on most other exports will remain in place, the EU has been pushing for special 'zero-for-zero' exemptions on some products. No special package for businesses However, public expenditure minister Jack Chambers said there will be no special package for businesses in the budget even if a deal is not reached with the US. 'If there isn't an outcome, we know we're into a much greater level of uncertainty and but we're conscious in how we're engaging presently, that we are surrounded by uncertainty whether we have a deal or not,' he said. Speaking after a meeting of the Government's competitiveness forum, Mr Chambers added: 'We've been clear that the measures we take have to be permanent and sustained and sustainable, and that means real choices and priorities for each minister about how they want to approach budget 2026. There's no intention to have one-off or temporary measures, and we want to return to a much more regular, structured budgetary environment. He warned that extra funds will have to be found to pay for overruns within the HSE again this year. 'We know that the overall rate of current expenditure is at about 6.5%, year on year, and that's a moderation from what happened between 2023 and 2024. 'We need much better discipline across Government on how expenditure is managed within [the] year and also to manage the overall trajectory of public spending over the medium term.'
