The health benefits of taking a long walk
Lace up those sneakers! Research says that walking is fantastic for your health. Incorporating more steps into your day can better your heart and lung health, help you manage your weight, improve your sleep quality, and lower your risk of chronic diseases like diabetes and hypertension. Then there are the mental health perks, such as reducing stress, anxiety and symptoms of depression, which should encourage you to lace up your shoes and go.
Experts debate how many steps are needed daily, but a 2024 study published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine found that walking between 9,000 and 10,500 steps provides the most benefits. However, even walking more than 2,200 steps a day can help you live longer, as well as lower your risk of heart disease.
As it turns out, it's not just the amount of steps completed but how they're taken. With extended walks, there are unique advantages, whether it's tackling the 6-6-6 challenge and taking at least one 60-minute walk a day, crossing your city on foot or hiking a scenic trail, as more and more Americans are doing these days.
Chris Mohr, a fitness and nutrition advisor at BarBend, tells Yahoo Life that longer walks (say, more than 30 minutes) offer distinct benefits. 'Long walks improve circulation, strengthen the heart and enhance lung capacity by sustaining aerobic activity for an extended period,' he says. That means the longer you keep walking, the more you build endurance for your heart and lungs, making them stronger and more efficient.
The same principle applies to your muscles. Extended walks help strengthen your calves, glutes and hamstrings. There are even greater benefits when you tackle inclines, such as during a long hike: Uphill walking engages more muscle fibers, enhancing endurance, stability and overall lower-body strength.
A long walk increases the blood flow to the brain too — something shorter walks can't do as effectively because they don't keep the heart rate elevated for an extended period. This effect leads to improved cognitive function, a reduction in stress and better mood, Mohr notes.
Plus, you're more likely to get into a meditative state on a longer walk than a shorter one, Michelle English, a licensed clinical social worker at Healthy Life Recovery, tells Yahoo Life. 'Long walks, unlike short bursts, allow you to enter a meditative state where the repetitive motion and rhythm can help quiet the mind,' she explains.
If you head outside, these walks 'also provide more time in nature or fresh air, which adds restorative elements to mental well-being,' English says. Research has shown that spending time in nature can lower our anxiety and stress levels.
Melissa Worley, Mindbody + ClassPass Wellness Council Member and personal trainer, tells Yahoo Life that long walks are also especially good for weight loss. For one thing, you're capable of walking for long durations before feeling fatigued, meaning you can burn more calories the longer you go. And walking 'involves a lower injury risk compared to high-impact exercises like running,' she says.
And while moving more can help you lose weight, Ronny Garcia, a personal trainer at Blink Fitness, tells Yahoo Life that you should consider longer walks if your goal is to lose fat. 'After 30 minutes of walking, the body starts to utilize stored fat as an energy source,' he explains.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that brisk walking is a moderate-intensity activity, and they recommend that individuals get 150 minutes of this type of exercise per week. While you can break up that 150 minutes however you want, there are benefits of stretching your walks past a brief stroll: Long walks are a sustained cardiovascular activity that won't lead to a risk of injury and are simple and free to start.
Need some motivation to hit the trail for a longer period of time? Worley tells Yahoo Life that she likes to 'habit stack' when it comes to longer walks. 'I do this by listening to a fun audiobook or podcast to stay motivated,' she says.
Working out indoors? You can throw on your favorite TV show while on a treadmill or walking pad instead — you may find it motivates you to get stepping.
One thing to keep in mind: While long walks are great, it's important not to let your big walk stop you from moving throughout the day. Sedentary time comes with health risks — yes, even if you regularly workout — so get up off the couch or desk chair and move for a few minutes at least every half hour, even if you already crushed a five-mile walk in the morning.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Appendix cancer has quadrupled in older millennials in the US
Researchers are reporting a startling spike in appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) — otherwise known as appendix cancer — in people born after 1945. Cases have more than tripled in Americans born between 1980 and 1985 and quadrupled in those born between 1985 and 1990, according to a new study out of Vanderbilt University Medical Center. 'I think it's alarming,' study author Andreana N. Holowatyj, an assistant professor of hematology and oncology, told The Post. Advertisement 3 A new study has identified an alarming spike in appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) — otherwise known as appendix cancer — in people born after 1945. top images – Appendix cancer is very rare, estimated to affect only about one or two people per 1 million per year, according to the National Cancer Institute. Indeed, Holowatyj's team identified only 4,858 people aged 20 and over who were diagnosed with AA between 1975 and 2019. Advertisement The findings, published Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine, are nonetheless part of a troublesome trend. AA is yet another type of cancer that seems to be on the rise in younger adults — joining the ranks of colorectal, breast, uterine, kidney and pancreatic cancers. 'I think the fact that we're seeing birth cohort or generational effects across a plethora of cancer types is indeed alarming because it really stresses the need to understand what is underpinning this pattern in order for us to be able to actively reverse it,' Holowatyj said. 3 Experts point to lifestyle changes, such as more sedentary behavior, as a possible cause of the rise in cancer cases in younger people. StockPhotoPro – Advertisement As with other cancers, health experts aren't exactly sure what could be causing the jump in AA cases. 'I think it's going to be a constellation of factors that may be driving appendiceal cancer development,' Holowatyj said. 'One of the things we often think about is, what has changed across birth cohorts over time?' she said. Advertisement Holowatyj pointed to 'possibly the use of antibiotics, both in childhood and in the food chain, the industrialization of the food industry over time, the lifestyle patterns and the tripling of obesity since the 1970s, increasingly sedentary behavior, possibly environmental exposures that have changed across different parts of the country and over time.' Whatever the cause, she hopes this study encourages the public to be 'aware of this cancer, to know about the signs and symptoms of appendix cancers and know that we're seeing more cases diagnosed across generations.' 3 Most AA cases are diagnosed incidentally after someone has their appendix removed. Avocado_studio – Many of these symptoms can mimic appendicitis: Abdominal pain, often on the lower right side Bloating, diarrhea or constipation Feeling full after small meals Unexplained weight loss Nausea and vomiting Abdominal mass or swelling Holowatyj hopes that people with symptoms 'see a healthcare professional in a timely manner because it's truly critical to detect appendix cancer early.' There are no standardized screening tests for appendix cancers — most cases are diagnosed incidentally after someone has their appendix removed. 'I think it's important to understand that appendix cancer is actually diagnosed in younger ages more commonly than we see in other cancers,' she said, noting that one in three patients diagnosed with appendix cancer is under the age of 50, compared to one in eight for colon cancer.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Collins calls Kennedy's firing of vaccine experts ‘excessive'
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) on Monday called Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s firing of all 17 experts on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) vaccine panel 'excessive,' but cautioned she needs to learn more about the decision. Kennedy announced the decision in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, catching many GOP lawmakers by surprise. 'I did not know that that had happened,' Collins, a senior member of the Senate Health Committee. 'It seems to me to be excessive to ask for everybody's resignations but I can't judge because I don't know who he's replacing them with.' The Maine senator said the CDC's vaccine advisory committee 'provided helpful guidance to the public on what they should do.' Collins said that Kennedy didn't promise members of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee that he would keep the vaccine experts in place. 'I'm just learning about it for the first time,' she said. 'I don't know what the basis was.' Kennedy said in his Wall Street Journal column that he removed the experts so that Trump could shape the membership of the committee. 'Without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028,' he wrote. Kennedy argued that vaccines have become 'a divisive issue in American politics' and that public confidence is waning' in health agencies, pharmaceutical companies and vaccines themselves. 'That is why, under my direction, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is putting the restoration of public trust above any pro- or antivaccine agenda. The public must know that unbiased science guides the recommendations from our health agencies. This will ensure the American people receive the safest vaccines possible,' he wrote. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) in a statement blasted Kennedy's move as 'reckless.' 'RFK Jr. and the Trump administration are taking a wrecking ball to the programs that keep Americans safe and healthy. Firing experts that have spent their entire lives protecting kids from deadly disease is not reform — it's reckless, radical, and rooted in conspiracy, not science,' Schumer said in a statement.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘We dissent': NIH workers protest Trump policies that ‘harm the health of Americans'
An NIH Pediatric Oncology Branch researcher's lab jacket, embroidered with the NIH logo with blue chevron detail. The POB is dedicated to improving outcomes for children and young adults with cancer and genetic tumor predisposition syndromes. (Photo courtesy of National Institutes of Health) Hundreds of workers at the National Institutes of Health on Monday openly protested the Trump administration's cuts to the agency and consequences for human lives, writing in a sharply worded letter that its actions are causing 'a dramatic reduction in life-saving research.' In a June 9 letter to NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, NIH workers said they felt 'compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political momentum over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources.' 'For staff across the National Institutes of Health (NIH), we dissent to Administration policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe,' they said. The letter is an extraordinary rebuke of the Trump administration's actions against the NIH, which include: terminating hundreds of grants funding scientific and biomedical research; firing more than 1,000 employees this year; and moving to end billions in funds to partner institutions overseas, a move current and former NIH workers say will harm research on rare cancers and infectious diseases, as well as research that aims to minimize tobacco use and related chronic illnesses, among other areas. Some NIH workers signed their names publicly, openly daring to challenge a president who has sought to purge the government of employees he views as disloyal to him. Others signed anonymously. 'It's about the harm that these policies are having on research participants and American public health, and global public health,' said Jenna Norton, who works at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, one of NIH's 27 institutes. 'There are research participants who generously decide to donate their time and literal pieces of their body, with the understanding that that service is going to help advance research for diseases that they are living with and help the next person who comes along with that disease.' 'These policies are preventing us from delivering on the promise we made to them and honoring the commitment that they made, and putting them at risk,' she said. The workers wrote that they hope Bhattacharya welcomes their criticisms given his vows to prioritize 'academic freedom' and to respect dissenting views as leader of the NIH, which is based in Bethesda, Maryland. Its authors called it the 'Bethesda Declaration' — a play on the controversial 'Great Barrington Declaration' that Bhattacharya co-authored during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bhattacharya's declaration advocated against lockdown measures and proposed that widespread immunity against COVID could be achieved by allowing healthy people to get infected with the virus and instituting protective measures only for medically vulnerable people. It was criticized at the time by Francis Collins, then-director of the NIH, who called Bhattacharya and his co-authors 'fringe epidemiologists,' according to emails the American Institute for Economic Research obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. In their letter, NIH workers demanded that Bhattacharya restore grants that were 'delayed or terminated for political reasons.' Those grants funded a range of projects, including those addressing Alzheimer's disease, ways to boost vaccination rates, and efforts to combat health disparities or health misinformation. 'Academic freedom should not be applied selectively based on political ideology. To achieve political aims, NIH has targeted multiple universities with indiscriminate grant terminations, payment freezes for ongoing research, and blanket holds on awards regardless of the quality, progress, or impact of the science,' the NIH workers wrote. The funding terminations, they said, 'throw away years of hard work and millions of dollars,' 'risk participant health,' and 'damage hard-earned public trust, counter to your stated goal to improve trust in NIH.' In an emailed comment, Bhattacharya said, 'The Bethesda Declaration has some fundamental misconceptions about the policy directions the NIH has taken in recent months, including the continuing support of the NIH for international collaboration. Nevertheless, respectful dissent in science is productive. We all want the NIH to succeed.' The NIH's nearly $48 billion budget makes it the world's largest public funder of scientific research. Its work has led to countless scientific discoveries that have helped improve health and save lives around the globe. But it hasn't been without controversies, including instances of research misconduct and not effectively monitoring grant awards and the related research. Researchers and some states have sued NIH and HHS over the grant cuts. An April 3 deposition by NIH official Michelle Bulls said Rachel Riley, a senior adviser at HHS who is part of the Department of Government Efficiency created by executive order, provided NIH officials lists of grants to terminate and language for termination notices. Elon Musk, the world's richest person, led DOGE through May. Norton has worked at the NIH as a federal employee or contractor for about a decade. She said the current administration's policies are 'definitely unethical and very likely illegal,' listing a string of developments in recent months. They include terminating studies early and putting participating patients at risk because they have had to abruptly stop taking medications, and holding up research that would predominantly or exclusively recruit participants from minority races and ethnicities, who have historically been underrepresented in medical research. 'They're saying that doing studies exclusively on Black Americans to try to develop interventions that work for that population, or interventions that are culturally tailored to Hispanic-Latino populations — that that kind of research can't go forward is extremely problematic,' Norton said. 'And, as a matter of fact, studies that over-recruit from white people have been allowed to go forward.' The NIH workers also demanded that Bhattacharya reinstate workers who were dismissed under recent mass firings and allow research that is done in partnership with institutions in foreign countries 'to continue without disruption.' The NIH works with organizations around the globe to combat major public health issues, including types of cancer, tobacco-related illnesses, and HIV. In addition to the firing of probationary workers, NIH fired 1,200 civil servants as part of a rapid 'reduction in force' at federal health agencies. During a May 19 town hall meeting with NIH staff, a recording of which was obtained by KFF Health News, Bhattacharya said the decisions about RIFs 'happened before I got here. I actually don't have any transparency into how those decisions were made.' He started at NIH on April 1, the day many workers at NIH and other agencies were told they were fired. Other workers have been fired since Bhattacharya took the helm — nearly all the National Cancer Institute's communications staff were fired in early May, three former employees told KFF Health News. The letter is the latest salvo in a growing movement by scientists and others against the Trump administration's actions. In addition to in-person protests outside HHS headquarters and elsewhere, some former employees are organizing patients to get involved. Peter Garrett, who led the National Cancer Institute's communications work, has created an advocacy nonprofit called Patient Action for Cancer Research. The aim is to engage patients 'in the conversation and federal funding and science policymaking,' he said in an interview. His group aims to get patients and their relatives to speak out about how federal cancer research affects them directly, he said — a 'guerrilla lobbying' effort to put the issue squarely before members of Congress. Garrett said he retired early from the cancer institute because of concerns about political interference. Career officials routinely work under both Republican and Democratic presidents. It is par for the course for their priorities and assignments to evolve when a new president, Cabinet secretaries, and other political appointees take over. Usually, those changes occur without much protest. This time, workers said the upheaval and harm done to the NIH is so extensive that they felt they had no choice but to protest. In 11 years at NIH, Norton said, 'I've never seen anything that comes anywhere near this.' In the June 9 letter, the workers said, 'Many have raised these concerns to NIH leadership, yet we remain pressured to implement harmful measures.' 'It's not about our jobs,' said one NIH worker who signed the letter anonymously. 'It is about humanity. It is about the future.' Senior correspondent Arthur Allen contributed to this report. We'd like to speak with current and former personnel from the Department of Health and Human Services or its component agencies who believe the public should understand the impact of what's happening within the federal health bureaucracy. Please message KFF Health News on Signal at (415) 519-8778 or . KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and article first appeared on KFF Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
