
What to know about Senate bill's major changes to student loans
Why it matters: For future borrowers — and millions of current ones — fewer repayment options will be available when and if the House passes the current bill.
Here's what's in store for borrowers:
Fewer repayment plans for future borrowers
State of play: The bill cuts the number of repayment plan choices that federal student loan borrowers have down to two.
One is a standard repayment plan, which gives borrowers a fixed monthly payment to repay their loans in 10 to 25 years. The current standard plan has a loan period of 10 years, regardless of loan size.
The other is the Repayment Assistance Plan, which will involve monthly payments between 1% and 10% of a borrower's discretionary income (current offerings set payments at 10%, 15%, or 20% of income).
Borrowers on any current repayment plan other than the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan will be able to keep their current payment structure, however.
SAVE borrowers have to find a new plan
These changes will affect those whose take on loans from July 1, 2026 onward and current SAVE plan borrowers, with an appeals court blocking the Biden administration plan in February.
Under the Republicans' plan, SAVE borrowers will have between July 2026 and July 2028 to choose a new plan. After July 1, 2028, those borrowers, if they haven't chosen one, will automatically be enrolled in the income-based repayment plan.
There are about 8 million federal loan-holders enrolled in SAVE plans, making it the most popular income-driven repayment plan.
Graduate plans eliminated, scaled down
The legislation also slashes the Graduate PLUS Program, which covers the full cost of graduate or professional programs.
Instead, there will be a new lifetime $100,000 cap on loans for graduate students, $200,000 for medical and law school students.
Catch up quick: The bill's Senate passage represented a significant achievement for Senate leadership and the White House.
The taxes, border and defense package, however, still has to clear the House — where discontent has been building for days.
Polling has been bad for the bill, which slashes food and health benefits for the poorest Americans, while giving tax cuts to higher earners.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans make gains in New Mexico voter registration, including in Santa Fe County
While New Mexico remains solidly blue territory, Republicans continue to make gains in the state's voter registration rolls. The GOP even added more voters in Santa Fe County, one of the most liberal and Democratic-performing areas in the state. Granted, the 5.8% year-over-year increase in registered Republicans in Santa Fe County equates to only about 1,000 voters, but it reflects a statewide trend. The number of registered Republicans across New Mexico grew from 421,653 in July 2024 to 436,647 last month, an increase of nearly 15,000 voters, according to the latest voter registration data. At the same time, Democrats lost just over 11,000 voters. Despite Republicans' gains, the proportion of voters in each major political party remains relatively flat in the state, with Democrats accounting for about 43% of the electorate and Republicans 32% — although, the GOP added a percentage point and Democrats lost one. The increase in Republican voters may reflect a Democratic Party struggling to find its message, Brian Sanderoff, an Albuquerque political analyst and respected pollster, said Monday. "I think the Democratic Party is trying to find its way, especially at the national level, and that can impact voter registration statistics," he added. The Republican Party of New Mexico started the year with the ambitious goal of registering 25,000 new voters, and Sanderoff said it has been doing a good job registering voters at the "grassroots level." The party's executive director, Leticia Muñoz, said everything the party does revolves around voter outreach. "RPNM takes great pride in the work being done by grassroots volunteers to register voters around the state over the last 5 years," she said in a statement. Muñoz also credits the commander in chief. "President [Donald] Trumps' policies continue to benefit New Mexicans greatly, which is another reason we're seeing many voters registering Republican," she said. A spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico downplayed the increase in registered Republicans. "There is a significantly smaller number of Republicans in New Mexico anyway, so any percentage change will look more dramatic than the reality of the total numbers," Daniel Garcia said in a statement. "I suppose the New Mexico GOP has to spin something to look like good news," he added. "They're obviously in a tough place trying to explain why voters should support quid pro quo immunity deals for child predator Ghislaine Maxwell and the GOP's signature accomplishment — their unpopular 'Big Beautiful Bill' that will close hospitals, eliminate health care coverage, and take away food assistance right here in New Mexico. Not to mention they'll have to explain to voters why they think tariffs, inflation, and privatizing Social Security will make us 'great again.' ' Voter registration data shows a slight increase in independent or "decline-to-state" voters, a number that grew from 315,772 to 320,988. The percentage of unaffiliated voters has been rising over the past decade and a half, a trend that will likely continue after New Mexico adopted a "semi-open primary" system, which allows voters who don't state a party affiliation to cast a ballot in a Democratic or Republican primary without changing their registration. In the state's most populous counties — Bernalillo, Doña Ana and Santa Fe, which are crucial in a statewide race — Democrats have a comfortable edge over Republicans. In those three counties combined, there are 324,152 registered Democrats and 177,070 registered Republicans. Independents are closing in on Republicans, though. The data show 168,351 "decline-to-state" voters in those three counties. Muñoz said Republicans are intent on gaining even more ground. "RPNM will continue our goal to flip New Mexico," she said, adding it's taken six to eight years to flip other blue states red. Asked whether Republicans' gains would affect the governor's race next year, Sanderoff said changes in voter registration are used to measure the direction of the state, but he noted Democrats maintain an advantage. "If you're consistently seeing Republicans make voter registration gains and Democrats stagnating on voter registration statistics, that is a barometer that one looks at to measure the political mood," he said. "It can be a predictor, but it's all relative, and you still have the lopsided voter registration edge that the Democrats have in terms of the actual numbers."
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures make slight gains as Wall Street eyes earnings with trade tensions ahead
US stock futures held steady as Wall Street regained its balance after a tumultuous week and braced for the next wave of corporate earnings. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F), the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F), and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) ticked up 0.1%. Palantir (PLTR) stock rose in after-hours trading after the company's earnings report beat expectations and revealed its revenue had topped $1 billion in a quarter for the first time. On Monday, stocks sharply rebounded after tanking on Friday in the aftermath of a number of market-shaking events, including a weak jobs report, fresh tariffs, new signs of rising prices, and the firing of the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. President Trump continued to amp up pressure on trade Monday, threatening to hike tariffs on India. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Wall Street is now focused on the continuation of earnings season. On Tuesday, AMD (AMD) and Rivian (RIVN) are set to report their results. McDonald's (MCD) and Disney (DIS) earnings land Wednesday. However, another trade blow looms at the end of the week, with Trump's latest iteration of global tariffs set to take effect. Oil flattened from multi-day drop after Trump's India rebuke Oil prices steadied from a three-day decline following a ramping up of threats from Trump to India over the Asian nation's continued use of Russian crude. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Oil flattened from multi-day drop after Trump's India rebuke Oil prices steadied from a three-day decline following a ramping up of threats from Trump to India over the Asian nation's continued use of Russian crude. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Oil prices steadied from a three-day decline following a ramping up of threats from Trump to India over the Asian nation's continued use of Russian crude. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
Corrections: Aug. 5, 2025
Because of an editing error, an article on Saturday about the impact of President Trump's shifting tariff levels on the African nation of Lesotho misstated the day Lesotho's 15 percent tariff rate was announced. It was Thursday night, not Friday night. An article on Monday about a city in Kansas suing over a planned ICE detention center misstated the language in a poster seen at a protest of an immigration detention facility in Leavenworth, Kan. The poster said that Leavenworth is 'more than a prison town,' rather than 'not just a prison town.' An article on Friday about Ford Motor announcing that it lost money in the second quarter as tariffs took a toll on its business misstated the day that Ford reported its second-quarter earnings. It was Wednesday, not Tuesday. A picture from the streaming outlet TBPN published with an article on Friday about A.I. researchers' pay packages misidentified a Microsoft employee who used to work at Google's DeepMind lab. The person shown in the image was not Amar Subramanya. An article on Saturday about the negative impact that the Trump administration's tariffs are having on businesses they were meant to help misstated the month that the United States lost 11,000 manufacturing jobs. It was July, not June. The article also misstated the number of manufacturing job losses in June, based on initial estimates. The revised number was 15,000, not 6,000. The earlier estimate was 6,000. An article on Sunday about a veteran lifeguard's Friday routine misstated, in some instances, Javier Rodriguez's surname on second reference and that of his three adult children. Their surname is Rodriguez, not Hernandez. Errors are corrected during the press run whenever possible, so some errors noted here may not have appeared in all editions. To contact the newsroom regarding correction requests, please email nytnews@ To share feedback, please visit Comments on opinion articles may be emailed to letters@ For newspaper delivery questions: 1-800-NYTIMES (1-800-698-4637) or email customercare@