
Have Your Say On 30-year Plan For NZ's Infrastructure Investment
The Commission's draft National Infrastructure Plan looks at the infrastructure New Zealand already has and how factors like an ageing population and climate change will drive future demands. It shows what we should be spending and makes recommendations for how we can get better results from this investment.
Te Waihanga CE Geoff Cooper says that compared to other high-income countries, New Zealand already spends a greater percentage of GDP on infrastructure but is in the bottom 10 percent for the value we get from that spend.
"To ensure New Zealanders are getting the infrastructure services they need, it's critical that we get smarter about how we invest.
"A National Infrastructure Plan can help, showing where our infrastructure dollar will have the greatest impact in meeting New Zealand's future needs," says Cooper.
We need to be ambitious
"Some of our most essential infrastructure has already been built, but we're not always good at looking after it. Overall, we should be spending around 60 percent of our infrastructure investment on looking after what we've already got," says Cooper.
The way we invest in new infrastructure will also need to change:
We will need more investment in our hospitals. An ageing population means a greater need for hospitals. At the same time, we'll see a relative reduction in demand in the need for new schools and university buildings.
We will need to invest more in electricity. To reach net zero by 2050 we need to increase electricity use by over 60 percent, boosting electricity-using industries and replacing fossil fuel use across the economy.
We will see changes in how we invest in land transport. Investment in land transport - our roads, public transport, and railways - has increased over the past 20 years. In many parts of the sector, the pace of investment is expected to moderate as the population ages and the relative importance of income growth as a demand driver eases.
The cost of responding to natural hazards will rise as we build more infrastructure to higher standards and bring forward renewals following a rising prevalence of extreme weather events.
Improving our infrastructure planning
"As we have heard from many in the sector, infrastructure policy and investment has experienced a lot of churn in recent electoral cycles. This perceived 'stop-start' approach can be costly for large projects and ongoing investment programmes.
"The draft Plan provides recommendations on how we can get a more consistent and affordable approach and clear the way for delivering the infrastructure we need. It also makes recommendations on how we can better prioritise taking care of what we've got and optimise maintenance cycles so that we have more for new infrastructure. These changes can give the sector the certainty it needs to plan ahead, improve productivity, and create the jobs needed to maintain and deliver our infrastructure," Cooper says.
Identifying projects that can make a difference
The draft Plan shares the results of the first round of the Infrastructure Priorities Programme (IPP). The IPP takes proposals through an independent process to prove they offer bang for buck and meet a critical need.
"While endorsed proposals aren't guaranteed funding, they give decision-makers confidence that these proposals have been independently assessed.
"Proposals in the IPP were submitted to the Commission by central government, local government and the private sector.
"We expect the list to grow as we receive submissions over future rounds," Cooper says.
We want to hear from you
"We want the National Infrastructure Plan to help build common ground about our areas of need and what is affordable for Kiwis, giving the Government of the day guidance for making decisions about infrastructure.
"This is too important not to get right and too big a job to do alone. This is why we're seeking feedback now, while the Plan is still a draft. Tell us what you think and what we've missed."
You can read more and have your say on our website ( this page will be updated from 10am Wednesday 25 June): https://tewaihanga.govt.nz/national-infrastructure-plan/feedback-on-draft-national-infrastructure-plan
Some key facts
Over the last 20 years New Zealand's average spend on infrastructure is 5.8% of GDP. Crown investment as a share of GDP accounts for about 40% of this, or 2.5% of GDP.
More recently, between 2010 and 2019, New Zealand spent more per capita than any other OECD country on infrastructure.
The quality of our infrastructure lags, relative to what we spend on it. High-level comparisons suggest that New Zealand has among the lowest infrastructure spending 'bang for buck' in the OECD.
We estimate that for most sectors, simply renewing and replacing what we have will consume the majority of our investment dollars over the next 30 years. For most sectors, this is 60% of infrastructure investment on average, but can be up to 80% in some sectors like education.
After spending on renewals and replacements, we will have between 2% and 3% of GDP left over for new and improved infrastructure each year, or about $10 to $12 billion per year on average.
For central government, this is between 0.5% and 1% of GDP. In dollar terms, this is about $3 to $4 billion per year on average across all types of infrastructure central government provides.
The draft Plan is underpinned by a number of technical reports that have also been published on our website. The Commission has also released assessment information from round one of the Infrastructure Priorities Programme.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Techday NZ
3 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Calls grow for KiwiSaver diversification as Bitcoin yields soar
New research indicates that a lack of diversification in KiwiSaver portfolios may be limiting retirement prospects for thousands of New Zealanders, prompting renewed calls for advisers to expand their knowledge of emerging asset classes. Analysis conducted by digital investment platform Swyftx shows that investing NZD $36,500 - equivalent to NZD $10 per day - in Bitcoin over the past ten years would today have grown to approximately NZD $2.8 million, representing a 76-fold return. In comparison, the same sum invested in an average balanced KiwiSaver fund would likely now be valued at NZD $65,000 to NZD $70,000. Jason Titman, Chartered Accountant and Chief Executive Officer of Swyftx, stated that the new data highlights the need for contemporary retirement planning strategies and enhanced adviser education, especially as pension funds worldwide begin to integrate digital assets into their long-term models. "Digital assets are now a mainstream component of diversified investment portfolios internationally, yet New Zealand advisers are lagging in both adoption and education. "If you'd invested just $10 per day in Bitcoin over the past 10 years, you'd have spent $36,500 and accumulated roughly 14.5 BTC. Today, that would be worth around $2.8 million, a 76x return. That kind of performance deserves consideration, even as a small part of a retirement portfolio." Titman contrasted the Bitcoin returns to the typical balanced KiwiSaver fund, which he said had returned around 6% to 7% per annum over the past decade. This would have turned a NZD $36,500 investment into approximately NZD $65,000 to NZD $70,000 today. Titman noted that digital asset adoption among high-net-worth families has been more rapid, suggesting this group recognises the potential benefits of digital assets as part of long-term investment strategies. "It's a clear example of the opportunity cost facing retirement savers when portfolios remain too narrow. "Diversification into digital assets, even at a small allocation, could dramatically shift long-term outcomes for many Kiwis," he says. Official figures from the Financial Markets Authority show that KiwiSaver balances rose by 19.3% in the last year, taking the average member balance to NZD $33,514. Despite this, only two of the existing KiwiSaver schemes currently offer any exposure to digital assets. Titman pointed to international trends, such as reported moves in the United States to broaden permitted 401(k) retirement plan investments to include digital assets, as evidence that the retirement market is evolving. While these changes have provoked mixed reactions within traditional finance circles, Titman feels they indicate a global reassessment of retirement fund structures and the returns expected by investors. "Regardless of political stance, what we're seeing globally is recognition that younger generations want more control, choice and exposure to higher-performing asset classes. The question is whether New Zealand's system will evolve fast enough to meet that demand," he says. He emphasised that the aim is not to take excessive risks with retirement savings, but to modernise portfolio construction. "We're not talking about putting someone's retirement on the line. We're talking about disciplined allocation, say 3% to 5%, to a high-growth, emerging asset class that has already demonstrated long-term return potential. It's about optimising performance, not taking unnecessary risk," he says. According to Titman, increased investment in digital assets could also have wider economic benefits, potentially supporting local market development, job creation, and expanding the tax base. "It's a sector that is expanding, and investor engagement with it is already occurring outside of traditional channels," says Titman. Swyftx's research also examined the effect of early and consistent exposure to digital assets for long-term savers. Titman believed that such allocations can have significant cumulative effects over decades. "If a young investor allocated just 5% of their KiwiSaver contributions into Bitcoin when they enter the workforce, the compounding impact over decades, particularly with historically high long-term returns, could significantly accelerate the path to retirement for some individuals. "While not all investors would become millionaires, the data suggests that financial outcomes could improve substantially when higher-growth assets are appropriately integrated," he says. Titman identified a significant need to upskill the adviser community on emerging assets and said Swyftx has developed a digital asset education platform for financial advisers, including portfolio construction guidance and international case studies. Swyftx's user data indicates that 72% of its more than 300,000 New Zealand clients on its Easy Crypto platform are aged between 25 and 45. This demographic is consistent with the core KiwiSaver participant group, and many are already investing in digital assets outside of KiwiSaver. With KiwiSaver entering its 17th year, Titman argued that a broader discussion is needed around modernising the system for future generations. "We know that the current financial education gap in New Zealand is significant, however, when advisers are equipped with evidence-based tools and global context, they're far more confident having conversations about diversification that includes digital assets. "Adoption from retail investors is already moving rapidly. Our research shows over 700,000 Kiwis or 14% are engaging with digital assets independently, which points to a need for the sector to catch up, particularly as more of these investors expect personalised, forward-thinking retirement advice. "Better-informed advisers are better placed to help their clients navigate emerging options. The role of the adviser is not to speculate, but to build robust, evidence-based portfolios that reflect clients' long-term goals," he says.


Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Swarbrick will have her pay docked for refusing to leave House
Chlöe Swarbrick's comments in the House on Tuesday: By Craig McCulloch of RNZ The Speaker has 'named' Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick for refusing to leave the House. The punishment means the MP had to once again leave the House, and will have her pay docked. Swarbrick was ejected from Parliament yesterday after refusing to withdraw and apologise for comments suggesting coalition MPs grow a spine and sanction Israel over the war in Gaza. At the time, Speaker Gerry Brownlee barred Swarbrick for the rest of the week, unless she apologised when the House sat this afternoon. Swarbrick refused to do so and refused to leave. Brownlee then named her - a punishment handed down by the Speaker for a MP whose conduct is disorderly. Swarbrick had previously said she had already received her punishment, and that worse things had been said by other MPs without the Speaker's intervention. Speaking to his ruling, Brownlee said the difference was previous comments had been interjections, while Swarbrick's comment was made inside a speech. "If you think about the comment that was made, 68 members of this House were accused of being spineless. There has never been a time where personal insults like delivered inside a speech were accepted by this House - and I'm not going to start accepting it." Brownlee asked MPs what standard they expected of themselves. "We have so many threats and other stuff being directed at Members of Parliament. If we don't change the behaviour in here, nothing will change outside." Labour leader Chris Hipkins questioned the precedent of the ruling. "There's not a single instance where a member has been asked to withdraw and apologise the following sitting day, and then named for not doing that." New Zealand First leader Winston Peters also questioned the ruling. "My personal view is I don't agree with a thing Chlöe Swarbrick said at all, but this is a robust House where people have a right to express their views as passionate as they may, within certain rules, but I do not think that eviction was warranted." Peters said there had been many instances of language in the House he had disagreed with, including the use of the c-word earlier in the year. Te Pati Maori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer referred to that in her contribution. "There were many of us that were offended by the c-word, but I do want to be able to assure is that spineless is a word, and it looks like the ruling is a political suppression," she said. Ngarewa-Packer repeated the c-word outright. Speaking to RNZ this morning, Swarbrick said the party had received correspondence from legal experts and the public pointing out "far worse" things had been said by other MPs, where the Speaker had chosen not to intervene. "It just doesn't really wash." Swarbrick said she would prefer Parliament's attention was focused on the "real issues of the day" and re-iterated her call for more action against Israel. "New Zealanders want action, and if our House can come together on the point of sanctioning Israel for its war crimes, then that finally would bring us in line with our legacy of standing for human rights and justice." University of Otago law professor Andrew Geddis told RNZ it was unusual for Swarbrick to be asked to withdraw and apologise, given many MPs had made similar comments in Parliament before without consequence. He said the standard penalty for challenging the Speaker's authority was to be ordered out of the House for one day. A week-long punishment, Geddis said, was inconsistent with other rulings made by Speakers in recent times. "If the Speaker is starting to almost make up the rules as he goes along, he puts at risk the preparedness of other MPs to accord him his authority. "MPs might start asking, 'well, if the Speaker is just going to do their own thing with no regard to precedence, do we really trust them to have that sort of power?'"

1News
5 hours ago
- 1News
Winston Peters announces new US ambassador
Senior diplomat Chris Seed has been appointed as New Zealand's next ambassador to the United States, Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced. Seed's appointment comes at a crucial time for diplomatic relations between New Zealand and the US, New Zealand's second biggest trading partner. He would step into the role in January 2026. Earlier this month, the Trump administration levelled a surprise 15% tariff on New Zealand. Just a day prior, the FBI opened its new office in Wellington to "strengthen and enhance" its cooperation with a "key Five Eyes partner in the southwestern Pacific region". Director Kash Patel also said the new office would be working to counter China's influence in the Pacific. ADVERTISEMENT Seed was currently filling in as acting High Commissioner to the UK, stepping into the role after Phil Goff was sacked after he made comments about US President Donald Trump. He has previously served as Secretary of Foreign Affairs and Trade from 2019 to 2024, as well as leading New Zealand High Commissions in Canberra and Port Moresby. Hamish Cooper would take up the role of High Commissioner to the UK in September. Peters today described New Zealand's strategic partnership with the United States as, "one of our most important and long-standing relationships". He said it was "essential" that New Zealand's ambassador to the US was experienced and had the "judgement and influence to effectively represent our country in Washington DC and navigate the range of important and pressing issues that are vital to New Zealanders". 'Mr Seed is one of New Zealand's most senior and accomplished diplomats and is, accordingly, the right person for this vital role." Seed would be replacing Rosemary Banks, who would be completing her second term as ambassador by the time Seed arrives in Washington DC. "Ms Banks has had a most distinguished diplomatic career, having led New Zealand missions in Paris, New York and Washington,' Peters said. 'Twice Ms Banks has been asked by her Government to serve in Washington DC and we are enormously grateful to her that twice she answered that call to serve with distinction as New Zealand Ambassador to the United States. 'Ms Banks' long diplomatic experience and her elevated standing amongst her US counterparts, during such a challenging time in global affairs, has seen her contribute greatly to one of New Zealand's most critical bilateral relationships."