logo
How a fizzled recall attempt actually helped Mayor Karen Bass

How a fizzled recall attempt actually helped Mayor Karen Bass

Good morning, and welcome to L.A. on the Record — our City Hall newsletter. It's Julia Wick, with an assist from David Zahniser, giving you the latest on city and county government.
Several millennia ago during the Trojan War, an army of Greeks built a massive wooden horse, feigned departure and left it as a 'gift' outside the walled city of Troy.
The Trojans brought the offering — filled, unbeknownst to them, with Greek soldiers — into their fortified city and unwittingly wrought their own downfall. At least that's how the legend goes.
So if an attack disguised as a gift is a Trojan horse, what do you call a gift disguised as an attack?
One could argue that the attempted recall of Mayor Karen Bass inadvertently fits the bill.
Back in early March, Silicon Valley philanthropist and former Robert F. Kennedy Jr. running mate Nicole Shanahan launched an effort to recall Bass. At the time, Bass was still on her back foot — an incumbent, first-term mayor who'd become a national target for her initial response to the Palisades fire.
It's notoriously difficult to gather enough signatures to trigger a recall. But Shanahan's extremely deep pockets (her ex-husband co-founded Google) made anything possible. With the mayor already wounded and Angelenos feeling angry and frustrated, a well-funded recall effort could have been the spark that torched Bass' reelection chances.
That did not come to pass.
Proponents didn't even finish the paperwork necessary to begin gathering signatures, then tweeted in June that a recall would 'no longer be our vehicle for change' and that they would instead focus on holding elected officials accountable at the ballot box in 2026. Their spokesperson has not responded to several emails from The Times.
But the short-lived recall effort had one effect its proponents likely did not anticipate. During a tenuous moment for Bass, they may have unintentionally handed her an extremely useful tool: the ability to form an opposition committee unencumbered by limits on the size of the donations she collects.
The threat from Shanahan's group allowed Bass to form her own anti-recall campaign committee — separate from her general reelection account, which cannot collect more than $1,800 from each donor. Now, she could raise more money from her existing supporters, in far larger amounts.
Flash forward to this week, when the latest tranche of campaign finance numbers were released, revealing how much was raised and spent from the beginning of the year through the end of June. While Bass' official reelection campaign took in an anemic $179,589, her anti-recall coffers hoovered up more than four times that amount.
The nearly $750,000 collected by the anti-recall campaign included two major donations at the end of March that we previously reported on: $250,000 from the Bass-affiliated Sea Change PAC and $200,000 from former assembly speaker and Actum managing partner Fabian Núñez's leftover campaign cash.
Along with Núñez and Sea Change, the largest donors were philanthropists Jon Croel and William Resnick ($25,000 each), businessman Baron Farwell ($25,000) and former City Councilmember Cindy Miscikowski ($15,000). Several others gave $10,000 a piece, including pomegranate billionaire and power donor Lynda Resnick.
It's far easier to rally donations when you're dealing with an impending threat. ('Save the mayor from a right-wing recall!' is much catchier than asking for reelection dollars when a serious challenger has yet to jump into the race.) And it's infinitely faster to stockpile cash when you aren't limited to $1,800 increments.
'After the fires and what had happened, anything was possible, and we had to mobilize, and that's what the mayor did,' said Bass campaign strategist Doug Herman. 'But the people of the city didn't want to have a recall in the midst of what they thought were more serious problems.'
Shanahan declined to comment.
When the recall effort officially times out on Aug. 4, the Bass camp will no longer be able to raise unlimited sums to fight it (with a few exceptions, such as expenses related to winding down the committee or settling debt). But the anti-recall committee will still have quite the extra arsenal to fire off in her favor.
Sometimes your loudest enemies are really friends in disguise.
—WHITHER CARUSO? Brentwood resident and former Vice President Kamala Harris announced this week that she would not be running for governor, intensifying questions about whether former mayoral candidate Rick Caruso might jump into the gubernatorial race ... or potentially challenge Bass again for mayor. Through a spokesperson, Caruso declined to comment.
— RACE FOR THE 8TH FLOOR: City Attorney candidate Marissa Roy outraised incumbent Hydee Feldstein Soto during the latest fundraising period, delivering a major warning shot about the seriousness of her campaign. For now, Feldstein Soto still has more cash on hand than Roy, who is challenging her from the left.
— COASTAL CASH: In the race for a Westside council district, public interest lawyer Faizah Malik raised a hefty $127,360, but her stash pales in comparison to the $343,020 that incumbent Councilmember Traci Park brought in during the most recent filing period. That's far more than any other city candidate running in the June 2026 election.
— AHEAD OF THE PACK: Council staffer Jose Ugarte, who's hoping to succeed his boss, termed out Councilmember Curren Price, in a crowded South L.A. race, raised a whopping $211,206, far outpacing his rivals.
— VIEW FROM THE VALLEY: During this filing cycle, Tim Gaspar and Barri Worth Girvan both brought in real money in the race to succeed outgoing Councilmember Bob Blumenfield in the West Valley. Girvan outraised Gaspar during the past half-year, but Gaspar entered the race earlier and still has substantially more cash on hand.
— WHERE'S MONICA? One incumbent who didn't report any fundraising is Valley Councilmember Monica Rodriguez. When reached Friday, Rodriguez said she is still planning to run for reelection and was in the process of changing treasurers. She did not answer when asked whether she was also considering a potential mayoral bid, as has been rumored.
— WHAT ABOUT KENNETH? City Controller Kenneth Mejia does not have any campaign finance numbers listed because he qualified his reelection committee after the June 30 fundraising deadline. He'll be required to share fundraising numbers for the next filing period.
— LOWER LAYOFFS: The number of employee layoffs planned for the 2025-26 fiscal year continued to decline this week, falling to 394, according to a report released Friday by City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo. Bass' budget had proposed 1,600 earlier this year. Szabo attributed much of the decrease to the transfer of employees to vacant positions that are not targeted for layoff.
— TOKENS OF APPRECIATION: According to her disclosure forms, Bass' reelection committee spent more than $1,100 on gifts 'of appreciation,' including flowers sent to Mayer Brown lawyers Edgar Khalatian, Dario Frommer and Phil Recht; Fabian Núñez; lawyer Byron McLain; longtime supporters Wendy and Barry Meyer; author Gil Robertson; former Amazon exec Latasha Gillespie; L.A. Labor Fed head honcho Yvonne Wheeler; lobbyist Arnie Berghoff; Faye Geyen; and LA Women's Collective co-founder Hannah Linkenhoker. The most expensive bouquet ($163.17, from Ode à la Rose) went to Lynda Resnick.
— PIZZA INTEL: Bass has not, to my knowledge, publicly shared the names of her reelection finance committee. But her forms list a $198.37 charge at Triple Beam Pizza for food for a 'finance committee meeting' with Cathy Unger, Victoria Moran, Ron Stone, Kellie Hawkins, Todd Hawkins, Cookie Parker, Stephanie Graves, Leslie Gilbert-Lurie, George Pla, Wendy Greuel, Byron McLain, Chris Pak, Travis Kiyota, Areva Martin and Kevin Pickett. Bass' consultant did not immediately respond when asked if that list constituted her finance committee, and if anyone was missing.
— FAMILY-FRIENDLY PROGRAMMING? Speakers at Los Angeles City Council meetings will be banned from using the N-word and the C-word, the council decided Wednesday. But my colleague Noah Goldberg reports that the council's decision to ban the words could be challenged in court, with some legal scholars saying it could violate speakers' 1st Amendment free speech rights to curse out their elected officials.
— ZINE O' THE TIMES: City Councilmember Bob Blumenfield finally named his pick for the city's Charter Reform Commission: Dennis Zine, who served on the council for 12 years, representing the same West Valley district as Blumenfield. Zine spent more than three decades as an officer with the LAPD while also serving on the board of the Police Protective League, the union that represents rank-and-file officers, and should not be confused with progressive former Santa Monica mayor Denny Zane.
That's it for this week! Send your questions, comments and gossip to LAontheRecord@latimes.com. Did a friend forward you this email? Sign up here to get it in your inbox every Saturday morning.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Truth Social's Perplexity search comes with Trump-friendly media sources
Truth Social's Perplexity search comes with Trump-friendly media sources

Axios

time5 hours ago

  • Axios

Truth Social's Perplexity search comes with Trump-friendly media sources

President Trump's social media company Truth Social unveiled a new search tool powered by AI answer engine Perplexity on Wednesday — but Truth Social users who run Perplexity searches may find their results limited to a narrow set of typically Trump-supporting media outlets. Why it matters: Increasingly, where you ask online matters as much as what you ask. Catch up quick: Trump Media & Technology Group on Wednesday said it was launching a public beta test of a search engine, Truth Search AI, powered by Perplexity. Perplexity has been seen as a nascent Google-killer and is often touted by investors as a possible acquisition target for the likes of Apple. How it works: Axios asked seven questions on both a logged-in Truth Social account and the free, logged-out Perplexity website … What happened on January 6, 2021? Why was Donald Trump impeached? What crimes was President Trump convicted of? Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election? What is Hunter Biden's laptop a reference to? Was Hillary Clinton ever charged with a crime? Is the new "Naked Gun" movie good? Between the lines: In most cases, the responses were generally similar — but the sources linked to the answers were not. In all seven responses on Truth Social, either was the most common, or the only, listed source of information. Other sources were Washington Times or Epoch Times. In contrast, answers via the public version of Perplexity returned a wider variety of sources, including Wikipedia, Reddit, YouTube, NPR, Esquire and Politico. Although the questions were matched and asked at roughly the same time, there was no source overlap. What they're saying: A Perplexity spokesperson tells Axios that Truth Social is a customer of Perplexity's API, which means it — like tens of thousands of other developers — is building tools to its own specifications, and with its own restrictions. Any customization, like limiting the sources for its answers, would happen entirely on the Truth Social side. While it's standard practice for platforms to put their own layers of rules and information on top of tools, search tools usually cast a broader net. Truth Social did not mention any restrictions in its announcement, although it did say it plans to "refine and expand our search function based on user feedback." Perplexity's Sonar API specifically includes the ability for users to customize sources, which the company noted in January was a top user request. The bottom line: When you ask a search tool a question, particularly in the age of AI, it's best to know exactly where your information is coming from, and whether there are any limits on what the tool will tell you. Expect more of this as governments and businesses increasingly put their thumbs on the AI scale to serve their interests.

RFK Jr. defunds a medical miracle
RFK Jr. defunds a medical miracle

Vox

time6 hours ago

  • Vox

RFK Jr. defunds a medical miracle

This story appeared in The Logoff, a daily newsletter that helps you stay informed about the Trump administration without letting political news take over your life. Subscribe here. Welcome to The Logoff: In a blow to US pandemic preparedness, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced on Tuesday evening that he was slashing $500 million in federal mRNA vaccine contracts. What is HHS cutting? Twenty-two mRNA vaccine projects, intended to combat respiratory viruses like bird flu, are set to be wound down following the announcement. What is mRNA? mRNA, or messenger RNA, is the reason the US had safe, effective Covid-19 vaccines available as early as it did. A promising but still unproven technology prior to the pandemic, mRNA allowed pharmaceutical companies to develop effective vaccines far more rapidly and more adaptably than was once possible. Beyond respiratory viruses like Covid, researchers hope mRNA could even be effective in treating cancers. What's the context? Kennedy has long made false claims about mRNA vaccines, including describing the Covid-19 vaccine as 'the deadliest vaccine ever made.' On Tuesday, he falsely stated that mRNA vaccines 'don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract,' such as Covid. In fact, by one estimate, the Covid vaccines saved some 2.5 million lives. The Logoff The email you need to stay informed about Trump — without letting the news take over your life. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. What are the implications of the cuts? Tuesday's announcement is bad news for two distinct reasons. As far as Kennedy is concerned, this is just the latest reminder that he is who he always appeared to be, and only partially covered up while seeking to be confirmed as the secretary for the US Department of Health and Human Services: not a fair 'skeptic' but an anti-vaccine advocate who will use his power to impose unscientific beliefs on US public health infrastructure. For the country, vaccine experts say Tuesday's news is a real blow to efforts to prepare for the next pandemic, the arrival of which is a question of when and not if. mRNA vaccines have proved to be one of our best tools for saving lives, and the US will now be further behind in developing new vaccines than it otherwise would be. The consequence is likely to be measured in human lives. And with that, it's time to log off…

Google quietly doubles down on a controversial workplace trend
Google quietly doubles down on a controversial workplace trend

Miami Herald

time9 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Google quietly doubles down on a controversial workplace trend

Google (GOOGL) , operated by Alphabet, raised eyebrows earlier this year when it sent a memo to employees notifying them that it was scaling back its diversity, equity, and inclusion goals. In the memo, sent to employees in February, Google Chief People Officer Fiona Cicconi said that "recent court decisions and U.S. Executive Orders" prompted the company to make this change, since it is a federal contractor. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter "In 2020, we set aspirational hiring goals and focused on growing our offices outside California and New York to improve representation," said Cicconi. "We'll continue to invest in states across the U.S. - and in many countries globally - but in the future we will no longer have aspirational goals." Related: Google sends a harsh message to employees after layoffs Google's decision came after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2023 to end affirmative action in college admissions, raising legal questions about DEI programs in workplaces nationwide. Then, on Jan. 20, President Donald Trump issued an executive order dismantling the federal government's diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. In the order, he claims that the programs enforce "illegal and immoral discrimination." In addition to scaling back its DEI goals, Google also scrubbed 58 DEI-related groups from its list of nonprofit organizations that receive the company's "most substantial contributions," according to a recent report from the Tech Transparency Project. The report indicates that the change took place around February, and the groups that were removed had mission statements that contained the words "diversity," "equity," and "inclusion," and other terms the Trump administration advised federal agencies to purge. Related: Intel announces a drastic decision to fix its struggling business Some of the organizations that were removed from the list include the African American Community Service Agency, which aims to "empower all Black and historically excluded communities;" the Latino Leadership Alliance, which is dedicated to "race equity affecting the Latino community;" and the National Network to End Domestic Violence, which spreads awareness about violence against women. The revelation comes after Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said in an interview with The Verge in May that diversity is still "a foundational value" for the company, despite recent cuts. "What we are doing in the company is constantly at our scale," said Pichai. "We look at that first - see what works, what we can scale up better. All I can say is we probably have more resources invested in diversity now than at any point in our history as a company, in terms of the scale and the resources we put in." Many companies in corporate America committed to implementing DEI policies in their workplaces in 2020 after George Floyd was murdered by a white police officer who assisted in his arrest. The incident brought to light many inequities Black people face in America. These policies aimed to advance workplace opportunities for people of various backgrounds. However, when the U.S. Supreme Court ended affirmative action in college admissions, which aimed to improve educational opportunities for minorities, companies began questioning the legality of these policies. More Labor: Amazon CEO warns employees of a harsh new reality IRS sends stern warning to employees after layoffsGoogle sends a harsh message to employees after layoffs Also, DEI policies later became the source of backlash from conservative consumers who began boycotting companies that adopted them. Large companies such as Walmart, McDonald's, Amazon, and Lowe's have either scaled back or completely axed their DEI policies over the past few months. Despite recent cuts to DEI across corporate America, a recent survey from culture and inclusion platform Paradigm found that only 19% of companies/organizations plan to decrease their DEI funding in 2025, while 23% plan to increase their funding, and 58% plan to make no changes. Related: Meta quietly plans rude awakening for employees after layoffs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store