Govt embarrassed as CAT revokes IPS officer's suspension
The stampede, which occurred on June 4, led to the tragic death of 11 individuals and left over 60 injured. Following public outrage and criticism over the failure to manage the crowd, the government had ordered a magistrate-level inquiry and suspended several officials, including then Additional Commissioner of Police (East Division), Vikas Kumar, and then Bengaluru City Police Commissioner B. Dayananda.
Challenging his suspension, Vikas Kumar had approached CAT. A bench comprising Justices B.K. Srivatsava and Santosh Mehra had reserved its order on June 24 and delivered its ruling today, directing the state to revoke the suspension and reinstate the officer. The tribunal also ruled that Vikas Kumar is entitled to all service-related benefits.
Senior advocate Dhyan Chinappa, representing Vikas Kumar, argued that the suspension violated service rules and lacked procedural backing. With this decision, focus now shifts to similar cases involving other suspended officers, including Dayananda and DCP H.T. Shekhar, which are currently under CAT review and may also see relief soon. The suspensions were executed under All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 for the IPS officers and Karnataka State Police (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules, 1965 for the ACP and Police Inspector.With CAT's order exposing legal and procedural lapses in the government's handling of the disciplinary action, the episode has become a source of political embarrassment. It also raises questions about accountability mechanisms and the fairness of immediate punitive measures following high-profile public incidents.
However, on Wednesday the government approached the High Court challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's (CAT) order reinstating Additional Commissioner of Police Vikash Kumar Vikash, who was suspended following the tragic stampede at Chinnaswamy Stadium here last month, which claimed 11 lives and injured 56 others.
It contended that the CAT overstepped its jurisdiction by making determinations on the incident without the benefit of a full-fledged departmental inquiry. It termed the Tribunal's reasoning as 'perverse' and inconsistent with established legal principles concerning suspension.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Two Mumbai cops suspended for kidnapping, extorting pan stall owner
Two police constables have been suspended after an FIR was registered against them along with two others for allegedly kidnapping and extorting money from a shopkeeper in Andheri. The accused policemen have been identified as Hemant Kapse and Chandrashekhar Darade, both of whom are attached to the local arms division of the Mumbai police. Kapse has been in police service since 2008 while Darade was recruited into the force in 2014. Confirming the suspension of the two constables, an IPS officer told The Indian Express: 'Both the constables have been suspended and a departmental inquiry has been initiated against them.' Deputy Commissioner of Police (LA-1) Vinayak Dhakane has been assigned the task of conducting an inquiry in the matter. When contacted, Dhakane refused to speak. According to sources in the police, the two accused constable, along with another policeman Santosh Wagh posted with the Maharashtra State Security Corporation, and another person allegedly extorted Mohamed Arif Faizan Khan (35), a pan stall shopkeeper. According to the FIR, on the evening of June 24, the four accused visited Khan's pan stall in Andheri (west) in an Ertiga car. They posed as 'Food Department Police' and told him that he was illegally selling gutkha. They made him sit in their car and drove him towards south Mumbai. The accused allegedly abused and assaulted Khan and demanded Rs 3 lakh in lieu of not filing a case against him for selling gutkha. When Khan said he had only Rs 10,000 with him, the accused made him borrow money. Khan borrowed money from a friend and on their instructions, transferred Rs 40,000 via UPI to a bank account of a person known to the accused. They also snatched away Rs 3,500 from Khan's pocket and dropped him at the Kalachowki area. Khan noted down the vehicle's number and went back to Andheri. The next day, he contacted police and filed a complaint against the four persons. On Khan's complaint, the DN Nagar police registered an FIR against four unknown persons under Sections 137 (2)(kidnapping), 204(personating a public servant), 3(5)(common intention), 308(extortion), 351(2)(criminal intimidation), 352(intentional insult) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS). During investigation, police found that out of the four, three served in the Maharashtra Police. The four were arrested, but they secured bail from the court. Kapse was earlier suspended in 2021 for his alleged close proximity with a criminal.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
IPS appointments in CAPFs continue despite Supreme Court order against the move
Despite a Supreme Court ruling to 'progressively reduce' the deputation of Indian Police Service (IPS) officers in Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF), the Union Home Ministry continues to appoint IPS officers to senior posts. Since May 23, 2025, when the Supreme Court ruled that Group A officers of CAPFs are 'Organised Services' for 'all purposes,' at least eight appointments of IPS officers in the rank of Commandant to Inspector Generals in the CAPFs have been made by the Ministry. In the Sanjay Prakash & Others versus Union of India case, the court ruled that the deputation posts of IPS officers in the Senior Administrative Grade (SAG) or up to the rank of Inspector General in CAPFs should be 'progressively reduced over a period of time, say within an outer limit of two years.' The counsel for the petitioners have now written to the Home Ministry, the Department of Personnel and Training (DOPT), and the Director General of all CAPFs that the ongoing appointments are in contempt of the court judgment. In 2021, Group A officers of the CAPFs approached the apex court seeking Non-Functional Financial Upgradation (NFFU), cadre review and restructuring and amendment of recruitment rules to eliminate IPS deputation and allow internal promotions up to SAG. Reduce IPS dominance Presently, 20% posts in the rank of Deputy Inspector General (DIG) and 50% posts in the rank of Inspector General (IG) in CAPFs are reserved for IPS officers. The court's decision would significantly reduce the IPS dominance in CAPFs. Around 13,000 CAPF officers were likely to benefit from the judgment leading to faster promotions. The Home Ministry is the cadre controlling authority for CAPFs and the IPS. The CAPFs comprise the Border Security Force (BSF), the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), the Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) and the Indo Tibetan Border Police (ITBP). Due to a large number of posts being reserved for IPS officers, CAPF officers suffer stagnation in services and on an average an officer who joins as Assistant Commandant (AC) takes 25 years to be promoted as a Commandant, whereas he or she should attain the seniority in 13 years. A CAPF official said that before the judgment, the IPS officers were being appointed to the ranks of DIG and IGPs, but on June 25, the Ministry appointed a 2016 batch IPS officer of Tripura cadre as Commandant, equivalent to Superintendent of Police rank, in the Sashatra Seema Bal (SSB). Though there is a provision in the SSB Act to depute IPS officers to the post of a Commandant, the order was unusual as it is very rare for an SP rank IPS officer to come to CAPF on deputation. As on June 23, there were 69 sanctioned posts for IPS at the rank of IGP in BSF, CRPF, CISF, SSB and ITBP, out of which 56 were occupied. Out of 117 DIG posts for IPS officers, 24 posts were vacant.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Lokayukta recommends action against ex-SP for involvement in extortion racket
After the arrest of Ningappa Sawant, a former head constable, a fortnight ago, the Karnataka Lokayukta mentioned former Bengaluru Lokayukta SP Srinath Joshi M. as co-accused and has written to the Chief Secretary to take action against him as per the All India Services (Conduct) Rules. A probe allegedly revealed that Ningappa, who has proximity with Joshi, used to target government officials posing as Lokayukta officers and extort money threatening to foist cases against them. Lokayukta officials said preliminary findings established the link of the accused IPS officer, Joshi, which violates the service rules. The Lokayukta has also asked the government to submit an action taken report. According to an official release, even though there were no complaints, the Lokayukta, based on the information, took up a case and registered an FIR against the accused under the PC Act. Investigations revealed that Ningappa sent intimidating WhatsApp messages to officials, allegedly demanding bribes using the codeword 'KG', and the probe found that the accused had opened 24 crypto wallets to invest in cryptocurrency to convert the black money into white. Analysis of the accused's mobile also revealed that 13 out of 24 crypto wallets were found to have transactions amounting to over ₹4.92 crore. The Lokayukta also announced that it has set up an 'internal monitoring wing' to keep a check on erring officials. It also asked the government to appoint judicial and other officers. Earlier, Lokayukta officials submitted a proposal to set up such a wing using the officials transferred from Anti Anti-Corruption Bureau to monitor internal irregularities, but the proposal was turned down by the government. However, with Lokayukta having over 1900 staff and considering the increasing number of complaints and cases, especially against the police officials, it has become necessary to have an internal monitoring cell for a free and fair probe. Hence, the Lokayukta has set up a unit temporarily and has asked the government to sanction a judicial officials and required staff to head the probe, sources said . Taking serious note of the extortion cases through impersonators, the Lokayukta said that as many as 41 FIRs were registered across the State.
