Tangled rivalries complicate campaigns for Cook County property tax offices
Gov. JB Pritzker and U.S. Sen Dick Durbin have yet to announce whether they will run for re-election in the 2026 primaries, so many ambitious Illinois Dems are keeping their powder dry for the moment.
Down-ticket, hopefuls were already staking their claims at the Cook County Democratic Party's pre-slating meeting Wednesday to vie for three major property tax offices on the ballot in 2026: county assessor and two seats on the county's Board of Review.
This year's pre-slating, a gathering of city and suburban Democratic committeemen at the headquarters for IBEW Local 134, is a largely ceremonial opportunity for candidates to tout their credentials. But it also presents the first chance for hopefuls to lay out their lines of attack.
Assessor Fritz Kaegi so far faces a four-candidate field in his third bid: a former employee-turned adversary, the nephew of a former assessor, and two candidates connected to one of his fiercest critics.
Samantha Steele, who worked for Kaegi in his first term, now seeks to replace him. So does Patrick Hynes, another former employee and the nephew of former county assessor Tom Hynes. Two other people who worked for Larry Rogers, one of Kaegi's loudest detractors, also presented their credentials Wednesday.
The party's endorsement, which won't land until later this summer, comes with campaign help — passing petitions, fundraising, and a mass-mailing to prospective voters ahead of the primary in March 2026. Democrats have typically sailed to relatively easy victories in the general election.
Kaegi largely self-funded his previous bids for the Democratic nomination. In 2018 he defeated incumbent Assessor Joe Berrios. And in 2022 he beat water reclamation commissioner Kari Steele, who lost despite the backing of many powerful real estate interests. Kaegi loaned himself $500,000 last month.
Party Chair and Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle on Wednesday asked Kaegi's potential challengers how they would chart a path to victory that could overcome Kaegi's personal wealth. Some said they would seek campaign contributions from property tax attorneys, labor unions or business interests to compete.
Assessor candidates sought to flex their property tax expertise while blasting Kaegi's tenure. Several highlighted last summer's Tribune and Illinois Answers investigation into hundreds of properties Kaegi missed, while others criticized his controversial COVID adjustment and general 'unpredictability' in assessments for home and business owners in recent years.
Hynes, a longtime employee of the Assessor's Office who is now the assessor for Lyons Township, has been a consistent Kaegi critic since leaving the office in late 2021.
During a five minute introduction, Hynes noted he provided information to reporters about many of the problematic properties that undergirded the Tribune and Illinois Answers investigation. He has also helped run a social media account, FritzedAgain, that continues to point out potential assessment errors.
'The current volatility and unpredictability' in the assessment system stresses business and homeowners alike, Hynes said. 'Our commercial investors cannot confidently estimate future property tax costs, which depresses investment, and our residential taxpayers have been subjected to wild swings in assessed values and property tax burdens divorced from the actions of the market.'
It was a criticism most Kaegi challengers would repeat.
Hynes said he 'has not made a decision' about whether he would accept donations from property tax interests, but 'campaigns cost money… it may be an impossible situation.'
Kaegi did not attack any potential challengers at the pre-slating event, and faced only a few questions from fellow Democrats. He ticked off several victories during his tenure, including passage of a bill in Springfield designed to help spur affordable housing, current efforts to allow more seniors to qualify for the county's 'freeze' program, and continued efforts to reduce assessment disparities 'which fall too heavily on our average homeowner.'
Kaegi described himself as 'an advocate for the homeowner' and has been pushing for statewide approval of a so-called 'circuit breaker' program to help people pay for large spikes in their property tax bills.
Steele faced some more critical, though veiled, questioning, including about a lingering DUI charge dating back to November. Officers arrived at the scene of a crash, where Steele admitted to hitting two cars while driving a Honda that belonged to a friend.
According to body camera footage and the police report, officers found an open but corked bottle of wine in the footwell of the front passenger seat. They reported her eyes were 'bloodshot and glassy' and that her breath smelled like alcohol.
She repeatedly declined officers' requests, including to take a breathalyzer test, and told them she was an elected official. She eventually went to Weiss hospital after telling officers she hit her head during the crash. Steele kept her drivers license after the arrest because a judge agreed officers improperly filled out some of her arrest paperwork. Her next court date is May 1.
Steele acknowledged 'personal challenges' on Wednesday and said she wished 'that no one in this room has to face the public scrutiny' she had, without referring directly to the incident. Still, she argued it 'has nothing to do with the job that I am running for, and nothing to do with the job that I currently hold.'
'I would promise to ensure that industry standards are adhered to,' Steele said, pointing to her 20-year career in the assessment industry. 'I can do this work in my sleep.'
In addition to her work in Cook County, Steele separately served as an appointee on the Lake County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals in Indiana from 2020 until stepping down in January. Her exit, the Post-Tribune reported, came at the same time Indiana legislators were moving to require state residency to serve on such boards across the state. She runs a property tax consulting firm called Leonor Group, which she says does not have local clients.
Steele did not face direct questions about the case, but was asked by 50th Ward Committeeman Bruce Leon to provide 'more transparency about the situation that occurred… from my perspective, character does matter.'
Steele told Leon she didn't know 'how much more transparent' she could be and pivoted to discuss increased assessments in Rogers Park.
She told the Tribune in a separate Tuesday interview that a pituitary tumor, which has since been removed, impaired her peripheral vision and 'contributed to' the crash. She acknowledged she had a drink at around 3 pm that day, but noted it was more than five hours before the crash.
Two of Steele's colleagues on the board — Dana Pointer and Timnetra Burrus — also introduced themselves to the party on Wednesday. Both have ties to the Board of Review's longest serving commissioner, Larry Rogers, who has been in a protracted political tussle with Kaegi and last year pledged to either run for assessor himself or help fund someone who could beat Kaegi.
Pointer has worked as Rogers' outreach director and a senior condominium analyst that has defended property tax cases at the state's Property Tax Appeal Board on the board's behalf. Burrus worked for Rogers' for more than 15 years, according to her LinkedIn, before becoming the chief deputy commissioner — essentially the administrator for the board's 170-person staff.
Rogers did not say Tuesday which candidate he planned to support. He and Steele have also frequently butted heads. Steele said she would not run for assessor if the party did not endorse her, and that she would instead run to keep her seat on the Board of Review.
Two people are running for Steele's seat: Stephanie Mendoza and Liz Nicholson. Mendoza is Evanston's City Clerk. Nicholson is a longtime political consultant and fundraiser. George Cardenas, another Board of Review Commissioner, is also running for re-election.
Others that presented at pre-slating were uncontested and well-known to their fellow Democrats. That list includes county board President Toni Preckwinkle, Sheriff Tom Dart, Treasurer Maria Pappas and Clerk Monica Gordon, who first won her appointment to the seat from the same group about a year ago. Democrats also heard from candidates for spots on the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District and judicial seats.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eater
16 minutes ago
- Eater
Olmsted Is Closing in Prospect Heights
is the lead editor of the Northeast region with more than 20 years of experience as a reporter, critic, editor, and cookbook author. Chef Greg Baxtrom's standout Prospect Heights restaurant Olmsted will close August 17 after nearly a decade, he announced on Instagram. Olmsted, named for the famous landscape architect Fredrick Law Olmsted, who shaped the design of public spaces such as Prospect Park and Central Park in New York, opened to much fanfare in 2016. It was in the process of being saved, he said in his post, but efforts fell through. The announcement comes weeks after Baxtrom shuttered nearby Patti Ann's, the midwestern-leaning restaurant and bakery named after his mother. His remaining restaurant, 5 Acres, continues to run at Rockefeller Center. When it debuted, Olmsted 'was originally focused on steak-and-potatoes accessibility. But that isn't quite how it played out,' Eater wrote in sizing up how it became 'the hottest restaurant in Brooklyn' by 2017. A native of Chicago, Baxtrom opened his first restaurant in New York after working at acclaimed restaurants like Mugaritz in Spain, Atera and Per Se in New York, and Blue Hill at Stone Barns in Tarrytown. He once described himself as the '18-year-old with braces' working in the kitchen at Chicago's Alinea — and his Prospect Heights restaurant recently hosted the Alinea pop-up in honor of its 20th anniversary. Olmsted reflects Baxtrom's experiences, incorporating a working garden where diners could enjoy cocktails a stone's throw from live quail. His early menus featured dishes like watermelon sushi, the famous carrot crepe with clams, guinea hen two ways, and desserts like the frozen yogurt with whipped lavender honey. And while prices were more expensive than what had been in the neighborhood, he opened with prices that were 'low' compared to similar caliber restaurants, Pete Wells said in a two-star New York Times review. Baxtrom outlines some of his reasons to close in his Instagram post. 'Deciding to close a restaurant is never based on a single decision, but rather on many factors.' First, he cites his decision to get sober five years ago, when 'it became clear that I needed to prioritize my mental health over the restaurants if I was going to continue living. However, I find it challenging to practice this in real life.' In addition, the funding that would have kept the restaurant afloat fell through. 'If you are someone who appreciated what we created and would be interested in partnering with me to save Olmsted,' Baxtrom says on Instagram, 'please reach out.' Baxtrom told Eater that their pre-COVID expansion had become 'a bit of dead weight,' he says. The plan was to revert the restaurant to its original size. 'It just required investment. Beyond my means.' He also spoke of his hopes that Vanderbilt Avenue would have become more of a destination street, with Akhtar Nawab opening Alta Calidad in 2017, along with Joe Campanale and Erin Shambura opening nearby Fausto in the old Franny's space that same year. 'I hoped more big restaurateurs were going to follow.' Today, 'Vanderbilt is surprisingly a very difficult neighborhood to navigate,' he says. On his Instagram post, he says he has 'no desire to leave the industry I love; it brings me so much joy.' And over DM with Eater, Baxtrom says that perhaps he'd like to eventually open something in Chicago. 'My folks are getting older and I'd like to be there more.' Baxtrom demonstrated through his businesses that he is close with his parents. Patti Ann's that shuttered in July wasn't just an homage in name. It referenced the food he grew up on in his family's suburban Illinois household and featured an interior that nodded to his mother's career as a teacher — complete with a map on the wall as decor, cubbies that his father helped him build, and a report card on the table's performance that came with the check. Eater NY All your essential food and restaurant intel delivered to you Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's plan for White House ballroom sparks outrage from his critics
President Trump's plans to add a massive $200 million ballroom to the White House is angering critics, who see him moving forward with the long-sought project as part of his desire to leave a lasting mark not only on the office of the presidency but the first house as well. The construction of the ballroom, the cost of which the White House says will be covered by Trump and other donors, will begin in September. Trump is also paving the White House Rose Garden (though the rose bushes will be saved), which the White House says is necessary so people can walk more easily for events held in the space. And he's added his personal gold touch to the Oval Office. Trump says he sees the ballroom as a way to add to his legacy. And while detractors say his decorative and more substantial changes are out of touch and ostentatious, he says they are necessary. 'I always said I was going to do something about the ballroom because they should have one,' he told reporters Thursday. 'So we'll be leaving it, it will be a great legacy project. And, I think it will be special.' When asked if any government funds will be used to construct the 90,000 square foot facility, Trump replied, 'no government dollars, no.' The White House said the sprawling event space will be built adjacent to the White House where the East Wing sits. The goal is to complete construction before the end of Trump's term in January 2029. Trump's vision is for a space where he and future presidents can host state dinners, large gatherings with business leaders and other ritzy parties or functions. 'We've been planning it for a long time,' Trump said. 'They've wanted a ballroom at the White House for more than 150 years. There's never been a president that was good at ballrooms. I'm really good.' Democrats and regular Trump critics offered a sharp pushback on his plans. 'This is what DOGE was all about, folks,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in a video posted to social media hours after the White House announcement, referring to the president's Department of Government Efficiency. 'Cutting things from you, and giving it not to some place that needed it, giving it to the big shots who run the show, Donald Trump at the top of the list.' Others suggested Trump and his White House were planting an intentional distraction. 'You gotta hand it to MAGAs, for about a week they really did have everyone convinced they cared about kids and The Epstein Files,' journalist and pundit Seth Abramson wrote on social platform X. 'On to more important things! Did you hear Trump is building a $200M ballroom at the White House? Wowee!' The White House pushed back on those criticisms in a Friday statement to The Hill, saying 'as President Trump has said, for over 150 years, many presidents, administrations, and staff have all wanted a ballroom, and now we have a president who will accomplish building it.' 'President Trump is the best builder and developer in the entire world and the American people can rest well knowing that this project is in his hands,' a West Wing spokesperson said. 'Many future presidents and American citizens will enjoy it for generations to come.' The president, a longtime real estate mogul who is known for a hands-on approach in the design and construction of his resorts, golf courses and skyscraper office buildings, has long lamented the lack of sufficient event space at the White House. 'When it rains it's a disaster, and the tent's 100 yards, that's more than a football field away from the main entrance,' Trump said as part of his remarks to the press about the project. 'And people are shlopping down to the tent; it's not a pretty sight. The women with their lovely evening gowns, their hair all done, and they're a mess by the time they get [there].' There is longstanding precedent for presidents and first ladies putting their spin on the White House and its grounds. President Harry Truman oversaw a massive renovation from 1948 to 1952 that required he and his wife to move into the Blair House at the time and saw the White House completely gutted. Former first lady Jackie Kennedy, however, championed the historic preservation of the home and advocated that extreme renovations require oversight from the Committee for the Preservation of the White House. 'Every president and first family does make a mark on the White House — they already are a part of history and that snapshot in time,' said Anita McBride, former chief of staff to then-first lady Laura Bush. 'Since the cornerstone was laid, there have been additions, there have been changes that, at the time those happened, raised concerns.' The White House Historical Association welcomed Trump's planned ballroom. 'The history of the White House has evolved over 233 years since the cornerstone was laid in 1792. The South Portico, the North Portico, the East Wing, the West Wing, and the Truman Balcony all raised concerns at the time — but today, we can't imagine the White House without these iconic elements,' Stewart D. McLaurin, president of the association, told The Hill. He added, 'Since our founding by First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy in 1961, we have supported and partnered with every president and first lady caring for and adding to the White House and its Collection. We work to preserve the history of this remarkable museum, home, and office for generations to come.' Some agree with the president that a bigger events space at the White House is long overdue. 'I can understand why someone who thinks on a grand scale, as obviously President Trump does, would want this ballroom added,' said Barbara Perry, a presidential historian and co-chair of the Presidential Oral History Program at the University of Virginia's Miller Center. 'That being said, the optics for people who disagree with this president, it will probably have an impact on how they view this.' McBride agreed that the tents on the lawn, which have been constructed during more recent administrations, are not ideal. 'That doesn't come without challenges, putting up staging, putting up a covered structure, getting people to the actual location; dealing with inclement weather. And you're not really having your event in the White House,' she said. 'So you can see where that makes sense.' There are lingering questions about what the new ballroom location will mean for the staffers who work in the East Wing, which is where first lady's staff works. The East Wing is also where tours of the White House for the public are conducted. 'Betty Ford always called the East Wing the 'heart' of the White House,' McBride said. 'All the business and policy gets done in the West Wing, that's critically important. But the heart of the White House is the East Wing. And so what, what will be the new East Wing?' Others see the construction of an opulent addition to the president's residence as a matter of bad timing and poor optics given sluggish jobs reports and fears about how global tariffs might hurt the U.S. economy. 'This isn't something that's going to make or break another election, but it does add another page to the catalog of hypocrisy that these people read from when they want to lecture Americans about fiscal responsibility,' said Antjuan Seawright, a Democratic political strategist. 'It's a visible middle finger to working class Americans, many of whom voted for him.'
The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
The left is trying to use international ‘lawfare' to shut down Musk and X
Elon Musk had three recent posts on X that are worth noting if you are opposed to censorship and cancellation. The first was two cartoon panels with the question, 'How do you tell who's telling the Truth?' The next panel offered the answer: 'The ones trying to silence other people are the ones lying.' Just prior to that, Musk had reposted a post that reads, 'President Trump's State Department has announced it is coming to the defense of Elon Musk's X after France labeled it an organized crime group and opened a criminal investigation. The State Department's DLR [the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor] stated, 'As part of a criminal investigation, an activist French prosecutor is requesting information on X's proprietary algorithm and has classified X as an 'organized crime group.' Democratic governments should allow all voices to be heard, not silence speech they dislike. The United States will defend the free speech of all Americans against acts of foreign censorship.'' And just prior to that, Musk reposted a post from the conservative activist Mark Kern: 'There is a full on attack on the Internet by the UK and EU, disguised as 'for the children.' The ID requirement is affecting even Discord users and X users. It is full on dystopian as they ramp up police to arrest people for speech.' Below that is a link to a Telegraph article with the headline 'Elite Police Squad to Monitor Anti-Migrant Posts on Social Media.' Multiple people I have spoken with in the U.S., the U.K. and the EU believe that Musk and his X platform represent the greatest single threat to the far left and its goal of pushing its narratives unchallenged across the globe. One way the left now seems intent on stopping Musk and X is by mimicking the various 'lawfare' schemes rolled out against then-candidate Donald Trump prior to the 2024 election, which many Trump supporters saw as an unethical attempt to force him out of the race. While that 'lawfare' tactic failed — thanks in large part to Trump taking it head-on, day after day, while exposing it for what it was — activists in Europe and elsewhere believe the strategy can be refined and hardened for use against Musk and X in an attempt to intimidate, censor or silence them. Lest we forget, back in 2023, the European Union opened a probe into X for alleged 'failure to counter illegal content and disinformation.' Ah. The catch-all accusation frequently used by the intelligentsia on the left: 'disinformation.' Recall the draconian COVID-19 dictates from the left enacted to combat 'disinformation'? Here is a January headline from ABC News: 'EU politicians warn against Elon Musk's incursions into European politics.' Of course, Musk might rightfully retort that his 'disinformation' and 'incursions' were not only protected free speech, but simply ways to point out severe double-standards and harmful policies that were having an adverse effect upon the majority of the citizens of those nations. I wrote a piece for this site a year ago titled ' Could Elon Musk actually be arrested and X cancelled?' I highlighted calls for Musk to be arrested for stating his opinions while anticipating that the personal animus directed against him, X and the internet by certain individuals and groups in Europe advocating for censorship and cancellation could grow. It now seems that I was correct. All of which raises an obvious question:Why do so many on the left want to prevent people around the world from gathering as much information as possible on their own, then coming to their own conclusions based on their own research? Do they fear people thinking for themselves? Do they fear their own constituents, customers and neighbors? Open minds open doors. I have always believed it imperative to listen to those I may disagree with. What if I am wrong and they are correct? What if they show me a truth I refused to believe out of ignorance, intolerance or indoctrination? Aren't I the one getting a gift — one I could not receive if their voices were censored or canceled? Alarmingly, many on the left in Europe — as well as in the U.S. — don't seem to share my belief that we need to listen to those we disagree with. Note this April headline from The New York Times: 'E.U. Prepares Major Penalties Against Elon Musk's X.' The opening paragraph of the article spells it out: 'European Union regulators are preparing major penalties against Elon Musk's social media platform, X, for breaking a landmark law to combat illicit content and disinformation, said four people with knowledge of the plans.' Once again, the left rolls out 'illicit content and disinformation' against Musk, X and the internet. Of course, millions around the world who are against censorship and cancellation and strongly in favor of free speech might say this is a transparent attempt by some on the left to intimidate and censor a site and voices that expose their continual failures to billions of people around the world. One person's 'disinformation' is another's 'irrefutable truth.' Don't hide behind censorship. Let the people think for themselves.
