China is redefining the bounds of innovation
IN recent years, China's technology sector has been somewhat eclipsed by domestic economic challenges and geopolitical tensions abroad. Specifically, since 2022, the swift advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) within the US and the imposition of chip export bans on China have raised concerns about potential technological limitations for China, with fears that major US tech companies might outspend competitors to establish a technological monopoly.
However, early 2025 was a turning point when the world was taken by surprise by a significant breakthrough from DeepSeek.
DeepSeek's models have demonstrated impressive performance by integrating reinforcement learning for post-training with chain-of-thought reasoning. Notably, these achievements come at a fraction of the cost of pioneering models, while maintaining a narrow performance gap.
A significant benefit to the entire AI community is that DeepSeek's models are open source, accessible to anyone globally. DeepSeek's success underscores the adage that necessity is the mother of innovation, highlighting China's inherent structural advantages in research and development, talent and data, among others, to drive innovation despite chip restrictions. This has prompted a reassessment of structural investment opportunities within China's tech sector.
In recent months, the situation has become more complex due to sweeping US tariffs. Although these tariffs are temporarily paused, they still result in higher costs than before for the global tech sector. Many Chinese tech companies have diversified their market exposure by selling more to non-US markets and expanding their production footprint outside China, actions taken since the last trade war during US President Donald Trump's first term.
In the short term, companies facing new tariff measures may attempt to pass these costs on to end customers. If a company possesses strong bargaining power or operates within a resilient sector where customers are less sensitive to price increases, the pass-through process will likely be smoother.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
In the longer term, we are likely to see continued supply chain diversification, driven by initiatives such as 'China +1,' where companies establish capacities outside China, particularly for goods exported to the US. Meanwhile, tariffs are part of the broader US-China strategic competition. In strategic sectors such as semiconductors and AI, we can expect accelerated technology localisation in China.
Along the semiconductor supply chain, self-sufficiency remains low in areas such as semiconductor equipment, advanced materials and fabless operations. As suppliers in China enhance their technologies and broaden their product ranges, Chinese customers are increasingly adopting local solutions – often at the expense of global suppliers, driven by concerns over supply chain disruption.
In the realm of AI, China's AI ecosystem might evolve into a more closed loop, with greater localisation of both software and hardware.
As AI technology becomes more affordable and powerful, its adoption in China is rapidly increasing. In the realm of enterprise applications, AI has demonstrated its ability to improve digital advertising conversion rates, and is being integrated into enterprise software to boost productivity and customisation.
On the consumer side, various AI chatbots, such as DeepSeek, Tencent's Yuanbao and ByteDance's Doubao, are flourishing, while AI-enhanced learning devices offer highly customised and targeted learning experiences. Additionally, utilising more sophisticated large language models to distill and train smaller models enables lower inference costs and more effective AI deployment on edge devices such as PCs, smartphones and cars.
Overall, there are compelling investment opportunities within China's technology sector. While the sector's broad valuation remains below historical average levels, a selective approach is still necessary. We seek opportunities in AI applications that benefit from more affordable AI, such as select software companies that now integrate AI into their offerings to enhance performance while remaining cost-effective.
Domestic technology substitution in semiconductor equipment and fabless design areas is also worth monitoring. From a cyclical perspective, aside from AI, the general tech sector has experienced a relatively slow recovery. Some sub-segments, such as analogue and PC stocks, have not participated in the previous AI rally and present interesting prospects.
The writer is portfolio manager, Fidelity International

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
36 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Redefining Asia-Europe security in a multipolar world
French President Emmanuel Macron called for a 'positive new alliance' between Asia and Europe at this year's Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG At this year's Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, French President Emmanuel Macron called for a 'positive new alliance' between Asia and Europe – anchored in shared principles, strategic autonomy and practical cooperation – amid intensifying great power rivalries. His message builds on the argument that Asia and Europe's security is increasingly interconnected – whether through the global repercussions of Russia's war in Ukraine, Chinese coercion in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait, or the broader erosion of norms underpinning the international order. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Harvard crackdown: Can Singapore become its own intellectual leader?
THE US has long been a global science leader, with this best exemplified by its scientists creating a Covid-19 vaccine – amid a pandemic no less – within a year. Given that vaccine developments typically take a decade or more, this is nothing short of a feat, and something that has been decades in the making – a result of generous state funding for research and an openness to talent, among other factors. This is why US President Donald Trump's crusade against Harvard University and other top American institutions should give us pause, even if the fate of Ivy League colleges an ocean away may not seem, at first, to have major repercussions for Singapore. Alongside the on-and-off-again tariffs, immigration crackdown and slashing of government budgets, some observers may regard Trump's first 140 days as part of a natural ebb and flow in American politics. After all, the country has seen its fair share of upheavals in the last 249 years, having survived a civil war in the mid-19th century and, over 100 years later, lived through a particularly turbulent 1968 punctuated by two assassinations, heightened social unrest over the Vietnam War and issues related to values and race. Yet, even Americans appear spooked themselves. Experts and ordinary people, regardless of political leanings, are voicing concern that American democracy is being eroded and possibly sliding into autocracy, multiple surveys have shown. In particular, the administration's clampdown on its universities could have far-reaching consequences. America's embrace of diversity had long been part of its DNA, a trait that has drawn the world's brightest minds who, in turn, have kept its universities at the forefront of research and innovation that have resulted in life-saving drugs and key inventions. Some of these foreign talents remain in the country in pursuit of the American dream; others, equipped with new knowledge and skills, return home for the betterment of their motherland. Singapore too, has benefited from the return of US-trained scholars who have gone on to helm senior positions in government and the private sector. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But all that is now in peril under the Trump administration, which has threatened to cut funding and foreign student quotas – actions that portend a brain drain and a possible curtailment of its research capabilities. The question is how long this crusade would last, and whether the damage wrought would be permanent. Meanwhile, foreign students and postgraduates have been targets of an immigration crackdown. Some have had their visas revoked, and others fear they would not be able to re-enter if they leave. Prospective students are naturally reconsidering their choice, given the uncertainty and apparent lack of transparency. Even researchers are hesitating to visit; a French scientist was denied entry in March because he had criticised the administration in a text message. In 2022 and 2023, Singapore sent about a quarter of its Public Service Commission scholarship recipients to the US, and many more students went at their own expense. But the latest developments raise the question whether the city-state should reconsider its reliance on the US for intellectual leadership. The imbroglio should also prompt Singapore to look afield at Europe and China, which are now seizing the opportunity to woo students and researchers seeking alternatives. A small but growing number of Singapore students have headed for European and Chinese universities over the years. And not least, Singapore might also take a leaf out of their playbook and do the same, since having a strong talent mix is what would augment its universities' standing. Rather than looking mainly to the West for intellectual leadership, Singapore has now an opportunity to build up its own for the region.


CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
US Secretary of State Rubio seeks probe into Harvard's possible sanctions breach
WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is seeking an investigation into whether Harvard University violated federal sanctions by participating in a health insurance conference in China, according to a New York Times report published on Wednesday (Jun 11). Citing sources familiar with the matter and documents reviewed by the newspaper, the report said the conference may have included officials from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a Chinese state-run group that has been blacklisted by the United States. The New York Times reported that Harvard has launched an internal review of its role in the event. Rubio signed off on a recommendation to the Treasury Department last month to open an investigation, according to the report. Reuters has not independently verified the report. A spokesperson for the Treasury Department said it takes 'any allegations of sanctions violations extremely seriously' but declined to comment on possible or pending investigations. A State Department spokesperson also declined to comment. Harvard declined to respond to a Reuters request for comment and did not comment to the New York Times.