Space Force weighs options for boosting launch resiliency, capacity
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
The Space Force is eyeing options to increase its launch capacity and resiliency as demand for U.S. national security and commercial launch continue to strain existing launch infrastructure.
Brig. Gen. Kristin Panzenhagen, who serves as program executive officer for assured access to space and oversees the service's launch range operations, said this week the service is exploring a range of leads for increasing launch access — from new spaceports to international partnerships to newer models like sea-based launch. At the same time, it's also investing in overburdened insfrastructure at its current sites.
The Space Force operates two of the busiest spaceports in the world at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida and Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. The ranges have seen a steady, annual 30% increase in launch business for several years, Panzenhagen said during a May 6 Mitchell Institute event, conducting 144 missions in 2024 — 93 of those from Cape Canaveral.
The service is 'not in dire straits,' when it comes to launch capacity, she said, but its infrastructure is supporting a higher mission cadence than any other spaceport in the world — most of that driven by commercial launch business.
'Where we're seeing the need for added capacity is to be able to continue to support those commercial payloads,' Panzenhagen said. 'What we need for the national security space launch, what we're always looking for, is that added resiliency.'
To ensure access to more reliable and frequent launch opportunities for both military and commercial missions, the Space Force is investing nearly $1.4 billion through 2028 to improve its existing infrastructure.
The program, called Spaceport of the Future Infrastructure, aims to reduce disruption on the service's ranges and sets a goal of conducting at least one launch every day. It also aims to improve the resiliency of infrastructure to things like extreme weather and interference, and reduce the impact an increased launch pace has on personnel and operations.
To get after those goals, Panzenhagen said, her team has projects underway to widen roads to accommodate larger rockets, improve airfields, secure communication lines and increase power redundancy.
The service is also in talks with international and commercial partners about expanding access to other spaceports or ways of launching.
While Cape Canaveral and Vandenberg are the Space Force's primary launch sites, the service has also conducted launches from other domestic sites, including the Pacific Spaceport Complex in Alaska and NASA's Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia.
But the service is also in talks with other countries about taking advantage of their launch infrastructure. Panzenhagen pointed to Japan, New Zealand and France as potential partners in this effort — which she described as still preliminary. She also noted that Norway, the United Kingdom and Sweden have nascent launch capabilities that could be designed with built-in interoperability that makes it easier for international allies to leverage in the future.
'We're at the very early stages of that, but I'm really excited about building those international partnerships,' she said.
Panzenhagen said she's also met with several companies that are developing sea-based launch capabilities. While past attempts at a viable sea-launch system have hit technical and financial snags, China has seen some success with that modality. The Space Force is studying options offered by firms like The Spaceport Company, which is building mobile, offshore launch sites.
Panzenhagen said these firms still need to prove their business case, but sea-based launch potentially could help relieve congestion at ranges and give the military access to more orbital locations.
Among the key considerations for the service are funding — whether companies would rely on government contracts or see opportunities for private investment — and the logistics of transporting a rocket and any associated commodities to a barge.
'It's something that we're interested in seeing what the possibilities are,' Panzenhagen said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Golden Dome: Revolutionary missile defense or money pit?
Imagine a future where North Korea launches a surprise missile barrage, China unleashes a wave of hypersonics, and Russia sends intercontinental ballistic missiles arcing over the North Pole. In this nightmare scenario, the only thing standing between those warheads and millions of lives is a massive new missile defense system called The Golden Dome. However, that assumes it doesn't end up being a total boondoggle. Initially announced as The Iron Dome for America, and then glitzed up as The Golden Dome, the project, estimated to cost up to $175 billion, was ordered by President Donald Trump, who said during a May 20 press briefing that 'it should be fully operational before the end of my term, so we'll have it done in about three years.' The Dome, whether Iron or Gold, would create an all-encompassing missile shield that can detect, track, and destroy virtually any incoming aerial threat, like drones and ballistic missiles, before it strikes U.S. territory. It has been described by Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein as a project on the scale of the Manhattan Project, the top-secret World War II initiative that produced the atomic bomb. But where that project delivered a functional weapon in just a few years, The Golden Dome faces far more complicated technical, financial, and strategic hurdles. In this video, we break down what The Golden Dome is, and isn't, like how it's not a big shimmering bubble over America and is instead an integrated network of sensors, interceptors, and data systems backed up by AI-enhanced decision-making tools. And a number of systems already in operation today will form the backbone of The Golden Dome. The Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense system, whose origin can be traced back to the Strategic Defense Initiative, uses advanced SM-3 and SM-6 interceptors to target missiles in the midcourse and terminal phases. The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system, operated by the U.S. Army, is capable of high-altitude terminal intercepts and has a proven track record in live-fire testing and a handful of real-world engagements. Meanwhile, Patriot batteries, upgraded with PAC-3 and PAC-3 MSE missiles, serve as the last line of defense, targeting incoming threats at lower altitudes and closer ranges. We also dive into the price tag, which was initially estimated at $175 billion, but will likely come in at around $500 billion to $900 billion over 20 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. And then there's the question of whether it will actually work. This type of missile defense system has never been built before, and will require dozens of systems, some of which don't exist yet, and they all have to function together seamlessly, in real time, from anywhere on the planet, but also in space. So, yeah, we'll see. A Marine Corps reply-all email apocalypse has an incredible real-life ending Army shuts down its sole active-duty information operations command Army plans to close more than 20 base museums in major reduction Former Green Beret nominated to top Pentagon position to oversee special ops The Navy's new recruiting commercial puts the 'dirt wars' in the past
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
What is Liquid Glass? Internet reacts to Apple's new software design
USA TODAY and Yahoo may earn commission from links in this article. Pricing and availability subject to change. Apple's Liquid Glass made a splashy debut this week, but it might not be for everyone. Some social media users have been quick to criticize or poke fun at the "beautiful, new" software design for iOS 26, which was unveiled at the 2025 Worldwide Developers Conference, an annual information technology conference hosted by the tech juggernaut. The design, dubbed Liquid Glass, was crafted with a "translucent material [that] reflects and refracts its surroundings, while dynamically transforming to help bring greater focus to content," Apple said in a news release. Alan Dye, Apple's vice president of Human Interface Design, called the iOS 26 rollout the company's "broadest software design update ever." 'It combines the optical qualities of glass with a fluidity only Apple can achieve, as it transforms depending on your content or context," said Dye in a statement. Here's what to know about Liquid Glass, and what people are saying about it. Liquid Glass is a new software design, or aesthetic, described by Apple CEO Tim Cook as "Expressive. Delightful. But still instantly familiar." Expressive. Delightful. But still instantly our new software design with Liquid Glass. — Tim Cook (@tim_cook) June 9, 2025 According to Apple, the "look" makes apps and system experiences more expressive and delightful while being instantly familiar. It is translucent and behaves like glass in the real world and its color is informed by surrounding content and intelligently adapts between light and dark environments. The new design, unlike previous iterations, will extend across platforms, including iOS 26, iPadOS 26, macOS Tahoe 26, tvOS 26 and watchOS 26. Many people like the idea of Apple's "Liquid Glass," but the execution, not as much. Some of the most prominent concerns include the readability of notifications and the distortion to the image behind the squiggly, bubble-shaped app outline. "The new liquid glass looks abysmal and is a perfect example of focusing on form/prettiness/design over of functionality/readability/practicality like, what are we doing here," an X user wrote in a June 9 post. Some have also speculated the new design would not have passed the sniff test of the late Apple co-founder Steve Jobs. "Steve Jobs had very famously said that design was how it works, not how it thoughts on liquid glass would have been interesting," one user wrote, referencing a famous quote from the founder. Others, still, felt that Apple completely missed the mark by offering the "liquid glass display" instead of revisiting the AI upgrades unveiled at last year's WWDC. Memes, critiques and threads have surfaced on social in the wake of Apple's announcement. See a compilation of posts made about "Liquid Glass" below: So Apple's next big thing, aka Liquid Glass, is random icon packs from the Android world.🤣😂🤣😅 #WWDC25 #iOS26 #Apple #Android — Sadeeq (@Bunis_Malli) June 9, 2025 Market: "we want AI"Apple: best we can do is liquid glass display$AAPL #WWDC25 — Javelin Capital (@Jimmy_Javelin) June 9, 2025 My 85% battery health iPhone 13 trying to run Liquid Glass on iOS 26 — GSX (@GigaSyntax) June 9, 2025 Let's ignore those readability concerns for a at these satisfying Liquid Glass animations & visual effects on iOS 26. — Alvin (@sondesix) June 9, 2025 Liquid Glass definitely looks totally fine and normal — Rich Woods (@TheRichWoods) June 9, 2025 The thing is, Liquid Glass looks great at the component level, like the ones in this video. But once you put everything together and fill the screen, it turns into noise and makes things feel way too — Shayan (@ImSh4yy) June 9, 2025 Apple's Liquid Glass rollout is actually genius: the design ensures that you can't read the comically-wrong Apple Intelligence notification summaries. — Trung Phan (@TrungTPhan) June 10, 2025 Liquid glass…. 'this new material'. Ffs it's a graphic. — Asoz Rashid (@AsozRashid) June 9, 2025 I like the idea of liquid glass but the readability is not good at all…#WWDC25 — Bradley (@VerdeSelvans) June 10, 2025 I don't think the reaction to Apple's liquid glass is a 'who moved my cheese' moment. This is just objectively bad design: — Bryan Jones (@bdkjones) June 10, 2025 Liquid Glassに対する既視感 — あるごす (@argos_M1111) June 9, 2025 the Liquid Glass effect is so satisfying on menus — † lucia scarlet 🩸 (@luciascarlet) June 10, 2025 liquid glass looks sick — Dan Toomey (@dhtoomey) June 9, 2025 steve jobs in heaven watching apple introduce the liquid glass design. — Sahil (@sahilypatel) June 9, 2025 Apple trying to convince us they've done something groundbreaking by adjusting the opacity of the control center and calling it 'liquid glass' should be a crime. — no chaser, neat. (@Pvleng) June 10, 2025 Contributing: James Powel and Mike Snider, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What is Liquid Glass? New Apple iPhone aesthetic sparks discussion
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI-Google cloud deal, metals rally, Insmed trial results
Yahoo Finance host Josh Lipton tracks today's top moving stocks and biggest market stories in this Market Minute, including OpenAI's reported deal with Google's (GOOG, GOOGL) cloud service, silver (SI=F) and gold futures (GC=F) rallying, and Insmed (INSM) stock surging on new drug trial results. Stay up to date on the latest market action, minute-by-minute, with Yahoo Finance's Market Minute. It's time for Yahoo! Finance's Market Minute. US stocks little changed here as investors wait for clues on trade talks between the US and China. Open AI inked a deal with Alphabet's Google Cloud service, that's according to Reuters. The deal comes as Open AI looks to meet its growing needs for computing capacity. This would mark a surprising collaboration between the two AI competitors. Shares of Alphabet rising in today's trade. Turning to precious metals, silver and gold retreating, taking a breather from their recent rally. Pullback coming after the metals have surged higher amid the decline of the US dollar and uncertainty over President Trump's tariff policies. InMed shares surging to the highest intraday level in nearly 24 years. Company reporting positive results for its mid-stage trial of its experimental hypertension drug. Stifel viewing InMed's data as quote "a best case scenario" and easily exceeding expectations. And that's your Yahoo! Finance Market