
One-third say family's finances have worsened: Survey
The latest Yahoo Finance/Marist Poll survey, released Monday, found that 33 percent of U.S. adults said their family's finances have deteriorated in the last year. Another 27 percent argued it has gotten better while 40 percent stated that their family's financial conditions stayed the same.
Older generations, nearly four-in-ten of Gen X and 35 percent of Baby Boomers, are more likely to say their finances have gotten worse. Roughly 29 percent each of millennials and Gen Z said the same, the poll shows.
Nearly half of households, 47 percent, who are earning below $50,000 annually, said their finances are declining. Twice as many male respondents, 36 percent, said their finances have gotten better over the past year compared to 18 percent of women.
Around 45 percent of adults said the cost of living in their area is either not very affordable, 36 percent, or not affordable at all, 9 percent. More than half, 55 percent, said their area is affordable — with 11 percent of respondents saying 'very' affordable and 44 percent choosing just 'affordable,' according to the poll.
Men, 60 percent, are more likely than women, 50 percent, to think that the cost of living in their area is either 'very' affordable or just affordable.
Around half of Americans are at least somewhat satisfied with their savings. Roughly another third, 31 percent, said they are very dissatisfied or completely dissatisfied with their savings levels. Another 18 percent were somewhat dissatisfied, per the poll.
The Yahoo/Marist survey was conducted from June 13-17 among 2,575 adults. The margin of error is 2.1 percentage points.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Entrepreneur
20 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Where Retirees Are Most and Least Likely to Run Out of Money
Seniors in states with high projected incomes and moderate expenses may enjoy more security in retirement. How much money do you really need to retire with peace of mind? Americans believe the "magic number" for a comfortable retirement is $1.26 million, down $200,000 year over year, according to recent research from Northwestern Mutual. Still, despite the slight decrease, the anticipated figure for retirement security remains out of reach for many people in the U.S. Related: About 45% of Americans Will Run Out of Money in Retirement, Including Those Who Invested and Diversified. Here Are the 4 Biggest Mistakes Being Made. One in five Americans over the age of 50 has no retirement savings, and more than half worry they won't have enough money to last in retirement, per an AARP survey. New research from Seniorly, a platform that helps family and older adults find senior living options, unpacks where seniors are most and least likely to outlive their retirement savings. Seniorly used the latest available data on life expectancy at age 65, Social Security income, household net worth and cost-of-living metrics in its analysis. The research found that across the U.S., the average projected retirement income from benefits, savings and investments is $762,000, while projected living expenses over 18.2 years are $877,000, which translates to a $115,000 shortfall. Related: The National Average Salary Is About $65,000. Here's What Americans Are Saving for Retirement — How Do Your Stats Compare? However, the average savings gap retirees face varies significantly depending on their state. New York emerged as the state where retirees are most likely to outlive their retirement savings: Due to high expenses that even substantial incomes don't always offset, the average senior in New York will need about $448,000 more than they have, per the study. Seniors in Hawaii, Washington, D.C., Alaska and California are the next most likely to see retirement income gaps, with average shortages ranging from $417,000 to $337,000, according to the research. Related: Is Early Retirement Really Out of The Question For You? Here Are 10 Money-Saving Tips That Can Help Make It Happen. Retirees who want a better chance at financial comfort during their golden years might consider states where, on average, people have enough income and assets to cover their expected expenses. Thanks to relatively high projected incomes and moderate expenses, seniors in Washington, Montana and Utah are the least likely to outlive their retirement savings, with average surpluses of $146,000, $121,000 and $43,000, respectively, per the data. Check out Seniorly's full ranking of the states where seniors are most and least likely to outlive their retirement savings here.


Forbes
22 minutes ago
- Forbes
Embracing The Age Gap: The Value Of Generational Diversity In The Workplace
'Young people are high-minded because they have not yet been humbled by life, nor have they experienced the force of circumstances. They think they know everything and are always quite sure about it.' This quote could easily have come from a frustrated manager's performance review today, but it's actually Aristotle, writing in the 4th century BCE. Apparently, complaining about 'kids these days' is at least as old as Western civilization, which is a shame because the tendency to dismiss younger generations is frustrating, divisive, unproductive, and demoralizing for everyone involved. When I became CEO in 2017, the Rayburn Electric Cooperative workforce was 60% Baby Boomers and 40% Gen X. Today, we're 60% Millennials, 23% Gen X, 11% Gen Z, and 7% Boomers. That shift wasn't a strategic goal or a benchmark we tried consciously to achieve to meet some quota or other. It happened because we were clear about what really matters: performance, potential, and culture alignment. Age never made the list. We've established a culture where generational diversity feels normal. Our goal is to recruit people ready to roll up their sleeves, lead with integrity, and grow with us. Regardless of their age, every person has value and can contribute. We have six director-level positions at Rayburn: one held by a Boomer, two by Gen X, and five by Millennials. We don't let age get in the way. If you're performing well, we'll reward you. There's no entitlement here—longevity doesn't automatically mean advancement. We're not immune to generational tensions, by any means. The first Millennial we hired was paired with a seasoned Boomer, and it was oil and water from day one. I finally pulled the younger employee aside and tried to counsel him. 'If you can show up at 7:30 a.m. and recognize this will be challenging for about a year, what follows will be great. But one thing this Boomer will really respect is if you show up early.' The response? 'All y'all do is sit there and tell stories.' I explained that those stories contained Rayburn's history, the why behind our processes, and institutional knowledge you can't get anywhere else. But he never quite got it. He continued to struggle with his mature partner because he felt like he wasn't respected. And honestly, that was pretty true. That is, until we had a leaky tank. He rolled up his sleeves, got underneath that tank, and did everything necessary to fix the problem. That's when he finally earned that respect he craved. Bridging the generational divide isn't impossible—it just requires something we don't always teach anymore: patience, humility, and time in the trenches. We believe that success lives where experience comes together with a fresh perspective. When those two things align, innovation happens. Recently, we had a seasoned compliance professional who wanted to find a quicker, more efficient way to track regulatory reporting. A younger team member came in with fresh ideas for monitoring and analysis that had never been tried before in compliance. What started as a specific improvement snowballed into entirely new ways of doing both jobs better. The workforce of the future won't be won by the oldest or the youngest. It'll be built by those willing to listen across the table and learn both ways. At Rayburn, we don't sort people by generation. We unite them around purpose. That makes all the difference.


Forbes
34 minutes ago
- Forbes
Portugal Golden Visa: Americans Benefit From Key Court Ruling In 2025
Aerial view of Poiso forest, Madeira Island, Portugal. getty The Portugal golden visa program has become a top choice for Americans seeking residency abroad, and recent constitutional rulings have further strengthened the program. In 2024, Forbes named Portugal the best golden visa program for investors because of the speed towards citizenship, coupled with the minimum requirement of spending two weeks in the country every year. Like every other EU golden visa, holders have access to free movement in all 27 EU countries and the Schengen area beyond, but Portugal also offers a great healthcare and education system, and social services. When Spain closed its program, both Portugal and Greece were big winners. For example, Greek government figures highlighted a monthly increase in American applications from 302 to 383 by November 2024. (Greece has one of the fastest golden visa processes, granting residency within 60 days.) By June 2025, the Portuguese government had seen a 72% increase in approvals, with Americans being the main recipients, according to information from the country's Agency for Integration, Migration, and Asylum, AIMA. The government approved a record number of applicants, 4,987 more than the previous year. Portugal's golden visa program has raised more than $7.2 billion (€7 billion) since it was created in 2012, and most participants have been Chinese, Brazilian, and U.S. nationals. Non-Europeans can apply for fast-track residency through various options in Portugal, including a minimum $525,000 (€500,000) investment in eligible funds. The program allowed people to apply for citizenship five years after enrolling in the golden visa program. Vida Capital is a Lisbon-based golden visa fund that has seen an immense increase in American interest in gaining Portuguese citizenship over the past year—a 571% increase in traffic from the U.S. in the first half of 2025 compared to the first half of 2024. Since 2019, the foreign population in Portugal has almost tripled to 1.6 million, which accounts for about 15% of the total population, as per Portugal's Agency for Integration, Migration and Asylum. In June 2025, the government announced plans to toughen up on how people gain residency, and it was unclear how that would impact the golden visa program. For example, the government voted to extend the period required for a foreigner to obtain citizenship to as many as 10 years from the current five (reduced to seven years for individuals hailing from the so-called Community of Portuguese Speaking Countries, such as Brazil). The government also voted on introducing a need to really understand the Portuguese language and culture before acquiring a passport. Vida Capital has seen a 116% bump in U.S. traffic since the government announced citizenship these changes in June. The Constitutional Ruling Favours The Portugal Golden Visa Program The Portuguese constitutional courts this week blocked several proposals of the upcoming Foreigner's Law that the government was planning to introduce namely that all immigrants to the country would have to undergo a two-year waiting period before bringing family members to Portugal and limiting reunification to spouses and minor children. The court upheld the rights of golden visa applicants and added that AIMA must continue processing golden visa family reunification applications under the existing favorable rules. Alex Ohnona, co-founder of Vida Capital said, "the constitutional court's ruling this week actually strengthens the case to move forward now. It signals that golden visa investors will maintain their special status, including family benefits, regardless of broader immigration reforms." Tomás Assis Teixeira, a partner at CCA Law in Porto, agreed that the ruling reinforced the golden visa status. "The Court notably didn't challenge the privileged treatment of golden visa holders compared to other visa types, and specifically preserved full family reunification rights for golden visa investors, including spouses, children, and dependent parents. This demonstrates Portugal's commitment to maintaining the programme's competitive advantages." Joana Mendonça, General Counsel of Global Citizen Solutions, a consultancy specializing in residency and citizenship by investment, added that "by upholding differential treatment for investors and skilled professionals, the court has confirmed that strategic economic policy objectives can coexist with constitutional equality principles when properly structured." The Arguments For And Against A Golden Visa Program Golden visa programs allow non-nationals to gain citizenship or residency in a country through investment. Critics argue that golden visas allow applicants to bypass residency requirements that apply to the rest of the population, such as language proficiency and the need to be in a country for a specific duration before applying. Many EU countries have closed their programs because critics also argue that they sometimes enable corruption, money laundering, and tax evasion. Advocates argue they bring in outside investment, injecting much needed foreign capital into a country's economy. Another reason golden visas are seen as divisive is that one of the ways that many golden visa programs offer residency is in exchange for investment in real estate. Analysts and incensed locals see these as one of the main contributing drivers of increased property prices. In 2023, Portugal removed the part of the program that offered golden visas through real estate purchases, and it was a contributing factor as to why Spain closed its program entirely in April 2025. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said that the vast majority of these visas, 94%, were granted in connection with real estate investments in already strained housing markets. The current surge in American interest stems from many affluent families looking for a Plan B in respect of residency. However, as Forbes noted in 2025, U.S. applicants need to consider the additional cost of application fees, biometrics, and residence card issuance fees, due diligence costs, and renewal fees (every 2 years). Americans would also be liable for double taxation if they were to stay in Portugal for more than 183 days a year. Plus, to obtain actual citizenship, a language level of A2 in Portuguese would be required, as would a clean criminal record. One thing is clear, however. With European programs few and far between, interest in the Portugal golden visa will endure. Indeed, some industry insiders would go further, believing that the ruling might allow for the introduction of more favorable elements that would make it even more attractive. MORE FROM FORBES Forbes Here's How Retirement Visas For U.S. Expats Compare, Based On New Data By Alex Ledsom Forbes What It Means To Be Wealthy In Panama By Alex Ledsom Forbes The Prettiest Village In France, Voted By The French—In Pictures By Alex Ledsom