logo
Couple evicted from TUI hotel and banned from flight after 'complaining about food'

Couple evicted from TUI hotel and banned from flight after 'complaining about food'

Dublin Live26-06-2025
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
A dream holiday turned sour for a pair evicted from their Corfu hotel and then barred from their return flight.
Paul Bell and his wife Ellie faced a Grecian getaway gone awry when they were ejected after TUI accused them of "aggressive and disrespectful language" in the hotel's diner. The North Shields couple, Paul, 64, and Ellie, 65, had to spend a hefty sum on another stay in Corfu, book alternative flights, and sort out their transportation after the fallout with TUI.
In defiant response, the Bells promise never to use TUI again, denying the claims of causing trouble at Sidari's Terezas Hotel restaurant — an establishment they'd praised before. The controversial episode erupted following Ellie's expression of discontent with substandard food to the manager, with Paul labelling the offerings as "tepid" and "not very nice".
Paul laid bare their culinary grievances, describing meals such as: "Some of the things you would get were rice with sprouts, or another time you'd have rice with a slice of beetroot in it. My wife spoke to the manager twice, she complained about the food being inedible and he didn't seem interested. She asked him to join us for breakfast the next day so we could show him what we meant, but he never turned up."
Paul and Ellie were utterly shocked when they got a letter the next day telling them their stay at the hotel was cut short. The letter, dated May 20, accused: "You caused a serious disturbance by shouting inside the hotel restaurant in front of other guests, resulting in significant distress and disruption to the peaceful environment of the hotel," and claimed "you directed aggressive and disrespectful language towards both hotel staff, the hotel owners, and TUI representatives on site," as reported by the Mirror, reports the Irish Mirror.
(Image: Iain Buist/Newcastle Chronicle)
However, Paul disputed these allegations to Chronicle Live, maintaining that he and Ellie hadn't gotten the chance to present their version of events to TUI. He explained: "I don't remember anybody shouting. We only spoke to the rep on the day she was at the hotel and there was nothing disrespectful shown to her. They've never come and spoke to us to find out what happened, they've decided off what the manager has told them. But surely there are always two sides to a story? I was furious, because it spoiled the day we had planned."
Without the opportunity for a formal response or appeal, all Paul and Ellie were told was to contact the UK consulate should they need further assistance. Then, on the evening of May 21 at 22.28, the pair received yet another upsetting piece of news - a letter declaring that Ellie was prohibited from getting on the TOM1531 flight back to Newcastle scheduled for Friday, May 23.
Barely half a day had passed when Paul and Ellie got a shocker of an email informing them that they'd been banned from their TUI flight home. TUI said the ban was "due to your conduct and behaviour", in accordance with their policies.
In a scramble, Paul booked return flights back from Corfu using Jet2, shelling out €328.56 (£280) on Thursday, May 22. But when they got back to North Shields, TUI dropped yet another bombshell via email.
The latest update stated: "the refusal of carriage for Paul Bell and Eleanor Bell has now been revoked, and you will now be allowed travel on your inbound flight". Paul fumed over the hassle, saying "That doesn't help us now, because we were told we have to make our own travel arrangements and we came home. We had to pay €60 for a taxi to the airport as well, because we weren't allowed on the transfers,".
(Image: Paul Bell/Chronicle Live)
Explaining their peaceful holiday style, Paul remarked, "When we go on holiday, we try to go somewhere nice and quiet, sit and chill, try the local stuff, go to the towns and see the scenery and to have food like we did (in the hotel) was really disappointing. We got no back-up whatsoever from TUI."
He vented his frustration with how quickly the decision was made, detailing, "They took whatever the manager said as gospel and came to a decision just like that. Had we been drunk and disorderly, fine, but we weren't - we've never had any bother on any holidays before, until this time with TUI."
ChronicleLive has learned that TUI is planning to reimburse the couple's unexpected Jet2.com flights and their taxi fare to the airport. TUI has opted not to comment further.
The Mirror has contacted TUI for further information.
Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice .
For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage .
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ryanair: ‘We don't have time to waste with stupid follow-up questions from your readers'
Ryanair: ‘We don't have time to waste with stupid follow-up questions from your readers'

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

Ryanair: ‘We don't have time to waste with stupid follow-up questions from your readers'

A few weeks back we highlighted how a change in Ryanair 's policies on minors flying with the airline had seen the plans of two separate travelling parties left up in the air. In times past, in many cases, children over the age of 16 were able to accompany a child under the age of 16 on Ryanair flights across Europe without any fuss. However, unknown to a couple of readers who contacted us, the rules changed – and now under-16s need to be accompanied by an adult, or they will not be able to fly with Ryanair. The airline told us the change was implemented last September and was a result of rules in Spain and other countries mandating that children under the age of 16 had to be accompanied by someone over the age of 18. READ MORE And that was that. [ Two Ryanair passengers complain to Pricewatch. The airline is having none of it Opens in new window ] At least, that was that until other readers started contacting us questioning what we had been told. 'This summer we went to Portugal , but my 14-year old went to Biarritz the week before for a French language camp,' wrote a reader called Paul. 'The option of me waiting in Dublin for him to return and then follow the family wasn't a good one, so he flew out of Bilbao to Lisbon and then on a connecting flight to Faro. He was going to fly with TAP, so my wife rang them in advance to see what their minors policy was. Once you turn 12 you are not a minor with TAP, so he flew out of Spain and into Portugal on his own, and without any issue.' We also heard from a reader called Brid who had a similar experience to the readers who contacted us to say unaccompanied under-16s were not allowed travel with Ryanair this summer. 'The same issue also happened to my son and his friend, travelling to France in June this year,' she said. 'I hadn't yet gotten around to making a complaint, but your article has saved me some time and likely fruitless effort.' She says a 'question though that wasn't answered, and which they might more readily answer for you rather than us mere customers, was why their systems weren't updated for the change in policy. The Ryanair booking systems will not allow a child under the age of 16 to be booked on their own, whereas they will allow them to be booked with an over-16 (which is still how their booking system defines an adult, and they don't specify they must be over 18),' she writes. 'Furthermore, they allow (or at least, when my son and his friend travelled in June) an under-16 to be checked in with an over-16 but under-18. Surely resorting to 't's and c's' [terms and conditions] defence is insufficient from a consumer perspective for such clear inconsistency between their policies and consumer systems. At best, it is completely misleading.' We also heard from another reader, Aoibhe, who questioned what Ryanair told us about the timing of the policy change. 'Our policy is that under-16s must be accompanied by over-18s. We previously allowed them to be accompanied by over-16s, but we suffered some cases where such U18s were denied entry into EU airports. We have to ensure that we avoid this risk' — Ryanair statement 'I would question whether it's accurate for Ryanair to maintain they changed their minor's policy last September. We had a 15-year-old and a 17-year-old travel with Ryanair from Spain to Dublin on October 27th, 2024, and back on November 1st, 2024. It was all perfectly acceptable then. I can't see Ryanair not rigidly enforcing any policy they conjure up.' She said the 'same two teenagers – who have not changed in age since then – could not fly to Dublin together this month due to the policy change. Thankfully, their mother was aware of the policy change,' she writes, asking how, in an AI age, 'can a system let you make a booking that does not adhere to their policy?' She also points out that Vueling Airlines 'has no problem with a 15-year-old and 17-year-old travelling together, [and] I would question the accuracy of Ryanair saying that Spain is one of the countries where under-16s must be accompanied by an adult, as our friends have just come from Spain". She points out that her son travelled with Aer Lingus to Spain when he was 15 in the company of a 14-year-old in August 2023 and she 'had to fill out a 'Form Of Indemnity' to absolve Aer Lingus of any liability. The form is for 12- to 15-year-olds. Are Ryanair maintaining that Vueling and Aer Lingus are breaking EU law?' [ A letter from Michael O'Leary: 'MetroLink is a mad, bad project' Opens in new window ] We put these reader stories to Ryanair – and the response we received was typically robust. 'Our very sensible 'minors' policy was clearly set out in our July letter, and we don't have time to waste dealing with stupid follow-up questions from your handful of readers,' the mail begins. 'Our policy is that under-16s must be accompanied by over-18s. We previously allowed them to be accompanied by over-16s, but we suffered some cases where such U18s were denied entry into EU airports. We have to ensure that we avoid this risk, which is the only reason we changed this policy. If your readers don't accept this policy, then they should please feel free to fly with other airlines, who may operate a more lax minors travel policy.' There was more. 'This policy affects tiny numbers of our 206m pax [passengers], since most parents go to great lengths to ensure that U16 children are accompanied by over-18s – usually their parents! We don't block such bookings since many families book air travel on different bookings but on the same flight, and we don't want to prevent such families travelling together.' The email adds that this 'minors policy was changed in September last year. [Aoibhe's booking] was made on Sept 17th, before the policy change was made. Still, they should not have been allowed to travel on the Santander-to-Dublin flight. We cannot always catch all pax who break our rules, but if they are denied entry at an EU airport, it becomes their responsibility, not ours.' The statement concludes by saying that 'instead of whinging about our very sensible 'minors' travel policy, perhaps your handful of readers would simply ensure that an U16 child is accompanied by an over 18yo adult, or otherwise fly with another airline, who may operate a less sensible 'minors' travel policy, then we won't have to waste our time, or yours, replying to such stupid follow-on queries'. For the record – and for the avoidance of all doubt – we entirely accept Ryanair's position on minors travelling, and it is entirely within its rights to set its own policies irrespective of what other airlines do. We entirely disagree, however, with its claim that the follow-up queries from our 'handful of readers' were 'stupid'. We don't consider the queries a waste of time either.

TUI beats quarterly earnings forecast as new strategy 'paying off'
TUI beats quarterly earnings forecast as new strategy 'paying off'

RTÉ News​

time6 days ago

  • RTÉ News​

TUI beats quarterly earnings forecast as new strategy 'paying off'

Europe's largest tour operator TUI has today reported better-than-expected results as summer travel proved more resilient after chief executive Sebastian Ebel previously warned that 2025 could be a "challenging" year for the group. European airlines broadly performed well during the second quarter as concerns about a dip in travel demand appeared to have had a limited impact on results. TUI reported underlying earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) of €321m in its quarter ended June 30, compared with the €269m expected by analysts polled by LSEG, and up 38% on the previous year. Revenue in TUI's third quarter across all segments stood at €6.2 billion, gaining 7%. The group raised its full-year profit guidance yesterday, after strong hotel and cruise demand boosted the business so far this year, sending shares up. "The third quarter and the first nine months of the financial year 2025 were strong. Our strategy is paying off," Ebel said in a statement today. The company acknowledged that the environment for its airlines business remained difficult. In the previous quarter, TUI had flagged a slight drop in summer bookings, amid concerns that inflation and macroeconomic worries could weigh on consumer appetite for travel. While there was a 2% decline in summer bookings tied to the Middle East conflict, ticket prices were up 3%, helping to balance out higher costs, according to a media presentation. European travellers, making up the core base of TUI's customers, tend to be more price-sensitive than North American travellers. German bookings were also down 5% due to hot weather, Ebel told reporters on a media call, but added that he expected more customers in the autumn.

Heartbreak as couple miss their £1,200 TUI honeymoon due to tiny passport mistake that could happen to anyone
Heartbreak as couple miss their £1,200 TUI honeymoon due to tiny passport mistake that could happen to anyone

The Irish Sun

time7 days ago

  • The Irish Sun

Heartbreak as couple miss their £1,200 TUI honeymoon due to tiny passport mistake that could happen to anyone

The couple described TUI's decision to bar them from the flight as 'pathetic' SHALL NOT PASS Heartbreak as couple miss their £1,200 TUI honeymoon due to tiny passport mistake that could happen to anyone A NEWLYWED couple were left feeling heartbroken when they missed out on their TUI honeymoon in Cyprus. The couple were banned from going due to a tiny passport mistake that could have happened to anyone. Advertisement 6 The newlyweds were banned from going on their honeymoon when check-in staff discovered the groom's passport was 'torn and held together by tape' 6 The rip on Joe's passport that resulted in him being denied boarding 6 Joe shows the tape on the front cover of his passport that resulted in him missing his honeymoon 6 The newlyweds were left feeling heartbroken after being denied their honeymoon Staff insisted they could not travel Joe and Beccy Barnes had booked a last-minute honeymoon to Ayia Napa, Cyprus, after tying the knot on Saturday August 2nd. The pair, who have been together for five years, had collected all the money given to them as wedding presents to pay for a five-day, all-inclusive TUI package holiday. However, when the couple arrived at East Midlands Airport on Wednesday [August 6th], they were shocked when TUI check-in staff discovered a 1cm rip on the upper right-hand corner of Joe's photo page in his passport. TUI said the passport was 'very badly damaged', including suspected water damage, a small tear in the photo page, as well as the cover being ripped and repaired with tape. Advertisement The 35-year-old forklift driver said he'd flown with Jet2 on his stag do three weeks before with no issues, but said TUI staff insisted he could not travel. The dad-of-two and his new wife remained in the airport for two hours trying to come up with a solution before heading home. 'The decision was pathetic' Joe and Beccy, a 38-year-old civil servant, were 'devastated' after losing out on their £1,200 honeymoon, describing TUI's decision to bar them from the flight as 'pathetic'. Joe, who lives near Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, said: "The wedding was the best day of my life. Advertisement "We just wanted to get away and chill out for a bit so used the cash from all the guests to book the honeymoon. "We got to the front check-in desk and the woman said you've got a slight rip in your passport page. I need to go talk to my manager. Horrified Brits watch as TUI plane tyre EXPLODES during take-off in Corfu "She said 'yeah there's a rip in it'. I'd actually flown with Jet2 three weeks before for my stag do and that was absolutely fine. "I didn't know about the rip until then. There was no compassion at all. Advertisement "I told them it was my honeymoon. But TUI headquarters got back to say 'do not let this man travel'. "I thought this can't be happening. It was horrible. We sat around the airport for a good two hours trying to think of solutions. "We thought we could catch a flight with a different airline, but Jet2 said they wouldn't let us fly either." Fundraising for another honeymoon The couple were left 'devastated' after returning home from the airport, and said they've complained to TUI about the 'pathetic' decision to ban them from flying. Advertisement Joe said: "I just couldn't believe it. Me and my Mrs were mortified. I felt like crying my eyes out. "We'd had an amazing weekend with the wedding and everything just went downhill. "My wife was absolutely devastated. It was a horrible feeling. I wouldn't want my worst enemy to go through this. "I think it's pathetic I got denied boarding for that tiny rip. I could understand it if it was a massive rip over my photo or my personal details and you couldn't read them. Advertisement "It's looking doubtful that insurance will cover it. It's quite unlikely. We're just going to try and book something later on ."The worst bit is that it's other people's money. I would warn people to get their passport checked, even if there's a slight mark on it." A spokeswoman for TUI confirmed that Mr Barnes was refused travel by check-in staff at East Midlands Airport due to his passport being 'very badly damaged', including suspected water damage, a small tear in the photo page, as well as the cover being ripped and repaired with tape. The holiday giant said that staff recommended that Mr Barnes liaised directly with his insurance provider regarding compensation and to contact the passport office to get a replacement. Advertisement The Sun has approached TUI and Jet2 for a comment. A fundraising page has been launched to help pay for another honeymoon for Joe and Becci. 6 A fundraising page has been launched to help pay for another honeymoon for Joe and Becci 6 The couple tried to find solutions but eventually had to head home

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store