
Trump Policies Hurt Workers in America's Heartland. Democrats Have To Say So
Now, I don't doubt that many Democrats are eager to win back the working-class voters we've lost over the last decade. But, as many of my colleagues and friends agreed at a recent conference organized by the Progressive Policy Institute in Denver—titled "New Directions for Democrats"—our party's failure to focus on issues that directly affect working-class voters opened the door for MAGAism. To win those voters back, we will need to focus anew on the guys who return home from work drenched in sweat, and the women who stagger back from their hospital shifts burdened by exhaustion. That means changes in both our style and our substance.
Too often, we try to skirt the hard work that entails by focusing exclusively on President Donald Trump. I don't care for him any more than the next guy—but the hard truth is that we'll never make inroads by ranting against the "oligarchy" alone. Instead, we need to make clear what the Trump administration is doing to undermine the working-class American Dream. The specters of fascism, racism, xenophobia, and transphobia might draw crowds to rallies, but if we're going to reconnect with working-class voters, we need to make their cause our primary concern. And begins by highlighting how Donald Trump is affecting their communities directly.
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 28: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a swearing in ceremony for U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. Jeanine Pirro in the Oval Office of the White House on May 28, 2025...
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 28: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a swearing in ceremony for U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. Jeanine Pirro in the Oval Office of the White House on May 28, 2025 in Washington, DC. MoreTake, as an example, the Low-Income Heating and Energy Assistance Program. Millions of working-class families have long depended on federal subsidies to cover the costs of home heating. Bills were rising even before Trump's tariff madness—and now they're set to rise even more. And yet the Trump administration has laid off huge portions of the staff assigned to disbursing those funds, and the White House has more recently proposed to end the program in next year's budget. When strapped families find that it costs much more to heat their homes this coming winter, they should be made aware that Trump is to blame. Democrats shouldn't muddle that message.
Or consider the Trump administration's approach to Medicaid. Republicans like to frame the program as a grift for poor urban communities that consume billions through waste, fraud, and abuse. But many of the hospitals most vulnerable to the GOP's cuts are located in the rural heartland—places where people must drive hours to find facilities capable of handling heart attacks or delivering babies. When those hospitals are shuttered in the years ahead, Republicans will try to claim that Democrats were to blame. The reality will be that Republicans cut rural hospitals off at the knees. Democrats need to make voters aware.
Finally, note the issues of housing and work apprenticeships. Again, Republicans would have voters believe that federal housing resources go to 1950s-style projects in rough urban neighborhoods, and that apprenticeships are giveaways to failing urban schools. But when Trump calls for a 40 percent cut in rental assistance, including to rural areas, and slashes apprenticeship programs like those that teach workers how to handle the hard work of caring for livestock, the effects will be felt in the reddest parts of the country. Unless Democrats consistently highlight those consequences, voters won't know.
Here, in the end, is the problem: Democrats have spent years talking to the wrong voters and listening to groups that advocate on issues that simply don't resonate in places like working-class Northeastern Ohio, where I grew up. Now, as then, people living in the heartland know when a politician is talking to other types of voters—and that's what we've been doing. The Trump administration has gotten away with lying to working-class communities because Democrats haven't done the hard work of explaining why MAGAism cuts against working-class interests. Unless we figure that out, we're bound to remain lost.
Tim Ryan is a Senior Advisor at the Progressive Policy institute.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Pushes China to Quadruple U.S. Soybean Buys -- Markets React Ahead of Tariff Truce Deadline
Soybean futures posted their biggest intraday gain in four months after US President Donald Trump called on China to quickly quadruple its purchases of American soybeans, linking such a move to narrowing the trade gap between the two countries. The comments, made on Truth Social just one day before the current tariff truce is set to expire, came with a public thank-you to Chinese leader Xi Jinping, though no further detail was provided. The timing is notable US farmers are only weeks away from harvest, when fresh supply typically boosts export potential. While China bought more than $12 billion in US soybeans in 2024, government data show no bookings yet for the new season beginning in September, a sign that trade tensions remain an obstacle. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. The market reaction was swift. Chicago soybean futures jumped as much as 2.8% before easing to a 2.3% gain, with corn and wheat prices also edging higher. Analysts point out that this period often marks a shift in China's buying toward Northern Hemisphere origins, but the current pattern has leaned heavily toward Brazil, Argentina, and other South American suppliers. The US Department of Agriculture is expected to raise its domestic harvest outlook in an upcoming report, potentially adding to export competitiveness. Still, some market watchers caution that without progress in trade talks, China could meet its annual soybean needs entirely from South America, leaving US farmers sidelined. The tariff truce deadline on August 12 adds another layer to the story, with signals from Washington that an extension is possible. Broader US-China tensions remain in play from Beijing's defense of Russian oil imports against US tariff threats to state-linked criticism of Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) chip performance. For now, Trump's remarks have injected a dose of optimism into agricultural markets, but whether this translates into sustained buying from China could depend on the trajectory of negotiations in the weeks ahead. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Announces Deployment of National Guard in D.C.
President Trump escalated his attacks on the nation's capital in recent days, saying Mayor Muriel Bowser hadn't done enough to control crime and homelessness. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starmer Issues Not-So-Subtle Warning To Donald Trump About Putin Ahead Of Peace Talks
Downing Street has warned Donald Trump to be on his guard ahead of his crunch peace talks with Vladimir Putin. The two presidents are due to meet in Alaska on Friday in an attempt to thrash out a deal to end Russia's war with Ukraine. But Keir Starmer's official spokesman today used strong language to insist that nothing Putin says should be taken at face value. He said: 'You can never trust President Putin as far as you can throw him. 'We will obviously support President Trump and European nations as we enter these negotiations. 'Any ceasefire cannot just be an opportunity for President Putin to go away, re-arm, restrengthen, and then go again. 'So we're not going to leave it to trust. We're going to ensure that we're prepared such that we achieve a ceasefire.' Friday's meeting in Alaska will be the first face-to-face talks between Trump and Putin since the US president re-entered the White House in January. Trump has faced criticism for not inviting Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy to the talks, leading to fears that Kyiv could be forced to give up land to end the war. The PM's spokesman insisted any deal which is imposed on Ukraine would be unacceptable. He said: 'Any peace must be secured with Ukraine, not imposed on it. The prime minister has been very clear that the path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine.' The spokesman added: 'There can be no reward for aggression. There can be no compromise on Ukraine sovereignty.' Meanwhile, a leading think-tank has played down the prospects of a major breakthrough in Friday's talks. The Institute for the Study of War said Russia 'remains unwilling to compromise on its long-standing war aims of preventing Ukraine from joining Nato, regime change in Ukraine in favour of a pro-Russian proxy government, and Ukraine's demilitarisation – all of which would ensure Ukraine's full capitulation'. They said Russia 'will very likely violate and weaponise any future ceasefire agreements in Ukraine while blaming Ukraine for the violations as it repeatedly did in spring 2025'. Related... Downing Street Warns Trump Not To Force Ukraine To Give Up Land To End Its War With Russia Vance Claims Trump Broke A Major 'Logjam.' It's Unclear If Putin Will Play Along. Trump Has Already Handed Putin A Win By Hosting Peace Talks In Alaska