Should sports gambling still keep Pete Rose out of the Hall of Fame?
You're reading the Prompt 2025 newsletter. Sign up to get it in your inbox.
Pete Rose didn't live to see himself removed from baseball's banned list. Neither did 'Shoeless' Joe Jackson. But Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred lifted the ban on both players last week, along with a slew of others, under pressure from President Donald Trump. Their reinstatement also means that a committee will now decide if they belong in the Hall of Fame. The rest of us have opinions, too — and that's why there are columnists! Joining me now are two of the very best on this topic, The Post's Sally Jenkins and Will Leitch.
💬 💬 💬
Matt Bai It probably seems odd to a lot of casual fans that we're still talking about betting like it's a mortal sin, even though you can't watch a ballgame now without being constantly assaulted by three-way parlays. Let me ask you both: What do we think is really going on here? Is the commissioner admitting that times have changed? Or does he just want to get Trump and the Rose family off his back and make it the sportswriters' problem?
Will Leitch I think it's far more the latter. Rose's history with gambling had, in the wake of baseball's embrace of gambling revenue, become an inconvenience that MLB had tried to mostly whistle past. (MLB's statement when Rose died was unmistakably muted.) But Trump is a problem that had to be dealt with. I suspect MLB's decision was, essentially, 'give him this one thing and he'll leave us, and our antitrust exemption, alone.' It's basically NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell's strategy with Trump too: Appease him, and then get what you want when he's distracted.
Matt Because we know that appeasing Trump always works.
Sally Jenkins The fact that times have changed regarding fan betting has nothing at all to do with prohibiting players from gambling, which crooks the whole deal. So it seems to me he just wanted the president off his back, and to shift responsibility to the Hall of Fame committee members. If the change of attitude toward fan betting was part of his logic, it was totally illogical and incredibly dumb conflation.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Matt Yeah, that's my sense as well. Betting on ballgames is still a bright-red line. But I imagine he's tired of having to explain why casinos can sponsor teams but Pete Rose can't get onto the Hall of Fame ballot.
Will The thing that I find so strange about the statement itself is the notion that now 'permanent' bans end when you die.
Sally Well, as John Dowd said to me, 'Reputation survives death.' The ability to inflict harm posthumously is real. This is an open invitation for players, managers and even umpires to ignore Rule 21. What Manfred has done is invite current players to bet on the games and still have hope to be inducted.
Matt Let me ask the billion-dollar question: Should Pete Rose, or Shoeless Joe for that matter, be in the Hall? How would you vote?
Sally I would vote a total NO on both counts. Shoeless Joe took $5,000 in 1919 — equivalent to almost $100,000 today — to throw games.
Will MLB does have the advantage that we are two years away from anything being decided. I honestly think a lot of it will ride on what the political environment is in 2027, when the committee next meets. I mean, I just hope we're all still alive in 2027. At a certain level, I think the move to induct Rose and Jackson, as sort of soulless and craven as it is, makes a certain strategic sense.
Matt Bleak, Will, very bleak.
Will Give Trump what he's asking for. (It's worth noting that ESPN reported that Manfred indeed called Trump after he made his decision.) And then hope he gets distracted and moves on to something else. Then you get to do what you want.
Sally By the way, Trump is a guy who lies through his teeth about his baseball prowess.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Matt Sally, does it make any difference that Rose didn't actually bet against his own team? Or at least there's never been any allegation of that. He was still trying to win, as far as we know, which seems different to me than throwing a game, like Shoeless Joe might have done.
Sally I think it makes no difference at all that Rose bet on his own team. Betting on your own team, especially as a player-manager, is, in a way, worse. You can influence lineups, pitchers, stats. You can influence all kinds of factors — for one thing, you're exercising inside knowledge and info. It's a dirtbag thing to do. It defrauds others.
Will Also, if you were a gambler watching which Reds games Rose bet on, you definitely took note of the ones he did not.
Sally TOTALLY.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Matt All right, you guys are unforgiving on this, but let me try one other angle at magnanimity. Do we really want to judge Hall of Fame credentials by morality? I mean, if we're going to go into the Hall and start removing everybody who wasn't a great character, we'll need a much smaller building.
Sally Right, the Ty Cobb argument. This isn't necessarily a moral issue — it's a gambling issue. You destroy the credibility of the game itself. Ty Cobb was a bad guy, but the problem with players and managers betting on the games is they compromise everything and everybody.
Will I totally agree. I don't think Rose shouldn't be in the Hall because he was a jerk. (Though, I highly recommend Keith O'Brien's new biography of him for a full accounting of who Rose was.) He shouldn't be in the Hall because gambling is literally one rule that you cannot break. It's posted on the wall of every clubhouse in baseball — still. It is the fundamental rule of the sport — of any sport.
Sally As my friend David Von Drehle says, it's a nihilistic suicide-homicide thing to do to the game. It really is. Gambling removes the idea that the outcome is unknown.
Will Which is really the fundamental reason to watch sports in the first place.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Matt Last question: How crazy are the odds I'd have to give you to bet that Rose does make the Hall? Three to one?
Will I think it's more likely than that. I might put it at 50-50.
Sally I also think it's 50-50.
Will But again: Let's see where we all are in 2027. (Hopefully still here!)
Sally Maybe by then, Will, another gambler's notebook could show up, with evidence he bet against his own team. This is a real hazard for the Hall, because you can't count on a word Rose ever said. He denied gambling. He denied gambling on the Reds. He denied corking bats.
Matt Those are better odds than I'd give Republicans of still controlling the House by then.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
7 minutes ago
- New York Times
China Rejects Trump's Accusation That It Violated Trade Truce
China said on Monday that the United States had 'severely undermined' the trade truce the two countries reached last month, striking back against President Trump's accusations that it was violating the terms of their agreement. In a statement, China's Ministry of Commerce called Mr. Trump's attacks on social media last week 'baseless.' He had accused Beijing of failing to live up to its end of their trade deal, a 90-day rollback of tariffs and other trade barriers to give the two countries more time to negotiate and prevent an all-out trade war. China's commerce ministry said it had continued to honor its agreement responsibly and accused the United States of 'erroneous practices' by introducing a series of 'discriminatory restrictive measures.' These included restrictions on the sale of chip design software to China and barring American companies from using or financing artificial intelligence chips from the Chinese technology giant Huawei. It also criticized the Trump administration's announcement that it planned to 'aggressively revoke' the visas of Chinese students and that it would enhance scrutiny of all future applications from China, including Hong Kong. 'The U.S. side has unilaterally escalated new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' the ministry wrote in its statement. 'Instead of reflecting on its own actions, it has turned the blame onto China.' China said it would take measures to 'safeguard its legitimate rights and interests' if the United States continued to harm Chinese interests. The growing confrontation over the fragile trade truce between the world's two largest economies has raised questions about whether they can strike a permanent accord within the 90-day deadline. The United States has grown increasingly concerned about access to rare earth magnets, which are crucial for producing cars, semiconductors, aircraft and other vital items. China maintains a near monopoly on the production of rare earth metals. American companies' ability to keep factories running could be in jeopardy without a sufficient supply of those magnets. Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative who negotiated the deal along with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, said during a Friday appearance on CNBC that China was 'slow-rolling their compliance' and that the flow of some critical minerals has not returned to levels that American officials were expecting. The agreement, announced on May 12, offered a temporary reprieve to the escalating trade tensions between the two largest economies. The United States had pushed tariffs on Chinese imports to 145 percent and China responded by raising import duties on American products to 125 percent. Under the truce, the United States agreed to lower its tariffs to 30 percent, while China cut its import tax to 10 percent for 90 days. Amy Chang Chien contributed reporting from Taipei.
Washington Post
9 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Mariners slugger Cal Raleigh leads MLB in homers and is on pace to set a season record for catchers
SEATTLE — Just before Big Dumper put a thump into a soaring flyball, a smattering of 'MVP! MVP!' chants broke out from behind home plate Sunday. Given the way Cal Raleigh's season has started, perhaps the Mariners' catcher is wholly deserving of such high praise. With a solo shot during Seattle's latest victory, 2-1 over the Minnesota Twins, Raleigh upped his total to a major league-leading 23 home runs.
CNBC
15 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: It's a dicey matter to play 'chicken' in markets
When threatened, birds puff up their feathers to appear larger than they actually are, and squawk to signal aggression. On Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump suggested he would no longer be "Mr. NICE GUY" to China after the country "totally violated" its trade agreement with America. The same day, Trump said he would raise tariffs on steel imports to 50% from 25%. The escalations follow a détente in May, during which Trump reached a trade deal with the U.K., agreed with Beijing to sharply reduce reciprocal import duties and delayed for more than a month a tariff of 50% on the European Union — two days after announcing it. Those glad tidings lifted stocks. For May, the S&P 500 rose 6.2% and the Nasdaq Composite jumped 9.6%, with both indexes enjoying their best month since November 2023. The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 3.9% for the month. But the mood among investors might change quickly, depending on communication coming from the White House. The word "chicken" is used as a metaphor for cowardice. In reality, they can be dangerous — there have been reports of humans being killed by Colonel Sanders' favorite bird. Asia markets start June in the redU.S. markets traded mixed Friday. The S&P 500 was flat, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.13% and the Nasdaq Composite fell 0.32%. Futures tied to the three indexes ticked down Sunday evening stateside. Asia-Pacific stocks fell Monday. Hong Kong's Hang Seng index dropped 1.9% and Japan's Nikkei 225 lost 1.32% at 1:30 p.m. Singapore time. Expected Trump-Xi talkTrade tensions between China and the U.S. are escalating. On Monday, Beijing claimed that the White House's "export control measures" breach the two countries' agreement reached in Geneva, Switzerland, refuting Trump's claim on Friday that China has "TOTALLY VIOLATED" it. That said, reconciliation could happen as Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are expected to discuss trade negotiations "this week," U.S. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said on Sunday. Trump says he'll double steel tariffsTrump on Friday told steelworkers at U.S. Steel that he will raise import duties on steel to 50% from 25%. The new import duties will start June 4, the president posted on Truth Social. On Saturday, the European Union said it is "prepared to impose countermeasures, including in response to the latest U.S. tariff increase." Even so, "tariffs are not going away," U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on "Fox News Sunday." Musk cuts himself from DOGEElon Musk bid farewell to his role at the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency Friday. Musk said on Sunday that he doesn't want to "take responsibility for everything the administration's doing," expressing disappointment at the White House's "massive spending bill." Tesla shares lost 14% this year amid Musk's involvement in politics, but gained 22% in May following Musk's April statement he would spend less time at DOGE. Australia's Soul Patts and Brickworks to mergeShares of Australian investment firm Washington H. Soul Pattinson, also known as Soul Patts, spiked more than 15%, and its affiliate Brickworks rocketed over 25% after both companies announced a merger of 14 billion Australian dollars ($9 billion). As part of the deal, a new company listed in Sydney will acquire all outstanding shares of Soul Patts and Brickworks. The merged entity will have holdings across real estate, private equity and credit totaling A$13.1 billion. [PRO] May jobs report in focusThe U.S. nonfarm payrolls report for May, out Friday, will provide more information on how the economy is holding up amid Trump's multiple tariffs —and play a big role in determining whether the May rally in stocks still has legs. Economists expect the number of jobs added in May to dip from April. It misses the forecast, markets could take a downturn as the White House appears to ratchet up its tariff rhetoric. Investors are piling into big, short Treasury bets alongside Warren Buffett Investors always pay close attention to bonds, and what the latest movement in prices and yields is saying about the economy. Right now, the action is telling investors to stick to the shorter-end of the fixed-income market with their maturities. Long-term treasuries and long-term corporate bonds have posted negative performance since September, which is very rare, said Todd Sohn, senior ETF and technical strategist at Strategas Securities, on "ETF Edge." The only other time that's happened in modern times was during the Financial Crisis," he added. "It is hard to argue against short-term duration bonds right now." It would seem that Warren Buffett agrees, with Berkshire Hathaway doubling its ownership of T-bills and now owning 5% of all short-term Treasuries, according to a recent JPMorgan report.
