How 'violence' narratives threaten South Africa's tourism industry
South Africa's tourism sector must combat negative perceptions to thrive amid violence narratives
Image: Instagram.
Tourism experts have warned that South Africa's hospitality and business sectors must move away from a mindset of underselling their brand to the world, especially in light of recent comments at the White House claiming the country is a 'violent nation.'
Last week, the world watched as President Cyril Ramaphosa's delegation to the Oval Office sought to counter narratives suggesting genocide in South Africa.
During the meeting, delegation members took turns explaining the country's ongoing violence, a move that some believed complicated Tourism Minister Patricia de Lille's efforts to attract more visitors and boost the nation's economy.
The meeting followed controversial allegations by then-President Donald Trump, who linked South Africa to 'genocide' and made a decision to offer refugee status to minority Afrikaners, claiming they faced persecution.
Some experts and organisations, including the MK party and the EFF, have said these statements have contributed to the negative perception of South Africa internationally.
In response to questions from IOL about the potential impact of these comments on tourism, the Department of Tourism declined to comment directly.
De Lille's spokesperson, Tasneem Carrim, stated that only the department's marketing unit would respond, but despite numerous attempts by IOL, no response was received.
Professor Christopher Isike of the University of Pretoria pointed out the missed opportunity to clarify key issues.
'There was a chance to state clearly that there's no evidence linking political land reform or social unrest to violence or genocide,' he said.
Addressing concerns about false narratives affecting South Africa's global image, Michael Delaney, General Manager of Radisson RED Johannesburg-Rosebank, cautioned against narratives seeking to make South Africa look bad and argued the importance of highlighting the country's positive attributes.
'Many of the misconceptions can be countered by showcasing the friendliness of its people, natural beauty, and cultural diversity,' he said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
He also stressed the need to reassure visitors that robust safety measures are in place.
In what appeared to be a response to the images of white people being targeted in South Africa during the Oval meeting, Delaney expressed grave concern.
'he hospitality sector has expressed concern over the increasing use of AI-generated images and out-of-context, outdated photographs that portray South Africa as a land plagued with insurmountable problems.
'These misleading portrayals could damage the country's tourism industry.
Delaney noted that most international visitors' perceptions of South Africa tend to improve significantly once they arrive.
'They often find the country welcoming and beautiful,' he explained.
Having traveled extensively for work, he observed that people overseas are keen to experience South Africa firsthand.
Furthermore, he said that many hotels host guests from the United States, Asia, Europe, and Africa, including airline crews and delegations, ensuring their safety is in the industry's best interest.
'Travelers can be great ambassadors for South Africa because they move around the world and share their experiences.'
Delaney also encouraged the amplifying messaging around tourist safety in overseas markets.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
National Dialogue — Promising concept or an illusion of progress for SA?
President Cyril Ramaphosa's announcement on Tuesday night of a National Convention to start a National Dialogue is clearly meant to get South Africans talking to each other about solving our problems. Be careful what you wish for. At face value the concept of a national dialogue has much to recommend it. We are clearly in deep trouble, and many of our problems appear to be getting worse. The national coalition government appears to have made little progress, our economy is barely stuttering, and the number of people who are unemployed, or under-employed, continues to rise no matter how you define it. And of course, as President Cyril Ramaphosa pointed out, there is our history of a negotiated settlement that ended apartheid. A settlement that is still blamed today for some of our serious problems. All of that said, there are some important questions to ask about the wisdom of this idea. Firstly, very few leaders give up any power voluntarily. Ramaphosa, as leader of the ANC, is appearing to give the impression that the ANC will accept whatever settlement is reached through this process. But at the same time, the ANC will not, easily at least, be able to veto any settlement. This is hugely significant. For the conspiratorially minded, it may even suggest that he has accepted that the ANC will never actually have a large amount of state power again. For some, it could even suggest he has very little faith in whoever will replace him as leader of the ANC. And it certainly reminds us that he has failed to enact a new 'social compact', something he has promised since before he was even elected leader of the ANC. Different agenda However, Ramaphosa might actually have a slightly different agenda. Calls for this national dialogue have been growing for several years. For a long time people called for an 'Economic Codesa', to allow different role players in the economy to sit down and work out how to grow our economy. The person who has been the loudest in his calls for this event is former president Thabo Mbeki. It is interesting then that his foundation, and the foundations of other former presidents, have not been included in the list of people who are supposed to be guiding the process. It must be said that including Mbeki, in any form, is unlikely to be constructive. He has shown that he appears focused on protecting his own legacy. His conduct in the case of the Cradock Four families, in which he opposed an inquiry into the non-prosecution of those denied amnesty by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, suggests a very personal motivation. To claim that his character is ' priceless ' in the face of questions from the families about why the government he led did not prosecute those who killed their fathers and husbands appears to defy rationality. The sheer number of people involved is also interesting. Thirty-one people are included on Ramaphosa's Eminent Persons Group from the most incredibly diverse role is to guide and champion the National Dialogue. While there are business leaders and unionists (none of them are current, but they include Bobby Godsell and Bheki Ntshalintshali) there is also a rugby captain (you know the one), a mountaineer (Sibusiso Vilane), a rocket scientist, a storyteller, the chair of the National Planning Commission (Professor Tinyiko Maluleke), both Bishop Barnabas Lekganyane and Bishop Engenas Lekganyane (representing different strands of the Zion Christian Church), one Anglican Archbishop, an actor (John Kani), a football coach (Desiree Ellis) a former Constitutional Court Judge (Edwin Cameron) and Miss South Africa (Mia le Roux may in fact be there not to represent beauty pageant winners, but as a person who grew up deaf, representing people living with disabilities). While there is much wisdom on this list, it is also not clear what value some others may bring. Impossible position And they have now been placed in an impossible position. It would be hard to say no to the Presidency, and yet now they are going to be asked questions about their views on our politics. Someone like Siya Kolisi, almost universally respected, may find this hugely uncomfortable. Like singers and actors who have made political comments, he has no experience in making trade-offs and has no constituency to protect. Now they will be thrust into the harsh glare of our political spotlight. But this list is also curious because of who is left out. Some ancient schisms, such as that in the Zion Christian Church, are recognised, while others, such as that in the Christian church, are not. There is an Anglican representative but not a Catholic one. Perhaps more importantly, no one appears to represent that most under-represented group in our politics, those who have no job and no income. This gets to the heart of one of our economic problems: organised groups that represent people who are unemployed, such as the Unemployed Peoples Movement, are often left out of the conversation and thus they have very little voice in our society. Huge omission That said, it is a huge omission. It should also be noted that the sheer size of this committee may in fact be an attempt to make sure that nothing is done, that no agreement is reached on anything. This might well be the ruse of an experienced politician, who knows that putting so many people in a room, from so many different parts of our society, will simply result in endless arguments. Technically, this is supposed to result in a bottom-up approach, where people will be given the chance to speak in different parts of the country. On paper, this is inherently democratic. In practice, it can lead to undemocratic outcomes, as the most organised and the loudest voices can overwhelm the debate. And our institutions have shown time and time again that public consultation can be ignored. For years energy regulator Nersa has held public hearings before deciding whether to increase electricity prices. Despite so many people publicly opposing tariff increases, power prices have risen by more than 653% since 2007 (inflation during that time was 129%). Economic reality The reason Nersa did that, despite hearing from so many people who opposed it, was because of economic reality. Eskom needed the money. Public consultation is very often about hearing what people want. Making decisions is about what is possible. Nersa has understood that (Eskom has often complained it has not increased prices enough) and thus had to ignore the public comments. This is why bodies like Nersa are given legal authority to make decisions. They can force people to accept the outcome. This process will have nothing like that. It is also a fallacy to think that getting people in a room together will result in them getting closer. Yes, it can happen. But it can also lead to heightened tensions. During the Codesa talks, the stakes were so incredibly high that very few people were prepared to use violence. The one group that was, the right-wing AWB, eventually used an armoured car to disrupt the talks. But their support was tiny and measured in the hundreds. There are now people in our society who publicly oppose our Constitution and have used violence in the past. One of them, Jacob Zuma, won the support of nearly 2.3 million people in last year's election. He will surely demand to be a part of this process. Incentive Also, before 1994 all of the parties involved knew there would be an election after the process. As a result there was an incentive to appear to be constructive. No such incentive will be present in this situation. Currently, one of the great divides in our politics is between parties and constituencies that support the Constitution, and parties and constituencies that don't. This process of a National Dialogue risks giving those who oppose the Constitution, in all sorts of ways, a much louder voice. Imagine, for example, the separatist voices in our society, those who want independence for the Zulu Kingdom, or those who identify as Afrikaners, or who believe the Western Cape really is different to Mzansi, working together to dominate the process. Also, considering how our politics is in the process of fracturing, creating more parties representing more diverse constituencies, the result could just be a cacophony of voices, making it difficult to come to any conclusion at all. It is true that South Africa is in a difficult, and sometimes dangerous position. As Ramaphosa himself said, in his eulogy for Winnie Madikizela-Mandela in 2018: 'We must acknowledge that we are a society that is hurting, damaged by our past, numbed by our present and hesitant about our future.' He was entirely correct. The history of South Africa, so violent and oppressive, has created deep scars. And thus deep tensions. Sometimes our society can almost look like the most complicated knot of different types of string. When you pull it, you might be able to make sense of it all. Maybe.
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
'They are left out because they criticised Ramaphosa'- Analysts on exclusion of key foundations from National Dialogue
Political analysts are of the view that the Thabo Mbeki, Nelson Mandela, and Ahmed Kathrada foundations were 'excluded' from the National Dialogue process announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa, because of their criticism over Ramaphosa's administration. 'I think they are left out because they have been critical of Cyril Ramaphosa's presidency,' said Siyabonga Ntombela, a political analyst from the University of KwaZulu-Natal. 'These foundations have conducted parallel dialogues to discuss the failures of the ANC under Cyril Ramaphosa, the same way they did under (former) President (Jacob) Zuma.' The alleged exclusion comes after concerns about the makeup of the dialogue, with critics also expressing concern over the lack of youth representation. Professor Theo Neethling also expressed concern over the exclusion of not only the Mbeki, Mandela, and Kathrada foundations but also the FW de Klerk Foundation. 'I am disappointed that these foundations appear to have been excluded from helping shape the format of the planned national discussions,' Neethling said. 'Their significance and value as credible NGOs could offer invaluable input and insight.' He also emphasised the importance of involving business leaders and captains of industry, adding that their economic expertise was crucial to the dialogue's success. 'Before we get carried away with enthusiasm, we must ask: Who exactly constitutes the 'national' in this National Dialogue? Where will these dialogues take place? Who will participate, and how will role-players be selected?' he said. 'These critical details remain unclear and must be transparently addressed.' Ramaphosa officially launched the National Dialogue initiative, aimed at reshaping South Africa's future amid rising inequality, unemployment, crime, and systemic corruption. A National Convention will be convened on August 15, bringing together leaders from political, civil, religious, traditional, and business sectors. Ramaphosa said that this is not a one-off event, but the start of a phased, participatory process that will include local consultations, sectoral discussions, and provincial gatherings. The process will culminate in a second national convention in early 2026, where a comprehensive national program of action is expected to be adopted. 'At every turning point in our history, from ending apartheid to building democracy, it has been dialogue that led us forward,' Ramaphosa said. 'This is a call to every South African - young and old, rural and urban, from all communities - to help define our common future.' Ramaphosa announced the formation of an Eminent Persons Group to oversee and guide the process. Among the appointees are Bishop Barnabas Lekganyane of the Zion Christian Church, Grace Bishop Engenas Lekganyane of the St. Engenas Zion Christian Church, former COSATU general secretary Bheki Ntshalintshali, and Springbok captain Siya Kolisi. Those absent from the list were any of Ramaphosa's predecessors or leaders from the foundations. The foundation have consistently slammed Ramaphosa's administration on issues relating to corruption, accountability and governance. Despite the concerns, Ntombela said there was nothing wrong with the composition of the group. 'These are just categories of political, social, and economic organization,' he said. 'Among them, it's possible to have youth leagues and young people's formations. I do not think the criticism is fair.' Even though some have expressed concern and doubt about the effectiveness of the dialogue, Ntombela was blunt in his assessment. 'It will be another lip service, just as other dialogues conducted in the past.' Neethling, however, said there is value in seeking a shared national vision, provided the process is genuine. 'If genuinely inclusive and meaningful, the dialogue can play a vital role in shaping a shared understanding of our challenges and exploring viable solutions,' he said. 'Such engagement can enrich our grasp of the issues and help move us closer to a broadly supported vision for the future.' He stressed that the country's most urgent need is effective strategies to stimulate economic growth. 'Without reaching consensus on this, the national dialogue initiative risks becoming yet another talk shop,' Neethling said. He said the country has faced numerous debates and deep ideological divisions in Parliament over economic and financial policies, often without resolution. 'One of South Africa's most persistent challenges is not a lack of planning, but poor implementation,' he said. 'Even the best policies or visionary ideas will achieve little if implementation barriers are not tackled head-on.' He said the ongoing issues, such as corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, limited financial resources, and capacity constraints, are all well-known problems that remain insufficiently addressed. [email protected] IOL Politics
Eyewitness News
6 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Various SA foundations warm up to Ramaphosa's announcement of a National Dialogue
JOHANNESBURG - Various foundations have noted with gratitude President Cyril Ramaphosa's announcement of the commencement of a National Dialogue. The organisations, including the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Nelson Mandela Foundation, and Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, were not part of Ramaphosa's announcement on Tuesday night. He named 31 prominent South Africans from varying sectors of society, who will be championing and guiding the national convention. A national dialogue preparatory committee says South Africans have been given a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to reclaim the country's agency. ALSO READ: National dialogue will be an important forum to set out mandate & term of GNU - political analyst They've encouraged everyday South Africans to participate in the event, aimed at shaping and recreating the country's future, adding that the venture has to be led by citizens and not the government in order to close the gap between the two. More than 50 organisations backed the foundations' call for a dialogue last year. Meanwhile, the government says the president's eminent persons group will be a fluid structure, with more names likely to be added along the way It also notes the importance of obsessing over the mission of the dialogue as opposed to individuals associated with it.
