
Why We Live Today In An Age Of Value Creation
Despite dire newspaper headlines, the fact is, we live today in an age of extraordinary, sustained value creation. New ways of creating value have enabled fast-growing enterprises of all sizes in most sectors and in many countries to create unprecedented new value in dynamic workplaces with continuous innovation. These enterprises have already transformed the world economy. This is not a theory: it's a fact. It's not something that needs to be invented. It's already happened.
Meanwhile, autocrats, grifters and self-interested firms still trying to extract value operate behind smokescreens of worthwhile purposes and experience no more than spasmodic growth, with generally low levels of staff engagement and little if any real innovation.
Why don't all businesses realize that they would do much better if they embraced value creation?
Some 25 years ago, humanity began a major change. It occurred when some businesses started to think differently. They asked themselves: 'What if instead of aiming to make money, we set out to create value for customers? It's so much easier to make contact with customers with the internet and customers already have much more power than before. So why not accept this and give them what they want and need?'
The impact was magic. It happened so rapidly it's hard to recall how dramatically we chose to live differently. Very quickly, with the help of these businesses, we transformed how we work, how we communicate, how we get about, how we shop, how we manufacture things, how we bank, how we receive health care, how we get educated, how we raise our children, how we play and watch games, how we entertain ourselves, how we read, how we listen to music, how we watch theater and movies, how we engage with nature, how we understand history, how we worship; in short, how we live. The transition was accelerated by the COVID pandemic that began in 2020.
When firms aimed consistently at value creation, something else remarkable happened: they found that they made much more money than firms that aimed at making money. Not just more money: They made exponentially more money,
And their workplaces were generally more engaging because staff believed in creating value for customers.
At first, it was just technology firms. But pretty soon, it was occurring in almost all sectors and many countries: Retail, agriculture, manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, finance, even fashion.
Firms of all sizes: big, medium and even tiny firms.
So now perhaps 20% of public firms are focused on creating value for customers.
What about the other 80% of firms still focused on making money and extracting value for themselves? Why don't they embrace creating value when it would make them so much more money?
In the industrial era of the 20th century, management thinking reflected an internal view of the firm. Management was about making the firm operate more efficiently and effectively within a relatively stable world, with given systems, processes, and practices. The firm did what it could for the customer within the constraints of its existing systems. Top management knew best and issued directives to the rest of the organization, using steep chains of command to ensure order. Car companies competed against other car companies, banks with other banks, and so on. Managers saw themselves as solving the equivalent of familiar jigsaw puzzles. If they could fit the pieces together into the correct pattern, they could extract, and take, the value they believed to be their due.
Value creation requires different thinking. The perspective is mainly external. Success depends less on the internal workings of the firm and more on its ability to master a turbulent unpredictable world of exponential technological possibilities and to delight unpredictable customers. Competition can come from anywhere. Innovation is pivotal and involves not merely improving what already exists, but creating what is new. Firms aspire to generate new possibilities of working, operating, interacting, playing, and living for its customers. In the process, the firm can create new experiences for them, just as artists create works of art. Staff, partners, and sometimes customers, are active in the creative process. The firm is not merely copying or learning known rules. Profits are emergent effects of invention and creation. They are the results of making rather than taking, often out of literally nothing but the imagination.
When the product itself is digital, firms can grow quickly and attain global reach within a few years. In the industrial era, such scope usually took decades. In digital firms, many of the dis-economies of scale—the difficulties that came from being big—have tended to disappear. Instead, global scale—and the firm being the best in the world at what it does—can become almost mandatory. From Scarcity To Abundance
In the digital age, radically different business models have become possible and even necessary: from markets to platforms; from ownership to access, from workers to co-creators of value, from sellers and buyers to providers and users.
Firms that mastered the requirements of the new age have benefited from what economists call network effects. Users get more value as other users join the network, both as an increase in value to all other users and as an encouragement of non-users to join the network.
Whereas the industrial era was largely based on scarcity, digital services are based on abundance. Exponential technologies can generate an almost infinite array of digital services. It has become possible to make instant contact and converse with anyone from anywhere, buy anything anywhere, access the entire world's information, listen to almost any piece of the world's music, take, share and view unlimited photographs, and create and stream videos, all at zero, or a near-zero cost. The winning firms are those that have found ways to deliver, and monetize, parts of this blizzard of possibilities. The Emergence Of Deep Purpose
The dynamic of industrial-era management was all about the brain—measuring and calculating every possible metric, analyzing the past for clues to the future, and studying ratios and relationships. The passion, if any, concerned being rational. Shows of emotion were almost verboten . At most, there was talk of mindset. The heart supposedly had no role.
In the 21st century, the heart became exposed. Pervasive access to digital information collapsed the distinction between public and private content, and leaders could no longer hide behind press releases. Casual remarks made in private could become headline news. In the low-trust context, unflattering narratives—both true and false—became pervasive in social media. Some leaders began to see that they needed to present themselves and their firms as they are and express honestly what they believe. There has been a growing recognition that the whole person—including the heart—is key to leadership in this emerging world.
Building trust in companies and their leaders isn't easy, given many decades of dissembling. Commerce had become the antithesis of the authentic. Moreover, inside the firm, rah-rah HR workshops compounded the offense by attempting to manipulate the staff's very sense of self, getting them to profess feelings that they had never felt. Fixing The Flaws Of The Digital Winners
At the same time, we learned that digital technology can also have potentially devastating negative effects. It can be used to create tighter and more minute monitoring and control than even the worst tyrant, while invading without permission every nook and cranny of individuals' private lives, and turning human connections into zombie-like interactions, as customers and employees find themselves dealing with robotic machines or AI rather than people.
Some actors became very wealthy very rapidly, while those less able to adapt fell by the wayside. In a winner-take-most world, big firms grow steadily bigger and are tempted to exploit their dominance. In due course, the winners can be demonized, while the losers exercise political pressure to prevent change and redress their own suffering. These phenomena—familiar to business historians—are now playing out and are frequently—and mistakenly—seen as unprecedented.
The lessons of history can be helpful. The rapid accumulation wealth is not necessarily a sign of wrongdoing. Yet the abuse of newly-acquired power is common and must be addressed. Regulations designed for different technologies need to be rethought so as to encourage benefits for everyone while limiting winners' inevitable missteps. Self-regulation by winners to resist the temptation to crush every competitor must be part of the solution.
Current bipartisan efforts to regulate big technology firms have assumed a strident tone. These phenomena are common in the transition from one technology to another. The challenge is to understand the facts underlying the claims and counter claims, find ways to depoliticize decision-making, and implement effective regulation. Transitioning To The Age of Value Creation
Transitioning from traditional management to the age of value creation involves changes in the way people speak, think, feel, act, and interact with their fellow human beings. It cannot be absorbed by traditional conferences with 'sages on stage', panels of speakers debating the changes, or reading an article or a book.
It is mainly learned from encountering the experiences of other practitioners either through live interactions or through narratives. There is a need to learn from practitioners who have lived and practiced the change and learned what worked and what didn't in their context. Yet outsiders can't tell participants what would work in new contexts. Businesses themselves have to discover what the new way of thinking, speaking, feeling, acting and interacting might mean for their own workplace and their own business.
And read also:
Revolutionizing Business: From Management To Value Creation
How Creating Value For Others Has Become The Key To Business Success Appendix 1: Self-interested Organizations and Value Creating Enterprises
Summary of prevalent differences between self-interested vs value creating firms Stephen Denning Appendix 2: Firms with a track record of sustained fast growth
Appendix 2: Firms with a track record of sustained fast growth and engaged workplaces Stephen Denning; Seeking Alpha
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Entrepreneur
14 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
The OG of EV: Elon Musk, Co-founder & CEO, Tesla
This story appears in the July 2025 issue of Entrepreneur India. Subscribe » You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. In the world of electric vehicles, there is Tesla—and then there is everyone else. Over the past decade, Elon Musk's brainchild has transformed from a Silicon Valley curiosity into a global automotive powerhouse, reshaping not just how the world drives but how it thinks about mobil ity, energy, and innovation. Now, as Tesla prepares for its long-awaited entry into India, the question is no longer whether it will succeed, but how big that success might be. From Disruption to Domination Tesla's story is equal parts engineer ing brilliance, marketing wizardry, and audacious vision. Founded in 2003, the company endured a series of near-death experiences before its Model S seduced Wall Street and Silicon Valley alike. Today, with a market cap rivaling the world's biggest carmakers combined, Tesla leads global EV sales by a wide margin. It has also become a cultural icon, synony mous with clean tech, performance, and futuristic design. From the USD 35,000 Model 3 to the premium Model X, and with gigafactories across continents, Tesla's model of vertical integration—from battery production to software control—has become the blueprint for modern auto manufacturing. Its Autopilot software, supercharging network, and over-the-air updates are years ahead of most rivals. Cracking India: A Puzzle In Progress Yet, despite its global footprint, India has remained a conspicuous blank spot on Tesla's map. Until now. In early 2024, Tesla resumed high-level talks with Indian government officials, culmi nating in policy concessions that could reshape India's EV ecosystem. The govern ment agreed to reduce import duties for electric cars—under specific investment thresholds—and fast-tracked approvals for Tesla's proposed plant in Gujarat. According to insiders, Tesla plans to initially im port vehicles—likely the Model 3 and Model Y—before setting up local manufacturing and a battery ecosystem. This India pivot comes as global EV growth shows signs of plateauing. China, Tesla's second-largest market, is becoming f iercely competitive with BYD and others eating into its lead. The U.S. EV market, while robust, is grappling with affordability concerns and charging anxieties. For Tesla, India offers untapped potential: a rising middle class, government-backed EV incentives, and an auto market poised to become the world's third-largest. Opportunities and Obstacles India's appeal is obvious. With a 2030 target of 30 per cent EV penetration and a push for Make-in-India localization, the policy environment is gradually aligning with Tesla's expansion goals. The newly launched PM E-DRIVE scheme, worth INR 10,900 crore, along with a battery PLI (Pro duction Linked Incentive) program, could provide a launchpad for global EV brands. But Tesla's India foray won't be friction less. Price sensitivity, limited charging infrastructure, and a deeply entrenched ICE (internal combustion engine) ecosys tem remain significant challenges. Even among EV adopters, two-wheelers and three-wheelers dominate segments where Tesla has no play. Moreover, India's supply chain resil ience has come under scrutiny following China's restriction on rare earth exports, critical to EV motors. For a company that thrives on control, Tesla will need to navi gate complex regulatory, logistical, and geopolitical terrain. "Tesla is only interested in opening a showroom till now. They want to sell their car in India. There is no further development about Tesla," said Union Minister for Heavy Industries and Steel H D Kumaras wamy. Recently, the Minister launched the portal that will enable foreign electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers to submit their applications to manufacture EVs in India. Analysing Tesla's entry in India, Ravindra Patki, Managing Partner, Vector Consulting Group, says, "Tesla thrives on limited SKUs and high volumes for efficiency, whereas Indian consumers expect variety and value. At this price point, they won't get the volumes needed to justify their global operating model. The real opportunity lies in the mass market, not luxury—but to play there, Tesla will need to localise aggressively and rethink its one size-fits-all strategy." As per Nikhil Dhaka, VP, Primus Partners, While Tesla may not dominate the EV market right away, its presence alone elevates expectations around quality, technology, and design. It also brings attention to gaps in our current ecosystem, whether it's charging infrastructure or component localization. Though the entry is not without challenges. Dhaka says, "Tesla's current models remain out of reach for most Indian consumers, and high import duties continue to limit afford ability." The brand is entering a competitive landscape, where players like Tata, Mahindra, and BYD are already establishing strong EV portfolios. Tesla's suc cess will hinge on how quickly it can localize and adapt its pricing strategy. According to Srihari Mulgund, Partner and New Age-Mobility Leader, EY-Parthenon, "Limited initial localization could make cost competitiveness difficult in a price-sensitive market. India's EV infrastructure, especially charging networks, still needs considerable development. Regulatory complexities may pose hurdles to smooth market entry, and Tesla will also face stiff competition from estab lished luxury EV players like BMW and Mercedes." He remains hopeful that it can significantly boost local manufacturing by integrating Indian suppliers into its global supply chain, while also tapping into India's strong engineering talent for R&D and innovation. The brand's presence is likely to accelerate the growth of EV in frastructure and policy support, and appeal to a new generation of aspirational, sustainability focused luxury car buyers. The Musk Factor No Tesla story is complete without Elon Musk. His India ambitions go back over a decade, with periodic tweets teasing a launch. But this time, there's substance. In a recent post, Musk confirmed plans to visit India in 2025 for the inauguration of Tesla's first manufacturing site. "Looking forward to doing exciting things in India," he wrote, sparking speculation about partnerships, investments, and even the pos sibility of a localized "Model India." Musk's knack for leveraging government engagement, media momentum, and consumer anticipation could be Tesla's biggest advantage. If he pulls it off, Tesla could do for India's EV industry what it did globally— make electric aspirational, cool, and inevitable. After failed attempts in 2017-2020 to enter India, Tesla is testing the waters again in India with two showrooms set to open in July in Mumbai and Delhi, each. It remains to be seen if Tesla will be second-time lucky. A Catalyst Moment Tesla's India entry isn't just about selling cars. It's about rewriting the rules of the Indian auto game. It could catalyze faster EV adoption, ac celerate infrastructure develop ment, and spark competition among domestic and global play ers. For Indian startups, suppli ers, and investors, Tesla's arrival could open new opportunities across clean tech, mobility, and energy storage. India, often dubbed the "last big auto market," is now set to become Tesla's next big bet. And if history is any guide, Musk doesn't play small.


The Verge
22 minutes ago
- The Verge
You can buy Tapo's terrific RV30 Max robovac for just $200 right now
Amazon has already slashed the pricing on several excellent robot vacuums for Prime Day, including high-end hybrid mopping models like the Dreame X40 Ultra and Narwal's Freo Z Ultra. Thankfully, if a $700 or $800 robovac is out of the question, Tapo's RV30 Max Plus is an impressive alternative that's currently on sale at Amazon with an auto-empty dock for an all-time low of $199.99 ($100 off). Our favorite budget-friendly robot vacuum offers high-end features, including room-specific cleaning, a capable mop, carpet boost, and smart navigation. It also features an auto-empty dock. Despite costing significantly less than the aforementioned premium models, the RV30 Max Plus doesn't skimp on features, which is why it's our favorite budget robovac. With 5,300Pa of suction power, it easily sucks up cereal, dust, and debris from hard floors. Its wide mop pad and large 300ml water tank also allow for solid mopping performance, while the vac's customizable, room-specific cleaning allows you to choose between five suction levels, three flow settings, and three adjustable mop rotations. Navigation is another area where the RV30 Max Plus punches above its weight. The robot vacuum's smart, lidar-based system enables it to map and navigate your home with precision, and Tapo's intuitive app allows you to set both virtual walls and no-go zones. Notably, you can even set the direction in which it cleans and store up to four distinct floor maps, which is something typically reserved for more premium models. Of course, given it's a relatively cheap robovac, there are a few features Tapo sacrificed to keep costs down. It lacks AI-powered obstacle detection, for example, meaning you'll need to pick up any stray cables, socks, and other objects that might get in the way while running it. Its 2,600mAh battery also isn't the most robust, and charging can take a while. Still, if you're looking to expedite your cleaning on a budget, the RV30 Max Plus is a solid value, especially with this Prime Day discount. Sign up for Verge Deals to get deals on products we've tested sent to your inbox weekly.


Bloomberg
30 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
FDA New Leadership, US Farming Economics, Corporate Breakups
This week, the FDA's new commissioner Dr. Marty Makary outlines a new approach to the department, hoping to restore public trust. Plus, checking in on the heartland of the US - we travel to Iowa to see how much American farmers rely on export markets. Later, a look at the ever-evolving media landscape and whether mergers and breakups have actually helped the challenged industry. (Source: Bloomberg)