
Why this major carmaker thinks in-car screens have reached their peak
'We will see a return of the analogue, and the reduction of screens. It's going to take one or two generations,' Hyundai Motor Group chief creative officer Luc Donckerwolke recently told media including CarExpert.
'Depending on the type of vehicle, you will see less screens.'
He explained this will be different depending on the type of the vehicle.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
'Mainstream vehicles will utilise screens mainly for a couple of generations. Basic cars will have the bring-your-own-device parameter, and the luxury cars will certainly have screens but they will be seconded by voice control.
'You will see less dependence on these screens.'
Genesis last month revealed its X Gran Equator concept, a luxury off-roader that has four small screens looking more like gauges, but no traditional touchscreen.
In an age when even the cheapest Kia Picanto has a touchscreen, vehicles without one are rare – at least in Australia.
You can buy a Suzuki Jimny Lite here featureing a more 2000s-style bank of buttons and knobs, while in the Japanese market various entry-level vehicles like the Toyota GR86 RC simply have a blank where a touchscreen would be.
Some recently revealed vehicles such as Amazon's Slate electric ute feature a smartphone mount located where you might expect a touchscreen to be. Citroen's C3 comes standard with a smartphone dock, which the company says uses an app and the car's NFC wireless capabilities to quickly connect the phone to the car.
'Simply, people have their phone and normally they have everything that they need in terms of applications and utilities in their phone,' said Mr Donckerwolke.
Genesis' design chief isn't just seeing the future of in-car displays through the prism of a designer, and he raised safety concerns about a trend that has become increasingly prolific among, in particular, Chinese brands.
'We have to make sure that screens are not forcing you to go into sub-menus for operations that we required only one touch of a button for before,' he said.
'If you rely only on screens, you are tending to go away from the fact to have the hands on the steering wheel and the eyes on the road which is for me the most important factor of safety.'
Many brands like Tesla, Xpeng and Leapmotor utilise virtually no physical switchgear, with almost every function accessible via the touchscreen or by using the voice assistant.
Digital instrument clusters and infotainment touchscreens have also been joined by separate climate control screens (see: Audi, Land Rover) and passenger displays (see: Jeep, Ram, Porsche).
You'll find rear climate displays in some brands' vehicles (eg: Tesla) as well as rear displays for viewing media (see Genesis, GMC, Lexus).
As screens have permeated through interiors, some brands have introduced enormous screen assemblies. Mercedes-Benz's MBUX Superscreen incorporates a digital instrument cluster, infotainment touchscreen and passenger display under one piece of glass.
Cadillac and Lincoln have gone even further, having not only one continuous pillar-to-pillar screen in some of their luxury vehicles but also a separate touchscreen underneath for controlling key functions like the climate control.
Even Hyundai's own Genesis brand has an expansive – if not quite pillar-to-pillar – 27-inch display incorporating the instruments and infotainment.
The risk here is what looks fabulous on the showroom floor could look out-of-date just a few years later. That's arguably more so with luxury cars, where all the wood and leather and craftsmanship can be undermined by outdated user interfaces – something premium brands didn't have to worry about in decades past.
'I think that the main issue with big screens as well is you have to always update the contents, and other industries do that much better than the automotive industry,' said Mr Donckerwolke.
'There is a danger to have big screens and not the right quality of contents.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Musk's ‘Spicy Mode' AI porn generator is not just dumb, it's dangerous
Things are happening fast in the world of generative AI, and in the world of online safety. But where the two collide, particularly in the increasingly concerning regulatory environment of the United States, things seem to have shifted practically overnight. We're approaching a place where major Western governments are blocking access to educational material for young girls to learn about their own bodies, while AI scans images of those bodies without consent to make models for generating salacious material on demand. A place where mentions of homosexuality and transgenderism are scrubbed from scientific documents and pressure campaigns stop artists making money off their original erotic content, but where the world's richest man can sell you deepfakes of Taylor Swift's bare breasts for $45 a month. It's easy to imagine a horror-scenario future for our culture, which is already dominated and regulated by an internet that's increasingly privatised and vulnerable to the whims of governments and tech oligarchs. A scenario where certain kinds of sex – like anything that might empower women or queer people – are deemed woke and get buried. While other kinds – like the ability of men to see any woman they want naked, while she's powerless to do anything about it – are fine. And it's all the easier to imagine as the constant procession of AI grossness and conservative government mandates make us so apathetic that barely anybody seems to point it out any more. Last week, Elon Musk's xAI rolled out a public version of its image-generation platform Grok Imagine, with a marquee feature being its ability to turn any generated image into a short video. But true to form for Musk's 'free speech absolutist' X platform, which has a history of allowing, gestating and amplifying harm towards anyone of a different gender, sexuality, skin colour or belief system to the Tesla founder himself, this is mainstream AI video with a recklessly immature difference: an optional 'Spicy Mode' ensures the video output is suggestive or explicitly sexual in nature. The idea is that the user (and they must be a paying user, with access to Grok Imagine starting at $45 a month), can ask for an image of any person they want in any situation they want, and then hit the Spicy button to turn it into soft porn. X is filled with videos of users celebrating and sharing their creations. As you might expect, almost all the generated videos are of women, with videos commonly showing them removing their tops and shorts to expose their naked bodies, rolling around while ripping at skintight suits, or messily eating ice cream that Grok seems to think should become liquid the second it's touched by anything. The videos are uncanny, with moments of photorealism but also strange physics, impossible behaviour, weird shiny textures and other common AI video oddness, plus awful audio. They're also extremely unimaginative, despite the name of the product.

The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Musk's ‘Spicy Mode' AI porn generator is not just dumb, it's dangerous
Things are happening fast in the world of generative AI, and in the world of online safety. But where the two collide, particularly in the increasingly concerning regulatory environment of the United States, things seem to have shifted practically overnight. We're approaching a place where major Western governments are blocking access to educational material for young girls to learn about their own bodies, while AI scans images of those bodies without consent to make models for generating salacious material on demand. A place where mentions of homosexuality and transgenderism are scrubbed from scientific documents and pressure campaigns stop artists making money off their original erotic content, but where the world's richest man can sell you deepfakes of Taylor Swift's bare breasts for $45 a month. It's easy to imagine a horror-scenario future for our culture, which is already dominated and regulated by an internet that's increasingly privatised and vulnerable to the whims of governments and tech oligarchs. A scenario where certain kinds of sex – like anything that might empower women or queer people – are deemed woke and get buried. While other kinds – like the ability of men to see any woman they want naked, while she's powerless to do anything about it – are fine. And it's all the easier to imagine as the constant procession of AI grossness and conservative government mandates make us so apathetic that barely anybody seems to point it out any more. Last week, Elon Musk's xAI rolled out a public version of its image-generation platform Grok Imagine, with a marquee feature being its ability to turn any generated image into a short video. But true to form for Musk's 'free speech absolutist' X platform, which has a history of allowing, gestating and amplifying harm towards anyone of a different gender, sexuality, skin colour or belief system to the Tesla founder himself, this is mainstream AI video with a recklessly immature difference: an optional 'Spicy Mode' ensures the video output is suggestive or explicitly sexual in nature. The idea is that the user (and they must be a paying user, with access to Grok Imagine starting at $45 a month), can ask for an image of any person they want in any situation they want, and then hit the Spicy button to turn it into soft porn. X is filled with videos of users celebrating and sharing their creations. As you might expect, almost all the generated videos are of women, with videos commonly showing them removing their tops and shorts to expose their naked bodies, rolling around while ripping at skintight suits, or messily eating ice cream that Grok seems to think should become liquid the second it's touched by anything. The videos are uncanny, with moments of photorealism but also strange physics, impossible behaviour, weird shiny textures and other common AI video oddness, plus awful audio. They're also extremely unimaginative, despite the name of the product.

News.com.au
18 hours ago
- News.com.au
Suzuki Fronx review finds a solid performer
The new Suzuki Fronx hybrid compact SUV has arrived in showrooms at a time when Australians are embracing the technology like never before. After a wave of electric excitement, things aren't looking so swell for the pure battery-powered genre. Hybrids on the other hand are proving more popular than strawberry sundaes at the Ekka. They account for more than 15 per cent of the total market, while plug-in hybrids are also on the increase. An ace up the Fronx sleeve is price. Most of the hybrids are pushing into the $40k-plus bracket, whereas the new Suzuki is $30,990 drive-away. That significantly undercuts the Toyota Corolla Cross GX hybrid ($40,846 drive-away), Hyundai Kona Hybrid ($40,190 drive-away) and even the MG ZS Excite Hybrid+ ($32,990 drive-away). What do you get? Given the price it's not surprising there is liberal use of plastics in some areas, but the faux leather seat trim and the shiny dash surfaces raise the ambience. Other nice kit includes a 9-inch touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, heated front seats, head-up display, keyless start, wireless phone charger, satnav and a four-speaker stereo. Warranty coverage meets the industry standard of five years and unlimited kilometres, Servicing costs are at the midpoint of the scale, with the capped-price ranging between $319 and $579 for the first five dealer-service visits. The total would be $1915 with annual or 15,000km intervals – that sits in the middle ground compared to the Corolla Cross at $1275 and the Kona Hybrid at $2639 on the same schedule. White is the only external colour which is complimentary. Premium options of grey, blue and black are $690 extra, while the two-tone versions that combine silver, red or orange with black add $1190. How was the drive? Buyers of compact hybrids are chasing frugal machines, and the Fronx is miserly when it comes to running costs. Running on standard unleaded, $20 filled about half of the 37L tank. Our fuel consumption over a week returned an average of 5.5L/100km with a combination of highway, metropolitan and easy rural drives. That's slightly higher than the official figure from Suzuki. For comparison, our recent test in the Kona saw 4.6L/100km (3.9 claim), the Corolla Cross managed 4.8L (4.2 claim) and 5.2L/100km in the ZS (4.7 claim). Quarter-mile records are well and truly safe. The Fronx delivers consistent and reliable performance, just don't expect anything rapid or excitement-inducing. It's conservative in all aspects, but it feels typically Suzuki in terms of solid build and on-road confidence. Sitting just under 3000rpm at 110km/h, things can get rowdy as you push up into the rev range. Steep inclines can be challenging and the Fronx requires some right foot motivation to maintain pace – steering wheel-mounted paddles are useful to take manual control of the six-speed automatic gearbox. The sport button can be a placebo as it holds the gears higher into the rev range and feels anything but athletic. Like most hybrids, the Fronx does its best work in traffic. Its nimble and compact dimensions make tight carparks a breeze. The turning circle of less than 10m converts usual three-point turns into U-bolts. Unlike some of the other hybrids Suzuki employs a 12V mild-hybrid system with a small lithium-ion battery. So it can't run purely on battery power, the battery acts more as assistant and gains its energy from regeneration via braking and coasting. Those in the back seat will find reasonable head and leg room for adults, but it best suits two. Three would be a squeeze. Would you buy one? Kel: Our test car was in the two-tone with orange … that wouldn't be my first choice. The Fronx was user friendly and our family has had a reliable history with Suzuki courtesy of the Swift. I did feel not a great deal had changed with the Fronx operationally, and the limited boot space meant gear often spilt into the back seat while it also couldn't handle all 10 bags for our weekly grocery shop. I'm looking forward to the new Vitara which is coming soon and more my preferred size. Grant: Across the key performance indicators the Fronx remained good, but never pushed above and beyond. Some may be tempted to cross-shop it against the cheaper Chery Tiggo 4 or Mahindra XUV 3XO, but they're not hybrids, and Suzuki is a trusted name plate with runs on the board. Anyone chasing a solid performer with low running costs and a solid features list will find the Fronx won't let them down.