New analysis says Trump budget plan will take from poorest 40 percent to give to wealthy
Researchers Harris Eppsteiner and John Ricco of Yale's Budget Lab found that the proposed GOP budget whose framework was supported last month in a vote by the House would include $4.5 trillion in tax cuts that would largely benefit the wealthy, along with $1.5 trillion in spending cuts, including to benefits for the public, including the poorest.
Approximately $230 billion of those cuts would come from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — often shorted to SNAP — which helps poor families afford food.
Another $880 billion would come from cuts to Medicaid, which provides assistance for individuals with limited resources to pay for healthcare. It's also the program that covers most costs for 60 percent of elderly Americans in nursing homes.
Both cuts would occur over a 10-year period.
"The overall effect of these policy changes would be regressive, shifting after-tax-and-transfer resources away' from households at the 'bottom of the distribution towards those at the top," Eppsteiner and Ricco wrote in their analysis.
After-tax-and-transfer income refers to the income remaining after deducting all taxes and adding back government 'transfers,' such as Social Security, Medicare, unemployment benefits, and so on.
Taxed households at the 'bottom of the income distribution would see a reduction in after-tax-and-transfer income of 5 percent, those in the middle of the distribution would see a modest increase of 0.6 percent, and those in the top 5 percent of tax units [household] would see an increase of 3%,' wrote Eppsteiner and Ricco.
'More than 100 percent of the net fiscal benefit would accrue to the top quintile,' the analysis added.
Donald Trump has repeatedly insisted that he will not cut Medicaid, but independent analysts have reported that the Republicans cannot achieve their budget without making severe cuts to the program.
Proposed Republican changes to Medicaid have already caused protests in several parts of the nation.
In addition to the cuts, the proposed Republican budget would also renew expiring provisions of Trump's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which itself was the largest transfer of wealth from the poor to the ultra-rich in U.S. history.
The report notes that the proposed plan it analyzed may change between now and whenever it may be passed in the future.
"As noted above, the Resolution passed by the House on February 25 does not specify how each committee is to meet its specified target. As such, the committees may ultimately endorse policy changes that substantially differ from those analyzed in this blog post," the authors wrote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US senators call for Meta probe after Reuters report on its AI policies
By Jody Godoy (Reuters) -Two Republican U.S. senators called for a congressional investigation into Meta Platforms on Thursday after Reuters exclusively reported on an internal policy document that permitted the company's chatbots to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual.' Meta confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children. "So, only after Meta got CAUGHT did it retract portions of its company doc," Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, said in a post on social media site X. "This is grounds for an immediate congressional investigation," Hawley said. A spokesperson for Senator Marsha Blackburn, a Republican from Tennessee, said she supports an investigation into the social media company. Blackburn also added that the report illustrates the need to pass reforms to better protect children online, such as the Kids Online Safety Act, a bill she co-sponsored which the Senate passed last year but which failed in the U.S. House of Representatives. 'When it comes to protecting precious children online, Meta has failed miserably by every possible measure. Even worse, the company has turned a blind eye to the devastating consequences of how its platforms are designed," Blackburn said. KOSA would make explicit a "duty of care" that social media companies have when it comes to minors using their products, focusing on design of the platforms and regulation of the companies. The standards described in the Meta document don't necessarily reflect 'ideal or even preferable' generative AI outputs, the document states. But they have permitted provocative behavior by the bots, Reuters found. In one example, the document notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply.' Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon, called the policies "deeply disturbing and wrong," adding that Section 230, a law that shields internet companies from liability for the content posted to their platforms, should not protect companies' generative AI chatbots. "Meta and Zuckerberg should be held fully responsible for any harm these bots cause,' he said. Sign in to access your portfolio


Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
California moving forward with partisan redistricting effort to counter Texas' move
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The Democrats' proposed maps still haven't been released. That's expected on Friday. Then, lawmakers plan to quickly approve them next week. Democrats hold supermajorities in both chambers. Advertisement Newsom, who is seen as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, urged Trump in a letter earlier this week to abandon his scheme, telling the president he is 'playing with fire' and 'risking the destabilization of our democracy.' The California map would only take effect if Texas and other states move forward with their own redistricting efforts, and they would remain through the 2030 elections. After that, Democrats say they would return mapmaking power to an independent redistricting commission approved by voters more than a decade ago. Advertisement There are 435 seats in the U.S. House and Republicans currently hold an 219-212 majority, with four vacancies. New maps are typically drawn once a decade after the census is conducted. Many states give legislators the power to draw maps but some, like California, rely on an independent commission that is supposed to be nonpartisan. The Thursday announcement marks the first time any state beyond Texas is officially wading into the mid-decade redistricting fight, kicking off a national standoff that could continue spilling into other states. California Democrats face more complex legal and logistical hurdles than Republicans do in Texas. It's not clear how voters would respond to the mid-decade effort after they voted to give the power of drawing congressional maps to an independent commission in 2010. In Texas, that power lies with the Republican-controlled Legislature. Some already said they would sue to block the effort, and influential voices including former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger may campaign against it. 'Gavin Newsom's latest stunt has nothing to do with Californians and everything to do with consolidating radical Democrat power, silencing California voters, and propping up his pathetic 2028 presidential pipe dream,' National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Christian Martinez said in a statement. 'Newsom's made it clear: he'll shred California's Constitution and trample over democracy - running a cynical, self-serving playbook where Californians are an afterthought and power is the only priority.' California Democrats already hold 43 of the state's 52 House seats, and the state has some of the most competitive House seats. Advertisement Elsewhere, leaders from red Florida to blue New York are threatening to write their own new maps, bucking the standard once-a-decade redistricting process that happens after the census. But none have moved as far as Texas and, soon, California, in advancing new maps. Missouri lawmakers are waiting for Gov. Mike Kehoe to call a special session to draw more favorable Republican maps, and a document obtained by The Associated Press shows the state Senate has received a $46,000 invoice to activate six redistricting software licenses and provide training for up to 10 staff members.


Buzz Feed
27 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Shoppers Expose Hidden Price Hikes At Major Retailers
Ever since he proposed his tariff plan on the campaign trail, economists have warned that Donald Trump's import taxes would raise prices on everyday goods for Americans. Now, we're beginning to see this come into effect. Consumer prices rose by 2.7% in July, and economists predict that the tariffs will drive higher inflation as the year goes on. Unless you keep a detailed spreadsheet of how much everything in your local store costs (and seriously, who has time for that????), it can be pretty hard to spot price changes — especially on items you don't buy often. However, over on TikTok, users are sharing some of the sneaky little red flags that a big retailer has just raised the price on an item you're looking at. One Walmart shopper showed how torn-off price tags can be a subtle sign that the price has gone up. The video starts with an unripped price tag on a pair of shorts for $11.98. Then it shows how the price has been torn off the other tags on the rack: And the "everyday low price" displayed above the rack reads $26.98. And another Walmart shopper spotted this "clearance price" that's somehow higher than the original price: In another video making the rounds, a Target shopper noticed the same trick of tearing off price tags: Plus, another one: covering the old price with a new sticker. This item is labeled as $25. But the sticker scratches off to reveal the old price: $20. And in some cases, the price on the shelf may not yet reflect the new higher price, like in this video where someone shows the price labels for items at Target, like this $50 lamp: But scanning the barcode reveals the updated price: $65. Sooo, you might wanna get in the habit of price-checking before you check out to avoid nasty surprises at the register. In the comments, people have A LOT to say about these price hikes: Have you spotted price hikes when you're shopping? Tell me what you're noticing in the comments!