
Investors brace for oil price spike, rush to havens after US bombs Iran nuclear sites
The reaction in
Middle East stock markets
, which trade on Sunday, suggested investors were assuming a benign outcome, even as Iran intensified its missile attacks on Israel in response to the sudden, deep US involvement in the conflict.
US President Donald Trump called the attack "a spectacular military success" in a televised address to the nation and said Iran's "key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated". He said the US military could go after other targets in Iran if the country did not agree to peace.
Iran said it reserves all options to defend itself, and warned of "everlasting consequences". Speaking in Istanbul, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Tehran was weighing its options for retaliation and would consider diplomacy only after carrying out its response.
Investors said they expected US involvement would cause a stock market selloff and a possible bid for the dollar and other safe-haven assets when major markets reopen, but also said much uncertainty remained.
"I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed, and I think oil will open higher," said Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital.
"We don't have any damage assessment and that will take some time. Even though (Trump) has described this as 'done', we're engaged," Spindel said.
"I think the uncertainty is going to blanket the markets, as now Americans everywhere are going to be exposed. It's going to raise uncertainty and volatility, particularly in oil," he added.
One indicator of how markets will react in the coming week was the price of ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency and a gauge of retail investor sentiment.
Ether was down 8.5 per cent on Sunday, taking losses since the first Israeli strikes on Iran on June 13 to 13 per cent.
Most Gulf stock markets, however, seemed unconcerned by the early morning attacks, with the main indexes in Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait up slightly or flat. Israel's Tel Aviv main index was at an all-time high.
Oil prices, inflation
A key concern for markets centers around the potential impact of Middle East developments on oil prices and thus on inflation. Rising inflation could dampen consumer confidence and lessen the chance of near-term interest rate cuts.
Saul Kavonic, a senior energy analyst at equity research firm MST Marquee in Sydney, said Iran could respond by targeting American interests in the Middle East, including Gulf oil infrastructure in places such as Iraq or harassing ship passages through the Strait of Hormuz.
The Strait of Hormuz lies between Oman and Iran and is the primary export route for oil producers such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Kuwait.
"Much depends on how Iran responds in the coming hours and days, but this could set us on a path towards $100 oil if Iran respond as they have previously threatened to," Kavonic said.
While global benchmark Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18 per cent since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of $79.04 on Thursday, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks on Iran on June 13.
Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group, said oil prices would likely spike before leveling off in a few days as the attacks could lead Iran to seek a peace deal with Israel and the United States.
"With this demonstration of force and total annihilation of its nuclear capabilities, they've lost all of their leverage and will likely hit the escape button to a peace deal," Cox said.
Economists warn that a dramatic rise in oil prices could damage a global economy already strained by Trump's tariffs.
Still, any pullback in equities might be fleeting, history suggests. During past eruptions of Middle East tensions, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities, stocks initially languished but soon recovered to trade higher in the months ahead.
On average, the S&P 500 slipped 0.3 per cent in the three weeks following the start of conflict, but was 2.3 per cent higher on average two months following the conflict, according to data from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro.
Dollar woes
An escalation in the conflict could have mixed implications for the US dollar, which has tumbled this year amid worries over diminished US exceptionalism.
In the event of US direct engagement in the Iran-Israel war, the dollar could initially benefit from a safety bid, analysts said.
"Do we see a flight to safety? That would signal yields going lower and the dollar getting stronger," said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at IBKR in Greenwich, Connecticut. "It's hard to imagine stocks not reacting negatively and the question is how much."
Jack McIntyre, portfolio manager for global fixed income at Brandywine Global Investment Management in Philadelphia, said it was uncertain whether US Treasuries would rally after the US attack, largely due to the market's hypersensitivity to inflation.
"This could lead to regime change (which) ultimately could have a much bigger impact on the global economy if Iran shifts towards a more friendly, open economic regime," said McIntyre.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
7 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's peace offer to Putin on Ukraine war leaked while threatening deadly consequences if there's no peace
U.S. President Donald Trump plans to host Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15, 2025, negotiations aiming at securing peace in the Ukraine war. But according to leaked reports, the peace proposal could involve crucial territorial concessions — and Trump has privately cautioned of 'serious consequences' if the talks fail. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Alaska as Host: A Symbolic and Strategic Choice Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Peace Deal or a Concession? Global Reactions: Unease in Europe, Silence in Asia Will It Lead to Peace or Provoke More Conflict? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs: U.S. President Donald Trump is all set to host Russian President Vladimir Putin at a controversial summit in Alaska on August 15, 2025, focusing on negotiating an ending to the ongoing war in Ukraine. Leaked Reports show that Trump has privately cautioned Putin to accept the peace terms or face 'serious and immediate consequences.' Although no information has been revealed, the statement is regarded as a high-stakes strategy to force Moscow into accepting the to insiders, the proposal suggests that Russia would retain control over four occupied Ukrainian regions: Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. In return, Moscow would commit to halting all offensive operations and demilitarizing certain contested zones. While the arrangement has been framed as a practical step toward ending the bloodshed, critics warn it could embolden future territorial upcoming summit will take place remotely in a military base near Anchorage, far from Washington, D.C. According to insiders, Alaska was chosen due to its geographical proximity to Russia and a degree of neutrality in international affairs. It also allows the U.S. to avoid potential complications tied to international legal mechanisms such as the International Criminal Court, which has issued an arrest warrant for measures have been significantly tightened, and the event is being said as one of the most sensitive diplomatic meetings in recent years. While the Biden administration has remained in public silence, it has reportedly raised internal concerns about the legitimacy and legality of the summit, especially if it includes territorial concessions without Ukraine's indicate that Trump is considering the idea of a territorial trade to bring an end to the conflict . Under this rumored deal, Russia would maintain control over several occupied territories in eastern Ukraine, including Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson in return for a full ceasefire and possible demilitarization of specific a recent Fox News appearance, Trump described the arrangement as a 'win-win' stating 'Everyone gets something. Most importantly, the dying stops,' he Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has sharply criticized, calling any agreement that excludes Ukraine 'illegitimate.' He stressed that no foreign power can decide Ukraine's future and cautioned that appeasing aggression would set a dangerous global Europe leaders have expressed strong reservations. NATO officials have cautioned that any agreement rewarding territorial aggression could undermine the entire continent. Germany, France, and the U.K. have jointly highlighted that Ukraine must be directly involved in any peace contrast, China and India have remained mostly silent, signaling their characteristically guarded approach when it comes to high-profile geopolitical disputes involving Western powers and the high-stakes summit approaches,uncertainty hangs in the air. The central question remains: will Trump and Putin reach an agreement that halts the bloodshed or will the event further rift the international community?It is evident that the summit is not just about Ukraine. At its core, It's about the role of American leadership in global conflict resolution and whether diplomacy can still thrive in an era defined by nationalism, military strategies, and competing eyes will be on Alaska—not just for peace, but for precedent that this meeting could set for future geopolitics..A1. It's a planned meeting to discuss a possible peace deal to end the war in Ukraine.A2. The summit is scheduled for August 15, 2025


Time of India
7 minutes ago
- Time of India
Putin ‘begged' Trump for meeting? US State Dept drops bombshell on Russian Prez's surprising request
Ahead of the Alaska summit, the US State Department has claimed that Russian President Vladimir Putin was the one who personally requested a meeting with US President Donald Trump.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
The hunger games: How Hamas's starvation campaign exposes Western hypocrisy
The disturbing ease with which Western nations embrace Hamas's lies stems from classical antisemitism resurging. This worsens due to a dangerous alliance between liberals and Islamist communities wielding electoral power in the West Demonstrators hold torches, during a protest outside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office to demand the immediate release of the hostages kidnapped during the deadly October 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas, and the end of the war, in Jerusalem. Reuters Hamas's propaganda against Israel resonates widely in the Western world, not out of moral compassion for perceived victims, but because classical antisemitism still pulses beneath the surface—and since October 7, it increasingly bubbles above it. Hamas's 'starvation' campaign and accusations of Israeli genocide represent a direct continuation of one of history's most notorious antisemitic documents: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Like that conspiratorial text claiming Jews sought world domination, today's lie alleges Israel commits genocide against Palestinians. As then, the falsehood spreads like wildfire, now through digital platforms. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In recent weeks, the world watched with concern as images of three allegedly starving Gazan children dominated international headlines, further cementing the false narrative of Israeli genocide in Gaza. In reality, these children—who became symbols of supposed 'genocide'—suffered from genetic diseases, not starvation. Moreover, one of them received medical treatment in Italy with Israeli coordination, another was treated in an Israeli hospital, and in the third widely circulated photo, the sick child appears in the arms of his healthy mother. Earlier this week, Prime Minister Netanyahu delivered statements to the media, dedicating significant time to refuting Hamas and the international community's claims about hunger and starvation in Gaza. However, this move—important as it is for Israeli public diplomacy—remains a case of too little, too late. The facts, as the Prime Minister accurately presented them, no longer interest anyone. Meanwhile, the only intentional starvation occurring in Gaza is what Hamas inflicts on Israeli hostages. The shocking images of Evyatar David and Rom Braslavsky, which Hamas itself released to pressure Israel, clearly show who is deliberately starving whom. In one video, viewers can even see the healthy, full hand of the terrorist offering Evyatar a can of food. Yet even when the world saw this documentation, it chose to equate the hostages' condition with Gaza's humanitarian situation. Regarding the existing hardship in Gaza, context matters. This is the result of a war forced upon Israel. Nevertheless, while fighting, Israel provides extensive humanitarian aid—thousands of trucks, airdrops, and food distribution stations through the Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) to ensure aid reaches civilians, not Hamas. Yet Hamas itself violently hijacks food convoys, threatens Gazans who cooperate, and insists aid flow through the UN to preserve its control. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The disturbing ease with which Western nations embrace Hamas's lies stems from classical antisemitism resurging. This worsens due to a dangerous alliance between progressive liberal elements and Islamist communities wielding electoral power in the West. Countries like France, Britain, Canada, and Australia are prepared to make a historic error by recognising a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September—effectively rewarding Hamas for the October 7 atrocities. Despite the facts, it remains convenient to blame the Jewish state. This propaganda's consequences manifest beyond the political domain. Militarily, entrenched false narratives constrain IDF operations and encourage weapons embargoes against Israel, distancing Israel from achieving war objectives while draining resources toward missions that divert attention from defeating Hamas. This demonisation of Jews has a direct impact on the safety of Jews worldwide. Indeed, we witness a sharp increase in antisemitic violence, including murders. Some argue Israel's battle for global consciousness is doomed against 1.5 billion Muslims. I argue that the Muslim population isn't the problem—parts of it support Israel, as proven by the Abraham Accords and relations with Azerbaijan, for example. The real issue is classical antisemitism resurging in Western society, adopting false narratives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD International organisations under UN auspices strengthen Hamas's lies through pseudo-academic reports based on data provided by Hamas, echoing their messages. As we witness, these don't stop at public opinion-shaping but lead to concrete actions against Israel: embargoes and recognition of a Palestinian state. Even when some recognition announcements specify Hamas must disarm and won't be part of Palestinian leadership, this move effectively rewards Hamas for the October 7 horrors and is expected to strengthen its position among Palestinians—not only in Gaza but also in Judea and Samaria at the Palestinian Authority's expense. We must, therefore, continue fighting for the truth. The Jewish people are indigenous to the Land of Israel, and Israel's existence represents Jewish restoration after the Holocaust and exile—victory over Christian and Muslim colonialism in the Land of Israel. This battle isn't just against Hamas in Gaza; it's tied to our obligation as Jews to say, 'Never Again'. Joseph Rozen is a distinguished expert in International Relations, Asian affairs, and National Security. He is Senior Fellow at Misgav Institute for National Security, an Israeli think tank based in Jerusalem. He previously served as the Director of APAC and Euro-Asia Affairs at the Israeli National Security Council. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the uthor. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD