
Daily subject-wise quiz: Polity and Governance MCQs on first General Elections to the Lok Sabha, Ashok Pahwa Committee and more (Week 110)
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for April 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
With reference to the first General Elections to the Lok Sabha, consider the following statements:
1. It was conducted over four months in 1951-52.
2. The first elections were conducted when Sukumar Sen was the Chief Election Commissioner.
3. The first Lok Sabha had multiple-member constituencies.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) All three
(d) None
Explanation
— India's first Lok Sabha election, conducted over four months in 1951-52, began the democratic process by which the reins of the newly independent nation were put in the hands of its people. Votes were cast for 489 Lok Sabha and 3,283 state Assembly seats around the country. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
— The office of the Election Commission of India (ECI) was set up on January 25, 1950. Sukumar Sen, an officer of the Indian Civil Service and a former Chief Secretary of West Bengal, became Chief Election Commissioner on March 21, 1950. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
— The ballot papers were the size of a Re 1 currency note. They were pink in colour, with 'Election Commission India' inscribed on them. They displayed a serial number with two letters of the alphabet denoting the state — BR for Bihar, AS for Assam, etc.
— The ballots also had serial numbers printed in black, and the national crest in white. The papers for Lok Sabha elections had a thick vertical bar of olive green colour; those for state Assemblies had a chocolate-coloured bar.
— The first Lok Sabha also had multiple-member constituencies, a practice that was done away with in the elections of 1962. Under this, some constituencies returned two members — one from the general category, another from the SC or ST categories — and, in one constituency, all three categories returned one member each. Hence, statement 3 is correct.
— The ECI had granted 14 parties the status of 'national parties', and designated more than 50 parties as 'state parties'. After the elections, only the Congress, Praja Socialist Party (formed with the merger of the Socialist Party and KMPP), CPI, and BJS were able to retain their national party status.
Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
The provisions under Article 19 of the Constitution of India are:
1. to assemble peaceably and with arms
2. to form unions
3. to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India
4. to carry on any occupation
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
(a) 1, 2 and 3
(b) 2, 3 and 4
(c) 3 and 4 only
(d) 2 and 4 only
Explanation
— Article 19 of the Constitution of India provides for the protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc.
— All citizens shall have the right—
(a) to freedom of speech and expression;
(b) to assemble peaceably and without arms;
(c) to form associations or unions or co-operative societies;
(d) to move freely throughout the territory of India;
(e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India;
(f) to acquire, hold, and dispose of property. However, this right was omitted by the 44th amendment to the Constitution.
(g) to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.
Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.
(Other Source: Constitution of India)
With reference to the Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs, consider the following statements:
1. It was first constituted in 1949.
2. Before 1954, the Ministry of Defence was providing secretarial assistance to the committee.
3. Its function is to watch the progress of Government Business in Parliament and to give such directions as may be necessary from time to time.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 3 only
(c) 2 only
(d) 1 and 3 only
Explanation
— With the establishment of a bicameral Parliament composed of multiple representatives of the people, it was believed appropriate for the Cabinet to transfer overall responsibility for detailed parliamentary concerns to a small standing committee of the Cabinet that specialised in this duty.
— A Parliamentary and Legal Affairs Committee was established in 1949. This body was eventually renamed the Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs. Since 1954, the committee has had secretarial assistance from the then-Department of Parliamentary Affairs, which is now the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
— Prior to 1954, the Ministry of Law provided secretarial support to the committee, though the then-Department of Parliamentary Affairs also offered secretarial aid for the organisation of Government Business in both Houses of Parliament. Hence, statement 2 is not correct.
— The following functions have been assigned to the Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs:
(i) To watch the progress of Government Business in Parliament and to give such directions as may be necessary from time to time, in order to secure smooth and efficient conduct of such business; Hence, statement 3 is correct.
(ii) to scrutinise, and to consider the attitude of the Government on non-official bills and resolutions to be presented to Parliament;
(iii) to maintain a review from an all-India point of view of legislations undertaken by State legislatures; and
(iv) to consider proposals to summon or prorogue the Houses of Parliament.
Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.
(Source: mpa.gov.in)
The Ashok Pahwa Committee (1996) was associated with:
(a) Reforms in the Lok Sabha
(b) Caste Census
(c) Eighth Schedule
(d) Delimitation
Explanation
— The Ashok Pahwa Committee (1996) proposed that a language be added to the Eighth Schedule if it was an official language in at least one state, a significant portion of a state's population spoke it, it was an independent language rather than a dialect or derivative of one already listed, it was recognised by the Sahitya Akademi, and it had a well-defined and developed literary tradition.
Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
Consider the following statements:
1. A Member of Parliament shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of a vote given by him in Parliament or any committee.
2. Members of Parliament shall be liable to proceedings in any court in respect of anything said by them in Parliament or any committee.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation
— Article 105 of the Constitution of India provides for the powers, privileges, etc., of the Houses of Parliament and of the members and committees.
— There shall be freedom of speech in Parliament.
— No member of Parliament shall be liable in any court for anything said or voted on in Parliament or any committee thereof, nor shall any person be liable in respect of any report, paper, votes, or proceedings published by or under the authority of either House of Parliament. Hence, statements 1 and 2 are not correct.
— Each House of Parliament, as well as its members and committees, must have the rights, privileges, and immunities prescribed by Parliament by legislation from time to time.
Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.
(Other Source: Constitution of India)
Daily Subject-wise quiz — History, Culture, and Social Issues (Week 109 and 110)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Polity and Governance (Week 109)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Science and Technology (Week 109)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Economy (Week 109)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Environment and Geography (Week 109)
Daily subject-wise quiz – International Relations (Week 109)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
State poised to lead India's quantum technology push: Raichur MP
Bengaluru: Karnataka is ready to play a leading role in shaping India's quantum technology land-scape, Raichur MP G. Kumar Naik told the Lok Sabha on Monday while welcoming the Centre's decision to invest in the National Quantum Mission (NQM). Speaking under Rule 377, Naik stressed the need for better coordination, a clear im-plementation roadmap, and cooperative federalism to ensure that the mission delivers measurable outcomes. Drawing lessons from India's semiconductor programme, he warned against the risk of ambitious projects stalling despite large budget allocations. Naik highlighted Karnataka's early strides in the sector, including the announcement of a Rs1,000-crore Quantum Fund — the first of its kind in the country — and a compre-hensive vision for quantum technology development under Chief Minister Siddara-maiah and Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar. He credited State Science and Technology Minister N.S. Boseraju for conceptualising and executing the inaugural Quantum India Summit 2025 in Bengaluru, which brought together Nobel Laureates, global experts, industry leaders, and researchers. Key state initiatives include a dedicated Quantum Research Park and Q-City, Fabline, quantum coursework in over 20 colleges, and a strong startup ecosystem. Karnataka produces more than 91,000 quantum-relevant graduates annually, second only to the EU, Naik said. Boseraju added that the success of the national mission depends on the State and Centre working 'hand-in-hand' with shared vision, strategic coordination, and sus-tained investment in talent and infrastructure.


Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
Records of over 100 booths in Bengal missing, Chief Electoral Officer to inform ECI
Kolkata: The records of the voters' lists of around a hundred polling booths in West Bengal, post the last Special Intensive Revision carried out by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in 2002, are not available. The 2022 list is supposed to be the basis for carrying out the SIR by the Commission this year. Insiders from the office of the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), West Bengal, said that the matter would be brought to the notice of the ECI and permission would be sought to use the draft voters' list for 2003 as the basis of the fresh SIR. The sources said that, in the case of certain booths, the records of the 2002 post-SIR were not available at all. In some cases, the lists have been damaged in such a way that it is impossible to upload them to the Commission's server. It is learnt that the majority of the polling booths, whose records are not available, are from South 24 Parganas, Howrah, North 24 Parganas, and Birbhum districts, all being traditional strongholds of Trinamool Congress. The development has surfaced at a time when the ECI and the state government are at loggerheads over the Commission's suspension of four election officials posted in two Assembly constituencies in two districts of West Bengal. The four officials were suspended for their involvement in the wrongful addition of names to the electoral rolls of these two seats. After the state government, earlier this week, intimated to the ECI that it would not currently comply with the order to suspend the four election officials, the Commission, on Tuesday, summoned the state Chief Secretary Manoj Pant to the ECI's headquarters in Delhi by 5 p.m. on Wednesday. Now all eyes are on the outcome of the meeting between Pant and ECI officials. The complications on the issue of disciplinary action against the four election officers started from the beginning, with Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee challenging the Commission's order. She said that no action would be taken against the four officers as all of them were state government employees. The main charges against these four election officers are that they not only failed to perform their duties as EROs and AEROs while disposing of the applications, but also violated the policy of data security by sharing the login credentials of the election registration database with unauthorised persons. If proven guilty, the punishment of the erring individuals will be imprisonment for a term of at least three months, but can extend to two years, and with a fine, as per legal provisions.


The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Tejashwi claims Muzaffarpur Mayor has two EPIC numbers, days after allegation against Bihar Deputy CM
The Leader of the Opposition in Bihar, Tejashwi Yadav, on Wednesday (August 13, 2025) suggested that yet another high-profile name has two EPIC (Electoral Photo Identity Card) numbers, days after accusing Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Kumar Sinha of the same. On August 10, Mr. Yadav stated that Mr. Sinha had two EPIC numbers, one as a voter for the Bankipur assembly constituency and another for the Lakhisarai assembly constituency. Mr. Yadav had also displayed it in front of the press. Similarly, the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader, while addressing the press at his official residence, said that Muzaffarpur Mayor Nirmala Devi, who is likely to be the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) candidate, has two EPIC numbers and even her age is different. She is a voter of the Muzaffarpur assembly constituency. Mr. Yadav also claimed that even her two brothers-in-law Dilip Kumar and Manoj Kumar has two EPIC numbers. The former Deputy Chief Minister also asked why only the ERO (Electoral Registration Officer) of Bankipur assembly constituency sent a notice to Mr. Sinha in the two EPIC card matters. He added that Mr. Sinha should have gotten the notice from the Lakhisarai assembly constituency ERO as well. Accompanied by RJD State unit president Mangani Lal Mandal and senior leader Abdul Bari Siddiqui, the RJD leader also claimed that Bihar BJP organisation General Secretary Bhikhubhai Dalsania, who was a voter of Gujarat till the last Lok Sabha election, has now become a voter of Patna district. Mr. Yadav, however, asserted that Mr. Dalsania has deleted his name from Gujarat. 'Just see what is going on in the BJP; natives of other States are becoming the voters of Bihar, after the Bihar election, he will become a voter of some other States and will keep casting votes for the BJP candidates,' Mr. Yadav said. He further alleged that the Election Commission of India (ECI) is removing those voters who are sympathisers of Opposition parties. 'What I am wondering till today is that the Chief Election Commissioner of India, Gyanesh Kumar, has not briefed the media even once ever since the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) commenced in Bihar. In the evening, the ECI just issues a press note and does a fact-check by writing misleading news. What is going on in this country when the PM does not hold PC, the Bihar CM does not hold PC, nor eventhe Election Commissioner of India. What kind of democracy is it?' Mr. Yadav said. He also alleged that the BJP was earlier using the CBI, ED and I-T departments as tools to trouble the Opposition parties and now the BJP was using the ECI.