Op Sindoor: Inside story of what led Pakistan DGMO to make frantic calls for ‘ceasefire'
'India sent out a clear message that no matter where, India can carry out pinpointed conventional strikes anywhere in Pakistan. Pakistan learnt that if needed, India can launch a barrage of missiles and not just the numbers that were used this time. The messaging was very clear to the Pakistanis,' a source in the Indian defence and security establishment told ThePrint.
But what really changed in these 72 hours?
New Delhi: Pakistan, which 'brusquely turned down' the request of Indian DGMO Lt Gen Rajiv Ghai on 7 May 'with an intimation that a severe response was inevitable and, in the offing,' was desperately reaching out to him on 10 May to ensure a ceasefire, ThePrint has learnt.
ThePrint has also reliably learnt that the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) lost at least a couple of aircraft between 8 and 10 May.
Director General of Air Operations Air Marshal A.K. Bharti had publicly said that Pakistani aircraft were hit and technical analysis is being done, following which the armed forces would share more details.
Asked if the Indian Air Force (IAF) shot down Pakistani aircraft, he had said 'Their planes were prevented from entering inside our border…definitely, we have downed a few planes…definitely, there are losses on their side which we have inflicted.'
He added that the exact numbers are with the IAF, but it is still analysing technical details and will come out with a report soon.
The IAF has also said that details of its own losses will be made public in due course. However, all pilots have been accounted for
ThePrint is withholding information garnered so far of the onslaught by India and the damage caused to Pakistan since the operation is still ongoing and will wait for IAF to release the details formally.
However, even as the IAF finalises its report based on technical and visual evidence, ThePrint has learnt that the strikes were much deeper and wider than what has been claimed by both sides officially.
Sources said that India does not want Ops Sindoor to be about claims and counter claims and hence is very careful about the information it is putting out in public.
This is directly opposite to the tactics of the Pakistan military which claimed a lot without any evidence. Pakistan even showcased forged satellite images to show damage on the Indian side but got called out by international experts.
The IAF, it is learnt, does not wish to state anything which might be questioned due to lack of immediate tangible proof like what happened in the aftermath of the Balakot strikes when doubts were raised on the extent of damage inflicted.
For instance, even during the strike on terror camps in Pakistan and PoK on 7 May, India used missiles like the Crystal Maze which relays back video till the second it strikes, as was visible in one of the videos released by the Indian defence ministry.
Almost all strikes of 7 May were covered by high-resolution reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicles and post damage satellite pictures.
For all strikes post 7 May, India has claimed only those videos of which were shot by the public and shared on social media, or for which clear satellite pictures are available. There are some more strikes that Pakistan has obviously not claimed and neither has India.
Talking about the operations, sources also said that the much talked-about Chinese air-to-air missile PL-15, could not score a single hit.
The IAF, on the other hand, used a host of aircraft and air defence systems since 7 May with major setbacks inflicted to PAF from 8 May onwards.
The initial part of Operation Sindoor focussed on nine terror camps which were taken out by the IAF and the Army in pinpointed strikes with major casualties inflicted on the terror infrastructure.
From 8 May onwards, the strikes focussed on showing real raw power of the IAF to the Pakistani defence establishment, sources said.
A plethora of missiles, loitering munitions were used by the IAF to strike back at the Pakistani military.
It is learnt that several Chinese-supplied HQ-9B long-range air defence systems and HQ-16 medium-range air defence systems were taken out by Harpy and Harop loitering munitions—in use with the IAF for years even before the word 'drones' caught the fancy of the world in the wake of the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh.
The Government of India had formally said last Friday that the Indian military 'bypassed and jammed Pakistan's China-supplied air defence systems', borne by the fact that loitering munitions travelled deep inside Pakistan to strike at places close to what Pakistan Army considers as its fiefdom.
Missiles fired by the IAF include the BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles, which Pakistan claims were fired from air (IAF has both air and ground versions), SCALP long-range air-to-ground missiles, Hammer air-to-ground missiles, Rampage air-to-ground missiles and Spice 2000 among others.
The Indian medium-range surface-to-air missile system (MRSAM also known as Barak 8) and the indigenous Akash too saw action, and so did the S-400.
'It was a combined shock and awe operation using long-range missiles, air defence missiles, loitering munitions and strikes at specific sites that caused wide range damage to Pakistani military forces that forced them to seek ceasefire on the fourth day itself,' said one source.
Maximum damage caused to Pakistan Air Force assets on the ground was by way of missile strikes on its primary logistics hub, the Nur Khan base in Rawalpindi, and the Bholari air base. PAF Air Marshal Masood Akhtar (Retd) on a Pakistani news channel said he had information that a Saab Erieye, an Airborne Early Warning and Control System (AEW&C), was destroyed when India struck the hangar at Bholari.
It is reliably learnt that the actual loss may be higher than what Pakistan is showcasing, both officially and unofficially.
Pakistan operates 9 Saab Erieye and two IL 78 mid-air refuellers.
Incidentally, Pakistan has also put out names of five PAF personnel it said were killed in the strike on Bholari air base.
Sources said it was on the morning of 10 December, after India carried out hits on PAF bases in Chaklala, Rafiqui, Rahim Yar Khan, Sargodha, Bhulari, and Jacobabad, that Pakistan's DGMO made frantic calls to his Indian counterpart, wanting a ceasefire.
'On 7 May when our DGMO wanted to talk, they shrugged it off vowing retaliation. On 10 May, they reached out desperately. Clearly shows that the message was overwhelmingly delivered to Pakistan,' a source said.
Pakistan PM Shahbaz Sharif, addressing an event Friday, said that 'At around 2.30 am on 10 May, General Syed Asim Munir called me on a secure line and informed me that India's ballistic missiles have hit Nur Khan Airbase and other areas'.
Incidentally, it was after that Pakistan was desperately seeking a ceasefire.
As Air Marshal Bharti said earlier, 'Did we achieve our military objective? 'A thumping yes.'
(Edited by Amrtansh Arora)
Also Read: Operation Sindoor is a springboard in India's new confidence in Make in India weapons
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
23 minutes ago
- India.com
The Shadow Queen Of ISI: How ‘Madam N' Wove A Spy Web Of Sleeper Agents Across India
New Delhi: In a story that reads like the plot of a high-stakes geopolitical thriller, Indian intelligence agencies have uncovered the presence of a mysterious Pakistani woman known as 'Madam N' – a suave and powerful business tycoon from Lahore with alleged orders straight from Pakistan's notorious spy agency – the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Her mission was to infiltrate India through culture, faith and charm and to raise a ghost army of 500 spies scattered quietly across Indian soil. What began as a routine interrogation of arrested social media influencers turned into the stunning revelation. Hidden behind the polished curtains of diplomacy and travel was Naushaba Shahzad, owner of 'Zyana Travel and Tourism' in Lahore, now accused of masterminding an audacious espionage network that reached deep into India's digital and spiritual spaces. According to sources, Naushaba, under the ISI codename 'Madam N', had been working meticulously for months to build a covert network of sleeper cells in India. She was not sending spies across borders with weapons or radio sets. She was using smartphones, spiritual pilgrimages and social media likes. Her bait? Culture, faith and an open invitation to Pakistan – in the name of Sikh and Hindu pilgrimages. Over just six months, 'Madam N' allegedly brought over 3,000 Indian citizens and 1,500 NRIs to Pakistan. They were not just tourists or devotees. Intelligence inputs suggest many of them unknowingly walked into a well-scripted ISI recruitment program – meeting with military officials, being groomed for 'information gathering' and in some cases, receiving suspicious funding. Her operation was so slick and so invisible that she could allegedly arrange a visa to Pakistan with just a phone call. Her connections ran deep inside Pakistan's diplomatic machinery. One of her key contacts was Danish aka Ahsan-ur-Rahman, an ISI operative posted at the Pakistan High Commission in Delhi – recently expelled by India on charges of espionage. But Madam N's real genius was hiding the machinery of a spy factory behind the peaceful facade of religious tourism. She collaborated with Pakistan's Evacuee Trust Property Board, the body responsible for managing Sikh and Hindu shrines in the country. The pilgrimages, the cultural outreach and the hospitality – it was all a shimmering curtain. Behind it, millions of rupees allegedly moved silently to fund ISI propaganda, recruit informants and amplify anti-India narratives. What India has now stumbled upon is not another case of cross-border intelligence warfare, it is a new blueprint of soft-espionage – one that is harder to detect, harder to prove and deeply embedded in the emotional and cultural fabric of the people it targets. Indian security agencies are now in high alert mode. The revelations have jolted the intelligence community, not just for the scale of the network but for the subtlety with which it was built. The story of 'Madam N' is also not about one woman. It is about a reminder that the war for information is not being fought on battlefields anymore. It is being fought on timelines, visas, WhatsApp groups and temple visits. The spy game has changed. And India is finally waking up to just how dangerous the new frontlines are.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
In US, Shashi Tharoor's son grills him on Pakistan role in Pahalgam terror attack. Congress MP gives ‘three reasons'
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who is in the United States leading an all-party delegation, was asked a question by his son, Ishan, on Thursday about Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam attack. Ishan asked whether any country had asked the delegation led by his father for evidence of Pakistan's involvement in the deadly Pahalgam terrorist attack on April 22 that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. He also asked about Pakistan's consistent denial of its involvement in the attack. To this, Tharoor said that India would not have retaliated in the way it did if there was not convincing evidence against Pakistan. Responding to his son's question, Tharoor said, 'I'm very glad you raised this. I didn't plant it, I promise you,' before adding that no country had asked for any such evidence. 'Very simply, no one had any doubt, and we were not asked for evidence. But the media have asked in two or three places. Let me say very clearly that India would not have done this without convincing evidence,' Tharoor said. Further elaborating on Pakistan's involvement in terrorism, Tharoor highlighted the country's 37-year pattern of terror attacks accompanied by repeated denials. He brought up the Mumbai attacks in 2008 and Osama Bin Laden's location near an army base in Pakistan. 'But there were three particular reasons I want to draw your attention to all of you. The first is that we've had a 37-year pattern of repeated terror attacks from Pakistan, accompanied by repeated denials. I mean, Americans haven't forgotten that Pakistan didn't know, allegedly, where Osama bin Laden was until he was found in a Pakistani safe house right next to an army camp in a cantonment city. That's Pakistan,' Tharoor said. 'Mumbai attacks- They denied having anything to do with it. One of the terrorists was captured alive. His name, his identity, and his address are in Pakistan. Everything was revealed under interrogation. He told us where he was trained and what was done,' he added. Tharoor also talked about the recording of the Pakistani handler giving minute-by-minute instructions to the killers in Mumbai, which he said was recorded by both Indian and US intelligence. 'We know what Pakistan's all about. They will dispatch terrorists. They will deny they did so until they're actually caught with red hands. That's the first," he added. Shashi Tharoor highlighted that the Resistance Front (TRF), which he called a 'well-known proxy front of the Lashkar-e-Taiba', claimed responsibility for the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack 'within 45 minutes or so' of the tragedy. Tharoor said that the Resistance Front is 'a banned organisation listed by the United Nations and the US State Department, which enjoys safe haven in the town of Muridke in Pakistan' and added that India had already presented evidence about the Resistance Front and its doings to the UN Committee on Terrorism in December 2023 and again in 2024. However, since Pakistan was also a member of the committee, the UN did not list the Resistance Front, but its identity was 'known and publicised', Tharoor added. India was pursuing the listing of TRF in the United Nations by the UN Security Council's UNCC 1267 sanctions committee. 'The world hadn't even learned about this (attack) when they claimed credit, so that was itself a smoking gun. They repeated that claim 24 hours later, and having repeated that claim 24 hours later, then their handlers must have woken up to the gravity of this and told them to take it off their side, so they did, but the fact is the credit claim was on record and the world has seen it," Tharoor said. For his third point, Tharoor highlighted how funerals were conducted for the members of terrorist organisations such as Jaish-e-Mohammad and Lashkar-e-Taiba after India's first strike on May 7. India launched Operation Sindoor in response to the Pahalgam terror attack on May 7 and hit nine terror bases across Pakistan and Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) through precision strikes. "When the first strikes happened on the terrorist camps, funerals were conducted, including for members of key organisations, the Jaish-e-Mohammad and the Lashkar-e-Taiba. The funerals were conducted, and photographs have emerged on social media showing Pakistani generals and police officers in uniform attending these funerals being conducted by relatives of these terrorists. So we're looking at three concrete pieces of evidence as far as India is concerned". With ANI inputs.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Urban Adda 2025: Panel bats for urgent dialogue on urban water crisis
New Delhi: On the final day of Urban Adda 2025—a three-day conclave convened by the Raahgiri Foundation in collaboration with the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), Gurujal, and Nagarro—a thought-provoking panel titled, 'Imagining Water Secure Cities' placed the spotlight firmly on India's urban water emergency. Held on World Environment Day, the session served as both a call to action and a showcase of innovation amid worsening water stress across India's expanding cities. The panel, moderated by urban affairs specialist Vandana Menon, brought together leading voices in governance, community action, corporate innovation, and creative media. Speakers included Archana Verma, Additional Secretary of the National Water Mission; Maulik Sisodia of Tarun Bharat Sangh; Avinash Mishra of CII and former advisor to NITI Aayog; and award-winning filmmaker Nila Madhab Panda. The conversation explored what it means for cities to become 'water secure' and how to shift from consumption-driven systems to those rooted in conservation and stewardship. The panelists collectively emphasised that water sustainability isn't merely a policy issue—it is a cultural, social, and infrastructural challenge requiring deep citizen engagement. During the session, a Rainwater Harvesting Calculator was launched, offering urban residents and developers a real-time tool to assess and adopt water recharge solutions. This innovative step marked a pragmatic leap toward building climate-resilient infrastructure in Indian cities. The urgency of the discussion found resonance in the context of Gurugram, a city emblematic of India's water crisis. Despite being one of the wealthiest districts in Haryana, Gurugram struggles with groundwater depletion, unchecked urbanisation, and broken stormwater systems. Residents routinely depend on private tankers for water, while encroachments on natural water bodies have worsened flood risks during monsoons. Government efforts to revive bundhs and enforce groundwater harvesting rules have seen limited success due to lax implementation. The day's sessions closed with an emphatic plenary by Haryana's Environment and Forest Minister, Rao Narbir Singh. Speaking to a packed audience, Singh called for a cultural shift in sustainability, starting at the individual level. 'We have to stop blaming governments and start taking ownership,' he said. Using his own family as an example, Singh said he had opted for digital invitations for both his children's weddings. 'Not a single card was printed. That's how simple the change can be,' he added. Calling single-use plastic the 'scourge of modern living,' Singh urged for an immediate state-wide ban and encouraged citizens to adopt alternatives. He underscored the importance of intergenerational collaboration, urging elders to guide youth toward greener choices. 'Our future depends not on big speeches but on small, consistent actions,' he said. As the panelists dispersed and attendees pledged greater environmental responsibility, one message stood clear: water-secure cities are not a distant dream but a collective commitment—beginning with today's choices. Simultaneously, despite years of awareness drives and penalties announced by the state government, single-use plastic continues to flood Gurugram's markets. Street vendors, grocery stores, and even high-end delivery services are routinely seen flouting the norms. Plastic waste clogs stormwater drains and chokes water bodies, further complicating water management and sanitation efforts. Residents and environmentalists have repeatedly flagged this issue, demanding stricter action and better alternatives. Even in upscale sectors, residents spend thousands each week on water sourced through private tankers, many of which draw from illegal borewells. These tankers are not only expensive but often unregulated, raising serious questions about quality and health safety. Officials from the Municipal Corporation of Gurugram admit that enforcement is weak, particularly in unauthorised colonies where tanker operators face little to no checks. In Gurugram, the urgency of the discussion found particularly sharp resonance. Despite ongoing awareness campaigns, massive investment in infrastructure, and regulatory directives from multiple agencies, the city continues to face rampant misuse and commodification of water. Every summer, hundreds of residential colonies fall prey to an entrenched water tanker mafia that thrives amid the city's chronic water shortages.
