Colby Cosh: Carney's surrender to Trump was inevitable
On Sunday the Department of Finance issued a terse circular announcing that the Digital Services Tax announced in 2021 would not, as originally planned, begin to be collected on Monday. The DST (R.I.P.) was designed to exclusively target Canadian revenues of American 'web giants' that provide online services, advertising, or streaming content. As the Finance memo observes, it is being dropped at the last minute in the hope of restarting negotiations with the U.S. on an updated version of continental free trade.
The idea of a DST was framed by the Trudeau government as a moral necessity of the 21st century: something had to be done about foreign vampires like Netflix and Google which had built businesses with millions of Canadian customers out of digital ether, but paid no tax in Canada. Everybody recognized, however, that much of the cost of the tax was bound to come out of the pockets of the customers rather than the vampires.
It's inherently difficult to know how the tax incidence would have worked out, because the process of digital price discovery isn't especially mature: some of these companies are still figuring out their own optimum, revenue-maximizing price points in plain sight. But from a selfish point of view, Canadian consumers, considered strictly as such, can only feel relief at the sudden abandonment of the DST.
Is this a craven surrender on the part of the post-Trudeau Liberals? Well, this is the problem with interpreting everything in brute terms of animalistic personal combat, isn't it? The governments of the developed nations largely agree (perhaps against the interests of their own citizens) that there ought to be an international framework for digital-services taxation, and the OECD reached an agreement that nobody would run wild and introduce their own digital taxes until the issue could be sorted out collectively.
From that neoliberal-nerd point of view, Canada went rogue when it announced a homebrewed DST — one that would have had a nasty retroactive effect, that was designed specifically only to collect from large American companies with recognizable names, and that didn't address double-taxation issues. And let's recall that Joe Biden was still president when this happened.
It's worth noting that this isn't just a question of playing chess against Donald Trump. Canada was really forced to withdraw the DST by the terms of the Trump-designed One Big Beautiful Bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in May, and now before the Senate. The OBBB reflects the fact that there's genuine bipartisan distaste in the U.S. toward the digital taxes hypothecated by Canada and already in effect in some other countries; it allows for tax-withholding countermeasures against countries that impose 'unfair' taxes on U.S. digital companies, countermeasures whose size could easily have dwarfed the relatively meagre revenues from the DST. In other words, if the government hadn't pulled the plug on the DST, we might have quickly found out how a one-armed man does in a battle of elbows.
National Post
Kelly McParland: New York swoons over an American Justin Trudeau
Joel Kotkin: The West's immigration reckoning is here
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'We Can Keep Paying It, But Should We?' Why One Colorado Couple Wants To Cancel Their Homeowners Insurance
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Homeowners insurance is usually seen as a necessary expense for protecting one's biggest investment. But for some, the rising cost has raised a tough question: Is it worth it to keep paying? A Colorado Couple's Dilemma A couple in Colorado recently shared their frustration on Reddit about their homeowners insurance bill skyrocketing to more than $7,200 a year — an increase that felt hard to swallow, even with a fully paid-off home. They asked the online community: "We can keep paying it, but should we?" With no mortgage or loans against their house, they feel caught between financial pressure and the risk of going without coverage. They admit that if their home were destroyed, they couldn't afford to rebuild it. Renting in their area would likely cost between $2,500 and $3,000 a month, adding another financial strain. Shop Top Mortgage Rates A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes Your Path to Homeownership Don't Miss: Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. Why Are Insurance Costs Rising? According to CBS News, Colorado is facing some of the highest homeowners insurance premiums in the country. The state ranks second nationwide for hail insurance claims and for the number of homes located in high-risk wildfire areas. This combination pushed average premiums up more than 50% between 2019 and 2022, especially after wildfires like the East Troublesome and Marshall Fires. "We are in the hardest market in a generation for property insurance," Carole Walker, executive director of the Rocky Mountain Insurance Association, told CBS News. She explains that more people live in wildfire-prone areas than before, and "record-breaking catastrophes" are becoming more common. The Reddit couple isn't alone in these rising costs. For homeowners, like Melinda Endres of Broomfield, this has meant a sharp increase in bills, with some monthly payments jumping by nearly $440. Trending: $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. The Risks of Canceling Insurance Many commenters on the Reddit thread and insurance experts caution against simply canceling homeowners insurance. One Reddit user, who is both a former insurance producer and a lawyer, warned: "Do not go without homeowners insurance!" Others shared stories of people who dropped their coverage only to face disasters they couldn't financially recover from. Insurance doesn't just protect the physical structure — it can cover liability issues such as injuries on the property or damage caused to neighbors, which can lead to costly lawsuits. How Some Are Coping Experts suggest shopping around and comparing insurance quotes to find a better deal. Increasing deductibles, bundling home and auto policies, and adjusting coverage to reflect the actual value of the home rather than an inflated replacement cost are all ways to manage premiums. LendingTree reports that 13.6% of U.S. homes are uninsured, leaving millions vulnerable. "Insurance has become more expensive and harder to get in recent years," says Rob Bhatt, a home insurance expert at LendingTree. "This is putting people just one disaster away from losing the physical and financial security their home provides." , Should You Cancel? For many homeowners, canceling insurance is a gamble. While the upfront cost savings may seem tempting, the potential financial fallout from disasters, liability claims, or unexpected damages can be devastating. If insurance premiums rise to unaffordable levels, it may be worth exploring options like high-deductible plans or seeking state-backed insurance programs designed to help high-risk properties. As the situation evolves, experts encourage homeowners to carefully weigh their risk tolerance, financial situation, and local hazards before making a decision. Read Next: With Point, you can Image: Shutterstock This article 'We Can Keep Paying It, But Should We?' Why One Colorado Couple Wants To Cancel Their Homeowners Insurance originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's former jobs data chief decries firing of successor
(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump's firing of the chief labor statistician was criticized by her predecessor, who called it an unfounded move that will undermine confidence in a key data set on the US economy. We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole NYC Mayor Adams Gives Bally's Bronx Casino Plan a Second Chance 'This is damaging,' William Beach, whom Trump picked in his first term to head the Bureau of Labor Statistics, said on CNN's State of the Union on Sunday. Trump on Friday fired Erika McEntarfer hours after labor market data showed weak jobs growth based in part on steep downward revisions for May and June. The move by Trump, who claimed the latest monthly report was 'phony,' prompted an outcry from economists and lawmakers. 'I don't know that there's any grounds at all for this firing,' said Beach, whom McEntarfer replaced in January 2024. 'And it really hurts the statistical system. It undermines credibility in BLS.' Studies indicate that the agency's data is more accurate than 20 or 30 years ago, including any revisions of the initial data, Beach said. Even so, he said he'll trust future BLS data because people working for the agency are 'some of the most loyal Americans you can imagine,' making the bureau 'the finest statistical agency in the entire world.' Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, speaking Sunday on CBS's Face the Nation, urged the US government to improve its data collection to avoid revisions that engender distrust. 'We watch what consumers really do. We watch what businesses really do,' Moynihan said, while not addressing the politics of the firing. 'They can get this data, I think, other ways, and I think that's where the focus would be.' He noted the revision for May and June data, while not unusual, was one of the largest in seven years. 'That creates doubt around it,' he said. 'Let's spend some money. Let's bring the information together. Let's find where else in the government money is reported.' McEntarfer was confirmed by the Senate in a bipartisan 86-8 vote. Vice President JD Vance, then a senator, voted to approve her nomination. Kevin Hassett, Trump's chief economic adviser at the White House, alleged that the large jobs data revisions were poorly explained and were evidence enough for a 'fresh set of eyes' at BLS. He sought to contradict Beach's portrayal of the agency as politically neutral. 'The bottom line is that there were people involved in creating these numbers,' Hassett said on NBC's Meet the Press. Pressed on whether Trump would fire anyone offering data he disagreed with, Hassett, who heads the National Economic Council, disagreed. 'No, absolutely not,' he said. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable.' How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts What's Really Behind Those Rosy GDP Numbers? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio


Fox News
9 minutes ago
- Fox News
Ghislaine Maxwell refuses to testify without pardon: 'Cannot imagine a less sympathetic figure'
Fox News contributor Mollie Hemingway and Wall Street Journal White House reporter Annie Linskey discuss Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions for testifying before Congress.