Are 10-minute online deliveries killing the Indian corner shop?
The store sits in a bylane in the central Indian city of Mumbai's busy shopping precinct, and has served the community for 75 years.
Dharod began coming to the shop with his father when he was just 10. These days, he mostly sits idle, waiting for an occasional customer to walk in.
Behind him, cardboard boxes of unsold biscuit packets and snacks show a "stock clearance sale" sign posted on them.
"I wouldn't get a minute to breathe a few years ago, but now I rarely get anyone coming," says the septuagenarian wryly. "They are all shopping online. I've decided to retire and down the shutters."
As 10-minute online deliveries by "quick commerce" apps like Zomato, BlinkIt and Zepto pervade urban India, hundreds of thousands of neighbourhood stores across cities have closed down.
A lobby group of consumer product distributors estimated that number to be 200,000 last October, while the municipal body of the southern city of Chennai estimated 20% of small grocers and 30% of larger departmental stores had shut down in the city in the past 5 years.
Sunil Kenia who runs a provision store right beside Dharod's shop says he's still in business only because his family owns the shop. Those on rent are no longer able to stay afloat, he says.
"It started going downhill after the Covid lockdowns. Business is at 50% of what we did before the pandemic," Kenia told the BBC.
Most of his revenue now comes from wholesale customers – hawkers or those selling street-side snacks. The retail customer has all but "vanished", he says, because of the convenience of mobile deliveries.
Mumbai-based graphic designer Monisha Sathe is among the millions of urban Indians who've stopped their weekly run to the market because of the ease of quick commerce.
"Lugging groceries back home was a big pain," says Sathe. And occasionally, when she took out her car, navigating narrow market lanes and finding a parking slot would be a challenge.
Sathe says she misses the human interaction she had with the grocers and vegetable vendors and even the variety of fresh produce on sale – but for her, the balance still tilts in favour of online deliveries because of how much easier it has made her life.
A recent survey by consultancy PwC shows some 42% of urban consumers in India's big cities think like Sathe, especially preferring quick delivery for their urgent needs. And these shifts in buying behaviour have led to three out of 10 retailers reporting a negative impact on their business, with a 52% drop in essential goods sales.
But to what extent is quick commerce really hollowing out the Indian high street?
There's no doubt general trade – which includes grocery stores, corner shops and even big retail outlets – has come under threat, says Ankur Bisen, a partner at Technopak retail advisory. But at least for now "quick commerce is still a three-four city story", he says. Nearly all of their sales come from these cities.
Lightning fast deliveries bucked the global trend and became successful in India largely due to a large concentration of people staying in urban clusters.
They are serviced through low-rent "dark stores" - or small shops dedicated to delivery and not open to the public - in densely populated areas, enabling economies of scale.
But the precarious nature of demand and fragmented demographics of smaller towns could make it expensive for quick commerce players to expand and make money beyond the metros, says Mr Bisen.
There's little doubt though that these online deliveries will disrupt trade in the longer run.
Bain and Company expects quick commerce to grow at over 40% annually through to 2030, driven by expansion across "geographies".
And this has made traditional retail nervous.
Trade organisations - like the Confederation of All India Traders, or the All India Consumer Products Distributors Federation which calls itself the voice of India's 13m retailers - have made urgent and repeated pleas to the government against this breakneck expansion.
They allege that these companies are using billions of dollars in venture capital funds to engage in anti-competitive practices like "predatory pricing" or "deep discounting" which has further distorted the playing field for mom-and-pop shops.
The BBC spoke to several small retailers who shared these concerns. Mr Bisen too agreed there's evidence of such practices in the clusters that quick commerce companies operate.
Swiggy, Zepto and Blinkit, who primarily control this market, did not agree to comment on the BBC's queries on these allegations.
But a source within one of the quick commerce companies told the BBC the discounting was done by traders on the platform and not by them.
The source also said that contrary to the binary narrative of the "big guy versus small guy", online deliveries were solving real-world challenges for people for whom going to the market was a "traumatic" experience.
"Think of women or senior citizens - they don't want to be harassed or navigate potholes and traffic," the source said. "Also consider the small brands that sell on our platform - they never get shelf space in physical shops where only the big names are displayed. We've democratised the market."
Analysts say, the sheer diversity of India in terms of its stages of development, levels of income and infrastructure will mean that in the end all retail models - small corner shops, organised big retailers and quick commerce platforms - will cohabit in the country.
This is not a "winner takes all market", says Mr Bisen, giving the example of e-commerce which came into India in 2010 and was meant to sound the death knell of local retailers.
Even after all these years, only 4% of all shopping is done online in India.
But the ripples caused by quick commerce should be a warning for physical retailers, say analysts, to improve their marketing and integrate technology to use both online and offline channels to give their consumers a better shopping experience.
Competing with click-of-a-button delivery means it can no longer be business as usual for the millions of corner shops who've existed for decades, with little or no innovation.
Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, X and Facebook.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Entrepreneur
4 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Artha Select Fund Closes at INR 432 Cr, Strengthens Artha's INR 1,200 Cr AUM
Artha Select Fund will back the top 15% performers from its 135+ portfolio firms, investing INR 20 crore each in 12–14 startups through Series B and C rounds over four years. You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. Artha India Ventures (AIV) has announced the final close of its follow-on fund, Artha Select Fund (ASF), at INR 432 crore. The fund has exceeded its target of INR 330 crore by 131 percent, pushing Artha's total Assets Under Management (AUM) past INR 1,200 crore. ASF will invest in the top 15% of performers from Artha's existing portfolio of over 135 companies across Artha Venture Fund I, Artha Continuum Fund, and the soon-to-launch AVF II. The fund will write Series B and C cheques of around INR 20 crores each, for 12–14 winners over the next four years. The close of ASF underscores Artha's strategy to bridge the "missing middle" in India's venture capital landscape, where many promising startups face capital constraints between Series A and C. With 33 successful exits to date, Artha has built a reputation for identifying and scaling category leaders. "ASF allows us to stay invested in our most promising companies well into their scale-up phases," said Anirudh A Damani, Managing Partner of Artha Venture Fund and Artha Select Fund. "India has no shortage of promising ventures, but far too many face a capital drought between Series A and C. ASF ensures our winners have the firepower, strategic guidance, and operational backing to compete globally while preserving founder ownership and focus." According to Artha, 80 percent of ASF's corpus has been anchored by Indian family offices and ultra-high-net-worth individuals, while 20 percent comes from overseas investors in Singapore, UAE, Mauritius, Hong Kong, Africa, and the United States. AIV itself has committed nearly 10 percent of the fund. Prominent backers include Atul Kirloskar's Family Office, DSP Family Office, Shahi Exports, HIRA Group, and Anikarth Ventures. Manish Chhabra, Executive Chairman of HRIPL and a Limited Partner in ASF, said, "When I began my investing journey, I knew a portion of my wealth creation should be allocated to AIFs specialising in startups. My biggest concern was the investment thesis. When I first met Anirudh and he explained his approach and track record, I was convinced this was the right fund. Unlike many fund managers who spread investments thin and hope for one to succeed, Anirudh takes a deliberate and well-informed approach, making each investment decision count." ASF distinguishes itself by offering founders support from early institutional rounds through to late growth. By combining capital with operational guidance and access to a global network, Artha aims to remain a long-term partner for its portfolio companies.


CNN
5 minutes ago
- CNN
Qantas to pay record fine of $58 million for pandemic sackings criticized by judge
Aviation news Labor unions OceaniaFacebookTweetLink Follow A court ordered Australia's largest airline, Qantas Airways, on Monday to pay a record fine of A$90 million ($58.64 million) for illegally sacking 1,800 ground staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and criticized it for a lack of contrition. In imposing the penalty, the largest ordered by a court on a company in the history of Australia's labor laws, Federal Court Judge Michael Lee also inveighed against the airline's litigation strategy. While Qantas made changes to its board and management team, Lee said subsequent expressions of regret seemed more aligned with 'the damage' the case had done to the company than remorse for the harm caused to workers. 'I accept Qantas is sorry, but I am unconvinced that this measure of regret is not, at least in significant measure … the wrong kind of sorry,' he added. Lee said the size of the penalty, about 75% of the maximum he could have set, was important to ensure it 'could not be perceived as anything like the cost of doing business.' He said A$50 million of the fine would be paid to the Transport Workers' Union (TWU), which brought the case against Qantas. After the decision, Michael Kaine, the national secretary of the TWU, said, 'Against all the odds, we took on a behemoth … that had shown itself to be ruthless, and we won.' Monday's decision follows a December agreement on a compensation fund of A$120 million struck by the airline and the sacked workers. During the pandemic in 2020, Qantas' senior management decided to lay off 1,820 ground staff and shift their work to contractors. Qantas said it was a commercial decision but the Federal Court in 2021 held the move to be 'adverse action,' preventing staff from exercising their workplace rights and unionizing, in breach of Australia's Fair Work Act. Assessing Qantas' actions, Lee said he was unconvinced it was truly contrite and criticized its culture, public relations approach and litigation strategy. For example, he said Qantas had announced it would appeal to the High Court against the 2021 court decision 'without any time passing,' to consider the 431-paragraph judgment. When its appeal failed, Qantas issued a statement 'spinning' the outcome, however, and overlooking findings on its unlawful conduct, he added. He also criticized Qantas' conduct during litigation, such as opting to keep out of the witness box Vanessa Hudson, its current chief executive and former chief financial officer. 'It is one thing for the 'Qantas News Room' to issue press releases by a CEO saying sorry; it is quite another for written assertions of contrition, recognition of wrong and cultural change to be tested in a courtroom,' Lee said. The penalty was the largest ever ordered by a court for violations of Australia's labor laws, said Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, which represented TWU. 'This record-breaking penalty reflects the monumental scale of Qantas' wrongdoing,' the firm's principal, Josh Bornstein, said in a statement. The fine also reflected the unprecedented finding of adverse action against so many workers, said Shae McCrystal, a labor law professor at the University of Sydney. 'Adverse action cases are risky,' she said. 'It signals a message to employers that if they break the law, then trade unions may receive those penalties in order to assist them in enforcing the act.' Qantas said it would pay the fine as ordered. 'We sincerely apologize to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families,' Chief Executive Vanessa Hudson said in a statement.


Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Starbucks To Change How Long It Takes To Make Your Drink
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Starbucks has set a new goal for how long it should take for drinks to be made, seeking to have ordered beverages in customers' hands in four minutes. Why It Matters Starbucks is the largest coffee chain in the world and has stores on every continent barring Antarctica. There are more than 40,000 Starbucks stores worldwide, according to Statista. Despite its ubiquity, the chain has faced struggles on various fronts since the COVID-19 pandemic and a series of worker strikes. After a difficult 2024, the brand decided to close several locations in the United States. In February, the company announced a restructuring initiative that included the elimination of 1,100 corporate roles. In July, Starbucks reported its sixth straight quarterly drop in U.S. same-store sales. The Starbucks logo is displayed outside one of its coffee shops in San Diego on August 2. The Starbucks logo is displayed outside one of its coffee shops in San Diego on August To Know Led by CEO Brian Niccol, the coffee chain seeks to speed up service under a new operating model called "Green Apron Service." The model outlines a goal for baristas, saying no custom order should take longer than four minutes to make. In response to a request for comment, Starbucks directed Newsweek to a news release that said in part, "In just eight weeks of piloting Green Apron Service in 1,500 stores, we've seen faster service, stronger customer connections, and more engaged partners. This isn't just a new way of working—it's a return to what makes Starbucks special: human connection." Niccol took the reins of the coffee chain in September and has since been trying to revamp the company. He was previously the CEO of Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. and has held key positions at Taco Bell and Pizza Hut. In a September news release, Niccol said: "Today, I'm making a commitment: We're getting back to Starbucks. We're refocusing on what has always set Starbucks apart—a welcoming coffeehouse where people gather, and where we serve the finest coffee, handcrafted by our skilled baristas. This is our enduring identity. We will innovate from here." The chain has since introduced a new dress code, reduced the menu in the hope of improving customer service, and issued new orders for corporate staff—including ordering remote staff to relocate to Seattle or Toronto and instructing corporate employees to be in the office a minimum of four days a week. What People Are Saying A Starbucks news release about the initiative said: "It's all about making every visit feel personal, whether it's a friendly smile, remembering your name, or making your day just a little bit better. We're giving our partners the time, tools, and support to hone their craft and connect with customers." What Happens Next The Green Apron Service initiative has been rolled out across stores this week and is set to be implemented at all Starbucks locations.