A fifth of people deemed at risk of poverty in eight-year period, says study
The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) published research examining the complexities of income poverty and deprivation and how they intertwine.
Advertisement
On average, 22 per cent of the population experienced deprivation at least once in two consecutive years from 2016 to 2023: almost half of these were in persistent deprivation, slightly less than a third were exiting deprivation, and about a quarter were entering deprivation.
The study noted that there was a post-pandemic spike observed amongst lone-parent families, 30 to 65-year-old single people, adults above 65, and especially amongst single people over 65.
It said the stronger effect for the older population could be explained by the fact that the State pension was frozen in cash terms in 2020 and 2021.
The ESRI report, published in partnership with the Department of Social Protection, used longitudinal data from the Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) – the study explores the dynamics of poverty.
Advertisement
It found that the annual at-risk-of-poverty (AROP) rate declined from 16 per cent in 2016 to 11 per cent in 2023, while the persistent AROP rate declined from 10 per cent in 2015-2016 to 7 per cent in 2022-2023.
The latter shows the share of the population who were AROP two years in a row.
Material deprivation increased in the recent period from 14 per cent in 2021 to 17 per cent in 2023.
Over the period 2016 to 2023, an average of 5 per cent of people were both AROP and deprived.
Advertisement
Lone parent families, large families, and households with a working-age adult with a disability faced the highest risks of persistent AROP and deprivation, it said.
Children in lone-parent families, in particular, are most at risk, with an average of 33 per cent of them being persistently deprived, and 21 per cent being persistently AROP, between 2016 and 2023.
The report said that implementing 'targeted' policy measures to support lone parents, large families, and households with a person with disabilities is essential to help those at high risk of poverty.
It said timely adjustments to social welfare payments, including pensions, would be 'critical' to protect vulnerable groups from inflation.
Advertisement
Co-author Anousheh Alamir said the report highlighted 'the complex nature of poverty' and how different groups face different risks over various time periods.
'Over two-year stretches, lone parent families and households with a disabled adult are found to be the most at risk of income poverty and/or material deprivation for one year only.
'And while they are also the most likely to be materially deprived two years in a row (i.e persistently), large families are the most at risk of income poverty during that time.
'Thus, different groups are vulnerable to different forms and durations of poverty, an insight that should be key for effective policy.'
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Are YOU a pension planner, putting it off - or relying on your partner? Take our quiz
Nearly half of adults believe they are 'pension planners' who are on top of contributions and what they need for a decent retirement, new research reveals. Some 44 per cent of people feel confident enough to describe themselves this way, but 22 per cent admit to burying their heads in the sand and being unsure where to begin. The rest fall in the middle and declare themselves neither a 'planner' nor a 'procrastinator' when it comes to sorting out their finances to be prepared for retirement. Men are more likely to think of themselves as a 'planner', with 54 per cent identifying with this role compared with 35 per cent of women, according to Aviva which carried out the research. 'While this might suggest a confidence or engagement gap, it's also possible that men are more likely to say they are financially knowledgeable, or that women are simply more candid about their uncertainties,' says the pension firm. Aviva also says income is a factor in shaping people's habits, with 33 per cent of people earning £35,000 or less a year saying they are pension planners. But that rises to 66 per cent of those earning between £75,000 and £100,000 and reaches as high as 80 per cent at the top end of the income scale. Less prevalent confidence among lower earners could reflect affordability concerns or a sense of disengagement, while higher earners feel more able to take control of their finances, suggests Aviva. Meanwhile, among 45 to 54-year-olds - a key age when preparing for retirement - 32 per cent called themselves 'planners', 29 per cent said they were 'procrastinators' and the rest said neither. Aviva surveyed more than 2,000 adults, of whom around 1,370 were dating, living together, married or in a civil partnership. In this group, 22 per cent said their partner was a planner, 12 per cent called them more of a procrastinator, 28 per cent said they were neither, 26 per cent said both of them were clued up on pensions and 13 per cent said neither were on top of matters. The results suggest a gap in communication and self-awareness in couples, which means there is room for more collaborative conversations, according to Aviva. How to sort out your pension: A five step guide 1) Add up what you have saved so far If you are worried about whether you will have saved enough, investigate your existing pensions . Broadly speaking, you need to ask work schemes the following questions. - The current fund value. - The current transfer value - because there might be a penalty to move. - Whether the pension is in a final salary or defined contribution scheme. Defined contribution pensions take contributions from both employer and employee and invest them to provide a pot of money at retirement. Unless you work in the public sector, they have now mostly replaced more generous gold-plated defined benefit - career average or final salary - pensions, which provide a guaranteed income after retirement until you die. Defined contribution pensions are stingier and savers bear the investment risk, rather than employers. - If there are any guarantees - for instance, a guaranteed annuity rate - and if you would lose them if you moved the fund. - The pension projection at retirement age. You can use a pension calculator to see if you will have enough - check ours below. Pension calculator: When can you afford to retire? When can you afford to retire and how much do you need to get the lifestyle you want? This is Money's pension calculator, powered by Jarvis, uses benchmark PLSA Retirement Living Standards amounts to help you work out what your retirement could look like - and what you need to save. 2) Check what you will get in state pension You should add the forecast figures to what you anticipate getting in state pension, which is currently £230.25 a week or nearly £12,000 a year if you qualify for the full rate. Get a state pension forecast here. 3) Work out whether this will be enough You can use a pension industry-devised standard for a minimum, moderate and comfortable retirement to see how close you will get. This year's figures are £21,600, £43,900 or £60,600 a year respectively for a couple, with the first one doable if you have two full state pensions coming in. However, they do not include income tax, housing costs if you are still paying a mortgage or rent, and potentially care costs in later life. Others in the finance industry suggest a different approach which is to think about what you earn now and what proportion of that income - the target replacement rate - you want to aim for in retirement. You need to bear in mind that you will no longer have work-related costs such as travel, clothes and lunches, but you are likely to spend more on hobbies, socialising and holidays. 4) Think about tidying up your pensions Savers often collect a number of pension pots during their working lives as they move jobs but many never bother combining them. Doing this can save on paperwork and costs. But merging pensions is not always advisable because you can risk losing valuable benefits attached to employer schemes. Read our guide to merging pensions to ensure you won't be penalised. 4) Find any lost pots If you have lost track of old pots, the Government's free pension tracing service is here. Take care if you do an online search for the Pension Tracing Service as many companies using similar names will pop up in the results. These will also offer to look for your pension, but try to charge or flog you other services, and could be fraudulent. Here's our guide to finding lost pensions.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Ireland's ‘Viagra village' braces for Trump's tariffs
Nestled along Cork harbour, Ringaskiddy is just one of many Irish villages transformed by the arrival of America's giant pharmaceutical companies. The area has been nicknamed 'Viagra village' because Pfizer, the US drugs behemoth, manufactures the active ingredient for its erectile dysfunction drug at its site on the south coast of Ireland. Indeed, the combination of American investment and low corporation tax has fuelled Ireland's economic fortunes, bringing jobs and prosperity to the country over the past two decades. But for how long? With 15pc tariffs on EU exports to America, and an investigation by the US commerce department into overseas drug manufacturing, a cloud of uncertainty hangs over the coastal area. On Thursday, Trump escalated his assault on drugmakers further, warning companies including Pfizer to lower prices for Americans by charging higher fees abroad, including in Ireland and Britain. In a letter to the heads of 17 pharmaceutical businesses, he urged them to 'negotiate harder with foreign freeloading nations' in a veiled jab at Ireland. It is hard to overstate the impact of US investment on southern Ireland. Cork is home to seven of the 10 largest pharmaceutical companies in the world and more than 11,000 people are employed directly by the industry in the county. The village of Ringaskiddy boasts a raft of pharmaceutical and life sciences companies, from Johnson & Johnson to BioMarin, while Cork has around 190 multinational businesses. But tensions are rising. 'Will there be jobs in three years?' On a summer's afternoon, it's ladies day at Raffeen Creek Golf Club. The rolling nine-hole course and clubhouse was built by Pfizer just a stone's throw away from where it first set up in Ringaskiddy in 1969. As they enjoy tea and scones after a round of golf, friends Eleanor Crowley and Kay Desmond say that locals are wary despite the EU trade deal. Crowley, whose husband worked at Pfizer for more than 35 years, says 'there's no question' the region's pharmaceutical industry will be affected by tariffs. 'They're huge employers in the area and they're good quality jobs,' she says. Crowley adds that her grandson, who has just finished secondary school, is thinking about studying biological sciences. 'I'm wondering now, will there be jobs in three or four years?' she says. Desmond's son also works in the pharmaceutical industry, while his fiancée is employed by a whiskey company. 'They are a bit nervous,' she says. In the nearby coastal town of Crosshaven, where holidaymakers mill about the marina, Trump's tariffs remain at the front of locals' minds because of the impact on the region. Betty O'Halloran, who lives in the area, said the 15pc tariff on EU imports to the US is 'going to affect everybody'. 'Surely if [Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president], if the EU could have done any better, they would have and that Trump is so volatile that he could go back and put 30pc on,' she says. Down by the Ferry Boat Inn in Ringaskiddy, Bob Levis is also wary of the US president's wavering attitude. 'With Trump, you can't trust him. All right, it's 15pc tariffs now but sure he might change his mind and say he's going to up it for the pharmaceuticals.' The EU's agreement to buy $750bn (£570bn) worth of US energy products, including liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel have also left him underwhelmed. He says: '[The EU] did not want a trade war and I can understand that, but I think in their enthusiasm to get a deal I think they rolled over a bit.' Sarah Murphy, another local resident, says American pharmaceutical companies have brought a wealth of opportunities to the region, but fears are growing about site closures. 'We'll be lost without it and the workers will be lost without it,' she says. She cites the example of a friend who worked for ILC Dover, a US manufacturing group which supplies the pharma industry. They lost their job last year after ILC shut down its factory in Blarney, near Cork, and moved to Poland. It's a tale that many fear could happen across the region and for Ireland's economy the stakes could not be higher. 'We live or die by our competitiveness' Pharmaceuticals and the tech industry have driven much of the country's growth over the past half-century. The nation has fuelled its budget with corporation tax receipts from American companies, but these are extremely concentrated. Just 10 businesses are responsible for more than half of the country's corporation tax revenue. In a sign of the pharma sector's importance, the Emerald Isle exported €10.6bn (£9.1bn) in goods to the US in May – up 86.5pc from the same month a year earlier as companies sought to beat the tariff deadline. There are already fears that a slowdown is on the horizon. GDP fell by 1pc in the second quarter of 2025, and more pain could be around the corner. Such is the concern that Ireland's political class are starting to worry about the impact on local jobs. In the Cork suburb of Douglas, Jerry Buttimer, a Fine Gael TD who represents Cork South-Central, says: 'It's been a time of huge worry and tension for everybody. The pharmaceutical community and industry has been and is a pivotal part of the local Cork economy. 'We live in a volatile world where some actors use a bully pulpit to negotiate, to engage. The European Union, with its trading bloc, has taken a different approach.' Speaking outside Pfizer's Ringskiddy plant in the 'Viagra village', Billy Kelleher, Fianna Fáil MEP, remains hopeful after the trade agreement. 'The biggest fear of all was a protracted trade dispute where there was no end in sight, at least now we have a degree of certainty around the cost of the tariff and the impact that it will have and now companies can plan again.' As the final details are hammered out, locals are nervously waiting to see how the deal impacts pharmaceuticals. Kelleher makes the case that Ireland needs to remain 'an attractive option' for investment. 'We live or die by our competitiveness, that has always been the case since we started opening up our economy in the Sixties and Seventies.' Simon Harris, the Tánaiste and Irish foreign affairs minister, said on Friday that the Irish government had 'assurance from the US that pharma will not get a tariff of any higher than 15pc in the European Union'. He added that tariffs on pharmaceuticals will remain at 0pc until the US investigation into the sector concludes. It is expected to come to an end in two weeks. Yet trade tensions have a contagious effect that no drug can cure.
BreakingNews.ie
12 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Presidential candidates can now be reimbursed up to €250k for election expenses
An order increasing the maximum amount of election expenses that can be reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election from €200,000 to €250,000 has been signed by Minister for Housing and Local Government James Browne. Election expenses are reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election who is elected or, if not elected, the total of their votes exceeds one quarter of the quota. Advertisement Section 21A of the Electoral Act 1997 provides that the maximum amount of election expenses that can be reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election is €200,000. However, under the Act, the minister may vary the amounts having regard to changes in the Consumer Price Index. A review of the amounts typically takes place in advance of each election. Applying the CPI increase since the amount was last revised resulted in a potential increase to €252,700 which has been rounded down to €250,000. Section 53 (as amended) of the Electoral Act 1997 provides that spending by a candidate at a presidential election shall not exceed €750,000. It is not proposed to increase the spending limit, so it will remain at €750,000.
