Eurozone sees trade surplus fall 27% during April
The eurozone's trade surplus during April saw a 27% decline compared to the same month last year largely due to a fall off in trade in the machinery and vehicles sector, new data from Eurostat shows.
The data shows that the eurozone recorded a trade surplus of €9.9bn compared to the €13.6bn recorded in April 2024. In the machinery and vehicles sector alone, the trade surplus fell from €16.8bn to €12.8bn.
In total, the eurozone exported goods valued at €243bn to the rest of the world during April - a decrease of 1.4% year-on-year - while imports from the rest of the world were valued at €233.1bn, an increase of 0.1%.
In comparison to March, the trade surplus fell over 73% from 37.3bn. This decrease was mainly driven by a 'substantial reduction in the surplus of the chemicals sector', which fell from €42.8bn to €22.1bn.
Between January to April, the eurozone recorded a surplus of €71bn, compared with €68.6bn during the same period in 2024. Intra-eurozone trade rose to €878.9bn between January-April, up by 0.8%.
The wider EU's trade surplus for the month stood at €7.4bn - down from €35.5bn in March and from €12.8bn in April 2024. Again the month-on-month decline was largely driven by the contraction of the chemicals sector.
The US was the EU's largest export market during the month accounting for €47.6bn worth of exports - an increase of 3.8% year-on-year. The next largest export market was the UK accounting for €28.2bn worth of exports but this represented a decline of 4.8% compared to last year.
Exports to China fell by nearly 16% to €16.3bn while imports from the country increased by 8.4% to €44.4bn. China was Europe's largest import market during the month.
The US was the EU's next largest import market accounting for €29.9bn worth of imports, up 2.4%.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Ireland will have to commit substantial funds to arms procurement whether it approves or not
All they talk about in Brussels these days is defence. And with a sense of urgency and common political will that is a product of real fear that the EU itself is existentially threatened . A fear that the threats from Russia to Ukraine – regarded, as one senior European Commission official put it, as a 'de facto member state' – and Vladimir Putin 's wider ambitions against former Soviet states now part of the union are serious. And that the US can no longer be relied on for military support or even nuclear deterrence. The talk is all of meeting new Nato targets of raising defence spending to between three and five per cent of GDP. Russia, member states are warned, has been massively expanding its military-industrial production capacity with an estimated spending in 2024 of 40 per cent of the federal budget and up to 9 per cent of its GDP (up from 6 per cent in 2023) on defence, a commitment only possible in an autocratic state impervious to public sentiment. Ireland, despite its new commitment to bolster its army, remains the poorest performer in the EU class at 0.5 per cent this year. Member states' defence spending has grown by more than 31 per cent since 2021, reaching 1.9 per cent of the EU's combined GDP or €326bn in 2024, almost double the amount spent in 2021. Not enough, however; now a target of €800 billion in the next few years is being discussed. A measure of how seriously the debate is being taken has been the union's willingness with unprecedented speed to raise its sacrosanct fiscal rules, allowing member states to break debt limits to expand their military spending . READ MORE The thrust is now being driven by the EU White Paper on Defence Preparedness 2025, published recently. It was the subject of a well-attended debate this week in the Institute for International and European Affairs, which turned inevitably to the issue of Ireland's own national preparedness and its role next year in steering the EU presidency discussions. Centre stage will be the roll-out of the white paper proposals to revitalise states' military capacity and transform national defence industries to break reliance on foreign, notably US, imported weapons. A new defence financing initiative, Safe, will see the European Investment Bank raise €150 billion to lend to the private sector on condition 65 per cent of loans are for European-produced weapons. Ireland is not planning to dip into the fund, but Minister of State for Defence Thomas Byrne told the meeting that, in the spirit of 'principles-based pragmatism', we might yet do so. Ireland will also have charge of brokering a deal on the next seven-year budget (the Multiannual Financial Framework, or MFF). The process always severely stretches member-state solidarity and will particularly test them this time, with a huge increase in collective defence spending being proposed. That, at a time when all are cash-strapped, will require a massive breach of the one per cent of EU GDP budget spending ceiling, or as Prof Brigid Laffan warned, 'tough trade-offs' on long-standing policy areas. Like agriculture. Ireland cannot stand on the sidelines. It will necessarily have to commit substantial funds to arms procurement as a net contributor to the MFF, like all others, whether or not it approves. [ Parlous state of Defence Forces once again laid bare Opens in new window ] The EU white paper bears a remarkable resemblance in its scope and thrust to the paper produced in Ireland in 2022 by the Commission on the Defence Forces and which prompted our own commitment to major upgrading of the Defence Forces. The white paper, the EU Commission's senior defence official, Guilaume de la Brosse, insists, is not about redefining EU defence policy 'but about the specificities of member states, serving national agendas', and both starting a discussion about preparedness and capabilities and pointing to a way in which the needs may be addressed more efficiently, collectively and individually. The white paper projects are all 'voluntary'. Like the Irish commission's silence on neutrality's merits, it is not saying European collective defence must take a particular form, but that if you want a capability to deter aggression then this is how to do it – and it is best done collectively, ensuring interoperability and as little duplication as possible. [ Poll shows Ireland's attachment to neutrality is strong but nuanced Opens in new window ] Critical to getting both imperatives through will be important changes in the nature of defence discussions throughout the EU – not least in Ireland, where the debate has largely been confined to political and policy circles. Both the Taoiseach and the Tánaiste have engaged strongly, echoing common EU-wide concerns, but public opinion remains largely indifferent, albeit clinging to vague, often contradictory notions of 'neutrality'. There is often an unwillingness to acknowledge the need to upgrade our defensive capacity or even a need for it. A fundamental challenge remains a public unwillingness to perceive real new vulnerabilities or threats to ourselves – like to our vital undersea cable networks or to cyber attacks, or threats to the territorial integrity of our European partners – as urgent and requiring radical action. Although sympathetic to their plight, and generously receptive of refugees, Irish voters have yet to recognise that their problem is our problem, a real threat to our union, and to develop a real sense of obligation to fellow members of the union arising from our membership of this huge 'peace project'. From a narrow national perspective, as Minister Byrne acknowledged, 'working together is the only way forward'. This debate urgently needs to expand beyond Dáil Éireann's narrow confines.
Irish Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Figures show the amount of Child Benefit being paid to children living overseas
Over 3,000 people not living in Ireland are claiming child benefit for over 6,000 children, new figures show. It means that at least €866,040 in Child Benefit is being paid to children living overseas each month. This adds up to €10.4m over the course of a year. However, the actual amount could be higher as different rates are paid in respect of twins and triplets. Social Protection Minister Dara Calleary confirmed the figures in response to a parliamentary question from Fine Gael TD John Paul O'Shea. The Cork North-West TD asked the Minister for a breakdown of child benefit paid to persons living in countries other than Ireland. Child Benefit is an automatic monthly €140 payment to the parents or guardians of children under the age of 16. Since 2024, parents can apply for the payment if their children are 16, 17 or 18 and still in full time education or if they have a disability and cannot support themselves. Minister Calleary confirmed that under European Union (EU) regulations, Child Benefit is considered a 'Family Payment'. If a UK, EU or European Economic Area (EEA) citizen is working in Ireland, they can apply for Irish Child Benefit. If the child is living in a different EU or EEA country from the worker, they can also apply for any family benefit payments they are entitled to in the country where their children live. Minister Calleary confirmed that as of April 30, Child Benefit was being paid to 3,381 customers in respect of 6,186 non-resident children.' In total, people in 22 countries were in receipt of these payments. The highest number of claims was in the United Kingdom, where 1,310 people were getting the payment for 2,695 children. Some 1,129 people are in receipt of Child Benefit for 1,129 children living in Poland, while 685 parents are claiming for 1,320 children in Romania. All other countries have receipt numbers in the hundreds, and payments are being made to countries including Lithuania, Croatia, Bulgaria, Spain, Slovakia, Latvia, and Hungary. Deputy O'Shea told the Irish Mirror that he inquired about the figures to assist him in his work as Chairman of the Oireachtas Social Protection Committee. He said: 'As the newly elected chairperson of the Oireachtas Committee on Social Protection, I have put in a series of questions about expenditure across a range of different schemes, such as disability, illness benefit and child benefit. 'This information is useful in providing me with a greater understanding of the social welfare system. 'I intend to tease through all of this detail out further with the Department when they appear before the committee.'
Agriland
11 hours ago
- Agriland
‘They'll suffer, we'll suffer' – Irish MEPs on tariff threat
As a July deadline for Trump's threatened 50% tariff on EU goods looms, intense talks continue to take place between the US and the bloc. Tariffs pose a 'big threat', and if they were to apply to agricultural products, the effect could be 'detrimental' for Ireland, MEP Sean Kelly said. 'If Donald Trump goes ahead with them and then we [EU] reciprocate, they'll suffer, we'll suffer – and it's not in anybody's interest to go down that line.' Tariff talks Kelly's comments to Agriland come as Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Simon Harris confirmed he took part in discussions this week with US trade representative, Ambassador Jamieson Greer. This follows on from the Tánaiste's meetings in Washington in April, when he met with the US Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick. The Tánaiste and Ambassador Greer discussed recent trade developments, including an exchange of views on the ongoing negotiations between the US and EU. Speaking after the virtual meeting, the Tánaiste said he outlined the 'hugely successful two-way economic relationship between the US and Ireland', and that tariffs 'threaten this relationship and are bad for business, bad for consumers and bad for workers on both sides of the Atlantic'. During the meeting the Tánaiste reiterated that negotiations remain the main focus for both the EU and Ireland and welcomed the 'recent positive momentum', including Ambassador Greer's recent meeting with EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic. The Tánaiste added: 'I assured Ambassador Greer of Ireland's commitment to supporting a mutually beneficial agreement that works for the US and the EU and noted his recent positive meeting with Commissioner Šefčovič in Paris. 'The ambassador and I agreed to remain in contact as we seek to bring this trade dispute to an end.' Uncertainty According to Sean Kelly, the EU has to 'box clever' when dealing with the US, acknowledging the strong relationship Ireland has had with the US. 'I'm pleased that the EU are taking their time because the worst thing you could do at this stage is to rush into retaliatory measures that might be as harmful to us, and maybe with time, Donald Trump might back down and change his mind,' as negotiations continue, according to Kelly. MEP Billy Kelleher told Agriland that there is 'grave uncertainty' at the moment around international trade, with the impact of Trump's proposed tariffs coupled with the EU-Mercosur trade agreement. He said Ireland must 'hold firm in terms of addressing some of the issues' of Mercosur, Kelleher said, including the need for 'mirror imaging of regulations and farming practices to ensure that any products that come in comply with the standards we expect our farmers to produce food by'. The MEP warned: 'The other area I have concern about in Mercosur is deforestation. 'I am still convinced if we don't put measures in place to ensure there isn't further destruction of the Amazon rainforest, that could incentivise further destruction, and importation of cheap food, and that in itself doesn't serve the conditions of climate change and the impact that would have on global warning.'
