logo
America's housing market is shuddering

America's housing market is shuddering

Mint3 days ago
Few pandemic-era bets will have paid off quite as nicely as nabbing a house in a boomtown such as Atlanta, Austin or Miami with a two-point-something percent mortgage rate—and holding on as its value soared in the subsequent years. People wanted sun, space and an escape from covid killjoys. These cities offered it.
Now, though, the good times are coming to an end. America's housing market is flagging. Across the country, prices have drifted down in the first half of the year, with most cities seeing falls in the past three months (see chart 1). The Federal Reserve's tight monetary policy has kept interest rates painfully high. And this is feeding through to the property market, just as President Donald Trump's tariffs chip away at the economic growth that had been keeping sales strong.
The pain is not evenly distributed. Prices are still creeping up in the north-east and the Midwest, while the west and, in particular, the south are hurting (see map). Pity the homeowner in Dallas or Phoenix who bought last year. They are carrying a beefy, 7% or so mortgage rate and the value of their house is already down a few percentage points in dollar terms, or more after accounting for inflation.
Such cities face a number of difficulties. Fewer Americans are upping sticks and moving to the sunbelt than during the pandemic, when internal migration jumped (see chart 2). Mr Trump's crackdown at the Mexican border may be making a difference, too, by lowering the number of international arrivals. Housebuilding boomed in these cities a few years ago, when demand was high and rates were low. Although it has now slowed, many covid-era constructions are only just hitting the market. Worse still, the public perception of these cities has changed. Austin and Miami failed to attract enough superstar businesses when they were the flavour of the month; few tech bros today tout them as the new Silicon Valley.
For similar reasons, some of the worst-performing markets in the north-east are holiday towns, which also did well as demand from remote workers soared. House prices are falling in Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard and along the coast of Maine. Big city suburbs, another pandemic beneficiary, do seem to be faring better—whereas dialling into Zoom from the beach house doesn't quite work, modern hybrid work schedules perhaps make adding 15 or 30 minutes to the commute viable.
The state that fares worst of all combines these trends and adds a few peculiarities of its own. It is Florida, where prices have fallen by 4% over the past year. Aziz Sunderji, an independent analyst, points to high and rising home-insurance premiums owing to climate change ($11,000 or so a year in Florida, versus $2,400 nationwide), a sharp drop-off in demand from well-off Canadians (a surprisingly large number of whom flee cold winters to Florida) and expensive new safety rules that came in after a condominium in Surfside, a Miami suburb, collapsed in 2021.
What does the shuddering market say about America's economy? Historically, housing has been one of the most interest-rate sensitive sectors; buyers lever up to make purchases, and are less likely to do so when borrowing becomes expensive, dampening sales and new construction. The industry both helps drive economic growth—housing employs a lot of people and homes are a slug of many families' net worth—and is worth watching to see where the economy is heading.
The current slowdown is partly deliberate: the Fed says it is keeping policy tight to squeeze out the last of America's above-target inflation. Other parts of the economy are cooling, too: real private consumption and investment rose at an annualised rate of just 1.2% in the second quarter of 2025, having run at or above 2% for most of the past few years. And payrolls growth has slowed in recent months, even if that in part reflects lower migration.
Yet relief for the housing market, in the form of much looser monetary policy, may not be on the horizon (even if the Fed does look likely to lower rates a bit in the months ahead). Tariffs have complicated the job for policymakers, as they may cause inflation to spike. At the same time, a colossal build-out of artificial-intelligence infrastructure, data centres and the like is helping buoy growth. Capital spending by the 'magnificent seven" big technology companies now accounts for over 1% of GDP, and has near-doubled in just a few years, according to Renaissance Macro Research, reducing the need to stimulate the economy. The past decade has been very kind to America's homeowners. Perhaps aspiring buyers are due a break.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Not a single policymaking person who knows Russia,Ukraine' as Trump heads for talks with Putin
'Not a single policymaking person who knows Russia,Ukraine' as Trump heads for talks with Putin

First Post

time13 minutes ago

  • First Post

'Not a single policymaking person who knows Russia,Ukraine' as Trump heads for talks with Putin

Negotiations with Moscow have been handled not by diplomats steeped in years of Russia policy, but by real estate developer Steve Witkoff, who has no background in foreign affairs When Donald Trump steps into a room with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday (August 15), the setting will be a far cry from his first headline-grabbing encounter with the Russian leader in Helsinki six years ago. That summit went so poorly that Fiona Hill, his then top Russia adviser, later admitted she had considered faking a seizure to shut it down. This time, there are unlikely to be any Russia specialists within arm's reach of the president. In his second term, Trump has purged swathes of the federal workforce, elevated loyalists over seasoned experts and sidelined the traditional machinery of foreign policy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Negotiations with Moscow have been handled not by diplomats steeped in years of Russia policy, but by real estate developer Steve Witkoff, who has no background in foreign affairs. Former ambassador Eric Rubin says Trump 'does not have a single policymaking person who knows Russia and Ukraine advising him', Financial Times reported. Ordinarily, before a meeting of this magnitude, the US national security council (NSC) would be corralling input from across government to prepare the president for anything Putin might throw at him. Known for his command of detail and skill in exploiting gaps in an opponent's knowledge, Putin has been in power for a quarter of a century. That process has been hollowed out. Dozens of foreign policy and national security officials were forced out of the NSC in May. More than 1,300 state department employees were let go last month, including many analysts covering Russia and Ukraine. The diplomatic corps has also been hit hard; the American Foreign Service Association estimates around a quarter of foreign service officers have quit since January. Top posts dealing with Russia and Ukraine remain unfilled. The administration insists the cuts will make the government 'leaner' and more responsive. Deputy White House press secretary Anna Kelly said Trump still gets input from leaders at the state department, NSC and intelligence agencies before making decisions. But in practice, the most senior roles are concentrated in the hands of a few figures, including secretary of state Marco Rubio, who is also serving as acting national security adviser. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump has said the Alaska meeting will be 'a feel-out' and that he will know 'within two minutes' whether progress is possible. 'I may say 'lots of luck, keep fighting', or I may say 'we can make a deal',' he told reporters this week. For many former officials, that approach rings alarm bells. Daniel Fried, a former ambassador to Poland, warned: 'You can't have him and Witkoff winging it because they just don't know enough. You need somebody in the room who can just look at the president, roll his eyes and shake his head.' In Helsinki in 2018, Trump publicly questioned his own intelligence agencies' findings on election interference, accepting Putin's denials instead. Back then, he had what were described as the 'adults in the room' – experienced hands who tried to temper his impulses. John Bolton, his national security adviser at the time, recalled trying to brief Trump on nuclear weapons during the flight to Helsinki, while the president watched a football match. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This time, those guardrails are gone. Fried put it bluntly: 'This is not an administration that is going to have an experts-led process.'

Slamming 50% Trump tariffs, farmer leader Chaduni urges ban on US firms in India
Slamming 50% Trump tariffs, farmer leader Chaduni urges ban on US firms in India

India Today

time13 minutes ago

  • India Today

Slamming 50% Trump tariffs, farmer leader Chaduni urges ban on US firms in India

Haryana farmer leader Gurnam Singh Chaduni has called for a complete ban on American companies operating in India after US President Donald Trump announced steep tariffs on Indian week, Trump signed an Executive Order imposing an additional 25% duty on Indian imports — on top of an earlier 25% hike — citing India's continued purchase of Russian oil. The combined 50% tariff will take effect from August to the move, Bharatiya Kisan Union (Chaduni) chief Gurnam Singh Chaduni said India must "hit back in a similar manner" by targeting US companies. "The US has imposed heavy tariffs on India and India must hit back in a similar way and ban American companies operating on Indian soil," Chaduni told India Today farmer leader argued that many American businesses in India, especially large fast-food and retail chains, earn substantial profits and repatriate them to the US."Why are we allowing this when the US is imposing tariffs on us? We must give a similar reply and ban all these companies," he said. "You travel on highways and one can spot the big food giants of the US spreading their business all over. This must stop," Chaduni farmer leader, who played a prominent role in the 2022 anti-farm laws protests, said the government must take a firm stand to deter future trade pressure from Washington."We cannot allow anyone to dictate things to us like this. If we don't take a stand now, America will continue to do this in the future too and threaten us regularly. The US-based companies should immediately be banned and not allowed to mint money," he demand also comes against the backdrop of a long-standing flashpoint in India–US trade of the contentious issues has been the proposed entry of US companies into India's dairy and agriculture sectors — a move New Delhi has consistently resisted, citing potential threats to farmers' livelihoods and to the country's self-reliance in these key Washington escalating trade tensions through higher tariffs, Chaduni's call to ban US businesses signals growing pressure on the Indian government to respond with stronger retaliatory measures.- EndsMust Watch

US is now Tariff King of the world: Former diplomat Vikas Swarup
US is now Tariff King of the world: Former diplomat Vikas Swarup

News18

time23 minutes ago

  • News18

US is now Tariff King of the world: Former diplomat Vikas Swarup

New Delhi [India], August 14 (ANI): Noting that India has done the 'right thing" by not caving in to the Trump administration's pressure in trade talks to provide more access to the country's agriculture and dairy sectors, former diplomat Vikas Swarup has said 'the US called India a 'Tariff King' but now the 'Tariff King' in the world is the United States".In an interview with ANI, Vikas Swarup, who is a former High Commissioner to Canada, said steps being taken by the US President Donald Trump will eventually lead to ratcheting up inflation in America. 'US called India a 'Tariff King'. But now the 'Tariff King' in the world is the United States because our average tariff is about 15.98%. The US tariff today is 18.4%. So, it is now the 'Tariff King' of the world. But the fact is, tariffs are bringing in money. They will bring in about a 100 billion dollars a year for the US. But the issue is that eventually who will pay for these tariffs? By American consumers. So, what's going to happen is this is going to ratchet up inflation in America, it's going to ratchet up prices in America. I think that's when the chickens will come home to roost," he said.'If you cave in to a bully then the bully will increase his demands. Then there will be even more demands. So, I think we have done the right thing. India is too large, too proud a country to become a camp follower of any other country. Our strategic autonomy has been the bedrock of our foreign policy right from the 1950s. I don't think that any Govt in Delhi can compromise on that," says former diplomat Vikas Swarup on the tariff rift between India and the US," he added. President Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods plus an unspecified penalty in July, even as there were hopes of an interim India-US trade deal that would have otherwise helped avoid elevated tariffs. A few days later, he imposed another 25 per cent tariff, taking the total to 50 per cent, over India's imports of Russian Opposition questioning India's Foreign Policy and diplomacy, Vikas Swarup said India should not cave in to any pressure as India's strategic autonomy is non-negotiable'Here, I would not blame our diplomats at all. I think what has happened is Pakistan, through some intermediaries, has gotten the ear of the US President and that is why, two visits by Asim Munir to Washington, the so-called 'deal" with America on so-called 'oil reserves" of Pakistan. More importantly, I think Pakistan is now trying to position itself as the 'Crypto King' of South Asia and there, through World Liberty Financial in which Trump's family has stakes, Steve Witkoff's family has a stake, through that I think Pakistan has managed to project an image of itself as a reliable partner…All these things have led to Trump having a softer approach towards Pakistan," he said. 'But that does not mean that he has given up on India or that India is now an adversary for him. I think this is part of his pressure tactics to secure a more favourable deal. India should not cave in because our strategic autonomy is non-negotiable," he Swarup, a noted author, said Trump has made no secret of his longing for the Nobel Peace Prize and while he is a dealmaker, he has now made it his USP that he is the peacemaker.'On 50% tariffs imposed by the US on India, former diplomat Vikas Swarup says, 'Trump is a dealmaker and he has now made it his USP that he is the peacemaker. Look at the number of conflict situations that he has mediated in, whether it is Thailand and Combodia, Rawanda and Democratic Republic of Congo, Armenia and Azerbaijan; he has injected himself into each of those. He feels that the biggest one of these was the India and Pakistan one because these two are nuclear powers," Vikas Swarup said. 'So, from that point of view, Trump feels that he deserves credit and Obama is the only Amercian President to have got the Nobel Peace Prize. Trump really wants to do one better than Obama, and that is why, I think, he has made no secret of his longing for that Nobel Peace Prize. He is hoping that if he could not get it for these, if he has able to bring about a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, then that might be his ticket to the Nobel Peace Prize," he former diplomat said that there is a need to look at the US' relationship with Pakistan through a different lens from the US' relationship with India. 'I think the relationship with Pakistan right now is a very tactical one and is a short-term one, primarily motivated by the financial gain that the Trump family and Witkoff family hope to make from the cryptocurrency assets in Pakistan. With India, I think, the relationship is much more strategic. It is not so transactional as it is with Pakistan. That is why I personally feel that it is a passing phase. I call it a storm, not a rupture. You just have to wait out the storms. All storms eventually pass," he said there are three reasons US President Donald Trump has imposed 50 per cent tariffs on Indian goods including his 'being miffed that India has not acknowledged his role" in cessation of hostilities with Pakistan following Operation Sindoor, former diplomat Vikas Swarup has said, noting that if there is positive outcome of Alaska talks, Russia sanctions will be off the table.'We have to understand why these tariffs have been imposed. I personally feel that there are three reasons. One, Trump is not happy with India because we are a member of BRICS and somehow, in his head, he has got this notion that BRICS is an anti-America alliance which is hell-bent on creating an alternative currency to the dollar. So, because of that, he feels that India should not be a member of the BRICS. Two, Operation Sindoor and his so-called role in bringing about the ceasefire," Vikas Swarup said.'We have been saying right from the beginning that Trump had no role because we do not accept external mediation. This ceasefire was mediated directly between the DGMOs of Pakistan and India at the request of the DGMO of Pakistan. Trump has now said almost 30 times that it was he who got the two countries to stop back from the brink, who stopped a nuclear conflagration in the subcontinent. So, obviously he is miffed that India has not acknowledged his role, whereas Pakistan has not only acknowledged his role but has even nominated him for a Nobel Peace Prize," he to Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) talks between India and US, Vikas Swarup said Trump is resorting to pressure tactics to get India to sign on his maximalist demands.'…This is part of his pressure tactics to get India to sign on the dotted line on the maximalist demands that the US is making with regard to access to our dairy and agriculture and GM Crops. We have not caved in and it is also in a way a signal to Russia because he is also frustrated that he has not been able to get President Putin to agree to the ceasefire that Zelenskyy has agreed to," he Swarup referred to the summit meeting between President Trump and President Putin in Alaska on August 15 over the Ukraine conflict.'Now they are meeting in Alaska on 15th August. If there is a positive outcome of the Alaska talks then I am 100% sure that the Russia sanctions will be off the table because Putin is not going to accept a ceasefire and yet be saddled with economic sanctions," he and the US initiated talks for a just, balanced, and mutually beneficial Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) in March this year, aiming to complete the first stage of the Agreement by October-November April 2, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order for reciprocal tariffs on various trade partners, imposing varied tariffs in the range of 10-50 per subsequently kept the tariffs in abeyance for 90 days, while imposing a 10 per cent baseline tariff. The deadline was to end on July 9, and the US administration later pushed it to August the ongoing Monsoon session of Parliament, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal made a statement in both Houses, affirming that the government is examining the impact of tariffs and will take all necessary steps to safeguard the national interest. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store