Mother, 52, is left with agonising second-degree burns after tealight exploded in her face
Marnie Hobbs took her Home Bargains tealight outside when it began 'crackling' after burning for nearly two hours.
The 52-year-old from Chandler's Ford, near Southampton, Hants, watched as the flame grew bigger and as she went to blow it out, boiling wax splattered over her face and chest.
She said what happened in the aftermath remains 'hazy' until she woke up at the emergency department at Winchester hospital.
Now, more than seven weeks on, Ms Hobbs is calling for Home Bargains to take accountability.
'I bought a pack of 25 tealights costing around £2.50, from the store in Eastleigh in March before I decided to use one on April 2', she said.
Recounting the incident, she said: 'The hot wax covered me from the tip of my nose, down my face and over my chest.
'After arriving at A&E I was showered in cold water for 20 minutes before a consultant dressed my burns.
'I returned the following day so they could remove the blisters.
'I've had two children, and I have never felt pain like this removal, it was the worst pain I have felt.'
She emailed customer services at Home Bargains about the incident on April 4 and requested an investigation into the safety of the tealights.
Six days later Ms Hobbs was told Home Bargains were 'unable to provide further assistance'.
'The product in question is one of our highest volume sellers, selling 10s of thousands across the week over many years and this is the first complaint of this kind that our safety and compliance team has encountered,' she was told.
The 'dismissiveness' of their response upset Ms Hobbs, and she is fearful this could happen to more people.
She said: 'I would be mortified if this happens to somebody else, God forbid it happens to a child.
'I am so glad I took the candle outside, and I can't bear to think about the damage it could have done to our home.
'You trust that the products from Home Bargains are safe to use.
'It has been so traumatic and painful.'
In response, a spokesperson from Home Bargains said customer safety is a 'top priority' and a 'thorough investigation' was carried out.
'We are satisfied that the product meets the safety standards', they said, adding: 'We understand how distressing this experience must have been, and our thoughts are with the customer. We wish them a full and speedy recovery.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Would a new property tax be electoral disaster for Labour?
For many months, ministers have been curiously coy about whether they would introduce a ' wealth tax '. It was previously flatly denied and was not mentioned in the manifesto. Yet more recently, from Sir Keir Starmer down, there's been a refusal to comment. Now, perhaps, we know why: a conscious leak from the Treasury suggests Rachel Reeves is contemplating reforms to stamp duty and council tax that would amount to a new property tax. Apparently, the chancellor has briefed cabinet colleagues about the project and they are gauging public reaction. If implemented, it would be a politically brave move. What does the chancellor want? There are few details, but Reeves's idea seems to be to levy a new tax on homes worth more than £500,000 with, most likely, some adjustments to council tax and stamp duty at all levels of the property market. This new levy would replace stamp duty on owner-occupied primary residential homes (second and rental homes being treated differently already). A further annual local property tax would be added, based on an updated estimation of relative property values; this would replace council tax. When does she want it? A new national property levy could replace stamp duty in this parliament. A wholesale reform of local government finance, including a transition from council tax to local property tax and a valuation of every single home, would take years. Reportedly, that would be for Labour's hoped-for second term. Why is it being considered? Reeves is desperate for new sources of tax revenue that won't violate the manifesto commitment not to raise rates of income tax, employee national insurance and VAT. That doesn't leave much, even with income tax and NI thresholds frozen. Some researchers estimate the 'black hole' in the government's budget could yawn to about £40bn a year by the end of this parliament – way more than the current level and beyond what fiscal rules and the markets would tolerate. Is a property tax a good idea in any case? Yes, in the sense that the British approach to taxing wealth is completely irrational. Unlike any other asset – rental properties, shares, artworks, businesses – the value of a main home is untaxed, nor are any capital gains derived from moving up the property chain. That badly distorts against investment in productive capital and in favour of consumption, and thus blunts productivity growth and living standards. The resulting concentration of wealth as it cascades down the generations with minimal inheritance tax is driving a steadily more unequal society. Would a new property tax be a wealth tax? Yes, but it might be presented as a fairer and more rational version of the wealth taxes we already have: council tax, stamp duty, capital gains tax and inheritance tax. But it would suffer from the same drawbacks as council tax (and, to a lesser extent, stamp duty) in that it is almost completely unrelated to ability to pay. Someone lucky enough to live in what is now a very valuable home, but who has a small income in retirement, couldn't afford an annual tax bill and would have to borrow against or sell their home (although the tax could be deferred until death and deducted from the estate at probate, making it effectively a hike in inheritance tax). It would also favour the wealthy few whose money is tied up in several properties or businesses because they would only be liable on the first property as a main home; a 'proper' and efficient wealth tax would treat all kinds of assets neutrally. A more sensible approach to local government finance might be a local income tax – a policy idea adopted in Scotland by the SNP government in 2007 but later abandoned – and a more sensitive way of transferring money from richer areas to poorer ones. At the moment, council tax rates vary considerably between different areas, and about a fifth of local government funding comes from the Treasury out of central taxation. How much might it be? Anyone's guess, but most likely unrelated to wages or other income. The centre-right think tank Onward, which last year came up with the original paper that inspired the Treasury, suggested that owners, rather than the residents, of a property worth up to £500,000 would pay various tiered rates of national and local property tax dependent on the value of their home. They would pay a minimum of £800 a year directly to their local authority, but who knows what living in a £2m townhouse would set you back. How would it play politically? Disastrously. Any such reform necessarily creates winners, who are electorally ungrateful, and losers, who are highly resentful. The last time such a change was attempted was when the 'rates' were abolished in the late 1980s to make way for the flat rate per-person poll tax, triggering a riot, mass non-payment, and ultimately contributing to the fall of Margaret Thatcher. Vast accidental disparities in individual liabilities rendered the poll tax impractical and indefensible; it took some years and much cost to the Treasury to move from the poll tax to the current council tax regime with its various reliefs and exemptions. Memories of that painful episode mean no government has dared to touch property taxation besides fiddling around the thresholds. By making the plan part of the next Labour manifesto, but without much detail about who would pay and how much they'd pay, paranoia about the new tax would run rampant. Inheritance tax, which very few estates actually pay, is almost universally hated, and so would be a new 'Labour wealth tax'. It would be regarded as a 'tax on aspiration'. Whisper it, but some of the 'working people' that Labour has solemnly pledged to protect own their own homes, and it is their sole source of wealth. Some imagine they will one day have a £1m house; they may already do if they live in London. Even with her proven record of poor political judgement, it is hard to understand what Reeves is playing at. At best; she is being pushed around – again – by Treasury civil servants who care nothing about politics; at worst, she's become a little too crazed about fiscal rectitude.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Benefits misinformation spreads online as millions grapple with cost of living
Misinformation about benefits, money and government policy has likely been seen by hundreds of thousands of people as fake news has been allowed to feature amongst Google's top-ranking search results. The web giant's rotation of articles featured on its search engine and most prominent recommendation services has included several peddling incorrect information on crucial financial news relating to UK readers. Many of these sites falsely claim that the Cost of Living Payment that was administered by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) between 2022 and 2024 is returning this year, which is not true. The authors of the articles even falsely state that people on certain commonly-claimed benefits, such as Universal Credit and Pension Credit, can expect automatic payments worth up to £500 in the coming months. Another fake story sees WASPI campaigners told that they can expect a 'one-off, tax-free compensation payment' worth thousands, while yet another claims that next years' planned state pension age increase to 67 has been cancelled. The owners of these web pages are likely carrying out this activity with the aim of attracting as many readers as possible to their sites with sensational and false headlines. Using knowledge of Google 's website-ranking system to manipulate search results, they also focus content on topics that its open-source data shows is highly searched for. Visitors are shown hundreds of intrusive ads on the pages, the revenue from which becomes more valuable to the site owner the more a website is visited. The Independent has identified several sites that have been sharing false information that has been highly-ranked by Google's algorithm. None of those uncovered are based in the UK. Anna Stevenson, Benefits Expert at Turn2us, said: 'These sites prey on people's worries at a time when so many of us are feeling the pressure of the cost-of-living crisis, and that's really unfair. 'If you see a headline about a new payment or benefit, take a moment to check where it's coming from. Just because it's displayed on Google doesn't make it trustworthy, stick to established and authentic sources like . websites or reputable charities; if you can't find the same information there, it's unlikely to be legitimate.' A spokesperson for Google said: 'We see billions of search queries every day and we design our ranking systems to surface high quality information at the top of Search. Our spam-fighting systems aggressively fight mass-produced, low-quality content, keeping Search 99% spam-free and we take appropriate action against pages that violate our policies.' The owners of all websites shown in this article were approached for comment. Only one, 'Tamil Nadu Weatherman', has removed its article, which carried false information about the Cost of Living Payment, saying it was 'never [their] intention to spread false information.' A spokesperson said: 'Thank you for reaching out and bringing this to my attention. After carefully reviewing the articles you highlighted, I acknowledge that the information published may not have been accurate. This was an oversight on my part, and I sincerely regret any confusion it may have caused. 'Going forward, I will ensure that all such content is cross-checked with official government websites before publication. Accuracy and trust are very important to me, and I appreciate you raising this issue so I could address it promptly.'
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tesco urges customers to return facial wipes posing ‘serious' risk
Tesco is recalling its popular own-brand cleansing wipes over a 'microbiological risk' that could pose serious harm to its customers. During testing, a bacteria called Pluralibacter gergoviae was detected in its Kind & Pure Facial Cleansing Wipes, which could be unsafe for users, particularly those with vulnerable or compromised skin. The Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) has deemed there to be a 'serious' risk involved in using the product, the most severe risk rating it can give. The supermarket chain said: 'If you have purchased an affected product, please do not use it.' Pluralibacter gergoviae presents a low risk to healthy people however, it can cause infection in people with chronic illness or weak immune systems. It has been linked to respiratory diseases, urinary tract infections, eye infections, and sepsis, according to UK testing laboratory Melbec Microbiology. OPSS said: 'The product does not meet the requirements of Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 or the Cosmetic Products Enforcement Regulations 2013.' It is recalling its Tesco Kind & Pure 25 Facial Cleansing Wipes 163g and its Tesco Kind & Pure Radiant Facial Cleansing Wipes Vitamin C 25 Pack 159g. Customers have been asked to return the product in-store, where a full refund will be given with no receipt required. Last month, Tesco was forced to recall three of its prepared pasta salads due to possible salmonella contamination. It also recalled four of its Meals Made Easy products from its Northern Ireland stores over the possible presence of Listeria monocytogenes, a bacteria that can cause meningitis. In July, an adult died after contracting the bacterial infection listeriosis in the Republic of Ireland, caused by Listeria monocytogenes. It led to the recall of several ready meals, including products from Tesco Finest, The Happy Pear, SuperValu Signature Taste, and Centra Freshly Prepared. The Pluralibacter gergoviae detected in the wipes is an issue for cosmetic producers due to its resistance to preservatives that are present in cosmetic products. In Product Safety Alerts, Reports and Recalls, OPPS said: 'The affected batches of these products present a microbiological risk as testing has detected the presence of Pluralibacter gergoviae. 'This makes the products potentially unsafe to use, particularly for vulnerable users or users with a compromised skin barrier.'
