Dan Morehead assembled his Princeton mafia to pile into Bitcoin at $65 in 2013, leaving his Wall Street career behind to build a $5 billion crypto fund
The new operation, launched in 2013, got off to a roaring start, with backing from two of Morehead's fellow Princeton alumni, Pete Briger and Mike Novogratz, both from the private equity giant Fortress. The trio watched with glee as the Bitcoin purchased by Pantera at an initial price of $65 soared to over $1,000 by the end of the year. But then, disaster struck as hackers cleaned out the fledgling crypto industry's main exchange, Mt Gox, and the price of Bitcoin plummeted 85%. 'People would say, 'Didn't you do that Bitcoin thing that died?'' Morehead recalls. 'It's still alive!' he would respond.
During his 2016 trip to evangelize Bitcoin, Morehead took 170 meetings, each time going into a prospective investor's office and spending an hour arguing why the new currency was the most compelling possible opportunity. The result: He managed to raise just $1 million for his flailing fund. Even worse, Morehead's own fees totaled around $17,000. 'I earned $100 a meeting, going out there trying to evangelize people to buy Bitcoins,' he tells Fortune.
Less than a decade later, as Bitcoin pushes $120,000, Morehead's brutal early slog feels like the stuff of founder mythology— right up there with the tales of Apple's Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak tinkering in Jobs' parents' garage, or Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger trading stock tips at an Omaha dinner party.
Today, Pantera manages over $5 billion in assets across different crypto funds. Its holdings comprise digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, as well as venture investments in projects such as Circle, which went public in June, and Bitstamp, which was acquired by Robinhood earlier this year for $200 million. But what sets the firm apart from the crowded field of crypto VCs is its early-mover status as a storied bridge between the buttoned-up world of traditional finance and the once-renegade crypto sector. At the center is Morehead, an unsung figure in an industry dominated by larger-than-life characters.
'I'm very stubborn, and I am totally convinced [Bitcoin] is going to change the world,' Morehead tells Fortune. 'So I just kept going.'
The Princeton mafia
Back before Wall Street infiltrated the blockchain industry, Morehead's stuck out in the chaotic world of early crypto. A two-sport athlete at Princeton in football and heavyweight crew, Morehead still has the broad shoulders and square jaw of his youth. The figure he cut was a far cry from the wiry, iconoclastic types who spent most of their time on internet message boards. Morehead, in contrast, came from the conventional world of finance. He's still rarely spotted without a blazer.
Morehead had already had a long trading career before learning about Bitcoin. After stints at Goldman Sachs and Tiger, he began his own hedge fund, Pantera, which flamed out during the 2008 financial crisis, right around the time that a shadowy figure named Satoshi Nakamoto introduced Bitcoin to the world in an online white paper.
Morehead first heard about Bitcoin in 2011 from his brother and was vaguely aware that a classmate from Princeton, Gavin Andresen, was running a website that gave out 5 Bitcoins to any user for solving a captcha (current street value: $575,000). But Morehead didn't think much about it until a couple of years later, when another classmate, Briger, invited Morehead for coffee at the San Francisco office of Fortress to talk crypto, with Novogratz calling in. 'Since then, I've been possessed by Bitcoin,' Morehead says.
Tech is famous for its so-called 'mafias'—clusters of employees from prominent organizations like PayPal who go on to lead the next generation of startups. In crypto, it's not a company but a university, with Princeton responsible for some of the industry's most influential projects. Briger and Novogratz both served as key backers of Pantera, with Morehead even moving into empty office space at Fortress's SF office. Briger remains a powerful, albeit behind-the-scenes, presence in crypto, recently taking a seat on the board of directors of Michael Saylor's $100 billion Bitcoin holding firm, Strategy. Novogratz went on to found Galaxy, one of the largest crypto conglomerates. And another classmate, Joe Lubin, went on to become one of the cofounders of Ethereum.
But back in 2013, it still seemed far-fetched that Ivy League graduates working in the rarified fields of private equity and macro trading would be interested in Bitcoin. Briger tells Fortune that he first learned about it from Wences Casares, an Argentine entrepreneur and early crypto adopter, while sharing a room at a Young Presidents' Organization gathering in the San Juan Islands. Briger quickly saw the appeal of upending the global payments system—a point he sticks by today, though he argues that Bitcoin is still in its infancy. He says that Bitcoin mirrors the promise of the internet, which facilitated a new form of information flow. 'The fact that money movement doesn't happen in the same way is a real shame,' he says.
After sharing the idea with Novogratz, they thought that Morehead, who had experience working in foreign exchange markets, would be the right person to bring on. When Morehead decided to devote the rest of his financial career to crypto, he rebranded Pantera as a Bitcoin fund and opened it back up to outside investors. Briger and Novogratz both signed on as limited partners, with Fortress and the venture firms Benchmark and Ribbit taking general partner stakes, though they would later withdraw. His old mentor at Tiger, the legendary investor Julian Robertson, even backed a later fund.
Pantera's rebirth
In the hurley-burly early days of crypto, entrepreneurs had to confront dramatic booms and busts that make today's volatility look like minor blips. But the wild price roller-coaster wasn't the biggest headache, Novogratz recalls. It was simply trying to procure BTC in the first place.
He went to Coinbase, then just a year old, to try and buy 30,000 Bitcoins, which would have sold for around $2 million. He was met with a pop-up that his limit was $50. After trying to work it out with Olaf Carlson-Wee—Coinbase's first employee, who would go on to become a famed crypto figure in his own right—the firm agreed to increase his limit all the way to $300.
Morehead's most impressive achievement, however, may be sticking it out during the doldrums of 2013 through 2016, when prices remained in the basement and no one outside of the insular blockchain community paid Bitcoin much mind. 'In those quiet years where crypto wasn't doing shit, Dan was out there beating the pavement,' Novogratz tells Fortune.
That epoch still had its highlights, including three annual conferences hosted by Morehead out of his Lake Tahoe home. At one, Jesse Powell, the founder of the exchange Kraken, opted out of taking a private plane chartered by Morehead and drove instead. 'There was a large enough fraction of the Bitcoin community [there] that he feared if the plane crashed, it would take Bitcoin down,' Morehead recalls.
Unlike many of his compatriots, Morehead never positioned himself as a 'Bitcoin maxi,' or someone who argues that no other cryptocurrencies should exist. After buying up 2% of the global Bitcoin supply, Pantera became an early investor in Ripple Labs, which created the digital asset XRP. 'The way I think about it is Bitcoin is obviously the most important,' Morehead says. 'But there isn't one internet company.'
According to Morehead, Pantera has made money on 86% of its venture investments. It's a staggering figure considering that the vast majority of VC-backed startups fail. Crypto may be more forgiving given that many projects come with an accompanying cryptocurrency, meaning speculative value often endures even if a startup's product goes nowhere.
Morehead now spends half his year in Puerto Rico, which has become a hotbed for crypto. Joey Krug, then a partner at Pantera and now at Peter Thiel's Founders Fund, had relocated down there, and Morehead decided to make the move. He estimates there are 1,000 blockchain entrepreneurs on the island, though they've drawn scrutiny for driving up real estate prices. Morehead faced an inquiry from the Senate Finance Committee over whether he violated federal tax laws by moving to the island and earning more than $850 million in capital gains from Pantera. He told the New York Times earlier this year that he believed he 'acted appropriately with respect to my taxes' and declined to comment further to Fortune.
Bitcoin's future
Morehead acknowledges that much of the crypto industry is saturated with gambling, with Pantera staying away from memecoins, unlike many other venture firms. Still, he argues that it shouldn't distract from blockchain's broader goal of reshaping global finance. 'It's ridiculous to try and take down the blockchain industry because of a little sideshow,' he says. '[GameStop] doesn't mean the entire U.S. equity market is tainted.'
Pantera continues to grow, including raising a fifth venture fund with a $1 billion target, which Morehead says the firm will close after finishing investing out of its fourth fund later this year. Pantera has also moved into the red-hot field of digital asset treasuries, where publicly traded companies buy and hold cryptocurrencies on their balance sheets.
But Bitcoin remains at the core of Pantera's strategy. At the end of last year, its Bitcoin fund hit 1,000x, with a lifetime return of over 130,000%. When asked for a prediction of where Bitcoin is headed, Morehead has always had the same answer: The price will double in a year. For the most part, the simple model has worked, though Morehead admits the days of rapid growth are likely slowing down. He argues Bitcoin will still go up another order of magnitude, meaning it will approach $1,000,000, though he thinks that will be the last time it has a 10x increase.
Morehead is happy to shoulder the criticism if Bitcoin never reaches that milestone. In 2016, after all, he was struggling to make the case for the cryptocurrency at $500. And less than a decade later, he's just getting started. 'I have the same conviction—the vast majority of institutions have zero,' he tells Fortune. 'It feels like we have another couple of decades to go.'
Updated to reflect the latest regulatory filing figures on assets under management.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Did I just father a meme coin? Well, accidentally…
Did I just father a meme coin? Well, accidentally… originally appeared on TheStreet. Okay, I'll tell you what happened. Last month, I was writing an article about Pudgy Penguins — the NFT collection turned Walmart toy success story, known across crypto circles. It was a pretty normal day. The piece was supposed to highlight how Pudgy Penguins, against all logic, had outperformed Bitcoin that week in sheer price action. But instead of calling it "Pudgy Penguins" throughout, I used the phrase 'Walmart toy coin.' Why? Because you can literally walk into Walmart, buy a Pudgy Penguin toy, scan a QR code, and unlock an NFT. It felt accurate. It felt fun. It was just one line. That was it — the line that started it all. Apparently, calling something a Walmart toy coin is meme gold. Within hours, an X (formerly Twitter) community popped up. Someone forked a coin. They actually called it 'Walmart Toy Coin.' And no — this isn't a shill. This is just a first-hand account of what happens when the crypto trenches take a throwaway joke and run with it. To be clear: I didn't launch it. I didn't fund it. I didn't promote it. In fact, we never editorialized that phrase in follow-ups because we knew how wild things can get. But still, it happened. On that day, the newly minted "Walmart Toy Coin" was up 50%, data from DEXScreener showed. Market cap hit half a million dollars at its peak. As of writing this, it's back down to $38,000, as most meme coins go. But the community? Still hanging on. Memes are still flying. So... did I just father a meme coin? This is the kind of weird stuff only crypto can make happen. The speed, the spontaneity, the utter chaos of it all. It's funny, but also kind of telling. Anything—anything—can become a coin. A passing phrase. A tweet. A typo. If enough people think it's funny, or relatable, or ironic, they'll ape in. The coin isn't the product. The vibe is the product. We're in an age where making a coin is easier than ever. With platforms like you can launch a Solana-based token in a few clicks. No code needed. According to CoinGecko, of the nearly 7 million cryptocurrencies listed since 2021, 3.7 million have since stopped trading and are considered failed. It means over 50% of all cryptocurrencies have failed. But a handful spark. And when they do, they take on a life of their own. Communities form. Telegrams explode. Memes multiply. And suddenly you're staring at a microculture that didn't exist a day ago. And while Ethereum meme coins have been on a tear lately, it's worth noting that the success rate is still vanishingly low. For every $PEPE or $DOGE, there are 10,000 coins that never even see a chart. What makes one catch on? No one really knows. A good name helps. A good joke helps more. But timing, virality, and tribal momentum? That's the secret sauce. Walmart Toy Coin is a perfect example. It was never meant to exist. It was a throwaway line in a fun market recap. But that's the crypto internet for you — everything's remixable. Your analysis might be someone else's next Ponzi. Your joke might be someone else's LP. It's chaotic, it's dumb, and it's also a case study in how memes move markets. Honestly, the entire experience gave me a bit of insight into how meme culture works in the trenches. It's not about fundamentals. It's about being first, being funny, and being fast. Communities don't wait for permission. If they like the vibe, they'll mint the coin. And if it pumps, even for a day, that's enough. So yeah. I might have accidentally fathered a meme coin. No roadmap. No team. No utility. Just a phrase, a story, and a whole lot of copy-paste culture. The coin's probably headed to zero. But the memes? They'll live forever. That's just crypto. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this op-ed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of TheStreet or its affiliates. This piece is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. As mentioned above, our team didn't create, launch, fund, or promote the "Walmart Toy Coin." Did I just father a meme coin? Well, accidentally… first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 21, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 21, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 principles to invest by, whatever comes next
I recently opened a second-quarter investment account statement, not to euphoria—but relief. Let's not forget, US equities flirted with a bear market earlier this year. There were concerns that China's DeepSeek artificial intelligence would bring down US technology titans. There were the tariffs. Yet, here we sit in the third quarter of 2025 with the Morningstar US Market Index up nearly 8% for the year and the Morningstar US Core Bond Index having returned more than 3%. Ahead of us lie multiple pathways. Economic data and earnings announcements will provide direction, but there are also 'unknown unknowns' that could alter our course. Here are three investment principles to keep in mind. Principle 1: Where the market goes, nobody knows Coming into the year, how many pundits talked about AI out of China challenging US tech stocks? Did anyone expect tariffs to be such a factor? Though 2025 has had its plot twists, changes in market direction are hardly unusual. Consider thatstocks came into summer 2024 on a tear, beforesentiment turned. A series of releases—jobs, inflation, and earnings—compounded fears of a narrow and pricey market. Somehow, both an unexpected interest rate hike by the Bank of Japan and an expected rate cut by the Fed triggered selloffs. But markets recovered. Election results in November sparked a powerful rally. So, w here we go from here is anyone's guess. But I'll cite a story about how dead investors outperform living ones because they don't trade. Buy-and-hold has been a great strategy for long-term investors. Principle 2: Global investing can pay off Some think you don't need to own anything other than US equities. But I'llnote that the Morningstar Global Markets ex-US Index has trounced its US equivalent so far in 2025. What's behind the turnaround? The dollar weakening against many other currencies is part of the story. But markets in many regions—Europe, Latin America, and India—have roared to life this year. To me, global investing is about casting the net as widely as possible. So, just as some argue that US-based multinationals provide American investors with global exposure, you could also argue that they're not fully exposed to the US, from a revenue perspective, with a purely domestic portfolio. Principle 3: Bonds aren't broken The equity market's extreme volatility in 2025 makes bonds look like steady-Eddies. While US stocks were in free fall from late February through early April, the Morningstar US Core Bond Index gained 1.3%. Bonds diversified equities, serving as portfolio ballast. Bonds face a lot of 'headline risk.' There are debt and deficit concerns. And the shadow of 2022's ' worst bond market ever ' lingers. While the risks are undeniable, fixed income is also the victim of fearmongering. Not only have bonds diversified stocks, they're also providing above-inflation income streams. Thanks to the painful interest rate hikes of 2022-23, yields on fixed income are at levels not seen since the mid-2000s. The road ahead We're likely to see more twists before 2025 is out. Short-term asset-price fluctuations are driven by a complex interplay of variables—macro and micro, fundamental and technical. Longer term, valuation can be a useful guide. According to my Morningstar Equity Research colleagues, the US stock market looked a bit pricey coming into the second half of 2025—not in dangerous bubble territory, but 'trading at a slight premium.' The bargains cluster on the value side of the market and in smaller-cap stocks. Meanwhile, my colleagues in Morningstar Investment Management continue to see upside in bonds and international equities. As always, a buy-and-hold mindset and a diversified portfolio remain sensible investment tactics. ____ This article was provided to The Associated Press by Morningstar. For more markets content, go to Dan Lefkovitz is a strategist for Morningstar Indexes. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Entrepreneur
29 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Why AI Isn't Truly Intelligent — and How We Can Change That
Today's AI lacks true intelligence because it is built on outdated, biased and often unlicensed data that cannot replicate human reasoning. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Let's be honest: Most of what we call artificial intelligence today is really just pattern-matching on autopilot. It looks impressive until you scratch the surface. These systems can generate essays, compose code and simulate conversation, but at their core, they're predictive tools trained on scraped, stale content. They do not understand context, intent or consequence. It's no wonder then that in this boom of AI use, we're still seeing basic errors, issues and fundamental flaws that lead many to question whether the technology really has any benefit outside its novelty. These large language models (LLMs) aren't broken; they're built on the wrong foundation. If we want AI to do more than autocomplete our thoughts, we must rethink the data it learns from. Related: Despite How the Media Portrays It, AI Is Not Really Intelligent. Here's Why. The illusion of intelligence Today's LLMs are usually trained on Reddit threads, Wikipedia dumps and internet content. It's like teaching a student with outdated, error-filled textbooks. These models mimic intelligence, but they cannot reason anywhere near human level. They cannot make decisions like a person would in high-pressure environments. Forget the slick marketing around this AI boom; it's all designed to keep valuations inflated and add another zero to the next funding round. We've already seen the real consequences, the ones that don't get the glossy PR treatment. Medical bots hallucinate symptoms. Financial models bake in bias. Self-driving cars misread stop signs. These aren't hypothetical risks. They're real-world failures born from weak, misaligned training data. And the problems go beyond technical errors — they cut to the heart of ownership. From the New York Times to Getty Images, companies are suing AI firms for using their work without consent. The claims are climbing into the trillions, with some calling them business-ending lawsuits for companies like Anthropic. These legal battles are not just about copyright. They expose the structural rot in how today's AI is built. Relying on old, unlicensed or biased content to train future-facing systems is a short-term solution to a long-term problem. It locks us into brittle models that collapse under real-world conditions. A lesson from a failed experiment Last year, Claude ran a project called "Project Vend," in which its model was put in charge of running a small automated store. The idea was simple: Stock the fridge, handle customer chats and turn a profit. Instead, the model gave away freebies, hallucinated payment methods and tanked the entire business in weeks. The failure wasn't in the code. It was during training. The system had been trained to be helpful, not to understand the nuances of running a business. It didn't know how to weigh margins or resist manipulation. It was smart enough to speak like a business owner, but not to think like one. What would have made the difference? Training data that reflected real-world judgment. Examples of people making decisions when stakes were high. That's the kind of data that teaches models to reason, not just mimic. But here's the good news: There's a better way forward. Related: AI Won't Replace Us Until It Becomes Much More Like Us The future depends on frontier data If today's models are fueled by static snapshots of the past, the future of AI data will look further ahead. It will capture the moments when people are weighing options, adapting to new information and making decisions in complex, high-stakes situations. This means not just recording what someone said, but understanding how they arrived at that point, what tradeoffs they considered and why they chose one path over another. This type of data is gathered in real time from environments like hospitals, trading floors and engineering teams. It is sourced from active workflows rather than scraped from blogs — and it is contributed willingly rather than taken without consent. This is what is known as frontier data, the kind of information that captures reasoning, not just output. It gives AI the ability to learn, adapt and improve, rather than simply guess. Why this matters for business The AI market may be heading toward trillions in value, but many enterprise deployments are already revealing a hidden weakness. Models that perform well in benchmarks often fail in real operational settings. When even small improvements in accuracy can determine whether a system is useful or dangerous, businesses cannot afford to ignore the quality of their inputs. There is also growing pressure from regulators and the public to ensure AI systems are ethical, inclusive and accountable. The EU's AI Act, taking effect in August 2025, enforces strict transparency, copyright protection and risk assessments, with heavy fines for breaches. Training models on unlicensed or biased data is not just a legal risk. It is a reputational one. It erodes trust before a product ever ships. Investing in better data and better methods for gathering it is no longer a luxury. It's a requirement for any company building intelligent systems that need to function reliably at scale. Related: Emerging Ethical Concerns In the Age of Artificial Intelligence A path forward Fixing AI starts with fixing its inputs. Relying on the internet's past output will not help machines reason through present-day complexities. Building better systems will require collaboration between developers, enterprises and individuals to source data that is not just accurate but also ethical as well. Frontier data offers a foundation for real intelligence. It gives machines the chance to learn from how people actually solve problems, not just how they talk about them. With this kind of input, AI can begin to reason, adapt and make decisions that hold up in the real world. If intelligence is the goal, then it is time to stop recycling digital exhaust and start treating data like the critical infrastructure it is.