
Appeal success for Nazi salutes outside Jewish museum
Anthony Raymond Mitchell, 33, performed a Nazi salute and goose-step with two co-workers near the Sydney Jewish Museum in October 2023.
The salute, seen on the museum's CCTV by a security guard, came days after Hamas militants killed 1200 Israelis and took hundreds more hostage in southern Israel, sparking the latest outbreak of war in Gaza.
At the time, the construction workers were on their lunch break and walking back to their van.
When interviewed by police, Mitchell said he was mimicking a Netflix performance and realised "those who were not familiar with the Ricky Gervais skit could take the actions in a certain way".
Mitchell and his co-workers each argued the gestures were a joke but were found guilty of offensive behaviour and knowingly displaying Nazi symbols without excuse by a magistrate in October.
The case tested laws prohibiting the display of Nazi symbols, introduced by the NSW parliament in 2022 and carrying a maximum penalty of 12 months' jail, an $11,000 fine or both.
Re-running the case in the District Court on appeal, the trio's lawyers argued that the gestures should not fall within the definition of displaying a Nazi symbol.
But that was rejected by Judge Craig Smith on Friday.
"They are immediately recognised as being associated with that regime and period of history," he said in the Downing Centre court.
There was no reasonable excuse for the trio's actions to be performed outside the museum, he said.
While the new law allowed the Nazi symbol to be displayed for academic, educational, artistic or other public interest purposes, the tradies' actions were "nothing of the sort," Judge Smith said.
Lawyer Bryan Wrench, representing one of Mitchell's co-workers Daniel Muston, told the court that the actions occurred within a split second, and were not planned.
"There is no Nazi ideology behind this," he said.
Muston, 42, had completed a tour of the museum since his conviction in an attempt to educate himself on Jewish culture and history, Mr Wrench said.
Judge Smith accepted Mitchell, Muston and the third man - Ryan Peter Marshall, 31 - did not have any connection with the hateful ideologies underlying the Nazi party.
But he upheld a magistrate's guilty findings against all three men and the decision to record a conviction against Marshall and Muston.
Mitchell's conviction was however scrubbed from his record with the judge accepting he did not know he was outside the Jewish museum, unlike his co-workers.
"I've been persuaded to a different position for Mr Mitchell," Judge Smith said.
Mitchell was handed a nine-month good behaviour bond in place of the conviction.
The judge also reduced Muston's fine from $1000 to $500, labelling it as "excessive".
The original $1500 fine for Marshall, the instigator of the salutes, was kept in place.
The judgment follows the arrest of two men in February for unfurling a Nazi flag at a pub near the Sydney Jewish museum, and the jailing in November of a far-right extremist and self-proclaimed "Hitler soldier" in Melbourne.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
38 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Netflix raises monthly cost for Australian users
Netflix has raised its membership prices once more. Account holders on Netflix's two standard plans will now be slogged an extra $2 per month, with the cheapest Netflix option, 'Standard with ads,' rising from $7.99 to $9.99 per month. The standard, ad-free plan will rise from $18.99 to $20.99 per month. Netflix's premium plan will see the steepest increase, up $3 per month from $25.99 to $28.99. There's also been a $1 price hike across the board to add an extra member to any of the plans. Netflix last increased its prices in May 2024 – before that, the premium plan was $22.99, meaning users on this plan have seen a 26 per cent price increase over the past 15 months. Tech website Tom's Guide reports that back when Netflix first launched in Australia, the monthly cost for a 'basic' (ad-free) subscription was $8.99. The streamer's premium plan was just $14.99 when it launched, compared to $28.99 today. In recent years, Netflix has focused efforts on cracking down on password sharing between households. Netflix started sending out emails in May of 2023 to Australian users who were sharing their Netflix account with people outside their household. 'Your Netflix account is for you and the people you live with – your household,' the streamer warned at the time. In other Netflix news, royal reporter Bronte Coy revealed overnight that Prince Harry and wife Meghan are 'over the moon' to have inked a new deal with the streamer, which comes amid a challenging period for Harry. The couple confirmed their 'first-look' deal on Monday, which – unlike their previous multimillion-dollar, exclusive agreement – gives the streaming giant the opportunity to view and potentially buy any future productions before they are shopped around to other studios. It's understood to be worth significantly less than the contract Harry and Meghan signed back in 2020 – but a source close to the couple told that they were 'thrilled' with the new arrangement. 'Where Netflix was five years ago is a very different place to where it is today. Obviously, five years ago there was the pandemic and the way they operated as a business was different – they paid people for exclusivity,' the insider pointed out. 'Now the landscape has changed so [Harry and Meghan] are thrilled to have been signed on for another deal.'


Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Israel says it struck militants posing as aid workers
The Israeli military says it recently struck a group of militants in the Gaza Strip who were disguised as aid workers and using a car with the logo of World Central Kitchen, an international charity founded by celebrity chef José Andrés. The army said it carried out an air strike on the men after confirming with the charity that they were not affiliated with it and that the car did not belong to it. World Central Kitchen confirmed that the men and the vehicle were not affiliated with it. "We strongly condemn anyone posing as World Central Kitchen or other humanitarians, as this endangers civilians and aid workers," it said in a statement. The military shared video footage showing several men in yellow vests standing around a vehicle with the charity's logo on its roof. The military said five of the men were armed. The relief group, founded in 2010, has worked from Haiti to Ukraine, dispatching teams that can quickly provide meals on a mass scale in conflict zones and after natural disasters. The group prides itself on providing food that fits with local tastes. In April, an Israeli strike killed seven World Central Kitchen workers including Australian team leader Zomi Frankcom in the Gaza Strip. Israel quickly admitted it had mistakenly killed the aid workers and launched an investigation. In November, an Israeli strike killed five people, including a World Central Kitchen worker who Israel said was part of the Hamas attack that sparked the war. WCK said at the time that it was unaware the employee had any connection to the attack. Hamas-led militants abducted 251 people and killed about 1200 people, mostly civilians, in the October 7, 2023 attack that triggered the war. Most of the hostages have been released in ceasefires or other deals but 50 remain inside the Gaza Strip. Israel believes about 20 are still alive. Israel's air and ground offensive has since displaced most of the population, destroyed vast areas and pushed the territory toward famine. It has killed more than 61,400 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many were fighters or civilians but says about half were women and children. Besides those killed, 121 adults and 101 children have died of malnutrition-related causes, the ministry has said. The ministry is part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals.

News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Insider reveals how Harry and Meghan really feel about major Netflix announcement
IN LONDON The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are 'over the moon' to have inked a new Netflix deal, but it comes amid a challenging period for Prince Harry. The couple confirmed their 'first-look' deal on Monday, which – unlike their previous multi-million-dollar, exclusive agreement – gives the streaming giant the opportunity to view and potentially buy any future productions before they are shopped around to other studios. It's understood to be worth significantly less than the contract Harry and Meghan signed back in 2020 – but a source close to the couple told that they were 'thrilled' with the arrangement, given the dramatically-changed streaming landscape. 'Where Netflix was five years ago is a very different place to where it is today. Obviously, five years ago there was the pandemic and the way they operated as a business was different – they paid people for exclusivity,' the insider pointed out. 'Now the landscape has changed so [Harry and Meghan] are thrilled to have been signed on for another deal.' Questions after Meghan statement In the initial deal, both the duke and duchess were actively involved in a number of projects, with their tentpole production being the 2022 ratings hit docu-series, Harry and Meghan. However, other shows struggled to find an audience, including Harry's Heart of Invictus and his most recent solo show, Polo, which was released last year. Meghan's own individual offering, With Love, Meghan, premiered in March to plenty of fanfare – and while the reviews were less than favourable, it was quickly renewed for season two with Netflix even joining her online food brand, As Ever, as a commercial partner. Given that, the fact it was only Meghan quoted in the new Netflix deal announcement raised plenty of eyebrows – but a source close to the pair confirmed to that Harry is 'definitely still involved'. 'Harry is definitely still involved in the production side of [Archewell]. He'll continue to be involved into the future,' the insider said. 'Last week was a really difficult week with all the Sentebale stuff, but he's moving on. He's really excited about what potentially he could do in Lesotho and Botswana, he's excited about the new deal on Netflix, he's looking forward to the future and what's coming down the line.' Harry 'really upset': source With the Netflix negotiations quietly underway behind the scenes in recent weeks, Harry has also been dealing with the fallout of the controversy surrounding the charity he co-founded with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho. Sentebale, established in 2006 in honour of their late mothers, supports children and young people in Lesotho and Botswana, particularly those affected by HIV/AIDS. The princes – along with the board of trustees – stepped down from their positions with the charity earlier this year amid an irreparable relationship breakdown with its chair, Sophie Chandauka. The dramatic internal conflict resulted in a public war of words between both camps, and triggered an investigation by the charity watchdog, which released its findings last week. While there was no evidence of 'widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity', as had been alleged, and also no evidence of 'overreach by either the chair or the Duke of Sussex as patron'. Nonetheless, Harry is 'really upset' over the whole saga, a source close to him revealed. 'He put his blood, sweat and tears and a huge amount of his own personal finances into [Sentebale] over 20 years,' they said. There was a huge amount of investment by him, and then in 2023, Ms Chandauka came in and basically committed a hostile takeover of the charity.' It's been widely reported that Harry is now considering setting up a new charity to provide assistance in the region, but the insider insisted it's still 'just an option' at this stage. 'He's keeping all of his options open. Whether that's starting a new charity or doing work to support existing charities in the region operating in that sector, no decisions have been made,' the source said. 'One thing he will continue to do is support the children of Bostwana and Lesotho.' Back in March, Harry and Seeiso had released a statement saying they were 'in shock' and 'truly heartbroken' to be stepping down. 'What's transpired is unthinkable. We are in shock that we have to do this,' the statement read. 'With heavy hearts, we have resigned for our roles as patrons of the organisation until further notice, in support of and solidarity with the board of trustees. 'It is devastating that the relationship between the charity's trustees and the chair of the board broke down beyond repair.' Chandauka then hit back, claiming they had unsuccessfully tried to force her out because she 'dared to blow the whistle about issues of poor governance, weak executive management, abuse of power, bullying, harassment, misogyny, misogynoir – and the cover-up that ensued'. Following the release of the watchdog's findings, Harry's spokesman said the damage to Sentebale had already been done. 'Unsurprisingly, the Commission makes no findings of wrongdoing in relation to Sentebale's Co-Founder and former Patron, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex,' a statement to Page Six read. 'They also found no evidence of widespread bullying, harassment or misogyny and misogynoir at the charity, as falsely claimed by the current Chair. 'Despite all that, their report falls troublingly short in many regards, primarily the fact that the consequences of the current Chair's actions will not be borne by her — but by the children who rely on Sentebale's support.' Meanwhile, Chandauka, who remains as head of the charity, insisted they 'are emerging not just grateful to have survived, but stronger'.