&w=3840&q=100)
Israel attacks Iran: Oil shares tank, prices soar
Crude oil tankers lie at anchor in Nakhodka Bay near the port city of Nakhodka, Russia. File image/ Reuters
Crude oil prices have jumped by nearly 11 per cent after Israel attacked Iran in the early hours of Friday.
The Brent crude's futures jumped by 12.86 per cent to $78.31 and WTI crude's futures were up 10.95 per cent to $75.49 at the time of writing the story.
Israel struck several sites in Iran associated with the military and the country's nuclear programme. It also appeared to have attacked homes of senior commanders and other officials in what apparent targeted assassinations. The strikes have sparked fears of a full-scale war in West Asia.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Any conflict in West Asia is bound to upset the world's energy supply and global trade. West Asia supplies as much as 40 per cent of world's oil and around a third of all cargo of the world passes through the region.
As was seen in the aftermath of the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war, Iran-supported groups in the region, such as Yemen's Houthis, could disrupt the maritime trade and lead to further increase in prices.
This is a developing story. It will be updated as details emerge.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Trump did not lose, Putin clearly won': John Bolton after Alaska summit
Former US National Security Advisor John Bolton has said that Russian President Vladimir Putin "clearly won" and that US President Donald Trump "didn't lose" during the negotiations over the Ukraine war. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin hold a press conference following their meeting to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska.(REUTERS) The remark from the former top US official comes after the much-anticipated meeting between Trump and Putin in Alaska. Though the meeting ended without any agreements on ending the war in Ukraine, but both leaders called the talks productive. Reacting to the Alaska summit, Bolton said that Putin achieved most of what he wanted, adding that the Russian President escaped sanctions without a ceasefire. Catch all the latest updates on the Trump-Putin meeting "I think Trump did not lose, but Putin clearly won. Trump didn't come away with anything, except more meetings. Putin has, I think, gone a long way to reestablishing the relationship, which I always believed was his key goal," Bolton told CNN in an interview. "He has escaped sanctions and he is not facing a ceasefire. The next meeting is not set. Zelensky was not told any of this before this press conference," he added. The former NSA also criticised Trump's strategy, saying Trump achieved "very little" in the negotiations. "It's far from over, but I would say Putin achieved most of what he wanted. Trump achieved very little," he said. Also Read: Trump-Putin summit: 5 big takeaways from Alaska meet for India, other Russian oil buyers Trump has said that he and Putin made some significant progress toward the goal of ending the conflict. However, he didn't give any details on what that entailed. Trump has also spoke to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and several European leader where he briefed them about the summit. Zelensky has said that would be travelling to the US on Monday. In a post on his social media platform, Trump said, "A great and very successful day in Alaska! The meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia went very well, as did a late-night phone call with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine, and various European Leaders, including the highly respected Secretary General of NATO. It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often does not hold up." The US President added that Zelensky will be visiting Washington on Monday, following which the two leaders will schedule a meeting with Putin.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Israel is quietly in talks to relocate Palestinians from Gaza
Israel and the U.S. are pushing forward efforts to relocate hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip, a move they have presented in humanitarian terms but which governments in Europe and the Arab world have criticized as unrealistic and a potential violation of international law. The idea, which Israeli officials have publicly mulled since the beginning of the war in Gaza, got its biggest airing early this year when President Trump said the U.S. should take over the enclave and redevelop it as an international tourist destination while relocating many of its two million residents. That spotlight has moved on, but advocates of the idea are still pursuing. Israeli officials have sounded out their counterparts in half a dozen countries and territories including Libya, South Sudan, Somaliland and Syria about taking in Palestinians who agree to leave Gaza, people familiar with the matter said. Israel and the U.S. have also been pressing Egypt to resettle people from the enclave in the Sinai Peninsula, some of the people said. Egypt, which once controlled the Gaza Strip, has strongly resisted the idea. Its border with Gaza makes it a logistically attractive destination, in the eyes of the idea's proponents. The pressure has led to a number of contentious meetings, including shouting matches between Israeli and Egyptian officials, some of the people said. 'President Trump has long advocated for creative solutions to improve the lives of Palestinians, including allowing them to resettle in a new, beautiful location while Gaza rebuilds,' White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said. 'However, Hamas must first agree to disarm and end this war, and we have no additional details to provide at this time.' Israel's talks to resettle Gazans in South Sudan or Libya are continuing, some of the people said. Earlier talks to settle Palestinians in Syria or Somaliland—a breakaway region of Somalia—didn't make much progress, one of the people said. Most of the destinations under consideration have their own problems with civil strife and economic dislocation and would likely struggle to absorb hundreds of thousands of migrants. Their battered conditions, however, have opened the possibility of deals that might confer economic support or other benefits in exchange for taking in people relocated from Gaza or elsewhere. The Trump administration deported a handful of migrants in the U.S. to South Sudan last month and has pressed a number of African countries to also take in U.S. deportees. South Sudan, officials said, has been eager to reset ties with Washington, leaving it open to taking additional U.S. deportees and engaging in discussions with Israel on accepting Palestinians. The issue of relocations is sensitive. Legal organizations, humanitarian groups and some governments have questioned whether exits would be truly voluntary. Some including Malaysia, the United Nations and Human Rights Watch have warned the idea could be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. South Sudan's Foreign Ministry said claims that it is in such talks with Israel are baseless. A representative of Somaliland's government said no talks are ongoing. Libyan and Syrian officials didn't respond to requests for comment. Current and former U.S. officials said the U.S. wasn't involved in the discussions between Israel and African countries on resettling Palestinians. At the White House in July, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel and the U.S. are trying to find homes for Palestinians who want to leave Gaza. 'We are working with the United States very closely about finding countries that will seek to realize what they always said—that they wanted to give the Palestinians a better future,' Netanyahu said, as Trump sat in front of him. Israeli officials had advocated transferring Palestinians out of Gaza long before Trump floated his idea for a 'Riviera of the Middle East.' Within a week of the deadly Hamas-led attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Israel's intelligence minister at the time, Gila Gamliel, presented the cabinet with a plan to promote migration from Gaza with the goal of getting 1.7 million to leave, she said in a post on X in May. The most enthusiastic supporters have been far-right officials such as Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who have pushed for this idea for years. 'Encourage migration! Encourage migration! Encourage migration!,' Ben-Gvir said at a conference for Jewish settlement of the enclave in October. 'Honestly, this is the most moral and correct solution. Not forcibly, but tell them: We are giving you the option to leave to different countries. The land of Israel is ours.' When Trump announced the idea of moving Palestinians out of Gaza, Netanyahu and his government were quick to adopt it and praise it. In February, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz set up a new division in the ministry to oversee the voluntary departure of Gazans. Forcible displacement is a crime under the Geneva Conventions, to which Israel is party, and is permissible only in narrow circumstances such as temporary evacuation for civilian safety or military necessity. The bar for meeting those criteria is high and Gaza's war-torn environment complicates arguments that transfers would be voluntary, Israeli and international legal experts said. The effort to encourage departures creates a dilemma for many Palestinians stuck in the enclave, where food is in short supply. Many have been displaced from their homes, most structures are damaged, and more than 61,000 people have been killed, according to Palestinian authorities, who don't say how many were combatants. Many Gazans, particularly young people or families with children or relatives suffering from disease, would like to leave. But the decision now carries political overtones, as well as the risk that they won't be able to return. Humanitarian groups and regional governments who might want to help Palestinians leave face a similar dilemma. 'The issue is that Israel needs to guarantee that people will be able to return if and when they would like to,' said Tania Hary, executive director of Gisha, an Israeli human-rights and legal organization. 'These voluntary emigration schemes or other plans to deport people don't have anything to do with the safety or humanitarian needs of Palestinians.' Among Gazan Palestinians reached in a May survey by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, 43% said they would be willing to emigrate after the war. Khalil Shikaki, director of the center, said the most likely demographic to leave are young, educated men, which could contribute to brain drain in Gaza. 'Among this group, based on surveys from before the war, two-thirds to three-quarters expressed willingness to leave Gaza to go elsewhere for economic and security reasons,' he said. Many showed interest in moving to Europe, the U.S., Canada, Arab Gulf states or Turkey, he said. Most Palestinians in Gaza haven't had the ability to leave the territory even if they wanted to during the war, with crossings into Egypt and Israel largely closed. Those who could leave often had a second passport or a close relative who left, or were among the thousands of Palestinians selected for outside medical treatment in countries such as Egypt, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates. Ramez Musmar, a 24-year-old Gazan, was accepted to Trinity College Dublin last spring. The university and the Irish government intervened to help him leave, he said. His father died during the war and he fears for the safety of his mother and siblings, who remain in Gaza. 'I had applied to the university mainly so I could leave Gaza and eventually get my family out,' he said. 'My mom told me, 'Go for your future. Don't worry about us. Hopefully you can bring us later.' ' Write to Summer Said at Robbie Gramer at and Omar Abdel-Baqui at
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
'Russia lost an oil client': Trump says he ‘may not have to' impose secondary tariffs on India after Putin meet
Trump on Friday said Russia has 'lost an oil client' after Washington imposed penalties on New Delhi for buying Russian crude, but hinted he may not impose similar secondary tariffs on nations continuing such purchases. US President Donald Trump speaks during a visit to the Kennedy Centre in Washington. He warned that Russia would face very severe consequences if it didn't adhere to a ceasefire after Friday's meeting. Reuters US President Donald Trump on Friday said Russia has 'lost an oil client' after Washington penalised New Delhi for buying Russian crude, but further emphasised that he may hold off on imposing similar secondary tariffs on other countries continuing such purchases of oil. 'Well, he (Russian President Vladimir Putin) lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40 per cent of the oil. China, as you know, is doing a lot… And if I did what's called a secondary sanction, or a secondary tariff, it would be very devastating from their standpoint. If I have to do it, I'll do it. Maybe I won't have to do it,' Trump told Fox News before leaving for Alaska to meet Putin. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's tariffs on India His remarks came even as New Delhi has not confirmed any halt in oil imports from Moscow, despite Washington's decision to levy a fresh 25 per cent duty, on top of an earlier 25 per cent tariff, on Indian goods from 27 August. Earlier, Trump (on August 6) escalated the pressure by doubling duties on Indian products to 50 per cent, targeting New Delhi for its continued Russian oil imports. India condemned the move as 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' warning it would hit exports in sectors such as textiles, leather and marine goods. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said India 'will not back down' under economic pressure. Bloomberg reported that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian crude following Trump's action, though no official confirmation has been made. Indian Oil chairman AS Sahney said on Thursday that India 'has not halted purchases from Russia' and continues to buy solely on economic grounds. India, which became Russia's largest oil buyer in 2022 after Western sanctions, faces the prospect of its crude import bill rising by USD 9 billion this year and USD 12 billion next year if it cuts off Russian supplies, according to the State Bank of India. The report suggested Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the UAE could fill the gap. Russian crude is also being offered to Indian refiners at discounted rates as EU sanctions and US threats weigh on global demand, Bloomberg cited data firm Kpler as saying.
