logo
Party combo linked to rise in colon cancer rates in young people

Party combo linked to rise in colon cancer rates in young people

Daily Mail​30-05-2025
A new study has revealed that the combination of drinking and smoking is behind the alarming rise of one of America's fastest-growing cancers in under-50s.
Researchers in Germany analyzed just over two dozen studies comparing regular drinkers and smokers to teetotalers. They found drinking alcohol every day raised the risk of developing early-onset colon cancer by 39 per cent, even if it's just one or two drinks per day.
Also, just 100 cigarettes in a person's lifetime - the equivalent of one per week for two years - was linked to a 59 per cent higher risk than people who have never smoked.
SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO
The researchers wrote: 'Alcohol consumption and smoking are significant risk factors for EOCRC and should be addressed in the context of prevention.'
Alcohol and smoking have both been linked to colon cancer in the past, as they release chemicals that destroy DNA and cause cancer cells to mutate.
But the new study is one of the first to compare both factors at once in relatively low amounts.
However, fewer millennials and Gen Zers drink alcohol or smoke cigarettes than ever before, suggesting the findings may apply more to younger members of Gen X.
The American Cancer Society estimates over 154,000 Americans will be struck by colorectal cancer this year, including about 20,000 under 50.
While this is roughly in line with two decades ago, the disease is rising sharply in younger groups.
The review, published in the journal Clinical Colorectal Cancer, looked at 12 studies on alcohol consumption and 13 on smoking.
According to the latest data, early-onset colon cancer diagnoses in the U.S. are expected to rise by 90 per cent in people 20 to 34 years old between 2010 and 2030.
In teens, rates have surged by 500 per cent since the early 2000s.
Overall, the team found daily alcohol consumption in general increased the risk of early-onset colorectal cancer 39 per cent compared to lower amounts.
They also looked at moderate alcohol consumption and high consumption. Moderate was considered one daily drink for women and two for men. High is four or more daily drinks for women and five or more for men.
The team found people who consumed moderate to high amounts of alcohol every day had a 30 per cent greater risk of colon tumors and 34 per cent greater risk of rectal tumors than those who consumed low amounts of alcohol per day.
The strongest association they found was in a 2022 study published in the Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, which looked at colorectal cancer patients with a history of alcoholism.
Compared to patients who never abused alcohol, those with a history of alcohol addiction were 90 per cent more likely to develop colon cancer.
The researchers in the new review also found the risk of colon cancer increased 2.3 per cent for every 10 grams per deciliter (g/d) of ethanol, pure alcohol, consumed per day. This is the equivalent of one standard drink per day.
In the U.S., one standard drink is considered a 12-ounce can of beer with five percent alcohol volume, a five-ounce glass of wine at 12 per cent alcohol volume or a 1.5-ounce shot glass of distilled spirits with 40 per cent alcohol content, according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
The team behind the new review wrote: 'These results clearly suggest that alcohol consumption is associated with a significantly increased risk of CRC at any age.'
Experts believe when the liver breaks down ethanol, it creates the toxic chemical acetaldehyde, which damages triggers inflammation in the colon.
This damages DNA and leads to uncontrolled cell growth.
Alcohol also inhibits the body's ability to absorb folate, an essential nutrient for DNA repair. Low folate has consistently been linked to higher colon cancer rates.
The review also evaluated the effect of smoking on colon cancer risk.
Overall, the researchers found a 39 per cent increased risk of colorectal cancer in people who smoked cigarettes regularly compared to those who never smoked.
'Ever smokers', or people who have had at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime, were at a 59 per cent increased risk compared to non-smokers or former smokers while current smokers were at a 14 per cent greater risk.
Current smokers were shown to have a 43 per cent greater likelihood of developing a rectal tumor than those who never smoked, and colon tumors were linked to a 26 per cent increased risk.
The researchers added: 'The results on smoking showed a significant association of smoking with EOCRC, while former smoking was not associated with EOCRC.'
Smoking also exposes the body to thousands of carcinogens and free radicals that destroy healthy DNA and cause cells to mutate into cancer cells.
There were several limitations to the new review, including the small number of included studies and data on alcohol and smoking was self-reported, leaving it subject to bias.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump firing of labor statistics chief ‘undermines credibility', ex-leaders say
Trump firing of labor statistics chief ‘undermines credibility', ex-leaders say

The Guardian

time17 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump firing of labor statistics chief ‘undermines credibility', ex-leaders say

The former Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioners and non-partisan economic groups have criticized Donald Trump's shock firing of BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer after the July jobs report data revealed jobs growth stalled this summer. Trump, without any evidence to back his claims, alleged McEntarfer 'faked' employment numbers in the run-up to the 2024 election to boost Kamala Harris's chances and said that the recent data was 'rigged' to make Trump and Republicans look bad. The Trump administration has continued to repeat the allegations. The National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett, a Trump appointee, has claimed 'all over the US government, there have been people who have been resisting Trump everywhere they can,' in justifying the firing. Friends of BLS, a group chaired by former BLS commissioners Erica Groshen, an Obama appointee, and William Beach, Trump's appointee during his first term, strongly criticized the firing of McEntarfer, Trump's allegations, and called on Congress to act. 'We call on Congress to respond immediately, to investigate the factors that led to Commissioner McEntarfer's removal, to strongly urge the Commissioner's continued service, and ensure that the nonpartisan integrity of the position is retained,' Friends of BLS wrote in a statement. 'This rationale for firing Dr McEntarfer is without merit and undermines the credibility of federal economic statistics that are a cornerstone of intelligent economic decision-making by businesses, families, and policymakers.' The Association of Public Data Users, the National Association for Business Economics and the American Economic Association also criticized the firing. 'Under the law, disliking the data is not a qualifying reason to remove the BLS Commissioner from her four-year appointment. Under our democracy, it is unacceptable to fire someone for publishing data collected in accordance with scientific standards,' the Association of Public Data Users said in a statement, echoing the call for Congress 'to respond immediately, to investigate the factors that led to Commissioner McEntarfer's removal, to strongly urge the BLS Commissioner's continued service, and ensure that the nonpartisan integrity of the position is retained.' Beach added in a social media post: 'the totally groundless firing of Dr. Erika McEntarfer, my successor as Commissioner of Labor Statistics at BLS, sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau.' Beach was nominated by Trump as commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics in 2017, was confirmed by the Senate in 2019 and served a full four year term until 2023. In an email, former BLS commissioner Kathleen Utgoff, who was appointed and served under the George W Bush administration, told the Guardian: 'A functioning democracy requires accurate data so that workers, businesses, politicians and voters can make good decisions. I was at the BLS after the Iraq war. Many people asked me how to create something like the BLS there. They could not move forward without data on the state of the economy.' Republican US senators Rand Paul, Thom Tillis, Cynthia Lummis have also questioned the rationale behind Trump's firing of BLS commissioner McEntarfer. The last jobs report issued by BLS before the presidential election in November 2024 showed the US only added 12,000 jobs in October 2024, the slowest growth since 2020.

Old Mars rovers can learn new tricks! NASA's Curiosity marks 13-year milestone with new science capabilities
Old Mars rovers can learn new tricks! NASA's Curiosity marks 13-year milestone with new science capabilities

The Independent

time37 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Old Mars rovers can learn new tricks! NASA's Curiosity marks 13-year milestone with new science capabilities

Can you teach an old Mars rover new tricks? NASA says the answer is a resounding 'yes.' Following its landing on Mars 13 years ago, Curiosity has been given new capabilities, allowing it to do science on the Red Planet while expending less energy from its batteries. Essentially, it can now multitask. 'We were more like cautious parents earlier in the mission,' Reidar Larsen, of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, said in a statement. 'It's as if our teenage rover is maturing, and we're trusting it to take on more responsibility. As a kid, you might do one thing at a time, but as you become an adult, you learn to multitask.' Larsen led a group of engineers who developed the new capabilities for their six-wheeled teen. The agency said improvements to Curiosity will allow the rover to make the most of its energy source, which is a type of nuclear battery known as a radioisotope thermoelectric generator also used by the Perseverance rover. Managing the rover's daily power budget as the plutonium in the battery decays, Curiosity can now safely talk to a local orbiter while driving, moving its robotic arm, or snapping images. Curiosity can now decide to take a nap if it gets its work done early, ensuring there is less recharging necessary before the next day. 'Even actions that trim just 10 or 20 minutes from a single activity add up over the long haul, maximizing the life of the MMRTG for more science and exploration down the road,' the lab said in a release. These developments build on years of work developing other capabilities, including enhanced driving ability, the ability for Curiosity's head to capture panoramas without a color filter wheel on one of its 'Mastcam' cameras, a new way for Curisotiy's arm drill to collect rock and regolith samples, and an algorithm to help reduce wear and tear on the rover's wheels. The rover has recently been exploring formations of hardened ridges that were believed to have been created by underground water billions of years ago, finding rocks that were formed by the minerals deposited by ancient water flows and wind. 'A big mystery is why the ridges were hardened into these big patterns and why only here,' Curiosity's project scientist Ashwin Vasavada said earlier this year. 'As we drive on, we'll be studying the ridges and mineral cements to make sure our idea of how they formed is on target.'

Trading Day: Stocks bounce back, bonds more cautious
Trading Day: Stocks bounce back, bonds more cautious

Reuters

time38 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trading Day: Stocks bounce back, bonds more cautious

ORLANDO, Florida, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Investors shrugged off last week's worries over the U.S. economy to drive a powerful, tech-led rebound across global stocks on Monday, although U.S. Treasuries prices held onto Friday's gains, suggesting a fair degree of caution persists. More on all that below. In my column today I look at why rather than firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, President Donald Trump could have claimed that the weak jobs data and dramatic market reaction vindicated his stance that the Fed should cut rates. If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today. Today's Key Market Moves Stocks bounce back, bonds more cautious After getting slammed on Friday by unexpectedly poor U.S. employment figures, U.S. and world stocks rebounded on Monday. Whether this is a short-term technical recovery or the resumption of the bull run of recent months remains to be seen. In isolation, the positive start to the week has been pretty impressive. Wall Street more than recovered the ground it lost on Friday, led by the Nasdaq and Russell 2000, as investors bet that both tech and small caps would be among the big winners in a lower interest rate world. The global recovery was probably overdue. The MSCI All Country index's rise on Monday snapped a six-session losing streak, its worst run in nearly two years. While Friday's slump in U.S. bond yields reflected deepening growth fears and contributed to the huge equity selloff, the further drift lower in yields on Monday supported equity sentiment. The feel good factor could prove fleeting though. The U.S.-centric issues that drove last week's selloff - growth fears, tariff concerns and unusually high levels of policy uncertainty - haven't disappeared. Trump said on Monday he will substantially raise tariffs on goods from India over its Russian oil purchases, while Switzerland says it is ready to make a "more attractive offer" to Washington to avert the steep 39% tariffs it is facing. Investors are increasingly nervous about political interference in independent U.S. institutions after Trump fired Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer for allegedly rigging the jobs data. This comes amid Trump's verbal attacks on Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not cutting interest rates, and as he prepares to announce his nomination to replace Fed Governor Adriana Kugler, who surprisingly resigned on Friday. Looking ahead to Tuesday, the U.S. earnings calendar heats up again and purchasing managers index data will give an insight into how the service sectors in many of the world's major economies fared in July. Trump scores major own goal with labor official firing U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to fire a top labor official following weak jobs data obviously sends ominous signals about political interference in independent institutions, but it is also a major strategic own goal. Trump has spent six months attacking the Federal Reserve, and Chair Jerome Powell in particular, for not cutting interest rates. The barbs culminated in Trump branding Powell a "stubborn MORON" in a social media post on Friday before the July jobs report was released. The numbers, especially the net downward revision of 258,000 for May and June payrolls growth, were much weaker than expected. In fact, this was "the largest two-month revision since 1968 outside of NBER-defined recessions (assuming the economy is not in recession now)," according to Goldman Sachs. This sparked a dramatic reaction in financial markets. Fed rate cut expectations soared, the two-year Treasury yield had its steepest fall in a year, and the dollar tumbled. A quarter-point rate cut next month and another by December were suddenly nailed-on certainties, according to rate futures market pricing. This was a huge U-turn from only 48 hours before, when Powell's hawkish steer in his post-FOMC meeting press conference raised the prospect of no easing at all this year. Trump's constant lambasting of "Too Late" Powell suddenly appeared to have a bit more substance behind it. The Fed chair's rate cut caution centers on the labor market, which now appears nowhere near as "solid" as he thought. Trump could have responded by saying: "I was right, and Powell was wrong." Instead, on Friday afternoon he said he was firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, for faking the jobs numbers. Trump provided no evidence of data manipulation. So rather than point out that markets were finally coming around to his way of thinking on the need for lower interest rates, Trump has united economists, analysts and investors in condemnation of what they say is brazen political interference typically associated with underdeveloped and unstable nations rather than the self-proclaimed 'leader of the free world.' "A dark day in, and for, the U.S.," economist Phil Suttle wrote on Friday. "This is the sort of thing only the worst populists do in the worst emerging economies and, to use the style of President Trump, IT NEVER ENDS WELL." It's important to note that major – even historic – revisions to jobs growth figures are not necessarily indicative of underlying data collection flaws. As Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale, argued on X over the weekend: "BLS's first-release estimates of non-farm payroll employment have gotten more, not less, accurate over time." It should also be noted that the BLS compiles inflation as well as employment data, so, moving forward, significant doubt could surround the credibility of the two most important economic indicators for the U.S. - and perhaps the world. Part of what constitutes "U.S. exceptionalism" is the assumption that the experts leading the country's independent institutions are exactly that, independent, meaning their actions and output can be trusted, whatever the results. Baseless accusations from the U.S. president that the BLS, the Fed and other agencies are making politically motivated decisions to undermine his administration only undermine trust in the U.S. itself. "If doubts are sustained, it will lead investors to demand more of a risk premium to own U.S. assets," says Rebecca Patterson, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. "While only one of many forces driving asset valuations, it will limit returns across markets." This furor comes as Fed Governor Adriana Kugler's resignation on Friday gives Trump the chance to put a third nominee on the seven-person Fed board, perhaps a potential future chair to fill that slot as a holding place until Powell's term expires in May. Whoever that person is will likely be more of a policy dove than a hawk. Policy uncertainty, which had been gradually subsiding since the April 2 'Liberation Day' tariff turmoil, is now very much back on investors' radar. What could move markets tomorrow? Want to receive Trading Day in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for my newsletter here. Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store