EU prioritises negotiated solution with US on tariffs
In the first European response to US President Donald Trump's announcement of new tariffs on the EU, von der Leyen stated that very few economies in the world match the European Union's openness and commitment to fair trade practices.
She added that the EU has consistently prioritised a negotiated solution with the United States, reflecting its commitment to dialogue, stability and a constructive transatlantic partnership.
Von der Leyen stressed that the EU continues to work towards reaching an agreement by 1st August, while also preparing to take all necessary steps to safeguard its interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required.
She concluded, 'At the same time, we continue to deepen our global partnerships, grounded in the principles of rules-based international trade.'
WAM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Donald Trump has a Jeffrey Epstein problem and it's just getting started
US President Donald Trump, who likes to promote his peacemaker credentials, is facing a civil war within his own ranks. Fuelling the rebellion among his Make America Great Again loyalists is Mr Trump's response to developments in the case of Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced former financier who authorities say took his own life in a New York jail while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. Epstein in 2008 had pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution and solicitation of a child for prostitution, and his death in 2019 quickly became a cause celebre for Maga loyalists and the right-wing media world. They claimed, without evidence, that Epstein was murdered to keep him quiet about any wealthy and powerful clients he may have had. The theory was so widespread that it became received wisdom in the Maga universe. Last year, Vice President JD Vance said: 'We need to release the Epstein list, that is an important thing." But when the FBI and the Justice Department published a much-anticipated memo last week, it stated that no evidence supported the claim that Epstein had kept a 'client list', or that he had blackmailed prominent people. Investigators also reasserted 2019 findings that he had died by suicide. For many Maga supporters, the memo amounted to a betrayal, especially considering the source. For years before joining the Trump administration, FBI Director Kash Patel and his deputy, Dan Bongino, had pushed Epstein conspiracies in one form or another. Now that they are in office, they are saying there is nothing to see here and it's time to move on. In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi said she had an Epstein client list 'sitting on my desk right now to review". But when asked about it last week, she sought to withdraw the comment, saying she was referring to the overall Epstein file. For conservative influencers including Elon Musk and Laura Loomer, it all stinks. Ms Loomer, a staunch Trump loyalist, on Sunday told Politico that a special counsel should be appointed for an independent investigation of the handling of the Epstein files. Mr Musk, who fell out with Mr Trump last month, lobbed a 'really big bomb' at the President as he left the White House, claiming the reason the full Epstein investigation has not been made public is because Mr Trump is 'in the Epstein files'. He later deleted that post on X. We already knew that Mr Trump, Bill Clinton, Britain's Prince Andrew and other rich and powerful men had moved in Epstein's orbit, before he was known to be a sexual predator. But Mr Musk appeared to be hinting at something else. On Saturday, the tech billionaire posted on X that Mr Trump should 'just release the files as promised". Mr Trump's own reaction to the release of the memo has been disastrous. When asked about it at a Cabinet meeting last week, instead of addressing the terrible crimes Epstein was accused of, or telling supporters that he was committed to making sure justice is done, he snapped at a reporter who had the temerity to ask him about the case. 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?' Mr Trump said testily. 'This guy's been talked about for years … are people still talking about this? … That is unbelievable." It was a massively disingenuous answer as he knows only too well how important the Epstein case is to his supporters. He made things worse still on Saturday when he claimed that the Epstein file had been created by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other 'losers and criminals of the Biden administration". Let's 'not waste time and energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about", he posted in a lengthy message on Truth Social. A look at comments underneath that post are instructive. Normally, Mr Trump's posts are greeted with a tsunami of seemingly bot-generated memes that adulate him. Now, angry supporters are alleging he is part of some sort of cover-up. 'This is going to cost you so many supporters. I being one of them. I have been to multiple rallies and even was there on [January 6, 2021, at the US Capitol],' one user wrote. Another said Mr Trump is 'losing too many in your base'. It all amounts to a huge headache for Mr Trump and a credibility crisis for his administration. Just last month, he was coming off perhaps the most successful period of his time as President. In less than two weeks, he announced an Israel-Iran ceasefire, sealed a peace accord between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and persuaded European allies to increase defence spending for Nato. But his handling of the Epstein case means cracks are forming in his foundational support. If he's not careful, the saga could start to undermine his broader agenda.
Arabian Post
3 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Tariffs bite into Europe as earnings season begins – which sectors will be hit hardest?
A tide of tariffs is sweeping across Europe, and the damage is becoming visible just as earnings reports begin to drop. President Trump's trade decisions are no longer a future threat; they're now a present force reshaping European corporate performance. The timing is brutal. What was expected to be a modestly positive second quarter for European earnings has shifted into decline, with weakness now concentrated in a few critical sectors. ADVERTISEMENT Investors are bracing for confirmation that Europe's earnings engine has stalled. The continent's largest firms are being squeezed between softer demand and policy-driven pricing pressure. The hardest-hit? Energy, consumer-facing multinationals, and financial institutions—all of which are deeply entwined with global trade flows, dollar liquidity, and sentiment cycles. The latest data point to a shallow contraction in European earnings per share for the second quarter—just months after analysts were still forecasting robust growth. This kind of whiplash signals something deeper than seasonal volatility. It reflects the speed and scale at which expectations have been rewired in response to Trump's aggressive trade stance and the rising cost of doing business across borders. The energy sector has been among the swiftest to feel the impact. Oil prices, already under pressure through much of Q2, found no relief in tariff announcements. On the contrary, producers now face increased uncertainty around demand, pricing structures, and the stability of international supply chains. ADVERTISEMENT Crude has recovered somewhat since Trump's latest volley of trade threats, but that rebound masks the structural challenges beneath. Tariffs hit everything from upstream investment to downstream distribution. The big European energy names are not just contending with weak prices—they are navigating a much more unstable commercial environment than their US counterparts, who now benefit from friendlier domestic regulation and renewed geopolitical leverage. The consumer sector has its own set of problems, and they are compounding quickly. Currency pressure from a weakening dollar has lifted the euro to multi-month highs—bad news for exporters relying on US demand. But it's the tariff shock that has most dramatically reset the mood. European brands selling into the US market now face an awkward mix of falling margins and unclear guidance. From luxury icons to mass-market manufacturers, the story is turning sour. Investors are no longer looking for growth; they're looking for resilience. That's especially true for discretionary names with high exposure to the US consumer. As inflation softens stateside but tariffs rise, spending patterns are shifting in unpredictable ways. European brands reliant on price stability and repeat purchases may now struggle to justify forward earnings multiples. Some will hold the line. Others will crack. Commentary accompanying these results will be closely parsed for signs that demand has deteriorated faster than expected. Then there's the financial sector—until recently, the unshakable pillar of European earnings growth. That pillar is now wobbling. Bank profits have ridden high on rising rates, deal speculation, and net interest income. But tariffs, by design, depress cross-border investment. They cloud merger activity, discourage capital flow, and introduce costs that even the most efficient lenders can't hedge away. While forecasts still point to slight profit expansion this quarter, the momentum is clearly fading. The bigger concern for investors is whether this is the beginning of a trend. European banks are heavily exposed to global supply chains, especially those facilitating trade between the EU and the US. Tariff policy disrupts those flows. It also raises credit risks for firms caught in the middle—many of which are mid-sized manufacturers or logistics players dependent on transatlantic trade routes. The revaluation of these risks is already underway, and the sharp rally in European bank stocks earlier this year now looks increasingly out of step with the operating reality on the ground. Put simply: the Europe-versus-US divide is growing. While Trump's tariffs are raising costs in Europe, the US is simultaneously offering support to its domestic industries, including energy and digital assets. This divergence is altering the investment case for entire sectors. Europe is still the world's largest trading bloc—but trade is exactly what's under siege. It makes this earnings season less about individual company performance and more about policy drag. For long-term investors, this is a wake-up call. Valuations built on the assumption of stable, rules-based global commerce are being tested. In a world where tariffs can be imposed by tweet, diversification across regions isn't enough. Sector exposure, policy sensitivity, and forward guidance credibility all need to be reassessed. This reporting season will deliver more than financial updates. It will reveal which companies are best-positioned to survive the age of economic confrontation—and which are still clinging to a fading version of globalisation. Nigel Green is deVere CEO and Founder Also published on Medium. Notice an issue? Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Palestinian ambassador wants concrete EU measures on Gaza before summer break
Foreign ministers from the European Union's 27 countries must take concrete steps to pressure Israel to end its war on Gaza, including a suspension of weapons exports or academic research relations, a senior Palestinian diplomat has told The National. "It's not only about what is happening to the Palestinians and the genocide that Palestinians have to endure, but about the EU actually respecting its own commitments," said Palestine's ambassador to the bloc, Amal Jadou. The EU should not restrict itself to a financial role, but to a more active political role Amal Jadou, Palestine's ambassador to the EU "If it really is satisfactory for leaders to go home and enjoy vacations while a nation is being killed and massacred, I think that we have a real issue with our humanity." Gaza will be high on the agenda at Tuesday's gathering in Brussels, the last formal meeting before a summer break. Nearly a week has passed since the EU's foreign affairs chief, Kaja Kallas, struck a deal with Israel to allow more aid into the embattled enclave. The deal came after her services circulated on June 20 an eight-page document that found that Israel had breached its human rights obligations in Gaza, following a request for a review of relations with Israel by a majority of EU countries. They had expressed concern over Israel's months-long aid blockade and breach of a ceasefire agreed with Hamas in March. New deal concerns A few days later, Ms Kallas then launched discussions with Israel was to allow more aid into Gaza, adding that that if that was achieved, no action would be taken against Israel. The agreement struck last week laid out Israeli promises of a "substantial increase" in aid lorries delivering food and other supplies, in addition to opening more border crossing points. This was supposed to have been introduced "within days" but has yet to materialise. More than 30 Gazans were killed by Israel on Sunday as they were collecting aid, bringing the total number of dead in Gaza to nearly 58,400. Ms Kallas' team have insisted the deal remains relevant, describing it to news website Politico as a "vital step forward." Yet the lack of a clear timetable is a worrying signal, Ms Jadou said. "We welcome any agreement that allows the basic needs of Gazans to be met," she said. "But it really depends on Israel abiding by this agreement and we have seen it break many agreements in the past." There can be no role for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, she added, and the UN must be reinstated as the main aid distributor. The agreement announced by Ms Kallas made no reference to the GHF, despite most EU members voicing their displeasure at the UN being sidelined and the high death rate associated with the GHF's distribution activities. Nearly 800 people have been killed by the Israeli army in the vicinity of distribution hubs or on the route of aid convoys since late May, the UN says - a figure rejected by the GHF and Israel. Israel also rejects the use of the word "genocide", increasingly used by human rights organisations and countries such as Ireland. Ministers at dinner Tuesday's meeting is to be preceded by a dinner involving EU foreign ministers and their counterparts from Palestine and Israel as part of an EU-Southern neighbourhood ministerial meeting. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar and his Palestinian counterpart Varsen Aghabekian Shahin will be in the same room but will not speak. Issues that Ms Shahin will raise include an ongoing review of relations between the EU and Israel, and the need to implement an embargo on weapons sales to Israel, Ms Jadou said. "She's here to bring all these issues from the ground to the table of foreign ministers," she added. This is the first meeting between the EU and the 10 partner countries region in a new format aimed at revitalising relations that will be announced by Commissioner for the Mediterranean Dubravka Suica in October. Gulf countries will be invited to join the so-called New Pact. The EU's inertia on Gaza is fuelled by its own divisions, with a number of nations, including Germany, refusing to appear critical of Israel because of the country's historic role in the Second World War. This has led some countries to make decisions at national level, such as Ireland's recent move towards complying with an advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice to stop trading with occupied territories. Last month, nine countries, led by Belgium, asked the European Commission to analyse the impact of the year-old ICJ's decision on the common market. In a letter to Ms Kallas, they pointed out that there had been no follow-up after a statement by the EU Commission issued in January saying it would do so. "This discrepancy, in my opinion, will impact the way the international community perceives the EU and its standing, especially in its geopolitical relations with the [Global] South," Ms Jadou said. "We see that when there are other conflicts in Europe, the EU takes a very strong stance. But when the conflict is outside Europe, then the EU hesitates to take strong steps." At the same time, the EU is the biggest financial contributor to the Palestinian Authority, with a €1.6 billion ($1.75 billion) package announced in April. It views the organisation as the only viable option to replace Hamas rule in Gaza though it has called for governing reforms. "We're grateful to the EU for taking such a step," Ms Jadou said. "I also think that the EU should not restrict itself to a financial role but to a more active political role in line with international law, and with its values and principles." Yet another issue that will be raised by Ms Shahin in Brussels will be the blockage of taxes collected by Israel on behalf of the PA by Israel's far-right Finance minister Bezalel Smotrich. Ms Jadou added that she hoped more European countries would recognise Palestinian statehood, as France and Saudi Arabia prepare to co-chair a UN conference on the two-state solution. So far, 11 EU countries have recognised Palestine. European diplomats welcomed last week's deal and said that while they would look closely at its implementation by Israel, it was unlikely that any further decisions would be made on Tuesday. Ms Kallas had also circulated a paper outlining 10 possible retaliatory options to Israel's human rights breaches. They included a full suspension of relations, which necessitates an unlikely consensus from the EU's 27 countries. Decisions based on a qualified majority vote, such as suspending preferential trade relations, Israel's participation in the Erasmus+ student exchange or Horizon academic research programmes, were also listed. Ms Jadou said that while she backed a full suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, she understood this was impossible because it would be vetoed by a number of member states. But other options outlined in Ms Kallas option paper should remain on the table. "Why should the EU be complicit in the crimes that Israel is committing?" Ms Jadou said. Speaking ahead of the meeting, a senior EU diplomat said the options paper would be discussed, but declined to elaborate on further steps. "Whether the discussion on Tuesday will lead to concrete decision on specific measures, I don't know," he said.
