
AI-Powered Ads Set to Catalyze Yet Another META Earnings Beat
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
For its upcoming results, investors will be eager to see if Meta can maintain its momentum, and given the company's relentless focus on maximizing monetization potential and advertising efficiency, I feel this is going to be another blockbuster quarter. The stock also appears reasonably valued to this day despite the recent share price gains. Thus, I remain firmly Bullish on the stock.
Q1 Recap: AI and User Engagement Power Record Results
To get a sense of where Meta's coming from heading into its Q2 results, keep in mind that Q1 was nothing short of spectacular, with revenue soaring to $42.3 billion, up 16% YoY, while beating estimates by nearly $1 billion.
The company's Family Daily Active People (DAP) hit 3.43 billion, up 6%, showcasing sticky user engagement across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. AI-driven content recommendations fueled a 5% rise in ad impressions and a 10% increase in average ad prices, with Instagram Reels alone posting 20% year-over-year growth. In the meantime, Meta AI, approaching 1 billion monthly active users and over 3 billion across its app suite, has become a cornerstone of personalized content delivery, enhancing engagement and ad performance.
Profitability was equally impressive, with Meta's operating margin expanding to 41% from 38% last year, driven by cost discipline and economies of scale within the Family of Apps segment. Despite Reality Labs posting a $4.2 billion operating loss, the core ad business generated $21.8 billion in operating income, powering a 35% surge in net income to $16.6 billion and a 37% jump in EPS to $6.43, well ahead of Wall Street's $5.25 forecast.
One notable contributor here was Meta's notable investment in AI infrastructure, including models like Llama, which continues to optimize ad delivery and user retention, setting the stage for sustained growth without compromising gross margins.
What Investors Should Watch Out for in Q2
As Meta heads into its Q2 earnings, Wall Street appears to be filled with optimism, as evidenced by the share price; yet, I would argue that expectations are tempered given the rather conservative estimates. Specifically, consensus projects Q2 revenue of $44.79 billion, only a 14.6% YoY increase, all while EPS is forecasted at $5.86, reflecting 13.5% growth over Q2 of 2024.
Now, these figures do align with Meta's guidance of $42.5-$45.5 billion in revenue, supported by a 1% foreign currency tailwind. However, they are pretty conservative in my view, given Meta's ongoing momentum, as well as the fact that Meta has consistently beaten its outlook. In fact, Meta has beaten EPS and revenue estimates nine times in a row and is odds-on to make it ten out of ten this week.
Regardless, I will be looking for progress on several key areas. First, the impact of AI on ad performance, primarily through tools like Advantage+ and the subsequent effect on conversions. Second, engagement metrics, especially time spent on Instagram and Facebook, will signal whether Meta's recommendation systems are keeping users increasingly engaged. Third, I will be checking for updates on WhatsApp monetization, with its 100 million business users that could unlock significant revenue potential.
Finally, capital expenditure guidance, expected to be $64-$72 billion for 2025, will be scrutinized as Meta ramps up AI infrastructure investments.
Valuation: Still a Bargain Despite the Run-Up
While entering an earnings report following a rally can raise caution, I believe Meta's valuation still presents a compelling opportunity. At approximately 28x Wall Street's FY2025 EPS estimate of $25.73, the stock looks attractively priced for a company with a track record of 35%+ annual EPS growth—and 37% growth in Q1 alone. According to TipRanks data, META's profit margin has climbed consistently from just above 12% in Q4 2022 to over 36% today.
My own forecast places 2025 EPS in the $29–$30 range, supported by continued ad strength, AI-driven efficiencies, and expanding margins. Even based on the Street's more conservative $25.47 estimate, Meta's forward P/E remains below that of peers like Microsoft and Amazon, despite outpacing Apple and Alphabet in earnings growth.
Is META a Good Stock to Buy Now?
Wall Street remains quite optimistic on Meta, with the stock carrying a Strong Buy consensus rating based on 41 Buy and four Hold recommendations over the past three months. Notably, not a single analyst rates the stock a Sell. However, META's average stock price target of $761.55 suggests a somewhat constrained 6.12% upside from current levels.
Meta's AI-Powered Dominance Set to Continue
All things considered, Meta continues to execute at an elite level, with strong fundamentals, accelerating AI tailwinds, and a clear path to monetization across its core platforms. While expectations for Q2 are modest, I see plenty of room for upside given the company's track record of consistent outperformance.
Between robust engagement, ad efficiency gains, and compelling valuation, I view Meta as one of the best opportunities in large-cap tech today. I'll be watching closely on Wednesday, but my conviction remains Bullish heading into the big announcement tomorrow afternoon.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: BigBear.ai vs. Nvidia
Key Points has become an AI investor darling over the past few years. Nvidia is the leading artificial intelligence semiconductor company. There's no substitute for high revenue growth and profitability -- and Nvidia has both. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Many investors are focused on artificial intelligence stocks these days, which can be a smart play as AI transforms many industries. But it's starting to seem like any AI stock is a winner in the market right now, which means some investors may not be doing their due diligence when evaluating companies. With that in mind, two AI companies with surging share prices right now are Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) and (NYSE: BBAI), and it may be worth taking a closer look at both to see which one looks like the better AI stock to buy right now. What's happening with Nvidia Nvidia gets top billing in this matchup because the company has experienced monster growth over the past few years as companies clamor for its artificial intelligence semiconductors. An estimated 70% to 95% of data centers utilize Nvidia's AI processors, and there seems to be no slowing down for the company's growth. For example, Nvidia's total sales soared 114% in fiscal 2025 to $130.5 billion, and its earnings skyrocketed 147% to $2.94 per share. This growth has been fueled by the company's data center segment, which experienced a 142% revenue surge to $115 billion last year. The impressive earnings and revenue growth have resulted in Nvidia's stock surging 57% over the past year. That's pushed the company's valuation higher, and Nvidia's shares currently have a price-to-earnings multiple of about 56. That's not cheap, but it's still lower than the average P/E ratio of 64 in the semiconductor industry right now. What's more, Nvidia could continue to benefit from AI investments for many more years to come. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang believes AI will fuel $2 trillion in data center spending over the next several years. While Nvidia's growth isn't guaranteed, many tech giants have already committed to spending hundreds of billions of dollars to expand their AI data centers over the next few years. That's creating an ongoing opportunity for Nvidia to continue increasing its sales. What's happening with is an AI data analytics company that helps companies and the U.S. government sort through their data to make decisions. AI analytics is a burgeoning AI trend, and it has propelled the stock of similar companies, like Palantir, into the stratosphere. stock, for its part, has jumped 323% over the past year. But despite its impressive gains, there are some significant concerns I have with including its lack of strong revenue growth. sales increased just 5% in Q1 to $34.8 million, and management's outlook for the full year is for $160 million to $180 million -- an increase of just 7.5% at the midpoint. These are fairly unimpressive sales figures for a small AI company that's trying to tap into an expanding artificial intelligence analytics market. One of the company's problems is that 52% of its revenue comes from just four customers. That's a high concentration of sales from just a handful of customers, and it means that if one or two leave, could be in trouble. And then there's the company's lack of earnings. reported a loss of $1.10 per share last year and continued that trend with a loss of $0.25 per share in Q1. While many small start-ups often aren't profitable, it's problematic that the company's lack of earnings comes in addition to unimpressive sales growth. Meanwhile, stock has a price-to-sales ratio of 11, which is substantially higher than the average P/S multiple of 3 for the S&P 500 and means that investors are paying a premium for it right now. Verdict: Nvidia is the hands-down winner Nvidia's stock isn't cheap, and there are always risks with investing in AI stocks that have already experienced astronomical growth. But the company is a hands-down better investment than because it's massively profitable, continually expanding its revenue, and outpaces its rivals in the AI semiconductor market. Meanwhile, stock is overvalued, its revenue growth is unimpressive, and the company isn't profitable. This makes Nvidia the no-brainer in this matchup and one of the best AI stocks to buy and hold for the long term. Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Chris Neiger has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: vs. Nvidia was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Palantir gets $10B Army contract to improve readiness with AI
Aug. 1 (UPI) -- Denver-based software firm Palantir Technologies secured a 10-year contract worth up to $10 billion to improve the U.S. Army's military readiness and efficiency with artificial intelligence. Palantir specializes in developing software that enables the use of AI to make real-time decisions, such as those that the U.S. Army could face in the future. The contract supports the Army's sustained capability growth and enhances its ability to meet operational warfighting needs with proven [and] commercially available AI technologies, it said in an online announcement on Thursday. "This enterprise agreement represents a pivotal step in the Army's commitment to modernizing our capabilities while being fiscally responsible," Army Chief Information Officer Leo Garciga said. The enterprise agreement with Palantir will help the Army to save money while improving its operational efficiency and military readiness through a "comprehensive framework for the Army's future software and data needs," according to the announcement. "By streamlining our procurement processes and leveraging enterprise-level discounts, we are not only enhancing our operational effectiveness but also maximizing our buying power," Garciga added. The Army will consolidate 15 prime contracts and 60 related contracts into one enterprise agreement with Palantir, which accelerates the delivery of proven commercial software to the Army's military units. "This streamlined approach reduces procurement timelines, ensuring soldiers have rapid access to cutting-edge data integration, analytics and AI tools," according to the Army. The contract also saves money by eliminating contract and pass-through fees, while reducing procurement timelines. The contract enables the Army and other Defense Department to pay up to $10 billion over 10 years to obtain Palantir products, but it does not require the military to spend the full $10 billion. Palantir earlier this year provided the Army with two AI-powered systems as part of a $178 million contract, according to a CNBC news report. The Defense Department in May also increased to $795 million an existing contract with Maven Smart Systems to improve the military's AI capabilities. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Google AI summary feature deals blow to link clicks and website traffic
Google's algorithm changes last year led to a plummet in search engine traffic for news websites and publishers, and even resulted in the bankruptcy of some independent publishers, including Turkey's Gazete Duvar. The technology giant is now dealing another blow to online publishers through its artificial intelligence summaries. Google's Artificial Intelligence Overview feature is a service offered by the internet giant to compete with artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT. The feature offers short summaries generated by Gemini that appear at the top of search results. Below the summary, there are details such as links to the source and a "Show more" option. In other words, when a user types a query into the Google search engine, they can get the answer in a summary without clicking on the links below. But this presents a serious risk, especially for websites that rely on Google Ads revenue and traditional search engine optimisation (SEO) efforts. Traffic of popular websites dropped The introduction of the AI Overview has particularly affected traffic to sites that feature content such as holiday guides, health tips and product reviews. According to Similarweb, search traffic to websites decreased by 55% between April 2022 and April 2025. A report published by the Wall Street Journal indicates that traffic to many well-known news sites around the world is declining. Traffic from organic search to HuffPost's desktop and mobile sites has more than halved in the last three years, while the Washington Post has seen a nearly identical decline. Business Insider CEO Barbara Peng laid off about 21% of her staff in May, citing "extreme traffic declines beyond our control" as the reason for the layoffs. The share of traffic from organic search to the New York Times' desktop and mobile sites also fell to 36.5% in April 2025. Nicholas Thompson, CEO of The Atlantic, predicts that traffic from Google will drop towards zero and says the company needs to improve its business model. "Google is changing from a search engine to an answer engine," Thompson said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. In an interview with the WSJ, Thompson and other industry leaders said they are trying to develop new strategies and are most concerned with building reader relationships. Users don't click on links Google executives argue that the company is committed to sending traffic to the web and that people who click on links after seeing the AI Overview tend to spend more time on these sites. However, survey studies show a different picture. According to a new study by the Pew Research Centre, only % of the 900 Google users in the US click on the source page specified as a result of a search that includes the Artificial Intelligence Overview summary. The rest are content with the short information provided by Google. Moreover, according to the study, the most frequently cited sources in both AI summaries and traditional search results are Wikipedia, YouTube (also a Google subsidiary) and Reddit. 15% of the sources in AI summaries come from these three sites. Referrals to government sites (e.g. with the 'gov' extension) are more common in AI summaries than in traditional search results. On the other hand, both AI summaries and traditional search results are equally likely to refer to news sites, at 5%. Worse still, 404 Media, a website known for specialised technology news, noticed that a story about AI-assisted music production was not showing up in Google searches. This was because Artificial Intelligence Overview summarised the content of the story, but did not link to the actual story. The site summarises the situation with the following statement: "The AI Overview ensures that information is presented in such a way that the source itself is never clicked on." SEO loses its impact The effects of the AI Overview on SEO (search engine optimisation) are also remarkable. According to the Register, the latest data showed that the click-through rate of the top-ranked site in searches with an AI summary fell by an average of 34.5%. Being on the first page is no longer as meaningful as it used to be. AI often provides false information Moreover, there is another risk: the reliability of artificial intelligence. 404 Media published a news article showing that one of the responses given by the feature in question was actually generated from another AI summary, which in turn was based on an AI source. The margin of error increases as the information moves away from the main source. This situation is described by experts as "the vicious circle of information that leads to the collapse of artificial intelligence models themselves". When there are not enough sources of quality information, users are left with inaccurate and superficial content produced by artificial intelligence. The advertising industry continues to work for Google The revenues of websites and Google are based on the following advertising cycle: Websites allow people who use search engines such as Google free access to their content. Google redirects users to websites where they see adverts as well as content. Most websites make money from these adverts. According to the BBC, an estimated 68% of internet activity starts on search engines, and around 90% of searches take place on Google. This means that websites rely heavily on Google to make money. It is stated that the Artificial Intelligence Overview mode could therefore destroy the business model that has existed for 23 years. However, Google experience no loss in this change, at least for now. Alphabet, the Google's parent company, increased its revenues to a record level in the last quarter of 2024. According to data released by the company, Google's total revenue increased by 14% compared to last year, reaching $96.4 billion. According to the Register, the bulk of the revenue still comes from advertising: exactly $54.2 billion. That's because Google now places adverts directly in or around AI Overview summaries. According to a study by SparkToro, by 2024, only 360 out of every 1,000 Google searches in the US led to sites that are not owned or advertised by Google. These rates are predicted to worsen with the rise of artificial intelligence summaries. 'Desperation not demand' While Google still dominates the market, rival AI-powered search engines such as Perplexity are slowly entering the competition. According to Bank of America executive Muhammad Rasulnejat, Google's spending of $14 billion on infrastructure investment in the last quarter alone points to "desperation in the face of competition", not growing demand. In addition to all this, the fact that the US Department of Justice still accuses Google of monopolisation creates a separate pressure. The Ministry is even demanding that Google divest its Chrome browser. The company's recent advertising and artificial intelligence moves may further inflame these debates.