US may target Samsung, Hynix, TSMC operations in China
The U.S. Department of Commerce is considering revoking authorizations granted in recent years to global
chipmakers
Samsung
, SK
Hynix
and
TSMC
, making it more difficult for them to receive U.S. goods and technology at their plants in China, according to people familiar with the matter.
The chances of the United States withdrawing the authorizations are unclear. But with such a move, it would be harder for foreign chipmakers to operate in China, where they produce
semiconductors
used in a wide range of industries.
A White House official said the United States was "just laying the groundwork" in case the truce reached between the two countries fell apart. But the official expressed confidence that the trade agreement would go forward and that rare earths would flow from China, as agreed.
"There is currently no intention of deploying this tactic," the official said. "It's another tool we want in our toolbox in case either this agreement falls through or any other catalyst throws a wrench in bilateral relations."
Shares of U.S. chip equipment makers that supply plants in China fell when the Wall Street Journal first reported the news earlier on Friday. KLA Corp dropped 2.4%, Lam Research fell 1.9% and Applied Materials sank 2%. Shares of
Micron
, a major competitor to Samsung and
SK Hynix
in the memory chip sector, rose 1.5%.
A TSMC spokesman declined comment. Samsung and Hynix did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Lam Research, KLA and Applied Materials did not immediately respond, either.
In October 2022, after the United States placed sweeping restrictions on U.S. chipmaking equipment to China, it gave foreign manufacturers like Samsung and Hynix letters authorizing them to receive goods.
In 2023 and 2024, the companies received what is known as Validated End User status in order to continue the trade.
A company with VEU status is able to receive designated goods from a U.S. company without the supplier obtaining multiple export licenses to ship to them. VEU status enables entities to receive U.S.-controlled products and technologies "more easily, quickly and reliably," as the Commerce Department website puts it.
The VEU authorizations come with conditions, a person familiar with the matter said, including prohibitions on certain equipment and reporting requirements.
"Chipmakers will still be able to operate in China," a Commerce Department spokesperson said in a statement when asked about the possible revocations. "The new enforcement mechanisms on chips mirror licensing requirements that apply to other semiconductor companies that export to China and ensure the United States has an equal and reciprocal process."
Industry sources said that if it became more difficult for U.S. semiconductor equipment companies to ship to foreign multinationals, it would only help domestic Chinese competitors.
"It's a gift," one said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Taiwan faces a precarious future—whether or not US and China continue on path to conflict
Taiwan has often compared itself to being a 'shrimp between two whales.' That expression has never been more apt than today with the US and China – which considers Taiwan to be part of its territory – locked in a standoff over the future of the island. At an event I attended some years ago, a Chinese scholar remarked when the issue of the US-China rivalry came up that they believed there was an African saying: 'When two elephants are either having a fight, or making love, the grass around them gets trampled.' It was best for everyone, they advised the other attendees, for the two superpowers to have a workmanlike, unexciting relationship rather than take the risk of things getting too friendly or hostile. But whether or not the current period of conflict continues or the US and China magically become more aligned, the challenges facing Taiwan are severe. First off, Taiwan is itself in a period of domestic turbulence. The government of Taiwanese president William Lai Ching-te, leader of the Democratic Progressive party, was elected in January 2024 with a little over 40% of the vote. This was considerably less than his predecessor from the same party, Tsai Ing-wen. One of the main opposition leaders, Ke Wen-je of the Taiwan People's party, has since then been arrested on corruption charges. He is accused of accepting half a million US dollars in bribes during his term as mayor of Taipei as well as misreporting campaign finances during his presidential run. Most recently, in late July, recall votes were held where citizens in 24 districts of Taiwan chose whether or not to remove their legislator from office. This is the result of a law in Taiwan stipulating a new vote if 10% of the electorate in a specific constituency express dissatisfaction at the previous outcome. Activists supporting the government mobilised to achieve this. The votes seem to be associated with frustration that, while the Democratic Progressive party controls the presidency, it cannot get legislation through a parliament dominated by its opponents. All of the votes were directed at seats held by the Kuomintang, the main opposition party in recent years that is accused by its critics of being pro-China. Not a single seat was overturned. When the steady nationalism of Xi Jinping's leadership in Beijing is factored in, with its conviction that the global influence of the west is slowly declining and the east – dominated by China – is in the nascent, one can see why the issue of Taiwan might look more precarious and worrying. This is regardless of the various predictions that 2027 is the date that China has set to go for reunification.
News18
43 minutes ago
- News18
Why Trump Wants Intel CEO To Step Down, Who Is Lip-Bu Tan?
Lip-Bu Tan, a semiconductor industry veteran born in Malaysia, has built a distinguished career as an executive, investor, and innovator. US President Donald Trump has asked for the resignation of Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan following reports of his alleged ties to China. 'The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!" Trump posted on Truth Social. Trump's demand came just days after Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton raised concerns and pressed the chair of Intel's board over the CEO's alleged connections to China, questioning the integrity of the company and its impact on US national security. The statement tumbled Intel's stock more than 3% in premarket trading the following day as investors grappled with the political pressure on one of America's semiconductor giants. Who Is Lip-Bu Tan? Lip-Bu Tan, a semiconductor industry veteran born in Malaysia, has built a distinguished career as an executive, investor, and innovator. Tam holds a bachelor's degree in physics from Nanyang University in Singapore and a master's degree in nuclear engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). He also pursued an MBA from the University of San Francisco, according to his LinkedIn profile. In 1987, Tan founded a venture capital firm, Walden International, which focused on investments in technology startups across Asia and the US. His expertise in semiconductors led to his long tenure at Cadence Design Systems, where he served as CEO from 2008 to 2021 and as executive chairman from 2021 until May 2023. Last week, Cadence Design agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to resolve charges for selling its chip design products to a Chinese military university, as reported by Reuters. The institution was believed to be involved in simulating nuclear blasts. Tan joined Intel's board in 2022 and was appointed as the chief executive officer following the departure of previous CEO Pat Gelsinger. What Triggered The Resignation Demand? The demand for Tan's ouster was ignited by a letter dated August 5, 2025, from Republican Senator Tom Cotton to Intel's board chairman Frank Yeary, raising concerns over Tan's extensive ties to Chinese technology firms. At the heart of the controversy are Tan's longstanding investments in China, which critics argue pose national security risks. Through Walden International, Tan has backed hundreds of Chinese tech startups, including those in AI and semiconductors, some of which have been flagged by the US Treasury for connections to China's military-civil fusion strategy. Compounding these concerns is Cadence Design Systems' recent legal troubles under Tan's prior leadership. In the letter, the senator stated that Tan controls over dozens of Chinese companies and has a stake in hundreds of Chinese advanced-manufacturing and chip firms, of which at least eight are reportedly tied to the Chinese People's Liberation Army. Cotton underlined that illegal activities that occurred in the Cadence Design Systems took place during Tan's tenure and demanded proof that Tan had fully divested from these holdings, especially given Intel's receipt of USD 8 billion in funding under the CHIPS and Science Act to bolster domestic semiconductor production. US citizens can legally hold stakes in Chinese firms, even those linked to the military, unless the companies appear on the US Treasury's Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List, which bans such investments. According to Reuters, the news agency found no evidence that Tan held direct stakes in any firm on that list. The next day, Trump amplified these concerns on Truth Social, declaring Tan 'highly CONFLICTED" and calling for his immediate resignation. In a note to Intel employees on August 7, Tan rebutted the allegations, asserting that he has 'always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards" and emphasising his commitment to the US, where he has lived and worked for decades. Tan addressed the 'misinformation" surrounding his investments, clarifying that he had divested from conflicting interests upon joining Intel and vowing to continue leading the company through its 'critical moment" in innovation and manufacturing. Tan also mentioned ongoing discussions with the Trump administration to clarify facts, underscoring Intel's dedication to American interests amid the scrutiny. 'We are engaging with the Administration to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts," Tan said. 'I fully share the President's commitment to advancing US national and economic security, I appreciate his leadership to advance these priorities, and I'm proud to lead a company that is so central to these goals," he added. 'Intel, the Board of Directors, and Lip-Bu Tan are deeply committed to advancing U.S. national and economic security interests and are making significant investments aligned with the President's America First agenda," Intel said in a statement. About the Author Surbhi Pathak Surbhi Pathak, subeditor, writes on India, world affairs, science, and education. She is currently dabbling with lifestyle content. Follow her on X: @S_Pathak_11. Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : donald trump Intel view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 10, 2025, 11:12 IST News explainers Why Trump Wants Intel CEO To Step Down, Who Is Lip-Bu Tan? Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
India should consider whether cheap Russian oil beneficial after US imposes tariffs: Nobel laureate Abhijit Banerjee
India should consider whether the cheap oil imports from Russia are 'worth it' after the Trump administration announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, Nobel laureate Abhijit Banerjee has said. Last week, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order, slapping an additional 25 per cent levy on India for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil, bringing the total duties to 50 per cent -- among the highest imposed by the US on any country in the additional 25 per cent duty will come into effect on August 27."We need to think hard about whether Russian oil imports are worth it and then go back to the US to say that, you know, will they take it (tariff) off, if we stop importing Russian oil," Banerjee told PTI on the sidelines of an event organised by BML Munjal the steep tariffs are likely to hit the USD 27 billion of non-exempt exports that India does to the US, there has been chatter around stopping or curtailing oil imports from Russia. "It is not crazy to think about it. At a 25 per cent tariff, some of our exports are already not competitive, so maybe 50 per cent (tariff) does not matter," the eminent economist is the largest importer of Russian crude, purchasing 1.6 million barrels per day in July. However, it has not placed any orders for August and September, mainly because the discounts that initially encouraged Indian refiners to import oil from the Black Sea have decreased to about USD 2 per terms of volume, India imported 88 million tonnes from Russia in FY25, out of the total shipment of 245 million such a minimal price advantage compared to other internationally available oil, Indian refiners did not place any orders for August and companies typically secure import contracts about two months in advance, meaning the supplies for August and September were arranged before Trump's August 7 announcement of higher bilateral trade deal between the US and India has been stuck over the US demand for greater access to India's agricultural and dairy market. Asked if India should lift curbs on investments from China, Banerjee said, "Maybe we should combine that with trade negotiations with China". "I think it is a good moment to do it. The Chinese also need to think of how they will deal with the US, and what leverage points they have," Banerjee the Galwan clash in 2020, India took a hard stance on China and its companies operating in the Press Note 3 of 2020, the government has made its prior approval mandatory for foreign investments from countries that share land borders with countries are China, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Bhutan, Nepal and the decision, FDI proposals from these countries need government approval for investments in any sector in whether India should join the ASEAN trading block, he said, "Maybe, I think we need to. I think China is much more important than ASEAN". Responding to a question on how he sees the Indian economy doing this year amid geopolitical tensions and trade uncertainties, Banerjee said, "Not as good as we expected". He pointed out that the middle class is actually hurting, and for the past few years, private investments have also not picked up. "Companies like TCS are not hiring, the salary of IT employees is not increasing... These are all issues we have not dealt with, and we are sitting on them, so we need to kind of embrace the fact," he said.
