logo
The Labour Party has failed to grasp that the mood of the country is turning against it

The Labour Party has failed to grasp that the mood of the country is turning against it

Telegraph03-05-2025
SIR – We agree that more – and more accurate – information for prospective students is absolutely essential if they are to make informed choices about their futures. That is why we would like to move away from the Office for Students graduate outcomes and employability data that Paul Wiltshire quoted in Julie Henry's article (Features, April 27), which only goes up to 15 months after leaving university.
When student earnings are measured using the Government's Longitudinal Educational Outcomes data across a career lifetime, the average graduate's earnings outstrip the non-graduates by more than £100,0000, even once higher taxes and student loan repayments are taken into account. What's more, graduates are at least twice as likely to be in employment than those who didn't go to university.
For the vast majority of students, university pays off.
Vivienne Stern
Chief executive, Universities UK
London WC1
SIR – I read with interest the article by Julie Henry regarding the worth of going to university.
The article mentioned the financial burden of student debt, and also parents' large financial contribution, both of which remained unpaid when the promised return of a good salary after graduation did not materialise.
What was not mentioned was that the rise of 'new' universities and the need for student accommodation over the past 20 years have also created an opportunity for buy-to-let landlords. Many purchased properties close to the universities, then converted them into student houses of multiple occupation, which gave a good return on their investment. Historically, these properties would have been bought by first-time buyers or for long-term rentals.
All this has not only added to the need for more housing in most university cities across the United Kingdom, it has also created a huge number of properties which lie empty for a substantial period of the year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer promises government's 'full backing' to get Sunderland's Crown Works Studios on track
Keir Starmer promises government's 'full backing' to get Sunderland's Crown Works Studios on track

ITV News

time14 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Keir Starmer promises government's 'full backing' to get Sunderland's Crown Works Studios on track

Sir Keir Starmer has promised the Government's 'full backing' to get Sunderland's flagship Crown Works Studios project back on track. It emerged earlier this summer that the main private backer behind the £450 million film and TV studio development had pulled out. North East leaders are now pushing to find new investors to ensure that the huge regeneration, earmarked for the banks of the River Wear in Pallion, can go ahead. Speaking to the Local Democracy Reporting Service on Tuesday, the Prime Minister pledged his support in the hunt for new investment that can deliver a project hailed as the biggest boost for the region since the arrival of Nissan. The Government has already put £25 million into the Crown Works plans, via the devolution deal which established the North East mayor last year, while the local authorities have committed to a total public investment of up to £120 million. Asked what support Downing Street had offered since Cain International's withdrawal from the Crown Works deal, Sir Keir said: 'Let me be really clear on this because I know it really matters – we really want to see this landmark project come to fruition. It is such a good project, good for jobs, good for growth. 'We announced £25 million of funding for the studios in the Autumn Statement to support filmmaking and economic growth, and we are working with the mayor [Kim McGuinness] very closely because we need to get private investors to get in behind this. 'I am determined that we will do everything we can to see this project come to fruition. It is really important locally, it is a huge thing, and we need to give it our full backing.' Global entertainment company Fulwell Entertainment, who were behind the Sunderland 'Til I Die Netflix series, had partnered with Cain on the joint venture to build 19 sound stages on the riverside plot. The firm has said it remains committed to working with Sunderland Council to find new funding for the filmmaking hub. It had been hoped that the scheme could create more than 8,000 jobs and Labour's new creative industries strategy specifically highlights the 'game-changing plans for film production in Sunderland'. Planning permission for the development was secured last year, but detailed approval has only been granted for a first phase of building that would include four sound stages, production offices, workshop buildings, and a multi-storey car park. City council leader Michael Mordey has previously said that he expects to have new funding secured by the time that land remediation works at the site are completed later this year.

John Swinney opens £26m Moray glasshouse to tackle climate change
John Swinney opens £26m Moray glasshouse to tackle climate change

The National

time17 minutes ago

  • The National

John Swinney opens £26m Moray glasshouse to tackle climate change

Newton Tree Nursery near Elgin, Moray, first opened in 1931 and the new glasshouse aims to support Forestry and Land Scotland (FLS) to almost treble its tree production – from seven million to nearly 20 million trees per year by 2029. The upgrade, funded with £20m from the Scottish Government and £6m from FLS, contributes to meeting the Government's woodland creation targets and will help support the sustainable management of national forests and land. READ MORE: Wildfire warning issued in Scotland for 10th time this year Seedling operations at the redeveloped tree nursery began in March, and 12 million trees have already been established within the UK's largest and most advanced tree-growing glasshouse. The facility 'sets a new standard for bio-secure, sustainable, and high-volume forest nursery production', according to the Scottish Government, and it is also hoped it will boost the rural economy. It will ensure an adequate supply of high-quality trees is available to supply the publicly-managed forests of Scotland, with those forests supporting rural economies, providing flood mitigation, improving biodiversity and sequestering carbon. Mr Swinney said: 'Scotland's world-renowned forests and woodlands are a natural powerhouse, and one of the most important resources we have to tackle the climate emergency. 'Our investment in this state-of-the-art glasshouse will not only contribute to environmental sustainability and help to restore habitats, but it will also support rural jobs and the sustainable use of timber in the construction industry. 'The Newton Tree Nursery project is a national asset, powering Scotland's green recovery, forestry resilience, and environmental goals for decades to come. 'Tackling the climate emergency and growing Scotland's economy are two of my Government's top priorities and together they go hand in hand. 'We cannot do one without the other, and innovative, industry-leading facilities like the Newton Tree Nursery will play a vital role in achieving these goals.' READ MORE: Campaigners dismiss MoD safety claims after nuclear leaks in Scotland FLS chief executive Kevin Quinlan said: 'Newton Nursery represents a major investment by the Scottish Government in the future of forestry in Scotland. 'It strengthens FLS's ability to supply young trees at the scale and standard needed to support a resilient, productive and sustainable forest resource. 'This is especially important for the timber industry, which continues to grow as Scotland looks to reduce reliance on imports and embrace timber as a low-carbon material of the future. 'By increasing capacity at Newton, we're investing at the very start of that supply chain, ensuring a consistent supply of high-quality planting stock for years to come.'

Families of people dying too young to access pensions not spared in inheritance tax raid
Families of people dying too young to access pensions not spared in inheritance tax raid

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Families of people dying too young to access pensions not spared in inheritance tax raid

People who die young will have inheritance tax levied on pension savings they never had a chance to spend under changes pending in April 2027. Taxing pensions of anyone who dies before 55 - the minimum age to access private pots - the same as older people's has been decried as 'unbelievably unfair' and 'abhorrent' by some money experts. There is no age cut-off under new rules, announced in last Autumn's Budget, which will make unused pensions liable for inheritance tax like other assets such as property, savings and investments. Inheritance tax is levied at 40 per cent on estates above a certain size - scroll down to find out if you will leave your beneficiaries enough to be affected. The vast majority of people currently have to wait until they are 55 to access private pensions, or be slapped with punitive tax charges - and put themselves at dire risk of being scammed. Savers will be barred for even longer starting from 6 April 2028, when the minimum private pension age will rise from 55 to 57. There are only limited exceptions to this age restriction, for people in certain uniformed public service jobs or those diagnosed with a terminal illness. Unless you are in these groups, any early access 'pension liberation' schemes you might come across are virtually certain to be scams - savers are strongly warned to steer clear. The Government's plan to make money remaining in pension pots liable for inheritance tax has prompted widespread criticism that some families could be taxed twice. If a saver is aged over 75 when they die, their beneficiaries are going to have to pay their normal income tax rate of 20 per cent, 40 per cent or 45 per cent on pension withdrawals too. For a 40 per cent taxpayer this represents a 64 per cent tax rate - and as withdrawals from the unused pension pot will be added to other income, some taking larger sums may find themselves tipped into this higher tax band. The Government disregarded experts' warnings and recently confirmed plans to go ahead with this 'double tax' hit. But it has exempted all 'death in service' benefits from the inheritance tax changes following an outcry - including from unions representing workers such as firefighters. Regarding the impact of the changes on estates of people who die before age 55, it means levying inheritance tax on pensions a deceased person never had an opportunity to access. However, creating a new 'cliff edge' IHT threshold at minimum pension age could be unfair and arbitrary for families of people who die on or shortly after their 55th birthday, and make the rules more complicated. A Treasury spokesperson says: 'We continue to incentivise pensions savings for their intended purpose – of funding retirement instead of them being openly used as a vehicle to transfer wealth – and more than 90 per cent of estates each year will continue to pay no inheritance tax after these and other changes.' 'The message this gives to the public is - don't save into your pension' Ian Cook, chartered financial planner at Quilter Cheviot, says: 'Charging IHT, on an asset you have to accrue and are automatically enrolled into, before retirement age is abhorrent. 'It's particularly brutal when someone will have built up with 20 per cent tax relief on the pension contributions if they're a basic rate taxpayer, but then pay 40 per cent when they die. 'It's a disincentive for people to save for the long term. The message it gives to the wider public is: don't save into your pension, which is wrong.' Caitlin Southall, a director at financial services firm WBR Groupm says: 'Including "unused" pension funds in scope for IHT is unbelievably unfair. 'If people cannot "use" these funds under current rules, why should they be subject to IHT? The Government is creating significant barriers for people to save responsibly for their retirement. 'By all means encourage people to use pensions for later life saving, and not as a wealth transfer tool, but this is not the way to do it.' Michael Stimpson, partner at Saltus, says many wealthy people plan to transfer assets to their children more quickly while they are alive as a result of the inheritance tax changes, and recent HMRC data on pension withdrawals suggests this is already happening. 'The news that inheritance tax will be levied on the pension pots of those who pass away before reaching the minimum pension age, set to rise to 57 in 2028, has thrown another spanner in the works,' he adds. 'At a time when savers are already withdrawing significant sums of money from pension funds, this trend could accelerate. 'It is no secret that the Chancellor sees pension funds as key vehicles for economic growth, and if the Pension Schemes Bill allows regulators to compel workplace pension schemes to invest more in British assets, continued withdrawals from savers will only limit their buying power.' How will pension and IHT changes work in practice? 'If these proposals go ahead, the process for applying inheritance tax to pensions will be far from straightforward,' says Jon Greer, head of retirement policy at Quilter. 'At present, pension death benefits are normally paid without inheritance tax, but under the changes the value could be pulled into the estate. 'That would leave executors and beneficiaries facing the question of how to settle the bill. In practice, there are only three ways to pay it: from the free estate, directly from the pension, or by the beneficiary out of their own pocket.' Greer says the main tax threshold to think about is age 75, when income tax starts to apply, but there is also a lesser-known pre-55 distinction. Before age 55, most people can't access their pension, as explained above. So, Greer suggests a payment could potentially be classed as a death-in-service benefit, and avoid being caught by IHT. But he adds: 'If, however, someone under 55 was still caught by the regime, the optics would be terrible. Taxing grieving families who've lost someone in their working years is hardly a vote winner, and in revenue terms it would raise very little for the Treasury.' How do you avoid the looming inheritance tax raid on pensions? Many savers with larger pensions are keen to avoid the new inheritance tax levy, and there are ways to do this legitimately - though some are more sensible than others, depending on your wealth and personal circumstances. First off, consider consider if you really are likely to have a big enough estate to pay inheritance tax, especially after you have spent down your pensions and other assets during retirement. Check the rules in the box further below, before you start worrying about your beneficiaries paying inheritance tax after you are gone. If you have cause for concern, consider the following options. 1. If you can afford it, you can spend or gift as much of your pensions as possible, while avoiding a big income tax bill. Recent research showed many savers with larger pensions intend to spend them by splashing out on more holidays. Bear in mind it is better to avoid crystallising losses by making bigger pension withdrawals in market downturns. 2. Consider gifting out of surplus income, which remains inheritance tax-free providing you can afford it. We explain how to do this and prove to the taxman you are doing it from actual surplus income. A This is Money reader explains how he is doing this to pass his wealth to his two daughters. 3. Look into buying life insurance and putting it in trust. This can mean your loved ones get a payout straight after your death and free of inheritance tax - but you have to set it up correctly. Here's how to put life insurance into trust, but be aware that premiums can be high especially as you get older, and if you cancel a policy you immediately lose all the benefits of taking it out in the first place. 4. Leave more or all of your estate to your spouse, who can still benefit from estates free of inheritance tax, instead of your children to delay and minimise the eventual bill. Wealth manager Evelyn Partners has suggested there could be a marriage boom or rise in civil partnerships among older couples as a result of the inheritance tax changes - read its six options to cut inheritance tax on pensions. 5. Buying an annuity is another option which Evelyn Partners explores. Meanwhile, beware - although some people have raised the idea of siphoning pension funds into stocks and shares Isas, these are also liable for inheritance tax, and there are other pitfalls. A financial planner from Quilter Cheviot explains how switching pensions into Isas can backfire. How much is inheritance tax and who pays? Inheritance tax is levied at 40 per cent on estates above a certain size. You need to be worth £325,000 if you are single, or £650,000 jointly if you are married or in a civil partnership, for your loved ones to have to stump up inheritance tax. This threshold is called the nil rate band. A further allowance, the residence nil rate band, increases the threshold by £175,000 each - so £350,000 for a married couple - for those who leave their home to direct descendants. This creates a potential maximum joint inheritance tax-free total of £1million. This own home allowance starts being removed once an estate reaches £2million, at a rate of £1 for every £2 above the threshold. It vanishes completely by £2.3million. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said in the last Budget these thresholds will be frozen until 2030.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store