Energy bills to fall for millions of households this summer as price cap cut by £129 a year
Check to see if you can slash your energy bill today
GOOD ENERGY Energy bills to fall for millions of households this summer as price cap cut by £129 a year
ENERGY bills are set to drop this July, bringing much-needed relief to millions of households.
The energy regulator Ofgem has confirmed the new price cap, which comes into effect on July 1, 2025.
The average gas and electricity bill is set to drop from £1,849 to £1,720, saving the typical household £129 a year - around 7%.
But bear in mind the exact amount you pay can be higher or lower depending on your usage, and the cap is reviewed every three months.
This is significantly higher than the drop this time last year, when it decreased from £1,690 a year to £1,568.
The savings will still provide relief to millions, as over 22million households on standard variable tariffs are directly affected by the price cap, which is updated every three months.
Experts at Cornwall Insight had rightly predicted the energy price cap would drop to £1,720 in July.
Currently, the price cap sets annual energy costs at around £1,849.
However, many households may still pay more than Ofgem's headline figure.
This is because the price cap doesn't cap total bills but limits the maximum cost per kilowatt-hour (kWh) of gas and electricity, along with daily standing charges.
Ofgem's headline figure is based on the assumption that a typical household consumes 2,700 kWh of electricity and 11,500 kWh of gas annually.
So if you use more than a typical households expect to pay more.
What is the energy price cap?
However, energy experts say that households could make significant savings by switching to a fixed-rate energy deal now.
By choosing a fixed deal, customers can lock in consistent rates for a set period, potentially avoiding fluctuations in energy prices.
Of course, opting for a fixed energy deal carries the risk that, if energy prices drop further, you might end up paying more than you would on a variable tariff.
However, analysts have long said that households should not anticipate any significant drops in prices this year.
In response, National Energy Action Chief Executive Adam Scorer said: "Any fall in the price of energy is always welcome news, but this is a short fall from a great height. Bills remain punishingly high for low-income households.
"Four years of extraordinarily high energy bills has taken its toll. We hear heart-breaking cases every day.
"The likely expansion in eligibility for the Winter Fuel Payment will be a relief for some, but National Energy Action is calling for deeper energy bill support and a real focus to support households out of debt."
How do I calculate my energy bill?
BELOW we reveal how you can calculate your own energy bill.
To calculate how much you pay for your energy bill, you must find out your unit rate for gas and electricity and the standing charge for each fuel type.
The unit rate will usually be shown on your bill in p/kWh.The standing charge is a daily charge that is paid 365 days of the year - irrespective of whether or not you use any gas or electricity.
You will then need to note down your own annual energy usage from a previous bill.
Once you have these details, you can work out your gas and electricity costs separately.
Multiply your usage in kWh by the unit rate cost in p/kWh for the corresponding fuel type - this will give you your usage costs.
You'll then need to multiply each standing charge by 365 and add this figure to the totals for your usage - this will then give you your annual costs.
Divide this figure by 12, and you'll be able to determine how much you should expect to pay each month from April 1.
How can I find the cheapest fixed deals?
To find the best fixed energy deals, start by visiting price comparison websites, which aggregate various offers from different energy suppliers.
The best sites include Uswitch.com and MoneySavingExpert's Cheap Energy Club.
Enter your postcode and current energy usage details to receive a list of available deals tailored to your needs - it'll take you less than five minutes.
You'll then be able to compare the rates, contract lengths, and any additional features or benefits offered by each deal.
Next, visit the websites of individual energy suppliers to check if they have exclusive deals that are not listed on comparison sites.
Sometimes, suppliers offer special promotions or discounts directly to customers.
Compare these offers with those on the comparison websites to ensure you get the best possible rate.
Finally, consider customer service reviews and the overall reputation of the suppliers.
Once you have identified the best deal, follow the instructions to switch your energy provider.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
The five key issues from chancellor's winter fuel payment U-turn
There are considerable problems with the winter fuel payment U-turn, but perhaps the political argument in favour outweighs them all? First, Rachel Reeves has executed the plan without working out how to pay for it. This, for an iron chancellor, is a wound that opponents won't let her forget. A summer of speculation about tax rises is not a summer anyone looks forward to. Second, the fig leaf that she and Treasury ministers are using is an improvement in economic conditions. If you were being polite, you'd say this is contested. The OBR halved growth this year and the OECD downgraded UK forecasts, albeit only by a little, last week. The claim that interest rates are coming down ignores that their descent is slower because of government decisions of the last six months. Third, the question immediately becomes, what next? Why not personal independent payments (PIP) and the two-child benefit cap? At this stage, it would feel like a climbdown if they did not back down over those. But then, what will the markets - already policing this closely - make of it, and could they punish the government? 1:46 Fourth, this is aggravating divisions in the Parliamentary Labour Party: the soft left Compass group and ministers like Torsten Bell pushing bigger spending arguments. Those MPs in Tory-facing seats who rely on arguments that Labour can be trusted with the public finances are worried. Fifth, this has created a firm division between No 10 (the PM) and No 11 (the Chancellor). No 10 is now conscious that it does not have enough independent advice about the market reaction to economic policies and is seeking to correct. Others, I am told, are just critical of the chancellor's U-turn - for she wobbled first. Given the litany of arguments against, why has it happened? Because the hope is this maxi U-turn lances the boil, removes a significant source of pensioners' anger and brings back Labour voters, a price they calculate worth paying, whatever the fiscal cost.
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Martin Lewis lists five things DWP will check after £300 payment rule change
Martin Lewis lists five things DWP will check after £300 payment rule change The finance expert has set out what exactly the DWP will be counting as income for the winter fuel payment Martin Lewis has listed out the five things that constitute as "income" for the Winter Fuel Payment (Image: PA ) Chancellor Rachel Reeves has announced that millions of people across England and Wales will be receiving the winter fuel payment this year in a major U-turn. The Labour-led UK government had taken the unpopular decision to stop the universal winter fuel payment, instead making it means tested for pensioners. This decision drew widespread criticism, as it reduced the number of pensioners receiving the benefit from 11.4 million people to nearly 1.5 million. Though the payment remains means tested, Reeves has said her government is 'expanding' the payments, 'to benefit nine million pensioners this winter". This means that those on state pension who have an income of £35,000 or below will be receiving the payment worth up to £300 going into winter this year. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here The chancellor has defended her government's decision to keep the payment means tested (Image: PA ) What constitutes 'income'? Martin Lewis took to X, to explain five things that would constitute an income under the scheme. These would likely be: Article continues below The State Pension Income from Earnings Private Pension Income Investment income (eg dividends) Savings interest Though he hasn't '100%' confirmed this, the financial guru added that non-taxable payments like the Attendance Allowance would likely not be included. Content cannot be displayed without consent Will you need to do anything to receive the benefit? If you're eligible, you'll automatically receive the payment this winter without needing to take any action. If your income exceeds the threshold, HMRC will automatically recover the money. This winter, households will automatically receive a payment of £200, or £300 if there is someone over 80 in the household. Over 12 million pensioners across the UK will also benefit from the Triple Lock, with their State Pension set to increase by up to £1,900 during this parliament. Pensioners earning above the £35,000 threshold - approximately two million people in England and Wales - will have the full amount of the winter fuel payment they received automatically collected via PAYE or through their self-assessment return. There's no need for anyone to register with HMRC or take any further action. Pensioners who wish to opt out and not receive the payment at all will be able to do so, with details to be confirmed. Content cannot be displayed without consent The chancellor has defended the government's decision to means test the payment, saying this would make the payment 'targetted and fair'. Reeves has said: 'Targeting Winter Fuel Payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government. 'It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest.' Article continues below Speaking on the u-turn, she said: 'But we have now acted to expand the eligibility of the Winter Fuel Payment so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out. This will mean over three quarters of pensioners receiving the payment in England and Wales later this winter.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves may have U-turned on winter fuel, but her problems are far from over
Standing in what appeared to be a garden centre to announce her latest U-turn on the pensioners' winter fuel payment, Rachel Reeves looked as if she was wilting a bit. Never at ease in front of a camera, the chancellor was more stilted than usual and didn't make much of an attempt to justify the change on any rational grounds. If this 'difficult decision' was the right thing to do last year, when the public finances were under pressure, one might ask: why is it the wrong thing to do this year, when the public finances are still under pressure, albeit for different reasons? She cannot, for reasons of pride, admit the U-turn is because of the recent electoral punishment-beating administered by an angry public – with the added force of Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage both declaring they'd restore the payment in full and immediately. She certainly cannot concede that this totem of her 'iron determination' to do whatever it took to achieve sustainable public finances has had to be tossed away, against her wishes, because the prime minister publicly ordered her to do so and her backbenchers increasingly demanded this hated policy be ditched. But she knows that everyone knows the truth – and to her credit, she cannot disguise her discomfort. She is in the worst of all worlds: she looks callous (even if she is not) but now she also looks weak, and will get few thanks for giving the winter fuel payment back (mostly). This is not a dream combination of attributes for a senior Labour figure or, for that matter, for a finance minister hoping to dazzle the markets. In fact, even in executing this U-turn she has somehow managed to botch things, by trying to retain some element of the means-testing she introduced last year, just to save face. So, even now, not all pensioners will receive their £200 or £300 (depending on age). Or rather, all will receive it initially, but some, not fantastically rich on an income of £35,000 or more, will find it entirely clawed back by HM Revenue and Customs through the self-assessment procedure. It would have been easier all round just to complete the U-turn: instead, Ms Reeves has stopped around the 170-degree mark. It hardly seems worth it. Even when it was first announced at the end of July last year, means-testing the WFP was an ill-conceived move. Of all the options available to her – and all chancellors, even in the tightest of binds, have choices – she plumped for the one that combined an incredibly modest saving (about £1.5bn) with the maximum political damage. Some 10 million active and motivated pensioners were ready to head to the nearest polling station at the earliest opportunity to make their displeasure clear. Too late, Ms Reeves and Liz Kendall pointed out how relatively generous the triple lock on the state pension was. Yet they didn't attempt to point out what a functioning NHS might do for the quality of life of older people. There was never so much as the faintest hint that an incoming Labour government would scrap something introduced by Gordon Brown and retained by the Conservatives since 2010. Making the U-turn announcement now, two days ahead of the comprehensive spending review was, presumably, an attempt to manage the news cycle – getting the good-but-embarrassing news out of the way. That might be shrewd, if the review does indeed show how the public services will 'live within their means' in the coming years, with welcome extra resources for the NHS, schools and the defence of the realm, restoring Ms Reeves's prestige. Yet the authority of the chancellor has been badly compromised by the missteps she's taken in her first year in office – unforced errors compounded by poor presentation. The so-called 'tractor tax' and an over-reliance on employers' national insurance contributions have also landed badly. As some old Treasury hands suggest, it feels very much as though her civil servants reached for their favourite policies when the inexperienced chancellor asked about options, and she accepted the recommendations all too readily, in a way her predecessors did not. Maybe the very real 'black hole' she inherited panicked her. It looks like it. At any rate, she is finding it even more difficult to resist her more powerful colleagues in the spending departments when they push for politically expedient solutions. We need not exaggerate matters, though. Ms Reeves is not like Kwasi Kwarteng being recalled from an IMF summit to be sacked by Liz Truss for delivering (her) mini-Budget in 2022. Nor is this a repeat of a dazed Norman Lamont staggering into Whitehall to announce that sterling was leaving the European ERM in 1992. Unlike in those episodes, the government's economic policy has not been destroyed by an adjustment of about £1bn in a social security budget of more than £300bn. But she knows that she is in a weakened position – and, with no following in the party, depends heavily on the confidence of the prime minister to survive. Sir Keir Starmer knows, as she does, that if he were to move her this early in the life of the government it would only make matters worse in every respect. For now, they're still in this together.
